Hey Sup Forums what do you think of my new economic strategy? It took me a while to come up with

Hey Sup Forums what do you think of my new economic strategy? It took me a while to come up with

We need some people to do the shit jobs.

once we have robots that can do menial labor, yeah

>he doesn't understand how a bell curve works
Guessing you're in the "dead" region?

robots

Women and men have different curves, may need to seperate it to get an even distribution.
IQ 110+ Women live.
IQ 125+ Men live.

Everyone else can go start thier socialist utopia in Africa.

It will however make women scarce, perhaps we could have all marked for survival pick out a wife that will be sterilized and awarded to them.

autistic, shortsighted, unoriginal

Are you mad because you'd be a prisoner for the rest of your life or because you'd be taken out back and shot because no one wanted you?

Methinks the latter.

Not viable.

Whoever coordinates the executions will have too much power, which is dangerous as there always are, by definition, people at the bottom and the line will keep shifting.

And secondly, this eliminates my grandmother and I love her.

What?

Why stop at 125. By the time we have robots that can do everything a 125IQ can do, we'll have robots in a matter of months that can do what a 150 can do, and the increase in ability will scale geometrically once machines program themselves. 50 years to game over for humanity.

Enjoy your genetic diseases and schizophrenia.

pretty good, but everyone will be too depressed to do anything

Richard Feynman had an IQ of only 117.

LowIQ+hard work= high variance from genetic average

Feynman's true score once he got momentum was probably around 170.

>what is regression to the mean

>actually believing a dumbass can become Feynman by working hard enough, not that the IQ test he took was retarded

GIVE IT UP FOR MADAME PRESIDENT

>not making the cut off at least 135

That's less than 2% of the population. We need way more.

nobodys gonna kill anyone.

anyone above the 110 line or so will eventually just make their own country to live away from the retards.

Stop throwing around phrases that you clearly don't understand.

Do you think Varg would make the cut off?

iq is not the only measure of intelligence, or is a shit measure of intelligence.

If one generation is 2 standard deviations from the mean, the chances the next generation to be at that 2 standard deviations is unlikely. Thus the next generation "regress" to the population mean.

So if the cutoff is at 120 and the new mean is 130, the next generation will likely be closer to 110 because the average IQ of the next generation will regress to the population mean (100)

>IQ
>legitimate measure of intelligence

kek the only purpose of IQ tests is make the autist NEETs of Sup Forums feel superior in some way to normal people. Also if the IQ requirements are that high you will see a death of conservatism extremely quick. Without stupid people there is no conservative party and also no religion either.

statistically speaking, that will leave more ashkenazi jews than anyone else.

How do I know if I'm retarded? Can anybody inderjdkd?

>he doesn't know the average IQ is ALWAYS 100
If you kill those you'll just have more people below the line you imposed.

Nope.

it's okay to have a double digit IQ, it justs means you're special

OP is pretty fucking stupid, but you're even worse for misunderstanding the point. He's saying kill everyone who currently has lower than that IQ (OP's IQ).

i think its fine to kill everyone below 100

I don't think you'd want a world where it's mostly people like me.

>implying IQ exists

Just kill everyone in this list to speed up human evolution:
>unemployed for over 2 years
>disabled
>has an allergy
>wears glasses since childhood
>any kind of mental disorder
>has a criminal record
>is virgin over age of 20
>has asymmetric features
>dicksize/breastsize below average

And suddenly everyone is productive, healthy, beautiful and a useful member of society

Don't forget Jehovahs Witnesses. They get a double-triangle.

a better way to do it would be to chop off the bottom 10-15% of the distribution of the bell curve and generation after generation keep cutting off the bottom of the distribution....


Doing it the way OP has it set up demonstrates he wouldn't make it past the first round of his experiment.