Redpill me on the Templars pol...

Redpill me on the Templars pol. were they just pious Christian warrior monks with superb fort building skills or crypto baphomet worshippers who introduced heresy to europe and hoarded jew gold?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Smith_Mansion_House)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nauvoo_House)
cofchrist.org/js/homestead/default.asp)
dialoguejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/sbi/articles/Dialogue_V17N03_89.pdf).
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

They took the Gnosticism redpill obviously.

They were lizard jews from mars who were trying to awaken an ancient space parasite burrowed deep into our flat earth

They were globalist banksters and where dealt with like any globalist bankster should be dealt with

This and the curse was a meme

What curse?

Why would you want to know.
Your country didn't even existed back then

Except this faggot loved them when they financed his whims and desires, only wanted to deal with them when he couldn't pay them back.

C U C K

I heard that after the Templars were throw out of France they allied with the English and became the privateers who sailed to the new world. I think all the Asscreed games are probably based more on fact than on fiction.

It is said that while being burned alive, Jacques de Molay, their leader, cursed the king's dynasty. The Capetian dynasty's branch went extinct some time after that.

And? Specializing in usury is a dangerous business, Jews' history is a proof of that.

How is it dangerous business? Interest is the cost of capital.

If you want to link every mighty people in History that had a taste for esoteric knowledge, you can end up with pretty fucked theory.

If I don't want to pay my debts, I can accuse you to poison the well, no one will protest, some will even help me framing you, you die, I no longer have debts. This is how usury is dangerous business.

...

Here's another interesting theory I've read, Baphomet was in fact just a distortion of the word Mahomet (Muhammad in French). They were actually accused of being crypto-islamist but then a more fucked up idol were written around this.

That is an Obama = Osama tier theory.

Google it friend. At that time, it was easy for words to be distorted. Not that I believe that the accusations were true, but I won't cry over people that went from defenders of pilgrims to international bankers either.

Too complicated for your little mind?

The Templars were the mercenaries who whisked Jesus away from the Levant to Southern France after his mock execution. They say that Jesus' crucifixion was staged
--> Jesus came from an extremely wealthy family. King Solomon, King David, etc.
--> he deliberately was arrested to be sentenced to death.
--> he refused myhrr and wine because it would interfere with the heart-slowing poison he had already taken
--> the Roman soldiers were gambling for his clothes, proving they could be bought.
--> the "blood and water" that came from the spear was the from a skein of already coagulated blood, probably from a lamb.
--> the Roman soldiers did NOT break Jesus' legs like they did all the others
--> the Roman soldiers did NOT leave Jesus on the cross for weeks like the did the others
--> The new sepulcher was specially crafted by a wealthy friend specifically for Jesus

Once people stop milling about the grave, the Templars swoop in and whisk Jesus away to a waiting boat that takes him to Southern France.

So of course the Templars knew for a fact that the "rising from the dead" stories we all bullshit. That's why they were/are still a secret order.

This is the red pill for critical readers of the New Testament.

>this pic
Yeah, they totally worshipped a demon created in XIX century using mangled name of Muhammad.

Makes sense considering most of the latter crusades were marred with failure and sabotage. Just look at the 7th crusade and the sack of constantinople.

ok so what did jesus do with the rest of his life

>hoarded jew gold?
They were paid a fuckton of Jew Gold to get Jesus out of Palestine.

It wouldn't be the first time Jesus fled, would it? He just got much better at it with age.

>Da vinchi code
>repilled

Kek

You can literally read a Wikipedia article on Baphomet and not LARP like this. It will take 5 minutes of your time.

This is pretty believable, especially the fact that the Roman soldiers were probably paid more than the average Judean, so why would they want his clothes if he was an average Judean?

>Da vinchi code
>repilled

You mean The Templar Revelation?

>This is pretty believable, especially the fact that the Roman soldiers were probably paid more than the average Judean, so why would they want his clothes if he was an average Judean?

Right, no one is going to cast lots for rags.

The fuck are you on about?

>so why would they want his clothes if he was an average Judean?
Perhaps its because Jesus was very well known in the area they were stationed and they could sell his shit on the side for some coin

>The fuck are you on about?
The Templars are the good guys who saved Jesus.

They were heretics becase they refused to believe Jesus died. They actually had living proof that he didn't.

The Church demonized them and falsely accused them of heresy like it did the Jews.

Most people fall for the crucifixion and Templar demonization because it's the stories they desperately want to believe.

