Pros and cons of claiming Iceland as a white refugee oasis/fortress.
Go...
A White Oasis
Other urls found in this thread:
independent.co.uk
christiantimes.com
grapevine.is
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Pros:
Nothing
Cons:
Expensive Island
People are more cucked and PC than Sweden
They've already taken in refugees
No military
Free speech*
*unless we don't like it because it hurts someone's feelings
Don't forget:
- Cold as shit
- "Fugg life sucks here I'm gonna kill myself DDDD:"
Greenland and the very north of canada should be a white oasis, not iceland
All the cons can be dealt with when 50 million whites arrive.
FPBP
Iceland = just like Sweden, except they are more leftist-retarded, BUT they don't have enough bulls for their wives (so they keep trying to get some)
I assumed from the beginning that Iceland would claim Greenland when 50 million whites arrive.
>American education: the post
t. refused by immigration office
Iceland only takes in pure whites, Yanks and Latinos need not apply
Con: Bjork
>hey iceland, want to take in refugees? how about 50?
>hmm, make it 11,000 and we have a deal
I-I-CELANDERS A-AREN'T C-KEKS
A-A-MERICAN EJEWCASHUN GUIS