So Washington Post uses this list to propagate what is "fake news" ie.
They even have Drudge on there -- it's not even a news site, it's an aggregator that links to Bloomberg and Washington Post (Oh the irony)
>propornot.com
Has the left gone full retard?
Other urls found in this thread:
un.org
twitter.com
This is probably the most aggressive move they've pulled so far. I'm actually getting a little scared about how far they will go
>WaPo owned by Jeff Bezos (Amazon CEO)
>NY Times owned by Mexican Telecom businessman Carlos Slim
>CNN owned by Time Warner (Now soon to be monopolistic AT&T).
They're just covering their asses, m8.
After the fucking verbal raping trump gave them recently, I'm not surprised to see them pulling drastic moves, really hope they learn their place quick.
This is coming from the media that propagated Dubya's propaganda after 9/11.
They're just trying to maintain control. Of us.
The narrative has been broken
>Muh Minorities
So I wonder what they'll do next time...whoever the Democrats decide to run.
>really hope they learn their place quick.
so long as their place is in a really hot oven burning to death I wholeheartedly agree
This whole ((fake news)) spiel is by far the scariest thing to have come from this election cycle. The mainstream media, fresh from lying through their teeth about everything politics related, are now trying to define what is and isn't the truth. Hold me lads.
Just keep mocking them and standing up to them.
They *hate* mockery, hate it.....because they can't defend against it.
>They *hate* mockery, hate it.....because they can't defend against it.
>the right wing has now become Saul Alinsky
how do we keep getting away with it lads
Yuri was right.
Subversion is beaten by subverting it back - you just have to be careful with the truth and scale up the heat, slowly.
2016 was the year we collided with another universe and it threw everything into pandemonium.
I take it that CNN, NY Times and Washington Post are all on there.
Lol that they put Drudge on there. Not a smart crew apparently making the list.
also (((fact checkers)))
>washpo
>real news
>wikileaks
>fake news
Who is pushing this Russians are evil bullshit recently? It's like 1982 all over again.
The left.
They can't accept that their ideas are shit and people don't like them anymore, so it's a Russian conspiracy.
They are evil.
I'd rather cuck myself with "Russian" propaganda than the Clinton, globalist, pro-Islam press
Well, let's be fair here, Russia is all kinds of fucked up. But the left is using that as a scapegoat to deflect from all the shitty things they've been up to.
Even our news is the same. During the DNC convention, wikileaks was briefly brought up as an example of Russian interference in the campaign.
I'm not sure I'd say Russians are evil. I'd definitely say that Russia will always put its geopolitical interests ahead of those of the west, and I can't really fault them for this. I kind of wish the west vs. Russia rivalry would die, and I think Putin has tried to extend the olive branch, but leftists think Russians are barbarians for not allowing leftist sexuality/gender propaganda (while liking Muslims who routinely come from countries which kill gays/trannies/etc), and Hillary has been using them as a scapegoat this entire election.
The point is, limited cooperation is possible and should be done when its mutually beneficial, but with great caution.
Someone needs to take care of Jeff Bezos.
>
>also (((fact checkers)))
Well they are pretty much correct. Assad has mostly focused on rebels. Not IS.
So you mean Assad was fighting isis then
I think it's being taken care of.
Check his eye on the left.
thanks for that link op because following and after a few more clicks i found this interesting transcript of a UN security council about aleppo. it's fun to see russia and the UN calling each other liers. it has the syrian representative btfoing everyone at the end, it's pretty cool