I used to believe the lies about the holocaust, but then I began to research on my own sand found the truth.
Hitler didn't want to kill the Jews, he just wanted the out of Germany. The "death camps" we're like labor camps. There is no actual evidence gastas used to kill them en mass.
It's mathematically impossible to have cremated 6 millions in the time described with the technology used back then as discussed in the following video.
Bump. I used to believe the lie as well, until I learned about the Weimar revolt, after that the whole thing just started unwinding.
Jeremiah Carter
The last video is pretty based.... even though I don't agree with his brand of religion. He's pretty spot on.
Caleb Peterson
...
Daniel Johnson
>youtu.be/-rhGMCYWqKI this guy was actually barred from entering my country recently, something to do with him being homophobic iirc. strange coincidence.
Chase Thomas
Jesus christ no one said that 6 mln were cremated. 6 mln killed. There were special units of soldiers whose one and only job were to seek and destroy Jews
Jose Baker
>It's mathematically impossible to have cremated 6 millions in the time described with the technology used back then as discussed in the following video.
They didn't use individual furnaces like this video suggests. They used huge pits where they would cremate the bodies.
So yes, the maths actually is in favor of the official story.
Owen Cook
There was a Camp Hospital in Auschwitz. There were sports facilities and playing fields. >A death camp >camp hospital >sports facilities and fields
Gabriel Ramirez
...
Brayden Miller
...
Luke Baker
>It's another "make shit up about and falsely compare apples to oranges in order to make false conclusions" episode
Colton Rodriguez
Exactly. Why cut their hair and delouse ithem if they were going to be gassed?
Eli Lewis
You should take you research to Himmler
or you are a blatent disingenious propagandist from stormfront who seeks to play stupid people
Julian Rodriguez
To label prisoners, moron. It's part of the dehumanizing process and allows them to keep track of prisoners. They used them for labor as well. It wasn't just "show up at the camp and get gassed." There were many different, categorical processes that decided who died when. But nope, you're too stupid to understand it. It surely has to be a massive conspiracy that no one can "prove" isn't real without being laughed at like an idiot....
Benjamin Watson
Not an argument
Gavin Walker
I've always held the theory that the labor camps existed, but the numbers were ramped up to make it seem all the more horrifying. It was only recently that I started doubting the actual machinations of the camps as jewish extermination camps though
Hunter Brooks
Anything you say, Mr. Goldberg.
I'm sure all history is 100% correct as taught by liberal teachers armed with liberal arts degrees.
No one is questioning the Jews were singled out, marched to camps, forced into labor, and even killed. The questions arise with the authenticity of the 6,000,000 and use of gas chambers and mass cremations. The extent of the horror story is what's questionable.
Eli Nguyen
Hello JIDF , nice to see you again
Brody Kelly
B-bad goy Stop turning all these goyi-I-I mean good citizens into hateful anti-Semites! H-how dare you question the holy sanctity of the six million!
David Robinson
That's just a way that "revisionists" try to justify the fact that they want to be full-blown deniers. Trying to pretend that you're not being an idiot because I'm (((them))) doesn't make you any less retarded.
The beauty is the 6 million figure IS up for debate and in fact proving something new about a historical concept is HOW you get your PhD in the field. Historians CRAVE new information and providing such gets you merit and even notoriety. The 6 million figure is the current, exhaustively researched value. Notice how the value was wildly adjusting during the years after the war, only to stabilize around a viable figure as data was compiled and research consolidated.
>S-s-stop making me look stupid!!! You're just (((them)))!!!!
Hudson Rodriguez
I was agreeing, numb-nuts
Liam Campbell
The goyim are waking up to the truth, fire rises, my oven is on and set to 616 to be ready for the next shoah to begin
Kevin Nguyen
If it's a matter of uncovering the truth, then have 14 countries made it a crime to publically question its authenticity? Seems to me there's something to hide.
People are free to question the Catholics Churches checkered past with no barriers. But, say the holocaust, as it's being taught, is wrong - whoa off to jail with you!
Jayden Wright
Holocaust deniers are really a stupid lot.
The nazi's who did this were proud of what they did. They bragged about it, they talked about in great detail after the war.
It's not like there isn't a mountain of evidence that proves that it happened.
But now that the people who did this are dead, you come along and claim "oh no, they were just lying, they didn't do all of the things they openly admitted that they did".
Grow the fuck up.
Asher Carter
Apart from the mathematics of there being too many jews in the world today for the 6 million number to be even remotely true.
