>Trump wins 30 points in 50 least-educated counties with a median household income of 41k
>Trump loses 26 points in 50 most-educated counties with a median household income of 78k
fivethirtyeight.com
maybe should only allow postgraduates, physicians, and scientists to vote.
Other urls found in this thread:
fortune.com
theguardian.com
washingtonpost.com
twitter.com
what did you expect? It was Sup Forums's favoured candidate, can't expect intellectuals to vote for him then.
Yet you have to completely close your mind and retreat to a safe space to information to remain a liberal.
>Yet, you have to completely close your mind and retreat to a safe space to information to remain a conservative
See, I can be a cherry-picking reductionist too.
>Privileged little shits who went to liberal ass college voted for Hillary
Well color my ass surprised.
>Privileged
What do they do makes you think they're privileged/entitled??
>the poor and stupid shouldnt be allowed to vote aka have no influence on politics
Thanks for proving Hitler right,
FUCK democuckcy.
Do stupid people not deserve rights?
Well, their kids are privileged I mean, my smart conservative uncle made 120k a year at one point in time and his kids are bluepilled, smoke weed, vote left and often quit jobs. Where as i had degenerate parents who used a lot of drugs, so now I work, lower taxes, getting rid of the healthcare mandate and Trump are very appealing.
hope you have a good 4 years OP
Why couldn't the finest liberal minds in America, 1.5 billion (jewish and saudi) dollars, control of the media and campuses elect Hillary?
Really makes you think.
Most Americans have been brainless cattle for their government for decades. They wanted to elect a war criminal just because she was a female. While their government bombed middle east to stone age and starts wars worldwide, they worry about gays, bathrooms and weed. No surprise there.
Where was the outrage when BLM were attacking white people? Where was the outrage when muslims killed gay Americans? Until the elites forget their war plans with Russia and stop shipping jobs overseas this will continue to get worse. Your anti-white racism is the problem.
>poor, "well-educated" people voted for Hillary
Why should I care that SJW scum like this voted for her?
I dont know of any conservatives that posted that they visited a facebook and had to turn it off because they were starting to like Mudslimes. I dont know of any AI whos learning function had to be disabled to stop it from becoming racist. But I do know of examples contrary to that. Ask someone on the street why they hate Trump and you get the same 5 words. Ask someone on the street why they hate Hillary and you will get paragraphs. Real word examples show liberals are either retarded or they are insane. Which was expressed in the election.
Does anyone have statistics on which counties had the lowest voting turnout or who voted for a candidate other than drumpf/shillary?
Curious
Do you want your bathroom full of gay weeds? Seems like something to worry about to be honest family
I'm not convinced that a women's studies major should be considered more educated than a tradesman
Classism.
Glad that this election is showing how intolerant and bigoted the left-wing really is.
Shit, it's not even like you need to be a tradesman to survive in modern America, I only have a high school diploma and get 33k yearly, not rich but it's better than someone with an arts degree who hasn't ever worked.
This, the left made themselves appear to be the part of ladt gaga and the millionares, you just can't relate to them and I'm not even sure why Hillary had them on stage in PA.
Oh, I get it. This chart counts women's studies as and other bullshit in as "education" and that's why you get the low income baristas and burger town workers with Clinton
>liberals are either retarded or they are insane
>literally everyone who isn't a fucking white male
>the part
the party*
>shit poll that ended up being wrong by 5 points
Not only does Trump lose the educated and rich. He also loses among the top most successful CEOs by 16 points. He also loses among scientists and physicians.
fortune.com
To them gender studies and liberal arts are education somehow. Affirmative action also ensures us a ton of "educated" non-whites. Most educated whites voted for Trump, it's non-whites who skewed the statistics.
>business people who only want profit support the candidate that wont get boycotted and harm their sales
Hmm... no no I'm sure they're just smart ethical people
M0n3y maek da wUrld g0 round fGt
>Trump are very appealing.
proof that Trump voters are retards
>people who financially profit from globalism are less negative about it than those who lose money due to it
no shit sherlock
did you get your PhD in social sciences for finding out this incredible correlation yet?
Can you fuck off and say oat and aboat somewhere else?
WHY WOULD THE ESTABLISHMENT CHOOSE AGAINST TRUMP? I ONLY WISH MY LIBERAL ARTS DEGREE COULD REASON THROUGH THIS GORDIAN KNOT.
>college and postgraduates only do gender studies meme
mathematicians, physicists and and other scientists always prefer democrats.
theguardian.com
>54% of male college graduates voted for Trump
>trump supporters turning SJW when confronted with reality that their voter base is retarded.
it's winter, go play hockey leaf
>phD in social sciences
Top giggle
>formal education = intelligence or worth to society
W E W
E
W
Hardly
Bullshit. Game Theory PhDs went for Trump in a big way.
(((Education))) makes you stupid.
He lost postgraduate whites. Mccain and Romney had won college educated whites. But republicans always lose among postgraduates whites.
Nice source.
Nice source, again. He won college educated males. Nobody cares what the psychology and gender studies female graduates think.
What, you are saying the richest of corrupt wallstreet voted for Clinton? B-but but she told us it was time for the rich to pay their fair share! Are you saying she lied user? Clinton lied?! How come she was the pick of the corrupt elite if she was the worst pick for them? Really makes you think. M-maybe she really did hhink TPP was the gold standard..
>50 most
>50 least
Your statistics belong in the trash
Nice source.
Just bear in mind that all that information is 100% from self-reporting in exit polls. The same quality exit polls that had the Clinton family dancing with joy at their impending victory.
Democrat voters are significantly more likely to lie about college education. Results always indicate far more postgrad's and PhD's than actually exist.
Don't know about that.
