Why are you drumpfkiniggers so fucking retarded when it comes to climate change?
You do realize you can think for yourself, do your own research, instead of just parroting whatever Herr Drumpf and the closeted alt-right talking heads say, right?
You do realize saying stupid shit like this literally is not an argument, correct?
>m-muh grants
Welp, looks like all research goes out the window now! Ancap society! NAP! Hooray!
Fuck off
The Earth has been hotter in the distant past than it has now. Your move, nigger.
Dumbasses virtue signaling how patriotic and Trump like they are.
They are the right's answer to Paul Krugman in that they are obedient propaganda mouthpieces
Oh wow, CLIMATE CHANGE BTFO, it's just that simple!!!
Retard
It's over faggot. New study coming soon will prove the flaws in the current climate models. You'll need to find some other way to virtue signal.
Your mom's an obedient mouth piece.
>THE SKY IS FALLING!
>HELP! WOLF!
>CLIMATE CHANGE WILL KILL US IN 10 YEARS!
Really made me ponder my life choices.
Go on then faggot. Prove man made climate change is real.
>you need to pay higher prices and taxes on everything into the global kike slush fund, white people, even though the gooks and pooinloo niggers don't
>in fact, you should stop reproducing white people, but still feed africa, and let subhuman niggers into your countries, and also let those niggers breed your daughters' wombs and spawn more niggers
good goyim
I can't stand that guy, he's full of shit
Well I've certainly changed my mind!
The burden of proof is on you to disprove the actual preponderance of evidence and the consensus
"Global warming" is a misnomer and one aspect of climate change as a whole.
Oh look, generalizing a few fringe exacerbating retards as the entire aspect of climate change
This is basically the equivalent to "YOU'RE A FUCKING WHITE MALE"
It shows you've only paid attention to something stupid Al Gore said once.
>the burden of proof is on you
No, it's on you. You're saying humans made the climate change. It's YOUR claim. Prove YOUR claim. Give me your evidence or fuck off.
calthrate gun already fired, everything you do is futile
>You do realize you can think for yourself, do your own research
Oh, we already know that we can.
You can't though.
Good luck parroting the opinions of the global banking cartels who want to institute a global tax on breathing.... you fool.
95% of the scientific community says climate change is man made
You are the one trying to disprove a supermajority consensus
Your claim of "it was warmer before!!!!!" literally means nothing and was instantly quashed. Now that you've been BTFO you're just whining like a child and trying to weasel you're way out of this without looking like too much of a retard
Mission failure
But do tell me what you know that all those Phds don't, sunshine
Yes, better pay your carbon taxes goy. We don't want plants to have all this extra food.
T. Exxon employee
As opposed to what? Letting the crony oil companies control our land and then the government needing FEMA to control us all once everything starts going to shit?
>95%
Okay, what is their proof. And the "scientific community" what the fuck does an astrologer or a chemist know about climate change and how it has changed over centuries.
What are these talking points are you just gonna seriously say that's your proof that people say something and you agree with it? You must be the biggest faggot that everyone hates being around.
...
So Drumpf was supposed to be an "insult" to Trump? How dumb are you liberals?
Do you think this only effects oil? Are you really this retarded.
>Good luck parroting the opinions of the global banking cartels who want to institute a global tax on breathing.... you fool.
>global banking cartels who want to institute a global tax on breathing
That's what passes for bantz among their pathetic kind.
You're stupid. You clearly can't think for yourself, be more open minded. If you didn't just blindly follow Clinton you'd know climate change is bogus.
>my idiotic non-argument is so much better than yours!!!!!!
Im not even here to get into details. But when you have such blatant misinformed/willfully ignorant idiocy dismissing it just because daddy drumpf said so, is the antithesis of everything reasonable
>And the "scientific community" what the fuck does an astrologer or a chemist know about climate change and how it has changed over centuries.
