A White Oasis

Pros and cons of claiming Iceland as a white refugee oasis/fortress.
Go...

Other urls found in this thread:

independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/more-than-11000-icelanders-offer-to-house-syrian-refugees-to-help-european-crisis-10480505.html
christiantimes.com/article/out-of-10000-syrian-refugees-admitted-to-the-u-s-only-56-are-christians/62105.htm
grapevine.is/news/2016/10/20/73-of-icelanders-support-welcoming-more-refugees/
youtube.com/watch?v=5F_INMLk_lE
youtube.com/watch?v=qx8hrhBZJ98
youtube.com/watch?v=LR-rsVAHcV8
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Pros:
Nothing

Cons:
Expensive Island
People are more cucked and PC than Sweden
They've already taken in refugees
No military
Free speech*

*unless we don't like it because it hurts someone's feelings

Don't forget:
- Cold as shit
- "Fugg life sucks here I'm gonna kill myself DDDD:"

Greenland and the very north of canada should be a white oasis, not iceland

All the cons can be dealt with when 50 million whites arrive.

FPBP

Iceland = just like Sweden, except they are more leftist-retarded, BUT they don't have enough bulls for their wives (so they keep trying to get some)

I assumed from the beginning that Iceland would claim Greenland when 50 million whites arrive.

>American education: the post
t. refused by immigration office

Iceland only takes in pure whites, Yanks and Latinos need not apply

Con: Bjork

>hey iceland, want to take in refugees? how about 50?
>hmm, make it 11,000 and we have a deal
I-I-CELANDERS A-AREN'T C-KEKS
A-A-MERICAN EJEWCASHUN GUIS