I hear this thing on hear alot that
"Diversity + Proximity = Conflict"
Are there any studies on this that have some real basis to this claim? I mean I've seen a lot of people say it but they always get countered with "America is diverse and its a world superpower"
Redpill me on this
Other urls found in this thread:
jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk
evonomics.com
scan.oxfordjournals.org
cyber.sci-hub.ac
emilkirkegaard.dk
claremont.org
westhunt.wordpress.com
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
mods halp bump pls
xd
In good times, when everybody minds his own business, diversity might work. In bad times diversity will become an enemy, one side will blame the other for societies cancer. there will be war and the stronger will take over, unless some outside force interferes. bad times are inevitable.
here comes the jew, the jew is the guy who makes 2 or more sides fight over some trivial shit so they can sit back and profit. so what the jew does is help create bad times, so conflict emerges. conflict = profit.
That's a rather larger pupper.
>here comes the jew, the jew is the guy who makes 2 or more sides fight over some trivial shit so they can sit back and profit.
Here's where Im stuck tho swiss bro, cultural marxism pushes for the fact that there are no races and everyone is equal
Yet at the same time pushes for the "oppressed peoples" i.e. blacks, hispanics, etc, to be given power, thus contradicting themselves
Is the contradiction on purpose?
Also, what profit do the Jews get out of destroying society? I've known that they are behind it, but what do they get out of it?
Why yes, yes it is
what a good dogger
Yes very good dogger :^ )
Whats ur take on my question fellow burger?
reeeeee
bump
mods pls bump
Conflict isnt necessarily armed conflict, it could just be a conflict of values and which role the government should play in peoples lives. Compare the governments of the US and Sweden for example. Centralized government is more easily formed and face less problems in ethnically homogenous Sweden because people trust eachother/public officials more because they believe that all the people around them function pretty much the same way as they do. Meanwhile the US constitution is all about minimizing centralized government and ensuring the power of the states. This system is much more suited for a "multicultural" society. Although this system will also face problems because central and south-americans prefer big government and most whites in the US wants it to be smaller