>The "death camps" were like labor camps exactly, they made inmates work to death. malnourished and with bad clothing you're not going to last long.
Connor Bell
"Wahh, countries have decided it's in their moral interest to try quash racist, intentionally historically denying movements that has genocidal and supremacist intentions!!"
You can't possibly come up with a reason why the countries that personally witnessed the horror don't want people denying it and trying to spread propaganda? Really?
Why did not a single Nazi on trial stand up and go "They're framing me! This is all a lie!" Not one. It's always "I was following orders" or "I didn't know." The fact of the matter is this isn't a brand new precident and it isn't the last attempt at such. THere's currently movements pushing for the same regulations regarding the Armenian Genocide or the Rwanda Genocide. But shockingly, they don't have the same issue with "revisionists" like the Jewish Holocaust does... I wonder why?
Easton Cook
No. Wrong.
Jace Nelson
...
Benjamin Reyes
Just show the evidence then people can't deny it. Simple. No need to make it illegal. It only needs to be illegal if there's a legitimate case for denial.
Jacob Collins
...
Jaxon Ortiz
For those who prefer video, there is this excellent documentary on Netflix:
How the fuck did they pull that one off? I know our media is bluepilled as fuck but how do you justify to people "he said mean words with 1st Amendment so he in jayle now?"
Lincoln Roberts
Exactly. The only reason to make it illegal is because the truth hasn't been "released." There is something to hide, regardless of Mr. Goldberg's triggered posts above approving of limiting free speech.
Ryan Lewis
The evidence is literally available to anyone that wants it. There are books written on the subject. Documents from the Nazi regime itself. Allied reconnaissance of the facilities. Physical evidence that is in museums. The literal facilities themselves. Photos of the atrocities. Witness testimony. Straight up admissions by the high command and even townsfolk who didn't directly participate.
But you don't care. It's all fake to you. It's all a massive conspiracy and a lie and nothing would ever convince you otherwise. The beauty of it is if you actually had real concrete evidence, you would have had it accepted and added to the plethora of available knowledge. But you don't. You have incorrectly cited youtube videos and neo-nazi "revisionists" who are laughed out of any reputable research community.
Brayden Sullivan
All of the Nuremberg defendants denied knowing. But none of them denied the documentary evidence establishing an extermination program.
There are some questions about Auschwitz. It was certainly not designed as a death camp, and the building they show the tourists there is a fake. But the Aktion Reinhardt Camps certainly existed, as did the Einsatzgruppen. There is documentary evidence showing the number of people killed in these two stages of the Holocaust (see the report of Richard Korherr, Himmler's chief statistician). Even in Auschwitz, there were gassings (Hoess' testimony is tortured and inaccurate, but Aumeier, his deputy, also testified to gassings, albeit at an ad hoc level and at nothing like the scale the mainstream currently believes).
Dominic Wood
Jacob Rothschild, George Soros, the whole Frankfurt school, Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, Citigroup, millions upon millions more. All holocaust survivors.
I am sorry we failed you.
Luke Kelly
Why is denying or admitting literally anything else acceptable?
Like, I don't get in trouble for denying the moon landing, or for denying slavery. But I get in hot water if I say that only 5,999,999 jews died in the holocaust
Nolan Bailey
And that's the beauty of actual historical research. They revise and adjust the current belief based upon the presentation of concrete evidence to suggest such. Nobody is silencing "revisionists" because they fear the truth. It's because it's the equivalent of a flat-earther presenting the same, debunked evidence over and over despite being proved wrong.
>Disregard anyone making a fair point that contradicts my safe-space worldview. Shove head further up ass
Luke Peterson
In short, the mainstream is mostly right about the Holocaust. But they're wrong enough to give fodder to the people who--wrongly--want to deny it all.
The number was closer to 3-4 million than 6, and the gassings at Aushwitz were probably done on an ad hoc (rather than systematic) basis. But, clearly, between 1941-1943, millions of Jews were murdered by the Nazis, through mass shootings and gassings.
Isaiah Miller
Shut up goy
Caleb Garcia
Why is it illegal in 22 countries to deny the Holocaust?
Aiden Flores
...
Camden Roberts
Mate. We have ALL studied history here. We heard all about it in school. We watched all the documentaries. We read all the books. We are obssessed with it. There is nothing you've seen that we haven't.
We do not accept the story. We won't accept jewish testimony because too many have been confirmed lies and fraud. We need primary source evidence. Mass graves. Written orders. Killing infrastructure. Anything.
