GUESS WHO'S BACK, BACK AGAIN!
Computer scientists urge Clinton campaign to challenge election results
Jaxon Sullivan
Other urls found in this thread:
nytimes.com
twitter.com
Henry Williams
Old news, nigger
Brandon Ramirez
if i look them up, will they be (((computer scientists)))?
Joshua Campbell
Why wont she DIE AAHHHHHHHHH
Xavier Bell
>Mexican Warlock
Jackson Peterson
Its the clinton juggernaut bitch
Wyatt Rogers
They are already building her up. She'll be 73 in 4 years, certainly not young but still not too old to try again.
They'll destroy her in-party opposition and start a huge PR campaign about how sad and shit she is, this is already happening.
She'll be there with a lot of ammunition if Trump fucks up. If not, they will create fake news, fake issues like they always do.
Brandon Richardson
>Computer scientists
nytimes.com
Jace Richardson
>Computer scientists
>Scientist
Is there a more bloated title than "Computer scientist"?
Jacob Rivera
> either op or related pic is "fake news"
William Morgan
>Computer scientists
Rule of thumb - if their source is referred to as something vague rather than a specific name (for cases where anonymity is not vital) it means their source isn't worth shit.
Connor Hughes
IGNORE THIS THREAD. OP IS A GIANT FAGGOT ANYWAYS AND HE CAN KEK FOR CLINTON ON REDDIT. SPENCER WAS NEVER THE INTENDED TARGET, THEY ARE TRYING TO CONNECT SPENCER AND BANNON TOGETHER THROUGH THE "ALT-RIGHT" LINK!
Michael Thomas
Is this the "fake news" we hear so much about?
We already had this thread, so what. A bunch of nu-male (((""""computer scientists""""))) think she should challenge the election results?
Any idiot could have said that, it doesn't make it any more compelling that a CS said it.
Blake Lewis
Hills gotchuuuhhh.
Nostalgia Kek.
Benjamin Cox
Read the whole thing you fucking kraut, their names are right there along with where they work
Brandon Flores
so, is Sup Forums our enemy?
Jacob Rodriguez
>We base this speculation on inferior turnout from 2012 compared to Obama
So, they're surprised that an inferior candidate results in inferior voter turnout? I'm shocked.
Instead of defaulting to the most likely explanation, their minds go to "HACKED VOTING MACHINES!!!!"? Their meltdown really is something to behold.
Adrian Adams
Kek, that one was crazy.
Now you have been visited by the Cyber PAJET
good numbers and rain will come to you
but only if you reply with "MAKE PINDORAMA GREAT AGAIN!".
Caleb Wilson
I'll be fucked if I didn't think that was a Turkroach flag on her shoulder
Zachary Brooks
isn't the deadline to do this today?
Jaxson Ortiz
>scientists
It's amazing how they never have a name.
Aiden Collins
Either they don't exist or (((they))) don't want to be named.
Hunter Parker
Hillary admited defeat. There's no coming back on that statement. If she was planning to contest anything she wouldn't have admited defeat.
FOR ONCE the bitch is being fairplay and some fuck tard incite her to go back to her dirty tricks
Jonathan Collins
... Two different writers disagree on something? UNPOSSIBLE.
Gabriel Thompson
All fake engineering positions.
Henry Harris
Like when Gore retracted his consession to recount Florida?
Leo Allen
lololol
>CS
>real science
choose one, and only one.
Owen Fisher
Whom funded them I wonder
Alexander Moore
For someone who doesn't regard this as a science you sure are using a lot of the results from it.
Lucas Adams
Challenge it I bet when you remove the illegals and all the voter fraud she'd lose 5 million+ votes and lose even more.
Benjamin Rodriguez
the jews of coarse. All the major jews are butthurt their puppet didn't win.
Ethan Miller
Stanford mathematician here...
Sorry guy's but "computer scientists" is like "clean whore" in the faculty of arts.