Are these /leftypol/ twats the new CTR?

Are these /leftypol/ twats the new CTR?

Other urls found in this thread:

8ch
youtube.com/watch?v=nVNQ13f4qzM
youtube.com/watch?v=MLhYghzNfII
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/100978143/#100982279
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Nah, CTR was compensated, these losers will get bored after a week

I wonder if these commies realize that Soviet russia and China were racist as fuck towards black people and muslims...

Nah, without someone supplying shitposts and bait threads some Sup Forumsacks had to pick up the slack and create their own threads to troll. .

8ch dot net/leftypol/res/1104283.html#1104290

They have a bunker, who wants to be the buster?

Nope.

youtube.com/watch?v=nVNQ13f4qzM

>I wonder if these commies realize that Soviet russia and China were racist as fuck towards black people and muslims...
Yeah that's why one of the jobs of the KGB was to weed out racist and kill them right?

Yes. Also the ones that tries to frame Sup Forums as not being racist etc.

>new
Always been here user

There is a slight possibility of crossover, but they are wheelchan operatives. There is also a skreddit op with the same goals.

We split their thread 4 times.

I was the OP for like 2, and some commie retards figured out that I was splitting, so they created their own. Which led to their own demise.

>dont disturb our echochamber

This is you faggots, cant handle anything outside of being spoonfed what you already want to hear.

What a bunch of whiny pussy's

I actually have quite a bit of respect for communists. Maybe a bought too much into the idea that Democrats gave up on the rural working class but I really feel as though Left Nationalism has the working class, as a whole's, best intentions at heart.
I go to a few underground political sites, and I got to say the Trotskyist, the Anar-Communist, the National Bolshevik are all more reasonable, moderate people than the common left liberal, democratic socialist, or worse of all Left Globalist Corporatist. Most are pretty red pilled on who is destroying our society and a lot actually spoke favorably towards Brexit and Trump's nomination.

Nah, CTR was actually disruptive, these faggots are just annoying.

Liberals are cancer and literally everyone on the radical left has always despised then.

At least these fags contain themselves in their generals.

youtube.com/watch?v=MLhYghzNfII

well we wouldn't want to be rude now would we

only because the radical left feels a false sense of superiority at the "milquetoast" liberals, radicals are snobby as fuck

How fucking new are you?

They're from reddit. They made a thread about wanting to infiltrate us.

>only because the radical left feels a false sense of superiority at the "milquetoast" liberals, radicals are snobby as fuck
No, because liberals present themselves as being from the left despite not holding of the lefts beliefs about economics. Socdems are the only exception, American liberalism was always a centrist movement presenting itself as leftist.

Leftypol here.

You're a special type aren't you

If by that you mean the new boogeyman of Sup Forums like CTR, and SRS before that, and JIDF before that, and COINTELPRO before that, sure.

Yes, we're just imagining the spammed generals

most of them were created by Sup Forumsyps who thought they were "splitting up" the discussion, in case you weren't paying attention

"""Racists"""" aka anyone who is even vaguely anti-communist.

I almost feel bad for how gullible you are. Some retard had a field day injecting you with this nonsense.

oh fuck off
they've been maintaining a general for 3 days now

Says the nigger from an actual echo chamber.

Sup Forums is contrarian
the right is now in charge

Put them together

I was talking about simultaneous threads. What's the problem with a long-running general? Afraid of the bantz? at least we're not doing what Sup Forums usually does to other boards, i.e. spamming shitposts and sliding threads

>Post communist threads on Sup Forums
>Thread stays up

>Post anti-communist thread on /leftypol/
>Thread gets deleted

Nice try kid. :-)

shitposts, you don't say?
but anyway the problem here is you're a bunch of egotist asshole who think you can just spam us into being communist
you're all hubris and we're just going to continue to tear you down at every opportunity

there's a thread on nazism up right now. anti-communist threads are tolerated for the sake of discussion so long as they're not shitposts/bait. You want to discuss problems with communism, do so with sincerity.

public opinion changes fast on the internet, as it does on Sup Forums. you're welcome to try to debate with us, but I would hope you do so in good faith.

debate!?
here i thought you wanted banter
i'm not going to play by your rules commie
you're whole ideology is based around manipulating language
at any rate you might as well go into a biker bar and shout "harley davidson's are for queers" by pushing communism on Sup Forums

If you want a debate let me start with a question.