>an astrologer or a chemist
(Scientific Organizations That Hold the Position That Climate Change Has Been Caused by Human Action)
Academia Chilena de Ciencias, Chile
Academia das Ciencias de Lisboa, Portugal
Academia de Ciencias de la República Dominicana
Academia de Ciencias Físicas, Matemáticas y Naturales de Venezuela
Academia de Ciencias Medicas, Fisicas y Naturales de Guatemala
Academia Mexicana de Ciencias,Mexico
Academia Nacional de Ciencias de Bolivia
Academia Nacional de Ciencias del Peru
Académie des Sciences et Techniques du Sénégal
Académie des Sciences, France
Academies of Arts, Humanities and Sciences of Canada
Academy of Athens
Academy of Science of Mozambique
Academy of Science of South Africa
Academy of Sciences for the Developing World (TWAS)
Academy of Sciences Malaysia
Academy of Sciences of Moldova
Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic
Academy of Sciences of the Islamic Republic of Iran
Academy of Scientific Research and Technology, Egypt
Academy of the Royal Society of New Zealand
Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Italy
Africa Centre for Climate and Earth Systems Science
African Academy of Sciences
Albanian Academy of Sciences
Amazon Environmental Research Institute
American Academy of Pediatrics
American Anthropological Association
American Association for the Advancement of Science
American Association of State Climatologists (AASC)
American Association of Wildlife Veterinarians
American Astronomical Society
American Chemical Society
American College of Preventive Medicine
American Fisheries Society
American Geophysical Union
American Institute of Biological Sciences
American Institute of Physics
American Meteorological Society
American Physical Society
Sick argument, dude. You almost said something witty
American Public Health Association
American Quaternary Association
American Society for Microbiology
American Society of Agronomy
American Society of Civil Engineers
American Society of Plant Biologists
American Statistical Association
Association of Ecosystem Research Centers
Australian Academy of Science
Australian Bureau of Meteorology
Australian Coral Reef Society
Australian Institute of Marine Science
Australian Institute of Physics
Australian Marine Sciences Association
Australian Medical Association
Australian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society
Bangladesh Academy of Sciences
Botanical Society of America
Brazilian Academy of Sciences
British Antarctic Survey
Bulgarian Academy of Sciences
California Academy of Sciences
Cameroon Academy of Sciences
Canadian Association of Physicists
Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences
Canadian Geophysical Union
Canadian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society
Canadian Society of Soil Science
Canadian Society of Zoologists
Caribbean Academy of Sciences views
Center for International Forestry Research
Chinese Academy of Sciences
Colombian Academy of Exact, Physical and Natural Sciences
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) (Australia)
Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research
Croatian Academy of Arts and Sciences
Crop Science Society of America
Cuban Academy of Sciences
Delegation of the Finnish Academies of Science and Letters
Ecological Society of America
Ecological Society of Australia
Environmental Protection Agency
European Academy of Sciences and Arts
European Federation of Geologists
European Geosciences Union
European Physical Society
European Science Foundation
Federation of American Scientists
French Academy of Sciences
Geological Society of America
Geological Society of Australia
Geological Society of London
Georgian Academy of Sciences
German Academy of Natural Scientists Leopoldina
Ghana Academy of Arts and Sciences
Indian National Science Academy
Indonesian Academy of Sciences
Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management
Institute of Marine Engineering, Science and Technology
Institute of Professional Engineers New Zealand
Institution of Mechanical Engineers, UK
InterAcademy Council
International Alliance of Research Universities
International Arctic Science Committee
International Association for Great Lakes Research
International Council for Science
International Council of Academies of Engineering and Technological Sciences
International Research Institute for Climate and Society
International Union for Quaternary Research
International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics
International Union of Pure and Applied Physics
Islamic World Academy of Sciences
Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities
Kenya National Academy of Sciences
Korean Academy of Science and Technology
Kosovo Academy of Sciences and Arts
l'Académie des Sciences et Techniques du Sénégal
Latin American Academy of Sciences
Latvian Academy of Sciences
Lithuanian Academy of Sciences
Madagascar National Academy of Arts, Letters, and Sciences
Mauritius Academy of Science and Technology
Montenegrin Academy of Sciences and Arts
kinda like "trumped up, trickle down" lololo
Climate skepticism correlates with the highest carbon emissions per capita
But thats none of my business
National Academy of Exact, Physical and Natural Sciences, Argentina
National Academy of Sciences of Armenia
National Academy of Sciences of the Kyrgyz Republic
National Academy of Sciences, Sri Lanka
National Academy of Sciences, United States of America
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
National Association of Geoscience Teachers
National Association of State Foresters
National Center for Atmospheric Research
National Council of Engineers Australia