Besides, we know for a fact that Auschwitz wasn't a death camp from the story of Anne Frank and thousands of testimonies like hers. >Anne, sister, mother, father transported to Auschwitz in September 1944 at the height of the holocaust >NO GASSINGS >live for two months together in Auschwitz >NO GASSINGS >Anne and sister both transported to Bergen Belsen >NO GASSINGS >both dead from typhus by March 1945 >NO GASSINGS >mother dies from starvation in Auschwitz after a few months (she had been feeding her rations to her daughters) >NO GASSINGS >father survives Auschwitz and is eventually liberated in January 1945 from the Auschwitz hospital where he was ill with typhus >NO GASSINGS
Dominic Cox
...
John Phillips
I find it very interesting that nobody even knows about the Transfer Agreement between Nazi Germany and Zionist orgs throughout the world at the time. Really blows a whole in the whole narrative that "zomg, Hitler was obsessed with killing the Jews right off the bat!!1!".
Logan Robinson
...
Elijah Cox
Hmmmm let's try think of a few reasons using our big boy brains!!!
Maybe they don't want to have people indoctrinated into a harmful and counter-progress ideology?
Maybe it's because the only people doing such are those who prescribe to that failed ideology and as such the countries wish to send a clear message they don't condone that barbarism?
Maybe it's because denying the moon-landing isn't intentionally pushing a narrative or hate but denying a genocide is?
Woah, we came up with 3 already? Can you think of others that don't involve a massive conspiracy!? I bet you can, since you're such a smart cookie!
Bahahaha >Deny all the evidence, falsely quote a diary, then capitalize on the fact typhus went through the prisoner camp to deny the entire holocaust
Flawless logic.
Jackson Long
>A Nazi Travels Through Palestine And Tells About It
Yes. And? That's supposed to be damning?
Lincoln Turner
It's the result of lefties to knee jerk react to any opinions varied from theirs.
Notice how if you "question" the supposed facts you're automatically labeled a "denier?"
As previously stated, no one denies the Jews were systematically singled out. It's an issue of the extent of "damage" done, or more specifically the embellished or exaggerated numbers/results.
Nathan Stewart
...
Justin Morgan
Good goy, go to your nearest rabbi to receive your good goy shekels
Connor Kelly
...
Lucas Reyes
Your entire post reeks of exactly the kind of mentally why I DESPISE people who defend the official narrative on here.
KYS AND THANKS FOR ALL THE SHIT YOUR TOXIC, PERVERSE IDEOLOGY AND CIVIL RELIGION DID TO MY COUNTRY YOU ASSHOLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
FUCK THE HOLOCAUST! FUCK YOUR LAWS! AND FUCK YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Oliver Wright
>Notice how if you "question" the supposed facts you're automatically labeled a "denier?" Also notice how all SJW leaders are Jewish. Racial politics and hate speech laws keep them in power.
Blake Baker
Deaths AT AUSCHWITZ you moron. Not total.
>numbers different than 6 million >obvious lie
Cooper Allen
I can think of a reason Freedom of speech should be acceptable in any truly respectable nation.
Now can you explain why denying the Holocaust is a nono, but denying the Holodomor, an event WORSE than it is a-ok? How about the Great Leap Forward? Armenian Genocide? Barbary and Arabian Slave Trades? Assassination of many influential world leaders? Literally anything else in human history?
You actually haven't been able to give me a single reason why the restriction of free speech and thought is a good thing.
Dylan Hernandez
There is no evidence. That's the problem. People saying things is not enough when we know for a fact that so many stories were lies (lampshades, soap, shrunken heads, etc etc etc) AND that the physical primary source evidence contradicts and refutes the stories. Too many jews in the world. No nazi documents for planning/execution. No mass graves. No gas chambers. Everything that is offeted has cometely innocent explanations. No nothing that one would expect to corroborate the stories.
Jack Baker
"revisionism" is just a poorly disguised denial movement. That's why you get called out and laughed at. It's because everyone knows it's just an attempt to "foot-in-the-door" the full denial concept. "Hmm maybe if only 4 million died then we can move the argument to a false new set of goalposts." It's not hard to see that's the goal.
(((you)))
Sorry your grandpa's corpse got raped by an untermensch Soviet. Do you think they came inside him or just on his face?
Carter Long
...
Ian Sullivan
...
Tyler Perez
Nazis invented jet fuel you dumb nigger, they never flew any rockets. Put it together and shut the fuck up.
But revisionists have not been proved wrong. All the evidence and logic is on their side.
Camden Ramirez
>Maybe they don't want to have people indoctrinated into a harmful and counter-progress ideology?
