No majority black country is economically prosperous

>No majority black country is economically prosperous

Can someone explain to me why this is?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulsa_race_riot
upi.com/Top_News/World-News/2016/11/22/Chibok-Nigeria-still-under-Boko-Haram-siege-local-leader-says/9251479830803/
letmegooglethat.com/?q=Demographic winter
twitter.com/AnonBabble

They are better at picking cotton

our space age economy is too complicated for them to compete

Surely there were advanced and wealthy Sub-Saharan Africa countries before white people colonized and started the slave trade correct?

Did Blacks put up much of a fight?

They had nothing

>No majority black country is economically prosperous
No majority black city is either. Why do you think? Because applying metrics of Western Civilization is due to fail, whites set up Western Civilization, so only whites can maintain it (Asians can do a pretty decent job too).

Something, something slavery, colonialism, legacies of slavery and colonialism, oh and the legacies also travel backwards in time and not just forward which is why before slavery and colonialsim they weren't successful either.

Fucking Honkies

inb4 someone uses one of the small oil-rich countries as an example

Because black people don't have the genes of superior blood

Nigs are too incompetent and corrupt to run a country. See Zimbabwe/Rhodesia.

Nigeria is doing pretty well

Even then, the wealth inequality would be the most extreme in the world.

richest man in history was a black man

egyptians were kings man u gotta do ur research

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulsa_race_riot

Any time successful blacks get together, their efforts are suppressed and their people annihilated.

Pick up a history book, moron

They had advanced civilizations. Using flying pyramid technology they explored the galaxy until evil whitey showed up and enslaved them.

One word: racism.

>what is Sweden

>Nigeria is doing pretty well

GDP per capita: 124th out of 184
HDI: 152 out of 188

a quarter of the country is under Boko Haram control wtf are you talking about

upi.com/Top_News/World-News/2016/11/22/Chibok-Nigeria-still-under-Boko-Haram-siege-local-leader-says/9251479830803/

Average black IQ is criminal/retarded tier. They don't have the requisite intelligence to create infrastructure and maintain it, nor enough intellect to make laws and respect them.

Muh colonialism is the usual defense. Yet India and China are now world powers, and one was ruled as a British territory for years and the other was carved up and split between half of Europe's colonial powers and then ruled under Imperial Japan until the 1940s.

Oh but you might notice both of these countries have long histories of glorious civilizations, full of great philosophical and religious traditions, invention, and culture.

Africa had jack shit. The only worthwhile culture to come out of Africa was born and died on the Nile River in Egypt. They were stone age savages everywhere else until Europe civilized them, it's not a wonder they can't build a functioning state on their own.

Because they're full of niggers.

Blacks are never successful.

The Tulsa race riots started because a nigger raped a white girl.

Tulsa was rebuilt after the riot and continued to be prosperous. What killed it was desegregation in the 1960s, because "black wall street" can't possibly compete with (white) wall street.

WE

>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulsa_race_riot
>The only prosperous majority black community existed 90 years ago

obviously because racism.

WUZ

This desu

Interesting thing is modern Nigerians have completely forgotten their history/culture. Lower than 5% speak any of the native languages and they're pretty much westernised.

Does that coincide with becoming civilised?

t. """""woke""""" men

Take a guess.

sure

Who was keeping the black man down in Africa for thousands of years until Europeans showed up? Nobody was bothering the Congolese yet they never bothered to invent the wheel.

...

Because there will be not enough money for welfare payments

>can someone explain to me why niggers are lazy

How much time you got kiddo

bump for interest

>Specious argument posted with picture to bait fellow babydick virgins

Nice cherry-picking.

>economically prosperous
The most economically prosperous is the country that is stealing the most most.

Barbados?

...

>cherry picking
Literally every majority black area is a shithole.

If Baltimore is not to your liking, then we can talk about Detroit, Chicago, New Orleans, etc.

Well, Libya used to be...

t-thanks hillary, liberator of black prosperity.

Pretty sure Barbados is a very prosperous place.

I take it you've never lived in a black majority city then.

African Gorillas don't need food aid, why do niggers?

>Libya
>black
WE

telepathic abilities stolen by the white man

Africans actually were hereditary sovereigns, sole and absolute rulers of states.

A giant hotel run by whites.

A hotel plantation, in a sort of way.

How many of the upper middle class of Barbados are black?

>majority black
You answered your own question.

>he's never lived around niggers

Can you point out one majority black city that isn't a shithole filled with crime and poverty for the overwhelming majority.

I'm actually curious if it exist.

letmegooglethat.com/?q=Demographic winter

here you go buckaroo

2

The bottom line - black people treat each other like shit. To have any success or prosperity people need to have some bare minimum integrity trust & cooperation among one another. If you have this you can accomplish the work needed to build a prosperous nation. White people generally cooperate well with one another.

Because people can't survive on a diet consisting almost entirely of tree leaves?

>Surely there were advanced
Not really. The mighty Zulu empire arose in South Africa in the early 1800's... armed with short spears and hide shields.