After you prep the bull, do you let it fuck your daughter first, or your wife?

>here i thought you wanted banter
same thing on image boards really

>you're whole ideology is based around manipulating language
that's not true, even the most cursory glance at communist theory would reveal a focus on material conditions.

I have a question for you. After you buy the boss dinner do you invite him home to fuck your wife? Without him you wouldn't be able to provide for her, afterall.

hearty kek thread for the next 20 years

This. Kek is a fickle god.

you continue to miss the point
i want to be a part of your club even less than I want to be a part of the nazi club
fuck off already
i didn't come here to acquire a fucking label

who said anything about nazis faggot?

All these threads like this and the ones they make have these rich faggots trying to seed their bullshit in them. They are just like the sandniggers forcing shit people don't want.

don't you faggots claim to have been here the whole time?
none of you seem to have any real understanding of what this place is

some people have, I was mostly on 8ch

but anyways, an interesting phenomena I've noticed. Say someone's a nazi on Sup Forums and they'll tell you "pol isn't one person guys!" ask why someone suddenly brings up nazis and they'll say you have no idea where you are.

>impotent delusion beta cucks who think forcing a dead meme will do anything for them besides waste their useless time and energy
Sounds like CTR

this is why I don't feel the need to debate you
your kind always expose your retardation on your own
the notion that maybe there are literal neo nazis posting here in addition to other kinds of posters is impossible for you to comprehend

literally subversion on every board that means something

Nice generalization. Read the sticky and lurk more before you spread your fallacious mindset, faggot

Maybe with their time spent here they'll actually learn how to create some decent memes. Their shit is so cringeworthy so far.

see you're doing it again. I didn't even accuse anyone of anything.

what a fucking snake
you commies are really something

You have to go back

Notice how they started shilling almost immediately after Trump won? Do you guys not notice these forced generals spammed with cringy r/socialism and /leftypol/ memes to keep them bumped?

They realized just how influential we are from the election. They saw our meme magic do wonders. Now they're trying to spread their cancer over here in hopes that they'll manipulate our numbers and influence for their own kike interests.

DO NOT LET THESE SUBVERT YOU, IT'S ALL THEY KNOW.

>Sup Forumsyps getting their panties in a twist over nothing once again
I don't know what I expected

how uneducated are you people?

*THESE KIKES

you can't just do that
you can't just act like you didn't get btfo'd
it doesn't work like that

>be accused of generalizing
>I-I wasn't le generalizing
>Sup Forums btfo
Epic trole xD
>yfw

No. CTR had many more people. Leftypol faggots are like the same 10 people posting over and over again. If people here really wanted to, they could go to leftypol and take it over because they simply lack the numbers to stop it from happening.

Also CTR were paid by a neocon warhawk piece of shit to artificially boost her support, whereas Sup Forumssheviks actually practice what they preach. Why is it so unthinkable that, out of the hundreds of people who post here, some may hate capitalism and want to have a thread about that? It's not like you don't have 99 other threads which aren't about Marxism, or that /left/ is the worst thread on the board - every day I see porn spam, /r9k/ expats whinging about >tfw no gf, and borderline illiterate scrawls about movies and videogames. /left/ unironically dindu nuffin.

i was a leftist before Sup Forums now i want to put commies in gas chambers
their mission is hopeless theyll just get redpilled sooner or later

Because leftist arguments are always the same old shit points getting ripped apart. A lot of people arrive here blue-pilled and change unless they have a genuine cuckold fetish. Do you think the memes are just jokes?

>implying
You couldn't rip apart tissue, and that's if you were really trying.

I was a fascist before leftypol. Small world huh?

You must be over 18 to post on this board

>you must be over 18
>he said, as he posted his funny frog man for the billionth time

Your upboats have no power here, newfag

WE ARE BEING WATCHED

"1. Do today Marxists really take serious historic materialism?

During the whole Manifesto Marx and Engels make the claim that the way of producing goods in a society is the pillar of the intellectual production and social behavior. For me this is nothing more than complete and utterly bullshit, not even worth discussing such a simplification. First because you can't say that the entirety of social conducts and relations have only one influence that, pretty much, determines it. Secondly because countries that have the same structure modeled to produce goods and services have different cultures and political atmospheres.

