What is your excuse to be a racial nationalist? The truth is that there are individuals in every ethnic group that can integrate in western societies. Some cant, some can.
What is your problem living in a multiracial society if the people who make up that society are productive, integrated individuals?
Other urls found in this thread:
I don't want to be around non-whites.
no such thing exists
That is not an argument. Only a bias that you hold.
>IQ averages
>Musicianship (White traditions vs Jazz drumming)
>Instead if Politics dictating Culture, the other way around
>Culture stemming from Race
If you're gonna reply with the "but whites can rap hiphop songs as long as they work 40 hours/week" thing; why don't you invite africans and Current Years syrians to read Kalevala and claim Sampo/Väinämöinen et al as their own?
>integrated
Integration = immigrating while preying on the host nation, ie not giving up ones PREVIOUS culture and worldview (America is about assimilation, into X-American identities such as 'Latin-American' being distinct, over time, from proper Chileans or Peruvians)
You just answered your own question
Multicultural
One society, one culture, that's it.
This has nothing to do with color of skin but the willingness to participate in a cohessive community.
People that reject society should not expect society to welcome them.
His argument is his bias, dipshit. He argues that his bias is more important to maintain than your feelings.
I hate cucked snow niggers
no you're an idiot
it's your genetic make up. culture is a reflection of the genetic hivemind.
>The truth is that there are individuals in every ethnic group that can integrate in western societies. Some cant, some can.
>Some can't, some can
And statistics have shown Sweden that:
>Group Rapes, nonwhites "over representated" ie majority
>Music Festivals; while there certainly are occasional sexual assaults from year to year - people were drunker and higher as shit-er back in the 80's and 90's countercultures - STILL NO mass rapes akin to this year
>"Fesival Summer of 2016"; a chain of several music festivals ALL containing A Dozen - More rapes; performed by dindus
>statistics on illiteracy and again, IQ
>more, rather than less, nonwhites doing this
>(((mainstream media))) explanation: "Every male is a potential rapist!"
>Reality:
>Bruce Springsteen holds concert in the _same_ summer of 2016 that saw a chain of rapes taking place, by nonwhite dindus, all over our nation
>NO rapes reported at his show
>no WHITE RAPISTS arrested
This does not imply that whites, ie Swedes or other Northern European peoples living among us, do not commit rape; just that foreigners (defined as "nonwhites", "non-europid peoples", "#RefugeeCrisis") do and at a much higher frequency (statistics do not lie (but Leftism wants to blame socio-economics - ie all poor people are naturally drawn towards Rape and Murder no matter what (compare this to radicalized youth islamic terrorists not being broke, since they live on OUR WELFARE MONEY))
I'm assuming you don't give a shit and just want to rile people up, but still
>What is your excuse to be a racial nationalist?
You don't need an "excuse" to have a preference, fingolian.
>What is your problem living in a multiracial society if the people who make up that society are productive, integrated individuals?
assuming that you are finnish, not hiding behind a proxy:
>What is your problem living in a Soviet-invaded society [Finland if WW2 had turned out different] if the people who make up that society are productive, integrated individuals?
In your word having Finland occupied by
>jewish communists
>the various subraces found in the outer parts of Russia; not the white slavs
>(nvm that slavs were all commies too at the time)
since communists were great at Working and Contributing to society at that time :^), and that is all that matters to you. Not culture, not living amongst your own finns, just good integration of communist russians that don't slack around. You wouldn't want to be a (((Party)))-ophobe :^)
Putting it this way:
Are you okay with burning every copy of Jean Sibelius's 'Finlandia' ? If yes, then >>>/Canada/ post-Trudeau 4u
kys
Crime Statistics
If they did? I wouldn't care.
Anybody who loves America as much as I do and is willing to defend her is fine in my book.
Look at the Nips back in World War 2. We stuck them in fucking camps, and they -still- went to bat for us against their mother country. The Nip units were some of the most highly-decorated of the war on top of that.
That kind of immigrant I'd welcome. These waves of unwashed retards who don't give a good god damn about America or her culture can take a fucking hike, or get hung from lamp posts for all I care.
>integrate
That's what the cuckoo tells the surrogate parents when it lays its egg.
Ethnocentrism is the winning strategy.
What you propose is as idiotic as pacifism. It's a bleeding heart ideology fit for a utopia.
jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/16/3/7.html
I was not racist from the beginning, I was made racist by the fact that other races hate me.
I don't want to turn on my television and see channel after channel absolutely trashing whites, it should not be acceptable to be so blatantly racist against any race, but in our society it is permitted as long as that race you are discriminating against is white.
