Convince me that Fascism is a good political structure

Convince me that Fascism is a good political structure.

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fasces
youtu.be/Unkrzu7M3uI
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Not as bad as Communism.

it isn't.

best is ultranationalist libertarianism

No mudlems

>black and white drawing of an edgy faggot
wow. just wow. do you even want to be taken seriously?

>a*ssies

>ultranationalist libertarianism
Is this a thing? It should be.

Relies entirely on having a foreign enemy to fight, conflict if not open war is necessary to maintain the regime's legitimacy.

...

America in the 19th century

there's a star but nothing is missing.

I'm.... I'm arouse.

Call me a retard, but what is that drawing suppose to represent?

What word was used to describe fascism before WWII?

>muh war muhfugga: the ideology

> lol call me a retard XDDDD

Indeed, You fucking leaf

Literally the filename

Literally THE symbol of Fascism

roman ceremoniel axe i think

fascism

Well you gotta think about how the ideoligy translates to our era.
Hitler viewed the history of mankind as the eternal struggle between peoples.
That would mean that right now Islam would be the biggest threat for the future existence of the Germanic race.

I know that you idiot, but what is the meaning of the fucking thing. A fucking axe stuck to a bunch of sticks.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fasces

see now take your leafness elsewhere

Well, throwing commies from helicoptors does sound like a fine way to spend an afternoon.

Thanks.

Or burning gays

You say that like it's a bad thing.

Basically the whole 19th century. Look at Italian Unification, Revolutions of 1848, Revolutions of 1830, etc.

Yes, because conquest wars never, ever backfired.
That's why formerly fascist nations are thriving thanks to that.

In capitalism, the priority is financial prosperity, so in capitalism everything is for sale.
In communism, the priority is equality, so in communism everyone's equal in their misery.
In fascism, the priority is preservation of culture, so in fascism, the nation sticks together.

Anything unclear?

Be a little more open minded, there are not only conquest wars, you can subjugate another nation and keep her as a puppet or colony without taking the clay.
And the enemy must not be foreigner, it can be internal, joos, sandpeople and gipsies are good target for an internal enemy.

>Anything unclear?
Where do babies come from?

I just think we have to be brutal to violent "protest" groups. Like we should have had cops with gatling guns just MOWING down black lives matter rioters.

If that makes me fashy than so be it. "I am what's necessary."

>comparing fascism to capitalism
What is this meme? Fascism is a political ideology, while capitalism is an economic system.
They're not in any way incompatible or exclusive. Actually most fascist states throughout history had a capitalist economy, most notably the Roman Empire which defined a legal structure based around free trade, essentially inventing capitalism as we know it today.

>roman empire

Yeah look how well that turned out dummy

Exactly, but when fascism is a dominant ideology, the state interferes with the businesses harmful for the state. In capitalism only money matters, so if it runs rampant, it may lead to the society's downfall (as it usually does).
Communists are just a different side of that kike coin, ruining traditional values and stumping all progress with their indoctrination and control.

What are you talking about? Not the empire, but Rome its self existed for well over 1000 years. Literally the greatest success story in history, who can rival it?

Those where not libertarian, most of those revolutions either called for early socialism or a centralized (((liberal democracy)))

your favorite pop star thinks it's cool

>internal enemies
Come fucking on, you of all people should know that this always, always goes wrong.
Can't remember the red brigades?
>but they were commies
same thing, same reasoning, same methods
the police state is always shit

We are going to try mate.

Liberal essentially as libertarian on a lot of key tenants in the 19th century. These weren't the same liberals of today, they weren't even the same extremist forms that we saw in the French Revolution.

Most of the general and religious freedom we have today is because of these 18th and 19th century movements though. I know Liberalism went down hill but don't blame that on our great great great great grandparents who had good intentions.

>Yeah look how well that turned out dummy
One of the most successful empires in history.
It's downfall was precisely the distancing from those values that made it great.
>rejection of ethnocentrism which led to mass immigration
>rejection of free trade thru devaluation, regulation and higher taxes
The reason it fell was because they stopped being fascists.

...

it's pretty good m8

The red brigades were placing bombs in public places, like today muslims. Your plan is to not persecute them? You sound like the king of the leafs: "if you kill them, they win".
Our western society is going down to the toilet if we don't stop being pussies, a good blood bath is what we need.

youtu.be/Unkrzu7M3uI

Why do Italian revolutionaries always wear red? What the fuck is your obsession?

the level of authoritarianism necessary to hold a state together depends on the people, if they are convinced of mass immigration and other literal society destroying policies, then you have little choice but to use said political ideology to keep the country together

Apart from Garibaldi's army, I don't remind any other revolutionary wearing red.

Fascism
>collectivism
>redistribution of wealth
>hates free market capitalism
>no liberty
Fascism is a shit ideology

thats communism

>redistribution of wealth
>hates free market capitalism
>no liberty
That's called communism you dumb fuck

Their emblem is a bundle of sticks man... I can't get behind moral degeneracy like that.

yes, just a maximum of liberty and justice, self determination, habeas corpus, bill of rights, no hand outs, no government surveillance, maximal property rights, maximal self defense and bear arms rights, fredom of association, no hate speech laws, as little taxes as "necessary", no executive agencies who circumvent law making process...

combined with a prohibition on sexual relationships with foreigners, a ban on foreign banks, a ban on adoption of foreigners, a ban on foreigners owning land, isolationism,...

combined with policies as a year of mandatory military service and national guard militia, voting rights only to those over the age of 25 who own land and voter ID, allegiance to the flag,...

liberty and nationalism are the best combination.

19th century came very close to this ideal, only international things like anarchism, communism, catholicism, freemasonry,... ruined it by not acknowledging on one hand the liberty and on the other hand nation state who should go hand in hand.

It harkens back to the Roman empire's fasces, symbol for the supremacy of law. Reeds and an axe, beating or beheading

So basically going back to the US in 1776.

Boy have I got some bad news for you

Minus the slavery, yes.

It takes immense responsibility and education to not be led to what we are today, though. Fascism actively leads people into that light of strength and achievement, rather than relying on their own moral fortitude and judgment.

Historically fascism has "reset" nations that were fragmented due to war, poverty, monarchies, etc.

It is a great way to recruit national identity through nationalism, and creates a goal for society, through the economy, education, social programs, etc.

It's not good as a long term strategy, as it can burn out resources, especially if a war is involved.

FDR of the 30's was actually very facist in many ways, when compared to Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin, etc. But also quite globalist. He was a very contradictory and interesting mix of things.

Lynching a few back in the day kept them in check. When a child acts out, your reprimand them.

sadly, yes. I am not saying it is possible today, just what the ideal form of political government would be.

in many ways yes.

Also, something that I would think would be helpful would be: make it mandatory for congressmen/senators to run as independents. I would abolish political parties as they are now. no democrats or republicans, or whatever particracy is unconstitutional.

and politicians should not be paid in any way. no salary, nor should they be able to receive gifts or donations from anybody during their term.

Fascio - bundle of sticks

It is literally the best possible symbol of national unity.

Every stick is easy to break individually, but when they're tied together... Is that so hard to fathom for you?

...

>maximum of liberty and justice, self determination
>combined with a prohibition on sexual relationships with foreigners, a ban on foreign banks, a ban on adoption of foreigners, a ban on foreigners owning land, isolationism,.
Nice contradiction you got there.