/Fasc/

/Fasc/

A Fascist general for Fascists and those interested.

Previous Thread: We are reactionary and revolutionary, we are liberal and conservative, we are radicals and pascifists.
We are united not by blood, not by class but by hope for unity and glory.


conservapedia.com/Fascist_Manifesto,_1919

worldfuturefund.org/wffmaster/Reading/Germany/mussolini.htm

reakt.org/fiume/charter_of_carnaro.html

We are both reactionaries and revolutionaries, we are radicals and pascifists, we are theists and atheists, we are men and women.
We are fascists, we strive for the greatness not just of ourselves but of our homelands and comrades in the defense of all that is civilization and order.

Be respectful and please try to keep conversations relatively "intellectual"


Good fascists/similar or influential people to get an introduction

Oswald Mosely
Jose Antonio Primo de Rivera
Benito Mussolini
Adolf Hitler
The Strassers
Stepan Bandera
Corneliu Zelea Codreanu
Salazar
Ramiro Ledesma Ramos
Ettore Ovazza
Gaetano Mosca
Friedrich Nietzsche
Charles Maurras
Enrico Corradini
Filippo Tommaso Marinetti
Johann Plenge
Alceste De Ambris
Gabriele d'Annunzio
Juan Perón

Types of Fascism

Italian
Falangism
National-Syndicalism
British Union
National-Socialism
Strasserism
Meme futurism
Clerical Fascism
Brazilian Integralism
Peronism

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=MYXhOT1ZMEg
counter-currents.com/2011/07/the-doctrine-of-fascism/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

...

Good job user.
Bumping.

How come none of you faggots want to admit you're fascists, but all of us commies have no problem with saying we're communists or even tankies?

Because a lot of us are fascists without realizing that's what we are.

That says more about society and jews in general than anything. Fascism is the only direct threat to their power structure. Why would they not want a bunch of communist proles at their disposal, of course they will encourage the useful idiots.

>Fascism is the only direct threat to their power structure
What the fuck are you even talking about nigger? Being forced to give all their money to goyim is a pretty big threat.

...

>he thinks communism helps the working class
haven't seen someone this blue pilled in awhile LMAO.

>Peronism
top kek

Peron probably but peronism isn't fascist. Everyone here (liberals, right, center right, etc) claims to be peronist. It's hard to understand if you're not argentinian

Being a communist is not illegal

peronism is a fucking lie, a morphing ideology that is used to get the poor people's vote.

redpill me on peronism

...

Here or IRL? If you're talking about here we all talk about (and practically brag about) how we're fascist. If you're talking about real life, that kind of thing can get you fired and beaten up by an antifa gang, not to mention turn away anyone who might have listened to your ideas. I find that it is surprisingly easy to convince someone that a fascist system would work, as long as you don't describe it as fascist.

OMFG
You guys are fucking persistents trying to push this shit here.
Go back to your occupied school or campi

Evidently you are not my brother.

Then why is this thread empty?

Bump
Nothing triggers leftcucks more than Fascism, plus I'm interested in Fascist political theories.

1) It was recently made
2) There's usually also a NatSoc thread
3) We're usually BTFOing the commies on their own threads
4) There tends to be highs and lows to the rate of posting. Sometimes a fascist or NatSoc thread gets to the maximum bump count really quickly, sometimes it dies early on.

>1) It was recently made
It's older than the /left/ thread and has less replies

>2) There's usually also a NatSoc thread
>>Search results for: natsoc
>>Nothing Found

>3) We're usually BTFOing the commies on their own threads
And they BTFO you in here, it should be equal

>4) There tends to be highs and lows to the rate of posting. Sometimes a fascist or NatSoc thread gets to the maximum bump count really quickly, sometimes it dies early on.
You're on a year-long low, are you?

Friendly reminder that Quinsling did nothing wrong.

Hitler, Himmler and the majority of the NSDAP was total nordicboo, so they would end with a very good deal in the end.

Should i be fasc or populist? Which is better?

These pictures just make me so sad.

All the wasted opportunities. Where could we be now if the gommie/liberal mind poison hadn't destroyed the only really progressive world order.