So now I am forced into a position where I am marginalized in my own country and there is nothing I can do to fight back. I am racist because other races hated me, now I hate them back, it's as simple as that. We don't live in a time absent of reaction, all of human history is action and reaction, there will be serious consequences for treating whites like shit, it starts with Trump, it will end with another Hitler, just watch, just keep it up and you'll see what happens.
Hey if you want Non-Whites in Finland to mix up and integrate with Finns that's fine by me but don't forget...
Nigeria will always be over 99% Black and China will always be over 99% Asian.
if you're a "that's so eurocentric!" cuckalainen
>India: Muslim invaders in the 17th century
>nearly killed/enslaved all of Kashmir
>Kashmirians fleeing down south _in order to survive_
>Africa today
>there are strands of political ideas such as "African Anarchism" that explicitly wants to do away with all White, to them foreign (!), concepts of State and Rulership
Would you even dare speak your OP txt to an Israeli Citizen IRL, tea bh ? They certainly are free to _____KICK OUT___ african *jews* for being racially non-semite, despite their religious conversion
What is your excuse for showing picture of White Man and Negro working together?
Do you want more Africans in Finland ha Ural boy?Or you are maybe one of those Somali immigrants??
>What is your excuse to be a racial nationalist?
If Finland had not been RACIALLY WOKE, then finns would have pulled of a (((Nu Sweden))) and allowed themselves to be out-bred or raped by commie non-finn invaders
or, take the wars between scandis, and other european nations, in the past; they all settled with drawing separate 'lebensraum'
the properties of You would not exist today if hundreds of yers of previous humans in your geographical area had allowed themselve to either racemix with - or give birth to rape babies from - negroids.
Whites are like 8-12% worldwide, can't recall exact number atm
Light eyes are recessive traits
Finnish genes are rare, with many physical characterics regressive if paired with Non-White ---> Offspring
you're gonna start deny biology because it Triggers you?
That was the dream but the 21st century has shown us that race is more important than country. Identity politics is on the rise and there is no reversing that trend.
We are a tribal species. Instinctively we want to be around people who look like us and we trust them more. As politicians continually try to increase voter participation they will pander more and more to the lowest common denominator. That lowest common denominator is going to be people who don't understand civics, don't know policy, and just want to vote for someone they trust(aka someone who looks lie them).
Reminder that 'Racism' is a leftist buzzword; the characteristics of 'Defending Ones Own Side' are with any human subrace throughout all of History. Even the extinct peoples of the past died trying to defend themselves (!).
It is an argument, you just can't refute it.
Why don't I have a right to preferring my own chosen surroundings?
>The truth is that there are individuals in every ethnic group that can integrate in western societies. Some cant, some can.
Please put up or shut up:
Place on a 8:2 ratio
>Nonwhite 2015-2016 #RefugeeCrisis newcomers
>no selection made with regards to Intelligence, Literacy
>on your OWN porch
>in your OWN house
>sharing your OWN living space; bathrooms, living room, mailbox etc
otherwise you contradict yourself if you live 500 km away and just Virtue Signal to the finns experiencing Theft/Rape/Murder @Helsinki that you're mch more Enlightened-Humanist-Egalitarian [at a very long and very safe distance]
:^)
>your excuse
What makes you imagine one needs an excuse?
What's your excuse for NOT pursuing the best interests of your folk?
>on a 8:2 ratio
*That group VS your own Family, or your neighborhood a a whole (assuming that neigbhorhood is all White, Finnish-or-Finlandssvensk)
Which reminds me
>OP says that race is _____irrelevant____
>Swedish-speaking Finns, or Finlandssvenskar, whom are RACIALLY SWEDISH ... have have many times of conflict [as well as peace] with their host people, ie the Finnish
>the SwedeFinn culture derives from their History, Tradition, Genetic-Biological Living Space marked inside of Finnish territoy
>all of these things consequences of their racial characteristics; otherwise they would have GIVEN UP and said _____ages ago______ :
> "we are just as Finnish as you are! [ 1:1 ] There is no Finnish People. We don't feel 'Finlandssvensk' despite trying to preserve our own language. #OneWorldOneRace" etc
Combine this fact with the disgenic effects of welfare combined with heavy taxation and we're looking at a race war within 2 generations.
Unless we can convince the descendants Mexican immigrants that they are closer to being white(they kinda look Spanish... r-right?) than black we are fucked.
we have it so bad that whites are racist towards other whites
>and we're looking at a race war within 2 generations
Back when Nordic countries fought each other
>Norway, Sweden, Denmark [the most between SWE - DEN], Finland
>Sweden annexating the entireto of Finland, "Kalmar Union" era
>Finnish people still pissed off today over this, their sense of National Indepencence sparked both by leaving us AND resisting Communist Soviet-Russia
... you would find descriptions of racial characteristics such as every side describins its enemy's Looks and Physical Features in negative terms
The more we know of Race, the more politics has shifted towards
>Pan-European nationalism
>Pan-Aryanism
>Pan-White-ism, ie ideas of White Ethnostate
If scandinavian countries were able to fight each other, despite being racially close, then what does this say about nonwhite dindu-floods into historically White Countries, happening today?
