Men have always been the creators, defenders and bearers of culture. History clearly shows that when a foreign army invades a host culture, it is primarily the men who sacrifice for the host culture's defense. When the host culture is near defeat by the invading army, the young women of the host culture generally are the first to mutiny and voluntarily interbreed with the enemy.
For example, after WWII it was found that a surprisingly significant number of young French women voluntarily serviced German forces during the occupation. Even today, we see that despite Islam being completely counter-intuitive to women's rights, European women seem to defend or even prefer the migration of thousands of Muslim men to their host nations.
Similar behaviors can be seen in our closest anthropological relatives, the chimps and gorillas, where females of a host group secede almost instantly, with little or no resistance, after a more dominant individual or pack takes control.
Social and psychological studies also show that many women have rape fantasies, and a significant percent of women who were raped (forced penetration) actually reached climax. This can indicate a subconscious evolutionary preference to invaders, as a means to promote genetic diversity.
So Sup Forums is it possible that deep down women (particularly young women) really don't care about their culture or identity, but instead care more about the male individual or group that is most masculine and dominating? Is it dangerous for a host nation/culture to assume that women are as loyal as men? What can be done to address this?
