What benefit do scientists have to lie to us about global warming?

What benefit do scientists have to lie to us about global warming?

Lots of money.

>> Lots of money

and even a little more money after that.

> billions in carbon tax credits
> billions in revenue for businesses devoted to alternative energy junk (solar shit, turbines, whatever)

> A reason to shut down the coal industry so people cant make money mining that

> Force reliance on oil power plants (ironically enough, since coal is unavailable)

What benefit do journalists have to lie to us about Muslims?

they don't

They get a shitload of government funding to say it exists. If they come out and say it doesn't exist they get defunded. It's the only area where 99% of scientists agree with each other. That should tell you something.

kys

In other words...

Gigantic fucking scam and racket, all money based.

You bet there's a reason to perpetuate it, and scientists can use their job/status to lend verification to these (to make them "facts" when spun the right way).

In exchange they get grant money for other shit or even get paid. Or they get "The Big Job" at some corporation research thing. Or their families continue to live. Or some combination of those.

Scientists are humans, with the same weaknesses.

They get to keep their job and not become another Dan Rather.

Or if they're not a popular figure in news - actually get killed out in the field and forgotten.

METRIC TONS OF MONEY.

They don't lie about Muslims poop bather

saw the flag and laughed

Introduction of carbon currency i.e. mandatory debt that must be paid to even live, that can be manipulated however they want to depending on what they want to do with the people and the economy.

> THE
> ONLY
> AREA

where 99% of scientists agree with each other

They dont even fucking agree with each other at that level when it comes to nuclear physics

And they know even less about supposed "climate change" than other sciences.

> Common Sense
> Involves reading between the lines
> If it happens enough times its proof enough all by itself
> This is the difference between IQ 100 and IQ 140, you dont always need a scientific paper as proof of something.

Holy fuck people

>implying climate science is a particularly lucrative career

I wish mate.

Why is it then, that under Steven Harper, Tony Abbott and George Bush, all of whom did not believe in climate change, climate scientists did not switch to publishing research disproving climate change?

And for that matter I will say the existance of Magic, Demons, Aliens, or Dragons and other things can be verified simply by the fact people have talked about it through history so many damn times.

Whether there's any concrete proof of it or not, even the lack of it so it would seem, doesn't mean its disproven. The recurring incidence of it in culture is enough. May not know what it is, but something is going on with that.

Even ancient paintings and depictions of things like space ships that the people of the time literally had no reason to even think of.

Whether you can find the dragon bones or not is irrelevant, who knows maybe they were all slain and the bones were ground up and eaten or something. There are ways this can be explained.

None. They aren't lying.
Most scientists are fucking poor even.

Because they wouldn't get money? Lol.

>permanently screwing over you career for someone thats temporarily there

You're talking world leaders.
But world leaders dont make the decisions.

Governments only loosely guide and regulate Big Business, which goes about (well...) its business without needing to discuss its secrets with anybody. Government does not control Business at all, and we have a philosophy in our society against the notion of doing so.

So world leaders? they're irrelevant.

Who controls Big Business?

> read quotes from members of the Rothschild family

Parasitic governments push it as a means to further enslave the people. Scientists get sweet tax money to fuel their research so long as they tow the line. Another link in the chain around your neck. another hand in your pocket. Bureaucracy at its finest

Money you dumb fuck. Stop being so naive.

If you're over 12 and still believe in global warming then you need to get your head examined.

I'm a scientist

We do it for the shits and giggles

Carbon Currency

Explain why the Koch Brothers have put so much into trying to disprove anthropogenic climate change if it's all an (((elite))) conspiracy.

Funny how when this topic comes up on Sup Forums, it's almost always Americans denying it.l

>the country where less than 50% of the population believe in evolution

>be climate scientist
>Get grant to produce study on climate change
>fuck around with computer models till you get your desired result
Two thing can happen here, either
>report that climate change is a non issue and receive no further grants
>report that climate change is an issue, continue to get grants and grow the climate research industry.

1) Grants and bribes from libshits/globalists/(((those))) who want to push the global warming/climate change angle so they could implement carbon credits trading, which is the next new thing after insurance scams
2) Acceptance from the (((science cabal))). You either believe their bullshit or you're "excommunicated" from science. Being anti-global warming/climate change is like being an anti-Semite in the science community
3) A way for "literally who" scientists to make their mark by being a proponent of the scam. If they can't be the Einsteins or the Hawkings, they can be the stars of the upcoming pseudo-science that is global warmingology/climate changology, or whatever the hell they want to call that voodoo to make it hip/faggy

It's been said many times before...
>With Jews, you lose

Scientists have been in agreement on climate change long before carbon credits were being talked about. Also, carbon credits are considered a shitty thing by plenty who acknowledge climate change, including myself.
Gov't programs and dirty fuel lobbies have nothing to do with the science.

We get it you're a brainwashed liberal.

>What benefit do scientists have to lie to us about global warming?

1. Get billions in research funding for "science"

2. Make billions from investing in green energy companies/scams

Pretty fucking simple.

>Scientists have been in agreement on climate change long before carbon credits were being talked about.
That's phase one. Phase two is the establishment of carbon trading markets, for which (((they))) can not only make shekels but they can also utilize to exert influence and pressure upon any country.

Think big picture.