The red-pill clues take us a different direction.

They were faithful, but also acquired tons of knowledge. This knowledge might have lead some to become heretics, but the bulk would not have been.

French greed drove them to bribe the pope to declare them heretics, which ended with the Templars breaking up and going to Portugal, Scotland, and North America.

The ones in North America set up a small country, following the Norse, chances are they took with them some old heretical books of the bible, and might, if one believes the story of the Mormon Joseph smith, might have buried some of the scrolls, which he would latter find, and preach.

what about the knights hospitaller?

>Perhaps its because Jesus was very well known in the area they were stationed and they could sell his shit on the side for some coin

The law of parsimony suggests that his fine clothes were valuable and worth bidding on. Which also keeps the Roman soldiers distracted.

Moloch worshipers, they were, are and will be pro shillary

were good guys in 1st crusade, but them money hit them hard, even more when they were back in Europe

the Templars swoop in and whisk Jesus away to a waiting boat that takes him to Southern France.

Are you implying Jesus lived after the X century or Templars were around in Roman times?

>Are you implying Jesus lived after the X century

this is what he is implying, because you know French>Britain>USA Gods counties, approved by hesus himself

>were good guys in 1st crusade, but them money hit them hard, even more when they were back in Europe

Unlikely. They started out with a lot of gold from Jesus' family. They took a vow of poverty for themselves, so just like the mormon church (doesn't pay its clergy) it accumulated wealth quickly.

The largest landowner in Florida is the mormon church.

Like all leaders of fake religions, Joseph Smith was a very wealthy man, too.
ASSETS OWNED BY JOSEPH/EMMA:
• Joseph Smith Mansion House (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Smith_Mansion_House)
• Nauvoo House built by order of revelation at the Church’s expense (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nauvoo_House)
• Homestead house in Nauvoo (cofchrist.org/js/homestead/default.asp)
• Brigham Young claimed that Emma owned $50,000 in *city property* when they finished settling the assets with Emma ($1.4 million in 2010 dollars). (dialoguejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/sbi/articles/Dialogue_V17N03_89.pdf).
• Quincy property (aka Cleveland farm)
• One or more additional farms (Brigham Young twice used the plural when referring to farms given to Emma, saying that “besides these farms she owned city property worth fifty thousand dollars”).
• Owned at least two steamships: the Maid of Iowa and the Nauvoo (Joseph Smith owed a debt on the latter at the time of his death that was settled for over $5,000 (over $140,000 in 2010 dollars).
• Steamship docks (ownership was under dispute—still looking for more info on this one).
• Egyptian papyrus and mummies purchased by friends of Joseph Smith for $2,400 in 1835 ($60,000 in 2010 dollars).
o Mother Smith would charge admission (25 cents or around $7 in 2010 dollars) to see the Egyptian mummies and papyrus. Lying, Joseph reportedly told visitors that his mother had purchased them herself for $6,000 ($150,000 in 2010 dollars).
o They remained in the Smith family until Emma sold them shortly after Lucy Mack Smith’s death in 1855.

On the exterior they are badass but on the inside they just used Christianity as a means to their own ends.

>Are you implying Jesus lived after the X century or Templars were around in Roman times?

They were the original mercenaries. They weren't called the Templars back then

How were they called and how come no one speaks of them before the XII century?

(((shill))) go back to reading your blasphemous talmudic lies

First three crusades were based. just taking back the holy land from muslum invaders and protecting Christian pilgrims. Then after round the 7th or 8th it just went retarded and they sacked Constantinople and gave up the entire effort. they were probably infiltrated or something since they began practicing usury and making money off of other Christians.

>(((shill))) go back to reading your blasphemous talmudic lies
The new testament is not the Talmud

>How were they called and how come no one speaks of them before the XII century?
They were a secret order?
At the point where they (1) made an enemy of the pope and (2) made to much money to remain secret, then we find out about them.

I bet your one of those that think Paul created his own version of the gospel

Moar for big tits

>based in southern France
>Baphomet is "Sophia" ciphered
>accused of sexual religious rites
>searched under Jerusalem for hidden knowledge
>survivors probably formed Freemasonry
Templars were secret Gnostics.

baphomet worshippers

A few years ago a junior researcher stumbled across a formal Vatican decree that exonerated the Templars.

In other words, they actually din do nuffin wrong. At least as it relates to the charges from Philip the Fair.

