I have a 5,000 word essay to write on any subject of my choice that will be graded and count an entire grade amongst my subjects. I have the whole year to prep for it. I chose the title "To what extent in political correctness detrimental to British society?".
Thus, in need stats and good stories. Please redpill me on political correctness Vs facts in the UK (e.g. safe spaces and BLM and black crime stats etc.).
Would be greatly appreciated!!!
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
bump
please i need help pol.
MSM aint doing the job.
Don't chose a subject that could rustle your SJW teacher's Jimmie's or she might hate give you a C-
Frankly, just inform yourself on the Rotherham rape scandal - it is everything wrong in Britain in one giant clusterfuck and the more info emerges.
Pakistani child traffic gang has raped 1400 white girls (no shitskin, of course) cops refused to do anything, arrested the fathers who tried to save their daughters, when it blew up the `moderate` muslim community and imams outright refused to cooperate with investigation (because of course they did, fucking muslims, always the same, no matter where) and then they set up 100% muslim `diversity council` to better school the law enforcement when they handle such sensitive case in the future.
I respect your intention but this is a terrible idea, it is an important essay and you can write about literally anything, don't use it to piss off your Marxist professor, it's not worth it. Graduate with good grades and then troll the left all you want
What we call "political correctness" today started with the Frankfurt School in the 1920s and '30s. They were Marxists back in Germany who had to flee Hitler (because they were mostly Jewish intellectuals. The Bernie Sanders' of their day.) Once in the United States, they immediately set about trying to collapse the nation that took them in. One of their tacticians [named Herbert Marcuse] invented the idea of "speech codes". He was the father of "political correctness". He wanted these "speech codes" enforced on college coampuses. His reasoning? If people had free speech, the Marxists would lose every time. So certain parameters had to be imposed. Certain vocabulary enforced.. Only by rigging the debate could Marxism prevail, and the glorious socialist state be ushered in. By the 1950s and 60s, the first disciples of the Frankfurt Schoolers started to infiltrate the American academic establishment, By the 1990s, they'd ascended to the leadership positions in the universities. And now, here we are today--with cultural Marxists indoctrinating our children and brainwashing them with a hatred of America (and its host-population). "Those evil, bad whiteys need to be punished, and their nation [created by old slave-owning patriarchs] needs to be replaced by a glorious totalitarian state. Free shit for everyone . . . oh, and gulags. And thought-police. And surveillance cameras. Lots of surveillance cameras.
Shit even on pol how have I never heard of that?
what subject is this for?
Don't, they'll just find a way to give you bad grades after that. Schools is really about figuring out how to make teachers happy by validating their bias. Just write some bullshit about how diversity makes us stronger and watch your grades improve for no other reason.
Don't be autistic.
because you are a fucking new you cunt
The decade long rape of all those white girls by Arab pigs. Cops didn't want to speak out because of racism.
Don't be a fucking retard, write about a subject you actually know if you intend to pass.
If you precious brown bodies are drowning MAYBE STOP TRYING TO CROSS THE OCEAN TO LIVE IN A LAND FILLED WITH PEOPLE YOU HATE
never heard of a safe space being used on a UK campus, but I left uni 5 years ago so things have changed.
I don't hear the term "people of colour" either.
can anyone tell me where this stupid 'black bodies' shit came from? its aspecific, intentionally used phrase i hear again and again with the afrocentric/sjw/academic types. what's it supposed to accomplish in place of 'black people'?
I've only seen it in the LGBT soc area (worked at the union occasionally) in the student union. Don't think any uni would directly claim they'd m,ade a safe space, though obviously empty rooms for de-stress (what a joke most do 4 hours a week at uni) maybe get used as such.
Rotherham, Oxford, etc. sex gangs.
That being said, selecting political correctness is probably going to get you an F, just because your teacher won't like it and won't like your opinion on the subject. Literary talent and objective arguments won't help you.
>Shit even on pol how have I never heard of that?
Because pedo protectors change the subject to things like pizzagate which have no proof, or shape shifting lizards which is fucking ridiculous.
Most sex abuse cover ups probably aren't about race and political correctness etc. but Rotherham was, so political correctness can be part of that problem.
Shadilay. Seek divine inspiration.
Probably not such a great idea chap, you'll have everyone calling you 'literally hitler' and socially ostracising you if you show yourself to be anything right of cultural marxism.
From a vid put out by BLM's english branch called climate change is a racist issue or something. Not even satire.
these people literally have 0 business being in europe. Look at the shithole countries they come from, and then ask yourself why they have the fucking nerve to cause a ruckus in our countries when we LET them stay and reap the benefits of living in a white society.
It's supposed to emphasise the disconnect that the police feel when dealing with black people, ie, they don't see them as people primarily, but as black bodies first and foremost. I agree it has definitely become cliche and overused.
I think a good example of why people use it is this video
youtube.com
At around three minutes, he manhandles a young black girl in a way he absolutely would not handle a young white girl. Also the general way he treats all the black kids in the video.
...
>Frankly, just inform yourself on the Rotherham rape scandal - it is everything wrong in Britain in one giant clusterfuck
This. Fucking white sluts.