Oh no, heaven forbid anybody goes against progressiveness. We all need to do everything we can to make up for the sins of our forefathers.
Aaron Hernandez
...
Lucas Parker
Yes The Soviets were very good at photoshopping multipul images for propaganda
so is Pol in 2016
does not mean the holocaust did not happen
Cooper Lopez
Newsflash: Only a select few countries have freedom of speech. And you still aren't allowed to yell "fire" in a movie theatre. There's one example! Free speech /=/ you can say anything anywhere. All your examples would easily have the same protections if there were some kind of blatant movement to deny the event using a genocidal ideology as its basis...
Did I said "progressivism?" No. I said progress. As in, the betterment of the human race. I'm not telling you to apologize. Stop trying to strawman.
Oliver Hill
May you rot in hell and suffer for all eternity! You are the cancer of the human race!
Brody Nelson
...
Jaxon Young
...
Charles White
How many people are at risk of severe injury when I scream fire in a crowded place?
Now, how many are at risk of severe injury when I say "The Holocaust didn't happen"?
Apples to hypodermic needles my man
Jayden Scott
>the betterment of the human race. YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO EVEN TAKE THAT WORD IN YOUR FILTHY, DISGUSTING, DROOLING MOUTH!
I HOPE YOU GET RAPED AND KILLED BY A GANG OF ARABS, YOU PIECE OF ROTTEN SHIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Noah Cruz
...
Jaxson Bell
...
Leo Smith
...
Charles Ward
>But revisionists have not been proved wrong. All the evidence and logic is on their side.
Pretty much this. All anti-revisionism is just pussyfooting around the idea that censorship is necessary, because whenever evidence is asked for all they can do is go on about how historically accepted their evidence is while avoiding specific because they know that if they went into detail most of what they try to claim is blown out by counterclaims, contradictions and shear lack of evidence.
Jonathan Lewis
...
Michael Clark
So, all over his fancy uniform, then? How many times do you think he had cleaned it, and cared for it with a sense of pride, only for its final state to be splattered with cum?
"How many people risk death by me trying to advance an ideology that condones ethnic cleansing in the form of genocide!?" Really? That's your argument? You know damn well that if Nazi ideolgoy rose again ethnic cleansing in that form would recommence. Why keep lying about your overarching goal?
Brandon Sullivan
Holy trigger.
Justin Morgan
...
Alexander Howard
But there are too many jews in the world today for that number to be true. It cannot have been more than a million. And those numbers are fully accounted for in the historical record by typhus, starvation, execution of communists/partisans/saboteurs, accidents of war and isolated crimes. There is NO evidence for a general extermination plan. And even if there were, there was NO general extermination plan carried out in reality, othetwise people such as Anne Frank and the millions of other survivors (over a million Israelis were still claiming reparations in THIS decade) would not gave died from natural causes/still be alive.
Henry Fisher
>its like, they were designed in two different countries
>its like, gas does not need a tight seal to be effective
Leo Russell
Not true in the slightest. Present a well-researched and evidence filled dissertation and you will be given a PhD in the field! Imagine how proud your mom would be if you amounted to something!
Oliver Flores
...
Brody Jackson
How can the numbers of an individual camp fall by three million but the total six million figure go unchanged?
Cooper Green
Relax meine freund. He will get what's coming to him.
They ALL will get what's coming to them...
Luis Lee
>Advance an ideology by question what I am told?
Literally everything else about your post is concern trolling at best, pure idiocy at worst, and not worth rebuking. Now I await your smug meme arrows
Jacob Harris
Dude... Did you even visit or saw Auschwitz? Its (((gas chambers))) literally have glass windows.
"oh it turns out person X was killed at Dachau instead of Auschwitz. That's -1"
"oh wow, Dr. Y presented a dissertation showing victims A-G actually died in a cattle car leaving Ghetto 4 instead of at Auschwitz"
Make sense?
Wanna just admit you want to be a Nazi and perform genocidal ethnic cleansing? It would make this process so much easier. Notice how the only people who want to revise the number wish it would happen again.... Really makes me fire my neurons!
Aaron Reyes
>Historians crave information
T. Non historian. Lurkmoar your new faggotry is showing. It's illegal to talk about, and too taboo to talk about otherwise your academic credibility is completely shut down. The six million figure is up for debate ? Oh yeah no it wasn't 6 million is was 4 million chosen people. 1 millions at the most and most were due to the Einzatzgruppen, famine, and disease
Xavier Richardson
When you deny it this much it makes it seem like you would feel bad about it.