Did they pick up some customs/rites that were too esoteric or simply counter to the Church? Did they get greedy as gold keepers and become usurious lenders? It's hard to say.

Coulombe makes the point that they sort of lost their Crusader mission. The other orders found ways to reinvent themselves, but the Templars sort of became dedicated to the administration of their property. So my guess is that the truth is a mix of Philip just wanting the money and the Templars straying from their duty as Christian Knights.

First idiots who fought a war for (((them)))

Molay cursed the king (and his descendants), Philippe le Bel, the "prosecutor" and the Pope.

The next years, the prosecutor died, the Pope died, the king died.
After that, Louis X, the first child died after 18 months of Reign without heir.
Then Philippe V, the second son died after 5 years of reign, without heir (his son died when he was 1).
And finally, Charles IV died after 6 years of reign without sons.
And with Charles IV, the Capetian main branch died.

It's the reason for the hundred years war because the kinh of England was the grand son of Philippe le Bel.

Indeed it's for financial reasons. Philippe was in debt with them. No bankers = no debts.

>masonic propaganda

Except that's fucking retarded

>Indeed it's for financial reasons. Philippe was in debt with them. No bankers = no debts.
Well, lenders back then could impose conditions that would drive policy to some degree. This gave the Templars a political voice

>Except that's fucking retarded
Except all those fucking actual bible claims
--> Jesus came from an extremely wealthy family. King Solomon, King David, etc.
--> he deliberately was arrested to be sentenced to death.
--> he refused myhrr and wine
--> the Roman soldiers were gambling for his clothes, proving they could be bought.
--> the Roman soldiers did NOT break Jesus' legs like they did all the others
--> the Roman soldiers did NOT leave Jesus on the cross for weeks like the did the others
--> The new sepulcher was specially crafted by a wealthy friend specifically for Jesus

This needs to happen.

Lots of nobles were Templar but Philippe le Bel was an absolut monarch, the most powerful in Europe. He doesn't give a fuck about the polotical power of the Templars.

Also, his favorites counselors like Enguerrand de Marigny were common-born, not noble.

A black two-headed Eagle is GOD; even a Black Triangle is He. In His claws He beareth a sword; yea, a sharp sword is held therein.
This Eagle is burnt up in the Great Fire; yet not a feather is scorched. This Eagle is swallowed up in the Great Sea; yet not a feather is wetted. so flieth He in the air, and lighteth upon the earth at His pleasure.
So spake IACOBUS BURGUNDUS MOLENSIS the Grand Master of the Temple; and of the GOD that is Ass-headed did he dare not speak.

As above, so below. The name of 33rd Mystery is Baphomet.

Jacobus Burgundus Molensis suffered martyrdom in the City of Paris in the year 1314 of the vulgar era.

The secrets of his order were, however, not lost, and are still being communicated to the worthy by his successors, as is intimated by the last paragraph, which implies knowledge of a secret worship, of which the Grand Master did not speak.

The Eagle may be identified, though not too closely, with the Hawk previously spoken of.

It is perhaps the Sun, the exoteric object of worship of all sensible cults; it is not to be confused with other objects of the mystic aviary, such as the swan, phoenix, pelican, dove and so on.

Baphomet is the mysterious name of the God of the Templars.

The Eagle described in paragraph 1 is that of the Templars.

33 is the number of the Last Degree of Masonry.

>Jesus came from an extremely wealthy family. King Solomon, King David, etc.
this may be true as translations from "carpenter" also mean scribe (if my memory serves)
> he refused myhrr and wine
at the end he took wine
> the Roman soldiers were gambling for his clothes, proving they could be bought.
true as it was a seamless garment
> the Roman soldiers did NOT break Jesus' legs like they did all the others
thats because they others were still alive and he already dead so whats the point
> the Roman soldiers did NOT leave Jesus on the cross for weeks like the did the others
his wealthy friend paid to have him removed and place in his own tomb
>The new sepulcher was specially crafted by a wealthy friend specifically for Jesus
wealthy friend but not for Jesus where are you getting this from? he was place there but that does not prove it was made for him.

leaving alone the claim that they went to southern france for no reason

as a follow up which others brought you to this conclusion

this is not a theory

they were gnostics...they worshiped Sophia which is wisdom. In aramaic wisdom is Baphomet .. gnosticism is the ultimate red pill

What you even know about Christianity? You allied with the Ottomans against the rest of Europe.

>tfw even the medieval France was a cuck for Arabs