It's from Michel Foucault's Discipline and Punish.
god I hate that post-structuralist bullshit.
You know you don't have to write bump right? Like you know whether you take the of time out of your fucking retarded worthless day, to write "bump" the post still gets bumped right? So let me ask you this, are you so fucking stupid and autistic that you don't know this? Or is it the fact that you're just such a fat worthless retard in need of attention that you feel the need to post "bump" so people can see this and you can feel validated, considering its the only thing you fucking did all day you worthless pice of shit.
I fucking despise you, you fucking cunt, I swear to God if I ever meet you, by any chance, God help me I will put you through the nearest fucking wall, you fat uneducated worthless piece of fucking shit.
See Fear and the Law video by Peterson.
youtube.com
Firstly I'd stay away from too much mention of the Frankfurt school etc, lest your teacher write you off as a conspiritard.
Define political correctness in a way that is indisputable, yet not negative. (E.g. "the avoidance of forms of expression or action that are perceived to exclude, marginalize, or insult groups of people who are socially disadvantaged or discriminated against.") Go on to argue that this is creating a new group of socially disadvantaged and discriminated people, and that this is furthermore detrimental to our culture.
Explore the Rotherham/Oxford paedophile rings and the issues around them. Look at BBC diversity quotas (remember those adverts that discriminated against white people). Challenge universities banning speakers and the rise of safe spaces. Compare and contrast reporting on men's and women's rights.
Be sure to offer counter arguments to your points, and do not dismiss them. Some common examples are that not all Muslims are paedophiles, that some groups of people are less advantaged than others, that some people have legitimate issues with PTSD and would encounter significant mental torment if subjected to certain things. Rip those counter arguments apart, pointing to evidence that suggests paedophillia is not only common within their culture, but also their religion, and that this is at odds with the communities that have adopted then, subsequently reducing community cohesion. Argue that disadvantaging a second group does not recreate the advantage the first group didn't have in the first place. Point out that those groups with PTSD are an extremely small portion of the population.
Watch professor (dr?) Peterson's YouTube channel to get a better idea how to argue in a more academically accepted way.
Most importantly, never, I repeat NEVER, go full retard.
People in UK choose to be racist to whom they still can be racist/discriminative (it's not Muslim or Black community). The other minority groups, such as Poles, Russians, Latvians and all the other small slavic communities. In general they put everyone in one bucket so you are either Russian or Polish if you are a white immigrant. For example you will find many situations where a white person speaking any slavic language gets told off by some English guy saying ''I wish people here could at least speak English while around me'', but they will never comment the same on group of people who are from the ''minority'' that outnumbers them. They choose to toss aside people who are willing to associate with them and behave in society, accepting out of correctness the ones who destroy them. I also want to say that even if one side is bad, it doesn't mean that other is much better. The one that is bad makes little effort to improve, because everyone already ''correctly'' loves them, and it shows (muh benefits). The one that is better doesn't care to improve because it's constantly alienated.
All in all, there are assholes on both sides with the difference that one are cocky glorified assholes and other is the asshole because of being thrown aside. Color? Yes your parents could have chose that, but when they made you they done it with love (except for rape), and guess what? You didn't have a color gamma before you got out from mommy's belly to take which one you want. Eventually you could have told your mommy to let you out when you started to kick her too hard from the inside, and she had to use the nearest hospital.
make a solid case as to how is that our fault?
And all in all, you should be doing this research yourself if you really do care.
Like he said.
This
Also this.
youtube.com
bumparino
>5000 words
>in 1 year
what is this kindergarden bullshit?
1400 kids raped for years and authorities not dealing with it because of political correctness. Leading to loss of faith in the establishment, the justice system, the social services and general mistrust of minorities.
Basically you want to word it in a way where every one is a victim, including the pakis
>poor pakis, when the racism of lower expectation justice system failed to remove the bad apples from the pooor paki community it lead to a general mistrust against all pakis
You can also bring up inbreeding and the lack of intervention of social services. Leading to human suffering and massive costs for the taxpayers.
Watch this
youtube.com
But i think the Rotherham is better, only idiots can call you a racist then because child rape trumps ''islamophobia'' for most people.
This is good advice.
This is better advice.
Dr. Peterson was made for this.
OP, you *could* get a high scoring grade on this paper, but you will not. And it is nothing to do with "muh kultural marxism educational system".
It is because you already have an agenda that you now want to write about.
My advice: redpill yourself. Put down your dogma, and - if you're really going to do this - do it properly.
Remember that you are not an exceptional firebrand rhetorician, and your tutor gets 2 or 3 of these edgycore essays every semester and has a set of criteria that they will judge your work against with no effort.
The bottom line is, that political correctness is just politeness. Everyone likes politeness. I listen to elderly relatives bemoan "political correctness means I can't say nigger" while in public. But then when I point out that they are from a bygone era and piss into a catheter, and suddenly they want cultural sensitivity and a safe space of their own.
Also, while it is illegal to say "Nigger" in public, it is also illegal to punch someone in the face. But if you go to Brixton and shout "Nigger" in the streets at a black man, that black man will punch you in the face.
And, in that sense, doesn't that prove that the system works?