Populism is clearly better but don't take it from me

yeah yeah your shitty bait thread is soaring as always, just like the cuckold and Sup Forums can't refute this really dumb tweet threads

clickbait economy at its finest

this thread is so fucking edgy, I can already tell you faggots haven't amounted to shit in your life. I guarantee you that most of you in this thread are either

>in community college
>working as wagecucks in a retail job
>no job NEETs
>underage and still living with mommy and daddy

I'm a proud fascist. Even in my job i advocate for heli rides and the ideals of plinio.

More like, rich people in fascism are the left picture and poor people in fascism are the middle picture. Actually it's the same with capitalism.

And there you go.

You can only admit to agreeing with fascist ideals if you have no career that can be affected by the persecution of the victors of the ideological war.

Do any of you Faschy Goys have a PDF copy of this book?

The Economic Foundations of Fascism by Paul Einzig
youtube.com/watch?v=MYXhOT1ZMEg

At least people are allowed to be rich under facism

Interesting read:

counter-currents.com/2011/07/the-doctrine-of-fascism/

>Fascism rejects in democracy the absurd conventional lie of political equalitarianism clothed in the dress of collective irresponsibility and the myth of happiness and indefinite progress. But if democracy can be understood in other ways, that is, if democracy means not to relegate the people to the periphery of the State, then Fascism could be defined as an “organized, centralized, authoritarian democracy.”

>Fashits

You talk like that's a good thing. You should know what inequality is, Juan.

There are leaders and potentats in every system. The most influential members of the party aren't at all different from the aristocrats. This is why every communist regime gradually ends up like a monarchy, ruled by political dynasties.

Egalitarianism is always just a ticket to a forceful rearrangement of the status quo. It never lasts, there are always people, who can and will grab more power and influence.

It's a convenient lie greedy people get hooked on to justify their ambitions.

Oh i know what inequality is. What i don't know is why you think its bad.

The concept of Egalitarianism is just plain stupid. Nobody is equal. Everyone is different and that's why people will
Inevitably be FORCED to be equal into a egalitarian mindset.

>doing double degree, Medicine and Boimed Sci.
>hate subhumans and inferior races
>planning on doing a phd thesis on human subspecies and genetics.
>fascist as fuck
>blonde/blue eye white fiance
>working while studying

Fuck off commie.

Irl I've said I'm ethnic facist before on my college campus. i guess it just depends on what type of person you are though. just enjoy as people try to throw hot spaghetti at you as you smugly and condescendingly shrug it off. It's easy to trigger leftists into supergiant out and making fools of themselves. The tricky part is maintaining your composure. It helps to be confidently stoic

>what inequality is, Juan

Something that stems from people. Look at every group of humans ever. There are always people, who are more competent and there are people, who will become leaders.

In every workgroup, in every class, in every sports team. People start to arrange into assuming different roles.

Monarchy, capitalism and rigid systems try to forcefully converse already obsolete states and hold back the natural fluctuation, socialism forcefully wants to trigger a rearrangement without the organic need for one.

A point of corporatism and third way is that people realize that what's important isn't a class struggle, but harmony between people.

If workers have value and good negotiating power, they are as valuable as they actually are and nobles can't exploit them. But still, it is insincere that every single man, the general and grunt soldier is equally important and have equal value for society.

And then it's only logical that more important people should have priority in the distribution of goods and services.

Israel is Fascist.

egalitarianism is always just a transitional state.

Look at every "communist" society. Directors of state companies are just like managers of capitalist companies, party functionaries act like actual nobility, political dynasties everywhere...

Equality is always like a reset. And then people will start to struggle for power again.

Great video user.
Thanks for linking it.

Pls explain the difference in fascist economics of Hitler vs Mussolini

You want to continue living in your favelas?

>making fools of themselves.
None of the people around you think people are fools for arguing with an "ethnic facist." They only think you're a fool.

...

Equality is a reset because is just an old KGB tatic to desmoralize other nations. Just like Yuri Bezmenov points out in his interviews.

USA is full of favelas because of capitalism too?
what kind of commie retarded brain do you have?

>Directors of state companies are just like managers of capitalist companies
Government shouldn't have that much power, workers should own the means of production. Socialism > communism my name is only "Commie" because this ideology doesn't have a nickname.