2. Why the transformation from a capitalistic to a communist society has to be done through a violent revolution?

Marx makes this claim. He explains why only a bloody revolution is the way to achieve big transformations on society and uses the French Revolution as a way to demonstrate the transfer of power from the aristocracy to the bourgeois. However, we all know that the transformation from the Medieval to a Bourgeois society was completely different and almost nonviolent in countries like Germany, for example. Again he makes a over simplification cheery picking one example to universalize his claim that has no empirical or scientific base.

3. If Communism is inevitable because the course of history can't be modified, why does he even bother putting up so much work?

No explanation whatsoever.

4. Marx says that he created a law, which would be dialectical materialism, to determine the course of history. Why is this taken serious?

As Karl Popper pointed out, you can't create such law because:

You can't know the knowledge that we will have in the future because if you did, we would already know it. Since we can't know the knowledge we will have in the future and if you accept that knowledge will make influence the future, you can't predict the future. It is all pseudo-science."
Quoting btw.

Original Source: archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/100978143/#100982279

>masonic hand gesture

yeah not a shill at all

"racist" is synonymous with "patriot" in the communist lexicon you fucking retard.

>Oh no, the small platoon of 15 year old retards are coming to shit in our shithole

youre right lad
im now officially a cruz missile

Yeah but you conflate modern liberals, neo liberals(neoconservatives), (American)libertarians, conservatives, and paleo conservatives as liberals. All of these ideologies have rich and separate ideological traditions (internationalism helped breed neo liberalism, hate to inform you).

It's like there is only 3 steps to you: socialists (who are communists), liberals(who are pseudo fascists) and fascists.

To keep it short: You're going to keep losing bud. It's like you have ideological AIDS.

>pseudo fascists

Forgot pic.

They're rebbit refugees.

Can't we just post gore and executions webm and pictures on their threads and sage them ?

No, they actually are /leftypol/.

someone posts this in every /leftypol/ thread like its a silver bullet to communism.
>1. Do today Marxists really take serious historic materialism?
Historical Materialism is a framework for understanding history and human progress. It states that the way production is structured, from top to bottom, has a great influence on how that society functions. i.e Canada is a capitalist nation, and that structure is the primary effector on how the culture functions, and this influence can be observed historically. How seriously it's taken depends on the leftist ideology but it's fairly universal.
>2. Why the transformation from a capitalistic to a communist society has to be done through a violent revolution?
The simple answer is why would a capitalist ruling class voluntarily hand over all the power? They're not stupid, it's a system designed by nature to disadvantage them. You're being disingenuous, though, because Marx states that a proletariat revolution is inevitable, and looking at the number of socialist revolutions that happened within the century of his writing, it's pretty hard to state he was wrong.
>3. If Communism is inevitable because the course of history can't be modified, why does he even bother putting up so much work?
It's inevitable that your pants will get dirty, why do you bother pulling them down to shit?
>4. Marx says that he created a law, which would be dialectical materialism, to determine the course of history. Why is this taken serious?
This isn't true at all. Marx himself said dialectics isn't supposed to generate future outcomes. It's a method of studying social progress and it's interconnectedness. What you're talking about sounds like some stupid tankie shit.

meirl

1. "The claim from Marx is that the way of producing goods is what determines all of society behavior, This has to be one of the stupidest things ever said. He completely ignores biology, geography, history, randomness... I'm not claiming that it doesn't have an effect, but saying it is the ONLY cause is pretty much stupid and, since it can't be proved, pseudo-science.

2. "Looking at the number of socialist revolutions that happened within the century of his writing..."(pic related)

3. Not an argument

4. Pseudo-science.

just newfags lmao

>this from India
Don't you need to go practice pooing in loo? You've almost got it.

>Are these /leftypol/ twats the new CTR?
No Some CTR had a job and wee paid. These people are unemployed middle class Americans.

>>I wonder if these commies realize that Soviet russia and China were racist as fuck towards black people and muslims...
>Yeah that's why one of the jobs of the KGB was to weed out racist and kill them right?


See stailns prewar purge of poles in Russia and genocide of several ethnic groups you commie fuck.