Only one of them has no links to the EU and one other has expressed eurosceptic views in the past. The rest are deeply involved in the EU machinery.
They're meant to be a-political. The question they're deciding isn't really about politics, it's about the legal procedure. Parliament could vote us out of the EU tomorrow and the court can't do shit about it. The complication is all because of the nature of the referendum as a source of legal authority.
Henry Gutierrez
Autist and weirdo Literally on the same tier as Milo
Benjamin Adams
The members of the Supreme Court made up their minds before this trial. What's the point in this? They won't change their judgement.
Blake Brooks
This is now a sheev thread
Dump your sheevs, boys
Anthony Lewis
because "due procedure" n sheit innit
Elijah Morales
TRIGGERED
Noah Turner
>not having white skin you do realize that racism itself immoral according to the bible you retard?
Jose Taylor
...
Isaiah Hall
say you're a student say you don't know, something along the lines of 'bloody politicians, eh?'
Owen Peterson
MAYNE SHTREAM METEOR
Ian Collins
I don't understand why it's allowed that so many of them are so involved in the EU. Being in any way politically active should automatically bar you from becoming a high/supreme court judge. This is common fucking sense.
Kevin Sanchez
mayne strewm mehdiarh/10
Evan Rivera
>Stop blocking Brexit
Robert Robinson
Where's the 100k rally ?
Josiah Murphy
Since when do we televise court cases in this country?
Nolan Torres
got canceled
Lucas Bailey
So we can join the EU with prerogative power but not leave?
Noice.
Colton Morales
They're involved in the legal side of the EU. Think tanks and the ECJ and whathaveyou - sorting out the legal issues involved in integrating 28 different legal systems and constitutions.
Not that I disagree with you, but it makes sense that our best legal minds would be involved in those things.
Caleb Hall
Cancelled because of Farage in America as well as """far-right infiltration"""
It's such an obvious open-and-shut case in favour of Parliament voting on it anyway that it would seem a bit SS-outside-the-Reichstag-tier anyway
Aaron Morgan
Cancelled because Britain First and ANTIFA geared up for a fight.
Radical leftists do have a good ground game, shameless rioting and thuggery is something they excel in.
Charles Harris
WHERE THE FUCK IS IT THEN
Wyatt Jackson
>if they vote to block brexit lefties will go ape shit cos they're fucking white males
Zachary Hall
Supreme Court will agree with High Court, and that is a good thing. Parliamentary Sovereignty is an extension of your power as a memeber of the electorate and an expansion of Royal Preogative will encroach on that power.
You may currently agree with the Gov "trying" to push Brexit through, but what if Gov then later pushed through skmething you disagree with via the now extended powers of Royal Prerogative? Your representative in Parliament cannot speak put against it bevause Parliamentary Soverignty has been reduced in power.
But this is by the point, May is fully aware the legal reasoning of the High Court is sound. She is pushing it through Supreme Court to delay any debates we could have already had by now.
>critically important legal case >but where are the women and POC?
Matthew Morales
This live stream is very difficult to understand.
Logan Price
(you)
happy now? :P
Gabriel Morris
I imagine most properly spoken English is to you.
Nathan Rogers
Alright, which one of you is this?
Zachary Harris
It isn't 'now extended' powers of Royal Prerogative'. It's the power that has always existed over matters on the international plane. Pull your Europhile head out of your bum and put the case on and listen to REASON!
Ryder Roberts
>we now move to paragraph 2S or 133 Sylabous 5 of the book >""""unwritten constitution"""
Easton King
Not really if you listen to the government's argument.
Parliament was already adequately consulted. The government isn't unilaterally exercising prerogative power. The referendum would never have happened had Parliament not passed the referendum act.
Essentially Parliament decided to defer the question to the people, and now the argument is that they need to answer that same question in the exact same way again. The government argues that Parliament already considered and answered the question.
Kayden Reyes
What does the Italian referendum result mean for the EU? I haven't been following
Lucas Ramirez
How did these degenerate subhumans get into power over us. They are so mediocre, corrupt, dishonourable, ignoble. Why is no one just loyal to the Queen and tribe anymore.
Zachary Green
>If the Supreme Court appeal is unsuccessful then the Government has the right to and is considering taking it to the European Court of Justice
>Literally admitting that EU law completely undermines our own after spending years trying to convince people otherwise
Just fuck my sovereignty up
Aaron Rodriguez
Fuck all, all anti-eu parties in Europe, bar UKIP, don't actually want to secede from the EU
Kevin Walker
it means "fuck off"
>n-n-nothing to do with the EU brexshitters >EURO tanks
Adam Gonzalez
...
