Is Objectivism truth?

What do you think Sup Forums? Was Ayn based?

Why you spamming Rand threads?

Put a new spin on Classical Liberalism. Boomers lapped it up. Nothing that wasn't obvious. Small gubmint, gtfo my wallet/kids/head/life.

But she denied the divinity of Christ. As though morals reeeeally were a product of human "reason".

She collected medicare and social security. Her philosophy that industrialists should be able to pay no tax, exploit without consequences, and sell heroin to children is a pipe dream. I'm a capitalist, but I do believe minimal government is a necessary evil. I do believe that no one should work for free and everyone is entitled to the sweat the their brow, but in practice her system would not work.

Rand had a burning passion to be relevant and to justify a total lack of moral backbone. She saw that she could make sycophants from equally greedy and narcissistic people, so she wrote 8000 pages justifying why society and civilization don't even matter, and how somehow she has been persecuted her entire life.

So pretty much normal jew stuff.

One more reason why Jews are correctly considered to be evil.

Ayn Rand was just really, really dumb, as in full-blown aspergers dumb. That's probably why she appeals to autists so much.

...

Was a big zio cuck baysed, /bol/?

1. Jewish.

2. Her family's business was seized by the Bolsheviks.

3. She was a sexual deviant.

4. Her ideology is basically godless, autistic libertarianism with no altruism at all. If you asked her to spare a dollar for a dying child she would call you a fascist.

>everyone i don't agree with is an autist
>strawman arguments.

...

>Her ideology is basically godless, autistic libertarianism with no altruism at all. If you asked her to spare a dollar for a dying child she would call you a fascist
There's nothing specially about that.

The entire western capitalistic society had that view all through the 19th century, that altruism hurts the economy (it's technically does)

She's worth reading. She'll make you think about morality and reason in a more disciplined way.

That said I think her philsophy suffers from a number of false premises, some of which couldn't be helped given the time period.

I like Ayn Rand. She gets libcucks all worked up and heated, so she must have done something right.

I think objectivism is great individually applied philosophy, and because the majority of people are fucking losers, it'll probably serve whoever adopts it very well. However, I don't support laissez faire capitalism.

>If you asked her to spare a dollar for a dying child she would call you a fascist.

Why do people always say this? Do you have a particular instance from any speeches or books that leads you to believe this?

JEWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW

>However, I don't support laissez faire capitalism.
you're on the side of affirmative action then

Her books helped me keep an open mind about everything and the importance of the individual. They were good reads and I have one to go still.

Personally its hard to take her seriously though when she lived the life of a mooch jew.

Atlas shrugged showed in detail how libs and socialists take over society so thats a plus.

Juden Raus

No. anyone who's anti socialist is a retard.

is being on welfare while preaching against welfare truth?

Her philosophy is as childish and unrealistic as communism.

Depends where you are.

old salty jew wench

She is boring and her writings are lame. She didn't even predict the age of automation, what a dumbass

We live in a world of moochers and producers, if you're against objectivism you're a moocher