so this lady tweeted that CNN broadcasted tranny porn for 30 mins. the media ran with it.
this is the first salvo against "fake news". they don't want us trusting self-styled journalists on twitter. whats next?
tl;dr they are fabricating false news in an attempt to show how much of an epidemic it is and how censorhisp is needed
And they're doing this right before they help to rig the recount in Hillary's favor
Check out this image.
notice that the twitter account which started this rumour has the name of Pizza. this could be pizzagate related.
>"Grass roots"
Is this code for astroturf?
funny how mark zuckerberg claims to take fake news seriously when i have seen all manner of bullshit spread around on Facebook.
Grass roots is a code word for anti white.
remember when twitter went mainstream in summer 2009 with the iran elections and the subsequent violence? twitter was the only way to find out what was happening. they don't want us to trust anyone. they only want us to trust them. to buy into their narrative.
this was 1000% predictable
are we learning yet?
Always trust CNN! (Trust them to lie about everything.)
they baited us with tranny porn!
Feminine Penis! our one weakness!
So the Brady Bunch mom is alive and well? Whew good.
Fuck, first time my degeneracy has actually made me ashamed of myself.
Kojima literally predicted an described the concept of "fake news" a decade ago.
It is kind of odd to accidentally broadcast tranny porn for, especially for that length of time.
A common tactic used in past conflicts, was to capture broadcasting stations and replace all broadcasts with pornography.
Such action is direct psychological warfare. Is this CNN's intent? Possibly.
They are testing the waters. They want to see how for along the road to "always at war with eastasia" we are; When the propaganda apparatus doesn't report reality, but IS reality.
If no one protests this they will start rewriting history right infront of us.
Tweet this to Trump.
>fake news
Gtfo with this bullshit. I literally watched it happen on live television. Explaining to my mother why that lady had a penis didn't just fucking not happen REEEEE
There would be a recording no doubt though. Someone watching it on sky.
I think the whole things is funny, revealing, and concerning. It's lesson that the MSM has been taught over and over again yet fails to stop doing: using social media as news sources.
STOP USING SOCIAL MEDIA AS NEWS SOURCES YA DUMB FUCKS HOW MANY TIMES DOES IT TAKE FOR YOU TO LEARN THIS?
If I was an editor and a reporter told me the source was facebook, twitter, or somebodies blog and I would threaten to fire them if they don't get their shit together and practicing real journalism.
>run fake news story to convince people fake news are a problem
>run it on news sites you want to push as real news
how fucking stupid are these people?
The best part is these faggots are sitting in their cubicles smirking like assholes thinking they're the cleverest cocksuckers in the world.
>they don't want us trusting self-styled journalists on twitter.
we don't trust anybody, we do consume all the nonsense and make out our best guess impression of it,
impossible not to in the world we live in, we're just waiting for these dinosaurs like cnn to die but their corpses won't fucking burn fast enough
It's fucking brilliant! Who's going to admit that they recorded this to prove them wrong?
CNN would have so much fun outing your tranny loving ass by saying your name on air as the one with 'proof' of the incident.
Do you people really think that recount will change anything? It's a bit late for that.
I think that this fake news thing is a long con, some sort of damage control in case some really bad shit gets leaked.
Is CNN trying to deney the Holocaust?
Bascily they are saying if you tell everybody about 'fake 6 gorilians" it will spread like wild fire !
Funniest thing is that local Fox and even British the Independent picked it up meaning one of two things:
1) The story is true and the MSM is trying to "gaslight" us with this "fake news" report
2) The story is fake and the MSM is peddling fake news just like the rest of us
They can't win this, can they?
>Prove their is a problem by creating the problem.
>tranny porn on CNN
Kek. What kind of fucked up timeline is this?
>Porn performer Christian XXX said on Twitter that the image featured him and fellow performer Riley Quinn. The screenshot was from the series “Transexual Babysitters,” he told HuffPost.
>Christian thought the whole debacle was “pretty funny”
huffingtonpost.com
dare I say it?? do I even have to?
Then you realize 90% of all college papers still are using facts from wikipedia
/ourgal/?
it's a concept that is as old as medias and was used by Bismarck in 1870 to provoke France into war.
You should read more books and play less videogames.
We've known here how far and wide a few assholes can spread some shit crazy quick.
They are just now figuring this out?
>someone twitted something
>all major MSM immediately pick this up and spread in a matter of seconds without even confirming anything
>turns out it was a guise for shit and giggles
>"s-see? that how bad and how fast f-fake news can spread! w-we must instill world wide internet censorship so you could get only Real News™®© from your trustworthy major MSM!"
#twittergate
So we're supposed to only trust "trusted" media sources?
Will someone here who has twitter report this post by Takei? Trump isn't losing in any recount. This is the fake news they have claimed to put a stop to.
>And they're doing this right before they help to rig the recount in Hillary's favor
>rig
No need to rig, just let the people vote again, and they will vote for Hillary. No more third parties. You know I'm right
It's fucking gamergate all over again
Mass media collusion after being exposed for colluding
Hopefully the normies can see through this shit
Massive operation going on right now.