Tyler Watson
>Going to the EU court about leaving the EU what could go wrong?
Jonathan Allen
Oh boy here we go - bets that it'll be Whites being blamed for not integrating
I think the government should do it just for the keks.
Chase Thompson
>Europhile head
What, I am pro-leave.
Leaving the EU is constitutionally transformative as EU statiute currently overrules Parliament. So no, it is not within the scope of power of Royal Prerogative.
This is not about Brexit, it is about our system of Democracy and to want to remove your own powers because the Gov on the face of it supports your view is absurd.
Our current law is EU statute > Parliamentry Statute > Common law
This means any change is constitutionally transformative. So any change to that is required to go through both houses of Parliament for the multiple readings that any other peice of constitutional statute would.
We are a representative democracy, referendums hold no legal weigjt.
>make a pithy point >flutter eyelids >tap pen against desk >lean right back
Gabriel Walker
>Non white face discrimination in White countries Good, that's how it should be for non natives for any country
Charles Ward
I AM THE PARLIAMENT *screeches 'Brexit means Brexit' autistically*
Isaiah Hall
...
Cameron Anderson
No need to go and see a panto because of this EU appeal. Quality entertainment.
> Expecting the gov to lose the judges have some very pro-EU ultra liberals among them.
Still..
Choose freedom, m'lord. Like the Italians just did.
Alexander Lee
>libel >ALLEGEDLY x) >looks at an imaginary lawyer in the audience, nodding and winking
Hudson Barnes
...
Anthony James
When will the ruling be?
Ethan Butler
I ONLY JUST TUNED IN WHAT'S HAPPENED SO FAR
Noah James
nothing
next year after the numerous delays and inquiries
Jaxson Morris
>This slimy Labour cunt Die
Chase Rodriguez
Both sides are putting forth their arguments
Hunter Morgan
>Breitbart tells me to boycott Kellogs >look at cereal shelf >most of the best brands are Kellogs >notice Shreddies isn't Kellogs >buy it I hope it's good...
Lucas Morales
So are you finally leaving?
Asher Foster
>you will never be the person that you are on benzos I don't think this will ever leave me lads Any other ex benzo fiends here?
Jacob Young
thanks
Shreddies are nice, especially chocolate Shreddies.
Anthony Kelly
>have to go to work now
Should i just finally end it today, lads?
Jayden Rodriguez
>The former Green party leftist now leads at 53.3 per cent to Mr. Hofer’s 46.7.
>tfw you realise European people aren't worth saving
Chocolate cereals make me feel too much like a baby.
Adrian Ward
Don't get you hopes up lad.
That said I'd laugh heartily if they ruled in our favour and May immediately triggered Article 50.
Aiden Nelson
how do you feel you racist xenephobes, all this racism just because you didn't want 650k foreigners a year and don't like foreign languages!!!
Luke Barnes
>may immediatley triggers 50 she'll never trigger it, she's just cameron 2.0
Evan Collins
U wot mate chocolate cereals are scrumptious.
Caleb Morgan
Not yet, May is purposly dragging out the legal case.
Eli Collins
Can't wait to either watch these cucks die to their enrichment or execute them
Logan Sanders
>because when Hitler lost the presidency he raged quitted and said germany wasn't worth saving
Camden Anderson
How is May dragging it out, you cuck?
Juan Thomas
>This slimy Labour cunt
my gaydar is off the charts, does he do little kids too ?
Eli Gutierrez
SERIOUSLY WHAT THE FUCK ARE THEY DOING?
WHY ARE DEBATING BRITEXT SHIT?
I THOUGHT THIS WAS OVER
WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON
TELL ME
Eli Jenkins
Well he is an MP So probably
Eli White
He actually did say the German people weren't worth saving at one point towards the end though
Andrew Williams
JUST
Brody Evans
that's why I was a #LeadsomBullet
Nolan Phillips
FUCK
Andrew Gonzalez
no
Wyatt Parker
>in 1945 >citation needed
Parker Hughes
Because Supreme Court will agree with High Court as constitutionally transformative legislation is not under scope of Prerogative.
She knows this and could have already started the process of Parliamentary debate, but here we are wasting millions and time for an already decided case.
Leo Davis
Imagine if Trump's wall went to the supreme court for them to decide if Congress has to vote on whether or not he's allowed to do it.