National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research, New Zealand
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
National Research Council
National Science Foundation
Natural England
Natural Environment Research Council, UK
Natural Science Collections Alliance
Network of African Science Academies
New York Academy of Sciences
Nicaraguan Academy of Sciences
Nigerian Academy of Sciences
Norwegian Academy of Sciences and Letters
Oklahoma Climatological Survey
Organization of Biological Field Stations
Pakistan Academy of Sciences
Palestine Academy for Science and Technology
Pew Center on Global Climate Change
Polish Academy of Sciences
Romanian Academy
Royal Academies for Science and the Arts of Belgium
Royal Academy of Exact, Physical and Natural Sciences of Spain
Royal Astronomical Society, UK
Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters
Royal Irish Academy
Royal Meteorological Society (UK)
Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences
Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research
Royal Scientific Society of Jordan
Royal Society of Canada
Royal Society of Chemistry, UK
Royal Society of the United Kingdom
Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences
Russian Academy of Sciences
Science and Technology, Australia
Science Council of Japan
Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research
Scientific Committee on Solar-Terrestrial Physics
Scripps Institution of Oceanography
Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts
Slovak Academy of Sciences
Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts
Society for Ecological Restoration International
Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics
Society of American Foresters
Society of Biology (UK)
Society of Systematic Biologists
Soil Science Society of America
Sudan Academy of Sciences
Sudanese National Academy of Science
Tanzania Academy of Sciences
The Wildlife Society (international)
Turkish Academy of Sciences
Uganda National Academy of Sciences
Union of German Academies of Sciences and Humanities
United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
University Corporation for Atmospheric Research
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
World Association of Zoos and Aquariums
World Federation of Public Health Associations
World Forestry Congress
World Health Organization
World Meteorological Organization
Zambia Academy of Sciences
Zimbabwe Academy of Sciences
t. Statist boot licker
nobody cares mane. nobody.
You guys need to read "State of Fear" by Michael Chricton
really makes you think
>You do realize you can think for yourself
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA,
When a liberal says do your own research what they really mean is watch a documentary created by a leftist faggot like Al Gore.
You have never read a scientific paper in your life cunt.
HAHAHAHAHA
>Implying climate change isnt good
>Implying you dont want large scale migrations to mars
>Implying we cant develop tech to scrub the atmosphere if we really gave a shit
What if you just set fire to the methane fields? I mean sure, you'd blow up Antarctica, but am I missing some other problem with that?
>The burden of proof is on you to disprove the actual preponderance of evidence and the consensus
HAHAHAHAHA literally using the same argument as Christ cucks
95% of the community does not mean shit fag, science is not a democracy all it takes is one motha fucka to prove you wrong and more than one has.
Muh 95% of scientist consensus
Yes, scientists have thought about this and been able to prove that anything natural cannot be accounted for the current rates of almost anything related to anthropogenic climate change
Or are you telling me you're the first person to ever discover this! Wow! Congrats!
The Maunder Minimum was corrected quite some time ago and has actually shown sun spots have been relatively stable since the 1700s
Go ahead and show me where I said to read Al Gore
>literally using the same argument
Literally not
>muh non-argument
You can feel free to admit that you haven't actually researched anything and are just being contrarian for the sake of spiting leftists
>prove
Go ahead and show the proof then ;)
There's nothing wrong with warming. It's just the media and grant takers scaring you poor snowflakes.
Even El Rato has better logic than you hippie cunts.
point is the sun can and does effect our climate over decades and centuries.
is human activity effecting the climate, yes, but it's minuscule compared to what the sun can do over longer periods of time.
Enjoy the demise of agriculture in the USA
Enjoy losing your key cities to the waters
you're moronic
Oh wow, what an argument
>isnt like uh science, like uhhhhh not supposed to be like uhhhhh 100%
Wow, stunning revelation, I guess we should not evaluate any abundance of evidence at hand
You're retarded. You are again just being contrarian and making complete non-arguments
because no one fucking acts like it is happening
if climate change was such a big deal for leftist they would advance programs to reduce birth rates in third world, to force environmental regulations on factories polluting stuff in the third world, to not outsource factories that conform environmental standards in the west to countries where they piss all over them and not invite millions of people into the west putting an even bigger strain on services and the environment
but they don't do that, which either means they don't actually care or they don't think it's real or as much of a danger as they claim
>Why are you drumpfkiniggers so fucking retarded when it comes to climate change?