They are setting the groundwork so "fake news" is a buzzword they can throw at anything they do not like.
They are testing the waters here
>Trusting self stoked journalists on twitter
I'd rather watch CNN.
This Verge gem
>Even if porn was aired on CNN, it’s clear that a lot of publications ran with a story based on tweets from one person before verifying the facts. Many of the headlines already implicate CNN, claiming the channel aired 30 minutes of porn without giving any context.
>even if it is true, you should only trust us GOY :^)
(you)
Forgot to add -
It basically amounts to MSM wanting to stop rumours spreading, so they can get at it first, manipulate the truth, and then broadcast their version of the "truth".
At this point if photographic/video evidence came out showing recount rigging, it'd be dismissed as "fake news, move along goy"
>CNN confirms the mishap
So they supported the fake news story. They lied to people, people who trust them to tell the truth.
Hmmmm....
I'll show you fake news
Oh god so I'm not the only faggot that thinks this is completely backwards and couldn't possibly backfire in them...it's like I'm not even in reality anymore and we just switched over to a fucking dream
Our history is full of hoaxes and lies already.
Wait, what exactly happened?
So CNN ran porn to do what??
If people didnt watch their network they sure as shit arent gonna do it after this
The problem is that Wikileaks has more credibility than anybody in the world at this point, even after the media tried to suggest Assange worked for Putin, etc. That's why the media gives Wikileaks more attention than any other news story (Hillary leaks aside). Wikileaks is unopposable competition. The media can call Breitbart white nationalist or whatever, but nothing really sticks to Wikileaks.
Somebody make a hashtag already jfc
No. Read the damn image...it has all your answers.
The moral panic is obviously a psyop by the establishment who realize they cannot control people via the media as they used to before. They try to herd the sheep back in.
There is nothing unusual abot "fake news" in 2016
disinformation is as old as humanity, Sun Tzu talked about it.
The internet was full of fake news ever since news were on it. Before that the convention al media were full of lies. And before mass media, when people just asked for news, there were a lot of worthless rumors flyinmg around too.
Nothing unusual related to the presence of "fake news" in the public sphere happened recently
What changhed then?
Brexit. Trump. Backlash against the """refugees"""
The problem with wikileaks is that they don't leak anything to do with Russia. It's easy to shit on for that reason alone. It's getting to the point that even if wikileaks is posting stuff that's true, people will just brush it off now.
CNN believed Wikileaks enough to fire Donna Brazil.
literally lost all credibility forever
well done cnn
>CNN tries to prove fake news.
>The news spread from a fake tweet.
But that just shows how lazy these people are, and CNN does the same thing.
>TRUMP TWEETED!
so get fucked.
But they have leaked documents about Russia user. Ironically, they have also leaked documents about Ecuador. Stop thinking Wikileaks is new.
Spanish American War and Vietnam, too.
(((Fake news))) is just another term for Lügenpresse.
So they someone tweet that CNN ran tranny porn to bait other news places?
I know and I don't understand the message. Are they claiming they botched news because they relied on fake news from social media? Or are they only wanting social media trolling for the rightwing banned? Do they all social media trolling banned? WTF are they trying to accomplish?
Oh yeah, everyone in the press knows it's the truth. They still try to sling mud at it when it goes against their narrative though.
>implying the Maine wasn't blown up by Spanish spies
nice try Carlos
To bait anyone on twitter, but the MSM being the fuck heads they are, ran stories about it as if it was true.
lol hey guys i got an idea to prove fake news exists
we'll have representatives from cnn confirm multiple times that a story that happened to themselves happened. then when other news stations say it happened because we confirmed the stories we'll put them on blast. WE GOT'EM BOYS
>i got an idea to prove fake news exists
Nobody denies fake news exists. They claim they want it banned. which is pretty fucking ironic if you ask me.
The irony is I only heard about this from the MSM
what's the real problem here?
1. fake news
2. retards not taking two god damn seconds to verify sources or look for evidence
There is always the same problem of labeling what a "fake news" is.
In this case it's censorship for infowars and Sup Forums.
They're retarded for taking one tweet as news anyway.
They do it all the time.Too lazy to do the legwork? Fuck em.
>2. retards not taking two god damn seconds to verify sources or look for evidence
Honestly I think it's really this. Nothing else seems to make much sense. Sometimes I wish I had dropped out of school at age 15 and become a journalist.
>The moral panic is obviously a psyop by the establishment who realize they cannot control people via the media as they used to before
This is what meme magic has been all about.
Governments and corporations are losing their monopoly to wage information warfare because of technology.
“Everything we hear is an opinion, not a fact. Everything we see is a perspective, not the truth.” -Marcus Aurelius
He who controls information controls the perception of reality. All news are fake news.
"Saddam Hussein has weapons of mass destruction, we need to invade.
Gaddafi is killing his own people, we need to help those poor innocent civilians waving Al-Qaida flags.
Assad is using chemical weapons against his own people, we need a no-fly zone."
>news outlets that shitposted about trump being hitler fell for some twitter meme
>we need to clamp down on those russians!