Your country is full of favelas while the rich men live in towers. The USA is also full of favelas, they just just them "cities."

Codreanu's writings are essential reading for anyone looking to learn how to further the cause of nationalism

Oh i see, you think is bad because some people live in the Favelas.
I don't really care about them desu. I rather live in a society that have some people on the low and some people on the hight end, than live in a society that everyone lives in the low end.

>Your country is full of favelas while the rich men live in towers.

What's your argument ? People shouldn't strive for the best because some people just can't do it ?

We all should live in mud-huts them...

>You're on a year-long low, are you?
Oh wow, has the time really gone by that fast? I don't recall making this thread a year ago.

Seriously though, just earlier today the we had a full fascist thread, and there's been exactly two fascist threads ever so far, so I'd say we're doing pretty fine.

>And they BTFO you in here, it should be equal
It's not. Usually we BTFO so hard that the commie threads basically turn into fascist threads, whereas you're lucky if you actually get our attention over on these threads. Unfortunately that means we're usually divided between about three threads, usually a mixture of NatSoc, fascist, and commie threads.

>Salazar
Why do you people always include Salazar? He was a Catholic authoritarian and a traditionalist. He didn't dress up in little uniforms like a retard and run around pretending to be a general. Stop this crap and stop sullying his name and his legacy by parceling him in with manchildren.

>Workers should own the means of production.

Why ?

You live in Brazil bro

So you are part of the "I've got mine, everyone else can fuck themselves" group. If your skin wasn't shit-colored you could pass for an American.

>He didn't dress up in little uniforms like a retard and run around pretending to be a general

So? This is as far from an argument as you can get
Also, Hitler was a decorated war hero, so hardly "pretending" anything

>leaf

What if those rich men are simply the sons of men who earned their money? By being born to the right person, they've "strived" for what they have?

>communist
You have no place in this nation you despise, go to Venezuela or Cuba if you want to see what your poison ideology has brought about.

>So? This is as far from an argument as you can get
So he was not a fascist. Stop propagating this idea that he was. Fascism is irreconcilable with the Catholic faith and Salazar was keenly aware of this.

Well, yeah, why do you think we're fascist and not communist or worse? Have you seen those communist protestors, with their street gangs and homelessness and zero education? Do you really think we want to emulate that level of failure? No man, you get a good job, you get a good wife and kids, and then like the Trump voters this election, you keep your head down until the vote comes. Don't make your move until people will listen.

Are you implying that nobody is filthy rich in Brazil or something ? Or was that a pathetic attempt to make a joke ?

>Oh wow, has the time really gone by that fast? I don't recall making this thread a year ago.

>Seriously though, just earlier today the we had a full fascist thread, and there's been exactly two fascist threads ever so far, so I'd say we're doing pretty fine.
We are not arguing about your threads you narcissist, we are arguing about the presence of fascists (who call themselves fascists) on Sup Forums. And very few of you call yourselves fascists, even if you are fascists.

>Usually we BTFO so hard that the commie threads basically turn into fascist threads, whereas you're lucky if you actually get our attention over on these threads. Unfortunately that means we're usually divided between about three threads, usually a mixture of NatSoc, fascist, and commie threads.
Posting spiderman memes qualify as "BTFO" do they? Fascists in /left/ threads only post memes, that's not a BTFO.

Because he was a fascist. Just because you like him doesn't make him not a fascist. Get over it.

Fascism is in literally no way incompatible with Catholicism. Salazar was a corporatist authoritarian in the mold of Mussolini, he was a textbook fascist.

Because they produce? Why shouldn't a digger own his shovel? Why shouldn't a miner own his pickaxe?

>Fascism is irreconcilable with the Catholic faith
Have you lost your dad's bike? The Vatican were some of the most ardent supporters of Mussolini's Italy.

you know your ideology is meme-tier when no one can agree on what it is.

If you're going to start kicking people out for thoughtcrimes you shouldn't call yourselves the land of the free.

>And very few of you call yourselves fascists, even if you are fascists.
No. There's a lot of people that get called fascist by liberals or conservatives, but actual fascists know when they are fascist, and on anonymous online imageboards they call themselves fascist.

>Posting spiderman memes qualify as "BTFO" do they? Fascists in /left/ threads only post memes, that's not a BTFO.
Well, when you guys actually have a successful communist society, you get back to me on that.