Because science, faggot.
>You do realize you can think for yourself, do your own research, instead of just parroting whatever Herr Drumpf and the closeted alt-right talking heads say, right?
Yes.
>You do realize saying stupid shit like this literally is not an argument, correct?
Correct, you have made no argument. Top kek that you even typed this sentence, in fact. HAHAHA.
>Welp, looks like all research goes out the window now! Ancap society! NAP! Hooray!
Koo.
>Fuck off
No u
Thanks for proving my point, you are such a true civic nationalist and ally to America
Trump will surely compensate you
Point is your original claim of the sunspots has been shown to not account for the total climate change. It cannot, nor can other natural factors account for the massive climate change
Solving climate change isn't a technical challenge; any retard with a periodic table and high school chemistry can figure out how to sequester excess carbon from both the atmosphere and oceans naturally, with zero consequences to the Earth's biomes.
Despite the simplicity of fixing this issue, the proponents of climate change solutions propose the most backwards solutions imaginable:
>Using rare earths to generate wind and solar energy but eschewing nuclear
>Starting a social movement to reduce consumption while expecting to maintain the pace of technological development necessary to create a post-carbon society in spite of declining consumption
>Championing expensive recycling programs instead of robust consumer durables that can be reused much more cheaply
Until I hear an environmentalist describe to me how we can use limestone or plankton blooms to sequester excess carbon on the seafloor, I'm not going to take them seriously.
Dear Bag of Fuck Morons.
Climate Change will not kill off the Human Race
We will kill or dwindle ourselves down to basically nothing with War Eventually - all it takes is another NUT Running a First World Army to Exterminate most of the Human Race.
Lastly Climate Change is the Liberals answer to "Give them an Enemy all countries can Fight Against" which is great and all, but we are at too early of a stage to 100% say without a doubt that Climate Change will end mankind
If anything over population will end us long before Climate Change will
>instead of presenting rational arguments I'll just call you a retard
>The burden of proof is on you
It always amazes me how prevalent the ideological subversion and cognitive dissonance is when a liberal attempts to express their views
95 percent used to believe the earth was flat at some point
guess what?
>T. Exxon employee
Oh, do you work for exxon?
Birth rates in the third world are not going to have a significant effect on climate
>force environmental regulations
That's the plan
I do admit that there are green profiteers trying to take advantage of climate change. This does not disprove it as a whole. This is no different from Congressman calling climate change a hoax conveniently getting thousands from oil companies
making an argument soon ?
Very
still a good 5 - 7% that still believe the earth is flat and that Nasa is just a bunch of Jewish Artists pulling off the greatest tax payer fraud of all-time, oh and Stanley Kubrick was killed for "Knowing Too Much"
No they didnt. That's entirely a myth
Literally not an argument. I can see it's not just one retarded poo worlder that has this, it seems retarded drumpfniggers and alt-righters as a whole are just part of a giant contrarian fad, just figuratively flipping off any possible thing they can link to an establishment
I just asked two people in the room and they say sasquatch is real. Now you need to disprove this conclusion reached by an overwhelming consensus of bigfoot experts, the burden of proof is yours.
Didn't you see the scientific documentary Harry and the Hendersons?
Not an argument
THAT FEEL WHEN TOO SMART TO UNDERSTAND BURDEN OF PROOF
I dont think you quite understand that trivializing and dismissing the actual preponderance of proof requires a burden of proof from you.
>Until I hear an environmentalist describe to me how we can use limestone or plankton blooms to sequester excess carbon on the seafloor, I'm not going to take them seriously.
Carbon sequestration is an active field of research but so far is expensive and energy-hungry.
Literally all Jew organizations that are funded by Soros.
Stefan! Is this an argument?
>It always amazes me how prevalent the ideological subversion and cognitive dissonance is when a liberal attempts to express their views
Today I learned that believing mainstream atmospheric physics is a) ideological subversion and b) cognitive dissonance.
You are so retarded.
Cool religious bullshit, now say a hundred "Hail Mary"s. I disagree with none of the data gathered, which shows human beings having a miniscule extra effect on an already changing climate.