Definitely 2, mostly because nobody holds them accountable. Rather than banning the fake content, they should be banning the idiot "journalists" who write spread the fake shit around
Should we take pictures of CNN stopped on our DVRs and hold up speech bubbles above the anchor's heads talking about "fake news"?
There will be no recount.
In western (and any) democracy there is only one rule: the house always wins elections. In every country elections are vote rigging competitions. Now in thirld world shitholes it's easy: the "dear leader" counts the votes and declares his victory.
In countries like US, Britain or Germany that is very complex. You need it to look credible. You need a massive movement to sweep the country or else nobody will believe they won (Brexit, Trump). The emotions have to be real and public support big - so there's an elemengt of actual People's Power. Think how Jeb! ended without real support on the ground even though he had some solid establishment backing. But once you have a genuine political movement going on the ground the behind the scenes rigging starts.
Factions of the establishment fight betting on this or that option. They rig the votes however they can, try to mess with the counting, try to control the counting computer systems. Trade blows under the carpet (think that dead DNC staffer). Like the pro-Hillary faction in the FBI (Comey) and the pro-Trump faction (whoever forced him to reopen the investigation and provided the leaks). Do you really believe Brexit would have happened if the ENTIRE establishment was against it? MI5 and MI6, military intelligence, all big business and every politician? No, you would get a 51% remain result no matter the votes and nobody would have noticed. Nigel was anti-establishment but undoubtedly there was a pro-Brexit faction in the secret services/politics, that fought against the remainers and make sure there was just a bit over 50% to win.
Trump faction won. The rest are still trying but it is done now. The actual vote count doesn't matter, of course it was a bit rigged (the Trump movement was real tho). Shillary lost. They are now still trying but the Trump faction only grows stronger by the day.
So if they called the whole Podesta pizza thing fake, it's going to turn right?
it's a simple appeal for censorship
anything which doesn't toe the party line gets branded "fake" and banned
easy as 1-2-3-gulag!
Is Trump not supposed to be held accountable for his tweets?
The fact that CNN had to verify that this didn't occur shows how idiotic this entire story is. It's not like someone hacked the signal like with the Max Headroom incident.
I'm pretty sure they think otherwise.
Is he a journalist? If he tweets green aliens landed in New Jersey should the media run headlines that New Jersey is being invaded by space aliens?
SOLUTION: Stop watching T.V., stop giving them clicks.
>SOLUTION: Stop watching T.V., stop giving them clicks.
SOLUTION: Stop watching T.V., stop giving them clicks.
>SOLUTION: Stop watching T.V., stop giving them clicks.
SOLUTION: Stop watching T.V., stop giving them clicks.
>SOLUTION: Stop watching T.V., stop giving them clicks.
SOLUTION: Stop watching T.V., stop giving them clicks.
>SOLUTION: Stop watching T.V., stop giving them clicks.
SOLUTION: Stop watching T.V., stop giving them clicks.
>SOLUTION: Stop watching T.V., stop giving them clicks.
lmao like damn nigga htf is this even real lol just close your eyes
That has nothing to do with censorship. It has to do with not trusting things without evidence presented.
He's the president-elect. He has a moral responsibility to not intentionally disperse false information to the public. You would have never let Obama get away with that shit.
Is a twitter post akin to a press release in your fevered mind? Because you are an excellent example of todays journalism standards.
>Obama get away with that shit.
Also, Obama did get away with this shit. Both on social media and MSM. Did anyone ask for him to be banned/censored?
No, but Twitter not a place for government officials to say whatever they want with no consequences. Everything they say or write to the public is important. What is wrong with that assumption?
this. They will say it was from russian elections not the US ones.
What did he say?
But if the media confirms election rigging, should we believe them? How do you go about selectively choosing when to believe the media?
hello there friend is code word for kill all blacks.
I will give you one example (they are too many to list):
"You can keep your own healthcare provider."
wew fake news! what the hell is operation mockingbird? what the hell is general electric?
>so this lady tweeted that CNN broadcasted tranny porn for 30 mins. the media ran with it.
>this is the first salvo against "fake news"
>this was 1000% predictable
>are we learning yet?
Actually I'm amazed at how fast threads about this on Sup Forums were predicting it was a strategic move.
Idiots said "but CNN said it was real so it wasn't a hoax" in those threads.
What's the next step of this master plan? Because they didn't just shoot a salvo against fringe online news sources, mainstream news picked it up too.
Did they shoot themselves in the foot? Did they accidentally expose that MSM is just as fake news as anywhere else and you need weaponized autism forums to deduce reality?
That's his private twitter account. He can do as he pleases on it once he doesn't violate the twitter TOS.
This, people were shit posting fake news on the old newsgroups (ask you parents, kids). What is new is more users consuming online content from 2nd hand sources. It's the nightmare big media fears, and they aren't going out without a fight.
The shots are across the bow, this is the time for all trolls to man their keyboards.
So it's NOT the medias responsibility to check if New Jersey is being invaded by space aliens and just report it as fact?