Is "just a small few 8 african/arab terrorists bombed an airport, while 450 000 of them continued to watch American Idol on their tv sets at home" enough justification for the worldview of OP ? [alluding to Belgium2016, but not in specifics]
>People of German tribal descent
>Nothing but marauding barbarians that take the works of great civilizations
>People of Mesopotamia
>build World's first great empire
>Great works of literature
>But brown people = mentally deficient
"BUT MUH GENETIC MAKE UP!"
kys
there is nothing wrong with it, except that race is always a reason for contention in a multiracial society. Its harder to be nationalist when one group is percieved as national majority and the other as minority.
Long story short, its just a mathematical game that is inefficient and ultimately less effective at satisfying peoples needs due to complex need stratifications between ethnic groups. You swedes will learn all about that in the next few years dont worry. You had your majority white days to feel happy about.
Secondly, only asians have ever really demonstrated adaptability in western culture. This matters, western culture is designed to be effective at a certain level and with a certain investment in intelligence, education and values for freedom of thought. But not all cultures actually care about free thought or about advancing the world. Many are content to remain plebs and vote for gimmedats.
Indian caste system is an informal reality between cultures whether you are aware of it or not. The only people on earth rising from this status are indians and its becuase they actually accept western culture. Sikhs especially are adaptable. They are a long ways ahead of congo niggers.
I live in a multiracial society. The majority of people are not productive and stagflation exists because despite our strong love for trinidad, gimmedat mentality and helplessness abound. The hardest workers are the Venezuelans that came from an economic crisis.
All the businesses want the Venezuelans now.
Lastly demographic shift is real. Nigs and indians reproduce more. The poor outreproduce the rich always but yet the rich are always replaced. The question then is, is it with someone of equal ability? Given IQ and racial preference and psychology difference. No. White culture has a real influence and once its lost hedonism sets in fully.
Hedonism can mask culture difference. Trinidad is testament. But it creates a climate for laziness.
Well, I could spend a lot of time writing paragraphs about biology, social influence and tradition. Anyone who agreed with me in the start would nod, and anyone opposing would just shrug and say "whatever". Not worth the effort
So, kys
relax finnbro :3
>peace between white countries, generally speaking
>Sweden-Finland-Denmark-Norway-Iceland do not, DO NOT:
>bomb markets in broad dayligt
>load cars with bombs ------> national or highway tolls blown up
>fly planes into each others buildings
>sell our children into becoming Child Soldiers
and even in the more tense periods of history... take WW2 and Hitler vs European nations. Silenced groups of people recognized the dangers of Communism and 'Fratricidal War' between whites
>one example: Australia's Prime Minister who declared the war itself, still having involved his country after pressure*, as a "Tragedy"
>even Gandhi ***refused*** to denounce Hitler as "below Humanity"/non-human, unlike many other world political leaders
*Australia had those who argued for avoiding entrance into the war; another one was American pilot Charles Lindbergh, who recognized the same problem of 'fratricidal warfare' occuring between America and its Germanic brethren over @nazi germany**, while (((special interests))) could gain from it [proto globalism]
**this did NOT mean that non-interventionists wanted to become NatSoc countries, but still there is that recognition for not doing ____un-necessary bloodshed__
My excuse is that my ancestors, as yours probably too, have been living on this land for hundreds of years and I do not intend to give it up to some random arabs that won't be respectful to anyone.
>Lastly demographic shift is real. Nigs and indians reproduce more
Exactly, therefore why should White Peoples follow an imperative to flood their own Living Spaces - Countries - with those that outbreed them fast?
Moreover, why are only EUROPEAN, white, nations branded 'Colonialist scum' by leftists and cuckservatives; meanwhile no one bats an eyelid over the Arabian Peninsula and its slave trade (the very much rich Saudi-Arabia even denies taking in refugees afaik), or Turkey...
Could it be that anti-Whites just want to enjoy the sick pleasure of seeing Whites die off? and (((who))) is pulling the string for this mentality to occur throughout the West?*
*The East, ie Asia and India, do not seem to care - other than those parts that have been infiltrated by Marxist academics, such as the higherups of India inflicting (western derived-) Feminism etc into Hindu Society.
>Two posts by this ID