>and wealthy
Their empires frequently went broke from fighting one another

>before white people colonized and started the slave trade
The slave trade existed in Africa long before Europeans arrived. In fact, it was European empires which started the process of stopping the African slave trade.

White man who lives in Baltimore here. The pictures on the left side are places that are still in good condition today. The right side is the shithole on the outskirts of town.

fucking double niggers and their shitty memes.

>white people [...] started the slave trade

Citation required.

>we wuz kangs

.

this is interesting to think about..

racism and jokes aside what would black civilization look like if it caught up to where we are now?

Barbados and a few other small black countries don't seem that shitty.

They're mostly shitskins, whether it's arab-berber moslems or niggers.

...

I invite you to cherry pick a single prosperous city with a majority black population. Just one, because the list of shithole cities is only slightly longer than the list of black-majority cities.

Not true. Black majority Apartheid South Africa and Rhodesia were great.

Barbados is 94% black and less corrupt than the United States with an HDI and disposable income that's first world tier.
I'm alt right man, but miracles do happen. Good economic policy and filthy rich Anglos seeking to hide their money make Barbados a pretty good place to live.

Nigeria

>racism and jokes aside what would black civilization look like if it caught up to where we are now?
Leprechauns would ride unicorns.

Sure, but they're not niggers.

You have to understand that niggers are practically a different species.

Whitey keepin dem down

Read a real book
Not the abridged version of the summary of the revised version of the interpreted version of a world history book
Black warlords sold blacks to europeans
Europeans just bought them

super low iq

source: science

because they are black

But how many of these blacks are wage slaves in hotels for whitey.

Answer: all of them.

I agree that a majority black country can be prosperous as long as the black population is docile and given a structure where it can work manual labor, overseen by whites.

Genetics.

It fucking sucks, but it's the truth. You can have a completely peaceful white town and change it to five percent negro population and suddenly crime rates rise, theft rises, you can't leave young kids to roam outside.

I wish we were all equal, I wish it were true. But we adapted differently. But honestly is this really that bad? We are human after all and animals that have evolved at our core. Higher intelligence does not mean you are superior by the way. It just means you have more tools to deal with the modern world.

no shit. im just trying to imagine what it would be like if niggers werent so fucked off. would they have built civilization on some of the same fundamentals

>Did Blacks put up much of a fight?

Not really. All of them were easily colonized except for Ethiopia which BTFO of Italians.

Jeb!

hey egypt seems to be a pretty prosperous country

>Higher intelligence does not mean you are superior by the way
Kinda does t b h.

You are forced by chairman Trudeau to accept a non-white roommate. You have the choice between a roommate from Japan and a roommate from Somalia.

What do you choose?

>No majority black country is economically prosperous
Ireland is

JEB WTF

see

KANGZ

Well I guess they'd be like whites, except they aren't.

>Not true. Black majority Apartheid South Africa and Rhodesia were great.

They were basically in the stone age when we arrived.

Why is Jeb! beating that poor nigger?

Somalia, I need some BBC.

Jeb no!
That's not how you get votes!

what a disgrace..

plus didnt mandela die in the80s or something?

rekt
>chekt

The reject western modernity in the grounds that it is imperialism or cultural genocide. The indegenious communities in australia don't send their kids to school because they think they are brain washing them. And the aboriginals then have the stones to complain about why they are improvished, die at 60, imprisoned more and under represented in parliment

"TELL ME AGAIN, WHO ARE YOU VOTING FOR THE REPUBLICAN NOMINEE?"

Died in 2013.

Yeah from poor prison conditions.

Is there believed to be a "real" reason?
Is it even true?

I think they're just slightly dumber, not lazy.

>No majority black country is economically prosperous

Barbados and Gabon, albeit both of those have government and education system that are mostly based off of Western European.

It has to due with the economy of power and resources.

Essentially, in order to be a president or king or dictator you have to satisfy the people directly below you. Generals, treasurers, senators, that kind of thing: people with power who aren't directly on top. If you fail to satisfy them, they either replace you or step aside to let others replace you. This isn't necessarily about greed, because they have people beneath them who have to be satisfied as well. You can't get rid of them because you can't personally run a country and a military and a church and a treasury and all of that by yourself. This is how power works.

In order to satisfy them, you need resources (usually money). The resources of a country can be derived from two sources: natural resources (diamonds, oil, etc) or productivity of the people (farms, steel mills, etc). This is where things get complicated. If your country's economy can function purely by pulling natural resources out of the ground and selling them to other countries, then the best way for you (the leader) to operate is to use slave labor or near-slave labor to do just that, then you leave everyone you don't need to rot. If your country can only operate by making the people productive, then you need things that make them productive, like hospitals, schools, roads, and nice houses. The things that make a people productive also make them happy.

Africa and South America are resource-rich continents. Europe consists of mostly resource-poor countries, but not so poor that they can't operate at all (like, say, Polynesian islands). African and South American countries are so shitty because their leaders and their leaders' key people are better served personally by stealing all of the natural wealth for themselves and keeping everyone else so poor that rebellion is impractical. By contrast, European countries (and Japan and South Korea) have to make themselves happy and productive in order to make their leaders rich.