I disagree with ALL of the alarmist bullshit which blinkers itself to the entirety of history in order to drive everyone into a panic over a routine, unremarkable 40-year shift.
The overwhelming majority of the church would promote whatever the official version of Catholicism was, to continue to receive funding via the governments paying to the central church.
Nothing. Has. Changed.
What causes climate change is irrelevant the only question worth wondering is how do we deal with the effects of climate changing
There have definitely been warming and cooling trends in the past but lately it has seemingly gotten hotter at a much faster rate. how can this be explained?
Deferring to a waffling cult leader who literally struggles to make arguments himself
Is not an argument
They're selling crushed limestone at less than 30 dollars per ton. Even assuming a modest wholesale profit margin of 15% that's aggressively cost-effective.
Iron, too, is dirt cheap and is the only missing ingredient to generating plankton blooms to eat up all that nasty carbon, which is then in turn eaten by fish, replenishing fish stocks.
Yeah, that's about the size of it.
Read Dilbert Merchant's take on this:
blog.dilbert.com
Let`s say all the sky is falling fearmongery is true (it`s not)
Explain to me how giving more of my cheque to the government will make the air have less CO2 in it
I did my own research. It showed that Global Warming is a scam. It's a hoax to raise taxes, period.
>B-b-b--but
Nope. We've caught you lying faggots falsifying data to fit your narrative before. I don't care what you believe and I don't care whether it's well intentioned or not, the nanosecond someone fakes data for political purposes INTO THE TRASH IT FUCKING GOES.
>being brainwashed into thinking you need to vote for globalists political parties who want to dissolve your countries borders and increase taxes or you are a "science denier" who is killing the planet
News flash, dick head. You can't stop the climate from changing and even if you could it wouldn't make a difference. Voting for lefty nutjobs like the green party won't do shit for the environment and will just give a bunch of pot head commies control of your countries finances and security.
Oh shit the Zimbabwe Academy of Sciences.
>actual preponderance of evidence and the consensus
What preponderance of evidence?
And, consensus on what exactly?
The older I get the more Climax Change I have, sonny. I'm just glad I cam still have a climax who cares if it changes?
You whipper snappers are always thinking sex.
Clinax Change is real. Just get down here and speak into Mr Microphone because I'm having trouble hearing. .
>I just asked two people in the room and they say sasquatch is real
You have to prove that global warming is real first...
You can't just use appeal to authority.
Also, you have to disprove the link between solar output and global temperatures, the heat island effect, the contribution of water vapor to the greenhouse effect, etc...
you do know that no such "scientific consensus" exists, correct? I'm a physicist and the people who are most skeptical of global warming are, indeed, scientists themselves. The average public is scientifically illiterate and doesn't know how bullshit the science behind it is. Their models have been demonstrably wrong and continually "corrected ;)" to fit the new data as it comes out. Oh it hasn't warmed in 15 years ? Turns out it's in the oceans ;). Don't mind us if it's uncertain if we can actually accurately measure global temperatures to the precision we state, we solved the "problem".
Seriously it's bad science, that being said it is a possibility that should be addressed because even if there's a 10% chance the theory is correct it seems quite catastrophic if it is, and should be accounted for accordingly. But to say it's 100% true just shows you're ignorant of the matter and haven't read enough of the actual papers to see how laughable it is
You might have schizophrenia
$0.05 has been deposited in your account.
Thank you for helping us take on the world's toughest energy challenges™
-ExxonMobil
>muh 97%
>muh 97%
>muh 97%
>muh 97%
>muh 97%
Sum up very well any climate ''debate'' with these cult members.
$0.05 has been deposited in your account.
Thank you for helping us take on the world's toughest energy challenges™
-ExxonMobil
$0.05 has been deposited in your account.
Thank you for helping us take on the world's toughest energy challenges™
-ExxonMobil
Feel free to evaluate the evidence yourself and debate actual people and not people on Sup Forums to base your retarded claims
$0.05 has been deposited in your account.
Thank you for helping us take on the world's toughest energy challenges™
-ExxonMobil
>We've caught you lying faggots falsifying data to fit your narrative before.
Seriously, when?
$0.05 has been deposited in your account.
Thank you for helping us take on the world's toughest energy challenges™
-ExxonMobil
why are you against global warming?
>sea levels rise drowning all the lefty filth
literally no downside you retard