In communism the worker does not own the means of production, the state does. Also, a worker can afford a shovel or pickaxe, not a whole factory. If a worker wants to enter in an engagement wherein he uses someone else's tools to produce something with his labor in exchange for pay, why should the government stop him and demand they take the product of his labor for nothing but what they deign to give him?
In capitalism the worker has the choice of where to give his labor and what to exchange it for.

Fascism doesn't have a definition, people who call themselves fascists just want to rebel against society, like a 6th grader who just found bad words for the first time.

Fascism is in no way incompatible with Catholicism, stop being silly.

>If you're going to start kicking people out for thoughtcrimes
Who has done this? If anyone it is the left, currently. Communist government have always oppressed any ideologues against the state.

Fascism is pretty well defined, there's just a lot of subtypes that add various stuff.

Im a fascist i admit it

>muh ebin helicopter rides xD

Pinochet was a neoliberal kike puppet, dumbass

I don't know if you realize but the "1%" is not static. People go up and crumble back down in matter of days.

And even if they're just the son of a rich men i don't see why they shouldn't give up daddys money.

After all parents will allways try to give their son the best chances at survival they can. Would you not care for the future of your child ? Or maybe try to leave a legacy for them ?
Here in Brazil people allways say "I want my child to be able to do what i was not able to do"

>but actual fascists know when they are fascist, and on anonymous online imageboards they call themselves fascist.
And we're back to the start, only a small percentage of fascists here call themselves fascists.

>Well, when you guys actually have a successful communist society, you get back to me on that.
Nice deflection. China.

>You have no place in this nation you despise, go to Venezuela or Cuba
Sounds like you want to kick people out for thoughtcrimes.

Yes, it is, and that was essentially the conclusion that Pope Pius XI came to in Non Abbiamo Bisogno - a Magisterial document. Salazar was not at all in the mold of Mussolini and all one needs to do to understand this fact is comparatively examine the relationship between the Church and the Estado Novo vs the Church and the RSI. There was a fundamentally different understanding of Church-state relations, and it's not to be treated as something negligible.

You might also want to take into consideration that PIDE dealt with actual fascists in precisely the same way they dealt with socialists: by arresting them or driving them underground. "Textbook fascist" is a phrase that cannot be uttered in the same sentence as the name António de Oliveira Salazar. Period.

Then whats the definition?

Sup Forums is at least 80% buttblasted teenagers venting because their oneitis is getting rodded by BBC.

This, communism is universalist and absolute by design, so is liberalism, to an extent. Fascism exists inside the context of nations and peoples.

>t. people who know nothing about the Church's struggle with fascism

i Judge a man by his deeds and not by some little fagot labeling him in a anime image board. Fucking nigger.

You just said that rich men should get to live in their towers while the rest starve because they've "striven" for it. Why should the sons of rich men get to live in towers if they've done nothing to earn it?

No, he wasn't. And you should probably open a book at some point in your life.

Bump

>He was a Catholic authoritarian and a traditionalist.
That's a fascist. You don't need to perform a coup to become a fascist.

Well u seem to forget we are facists and u do the same

>China
>Successful?
>Communist?
Ummm...we're talking about the same China right? The China that killed 45 million of its own people and destroyed its culture in the "Great Leap Forward"? The China that is most definitely NOT a communist state today?

Yes, "that's a fascist". I presume that's why PIDE cracked down hard on fascists under Salazar's leadership.

I find it incredible that people who clearly know nothing about a given subject somehow manage to come up with opinions on it. Don't you ever sit there and think "You know what, I don't really know much about this. Maybe I shouldn't just talk nonsense for the sake of (You)s," or has that thought never crossed your mind?

>Why should the sons of rich men get to live in towers if they've done nothing to earn it?

Because that the legacy of their parents and you can't deny that RIGHT that a Father has to leave his legacy to his SON !!!

And if the son fucks up, he's gonna be down there with the peasants very soon. Is the concept of Family so destroy nowdays that burgers can't get their heads around it ?

China is ruled by the Communist Party and it's the biggest superpower in the world.

Fascists are authoritarian and fascists are traditionalist. Many fascists are Catholic.