>maybe should only allow postgraduates, physicians, and scientists to vote.
>American """"""""""""Democrats""""""""""""
Good luck feeding yourselves faggots
If you look at the historical trends, Republicans won college educated voters by a wide margin until the mid-1990s, when more people were given "free" college and minorities and women started becoming the majority of college graduates.
>muh self-selected, self-identified survey with incredibly small sample sizes
I can guess what your major is in.
Physicians are also mostly white males.
Nice source. Relevant statistic. Self reported.
>Democrats
>Party of the working class
The polls were bad because they predicted voter turnout using Obama's figures.
>be smart
>give away ur money to the DNC
pick one
>sample size of 106
DID WE REALLY NOT JUST GO THROUGH THIS
Is there any data on who STEM majors voted for? It's no surprise that womyn's studies-, social sciences- and african american studies majors would vote based on vagina, but I have higher expectations for smart people.
Alright. Heres a sample of physicists.
>occupation as mathematican
>donate to democrats
>cant do the math
STE(((M))) is a joke
Give up.
According to your favourite lefty rag (((the guardian))) more white college educated males voted for Trump. Back to your cuck shed.
Is this really lefty/pol/? Can they possibly be this bad? This is sub-SRS tier shit.
On my 527 paperwork, I list my occupation as hatchetman.
Only a tiny handful of autistic supermen ought to be allowed to call themselves mathematicians. The rest are just faggots who are good at sums, always working in unrelated fields.
So you are saying Trump won the white working and middle class afterall, you know the people that actually makes a country function?
Trump voters as a whole are much wealthier than HRC voters as a whole, so you're retarded.
So, for the mathematicans they can create a number like 15 times a often, but for the physicans they cant?
I smell B.S.
All of this data is self-reported, exit poll garbage.
Again, self-selected, self-identified surveys are hardly accurate.
People who work for a living voted for Trump. (((Scientists))) who spend their lives in the Ivory Tower of Socialism voted Hillary. I thought chinks were supposed to be smart?
They are like that because their country fucked them out of the opportunity to do and be better. Can you blame them for voting for Trump? Like the other side is better.
All polls and surveys are self-reported. Do you have a better way?
> everyone who disagree with me is uneducated
> T. social studies and black lives major
SAGED
A better way is to site your sources.
That's pretty racist and insensitive to minorities.
Nope. Not this one. These are just donations that people are required to disclose by federal law if they donate.
This is some reddit tier surveys, if this is info that matters and decides what/who you support then I understand why reddit is so retarded.
>donations
>no source
>no context
Yes.
Women and shitskins tend to have stupid and poorly thought out views.
Sure. It's a pretty neat tool.
And all these people donated to the loser, how does that make you smart again?
Do you understand what self-selected and self-identified mean?
This whole argument is just a desperate mix of ad hominem and appeal to authority. That you don't even understand the survey you quote tells me everything I need to know about you.
It's from the federal election commission.
That's so funny. The self proclaimed champions of the proletariat manage to get no votes from the actual working class. How come Trump is called the right wing candidate?
He won college educated Whites by 5 points. Try again nigger. He also won 75k+ income by a big margin. Clinton won 0-35k (welfare bums) and nonwhite college educated (social degrees).
That's not a survey of who voted or not voted for Trump.
>muh fallacy.
citing fallacies don't work. You need to give evidence, and so far the evidence is that people who are more informed are much less likely to vote for Trump.
If you think otherwise, give some evidence.
Exactly. If they were being honest they would separate it into STEM and social degrees. Trump won with White STEM degrees
And they all lost, look at all the people that gave money to the democrats, a bunch of losers
It's not a random sample of voters. It's a sample of donations.
>you need evidence
>to counter a non argument
>conflates social degrees with being "informed"
lmao
Informed about marxism perhaps.
Yeah. It's better than a survey.
>Informed about marxism perhaps.
That's the last thing Marxists are informed about.
(((education)))
College is nothing but a sucker's game to the goyim. If the sheep actually took the loans and spent the money in private business, things would be much better for them. But goyim are goyim, literal cattle.
I gave you evidence.
Your stats are not relevant. "People who are political and donate" are not a random sample.
No it's statistics on people who donate. It's not a statistics on of people who vote.
>doesn't know what a non-argument is
>doesn't realize that self-selection can bias the results towards one candidate either way
>doesn't realize that even if the data if self-selected, it still implies scientists support Clinton over Trump by a large degree.
If you are making the claim, then you should cite evidence that is credible, not self-selected, self-identified raw data.
It is probably beyond your feeble mind to contemplate the political motives of a profession who relies almost entirely government grants for their livelihood. It's certainly a reasonable assumption to believe those who are politically active enough to donate to a party are smart enough to donate to the party that continually expands grants for their profession.
Yeah and it's based on donations, anyone who donated to the DNC 2016 is per definition a moron, you donated to the most corrupt political organ I have ever seen in my entire life among countries in the west. Plus they invested in a loser.
It's like the people who gave their money to Bernie because they hated Hillary, yet Bernie knew all along that the money would be given to her near the end, top kek. Some smart people you got there.
>How come Trump is called the right wing candidate?
Because the media has been calling niggers who work part time jobs meant for teenagers the working class
>Young people that goes to Colleges which encourage identity shit votes Hillary
>Young people historically has always voted for progress
You'd honestly have to be retarded if you don't realise this. Not saying that young people are wrong, I'm only fucking thirty myself, but it's hardly a surprise that older people and younger people vote differently and have different priorities.
>it still implies scientists support Clinton over Trump by a large degree.
1. No it doesn't.
2. A mathematician/physicist is not informed in politics. He's informed in mathematics/physics.
Post graduate anyone are such a small demographic they don't even matter