/left/ General - Red Edition Edition

Greetings Comrades

This thread is for the discussion of any and all left-wing political ideology, including, but not limited to, Marxism/Socialism/Communism/Anarchism/Syndicalism/etc.

>Socialism is an economic and social system defined by social ownership of the means of production. (Workers democratically own and operate the places in which they work, as opposed to private power aka capitalism)

>The means of production are non-human inputs the create economic value, such as factories, workplaces, industrial machinery, etc. Socialists refer to the means of production as capital, or private property. Private property in the socialist context shouldn't be confused with personal property, such as your home, car, computer, and other possessions.

>In a capitalist society the means of production are owned and controlled privately, by those that can afford them (the capitalist aka those with capital). Production is carried out to benefit the capitalist (production for profit). Workers are paid a wage, and receive that amount regardless of how much value they produce.

>Communism is the highest developed stage of socialism wherein there is no state, no money, no class system. The means of production are owned by all and provide for everyone's needs.

Resources:

ABC's of Socialism: s3.jacobinmag.com/issues/jacobin-abcs.pdf

Introduction to Marxism by Professor Richard D. Wolff: youtube.com/watch?v=T9Whccunka4

Selections of Left-wing Literature:
Anarchist:
theanarchistlibrary.org/library/petr-kropotkin-the-conquest-of-bread

Libertarian:
Mikhail Bakunin - God and the State (short read)
Thomas Paine - Agrarian Justice
Noam Chomsky - Notes on Anarchism
Anton Pannekoek - Worker's Councils

Marxist-Leninist:
marxists.org/archive/marx/works/sw/
marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/sw/
marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1884/origin-family/
marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1914/mar/11.htm

Other urls found in this thread:

gulaghistory.org/nps/onlineexhibit/stalin/
institute.coop/examples-worker-cooperatives
worldbank.org/en/country/china/overview
monthlyreview.org/2009/05/01/why-socialism/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

fuck yes, Genosse!

Give me one good reason communism will ever work without killing millions of people

Nice thread comr8.

Kill communists

Bust their heads open with rusty shovels

Gouge their eyes out with broken spoons

Hurt them, kill them, torture them

Laugh at the screams of pain

Throw them in a ditch and light them on fire, then piss on their corpse

Helicopter rides are too merciful for the communist scum.

Eat shit, communigger. As opposed to nothing at all.

Helicopter rides are too merciful for the communist scum.

Because we have learned from our past mistakes. It tool capitalism 400 years and countless deaths to defeat feudalism, communism is the next evolution

you first porky

give me an example how capitalism worked without killing millions of people

Gonna leave this here

so you're going to install Communism in the USA. How do you do it differently from soviet russia

>everyone is reddit
>the child's guide to arguing
I genuinely hate reddit tho

You blood will lubricate our tanks.

when are you moving to venezuela/north korea/cuba/vietnam?

Since adopting capitalist reforms, China has lifted roughly 70% of it's population out of poverty.
Over a billion people

This is the most rapid economic expansion in human history. Like a balloon held under water being released

What happened in Russia was that Lenin died before he could stop Stalin from taking power and corrupting the revolution

So, we just need to make sure the people heading the revolution won't die and let a tyrannical dictator take over.

Unlike in the ussr it will be a democracy where issues can be discussed. The resources will be shared between individuals and the USA will no longer be trading with anyone so they can share the resources among each other.

Why do you think gulags and breadlines are terrific things?

>picks poorly executed communist nations
>uses it as an argument against communism
No

when the socialist country I live in fails :3
So probably never.

Friendly reminder that right-wingers are best goys.

because they're not for us, they're for (((others)))

Two different beasts. But Socialism is the first step, characterised by a revolutionary government and wage retention.

>gulags
No we don't
>breadline
That was towards the dissolution of the ussr

this is physically impossible
for proof see pic related

But Lenin ordered the execution of dissenters and installed the first gulags...

Also, Lenin installed perfect communism but people starved so he allowed for a free market

Also, also, then why was the same result of death in countries where the leader didn't die early on like Mao or Fidel

No rebuttal? Unsurprising, this totally crushes your worldview

What? The USSR was known universally for its gulags.

gulaghistory.org/nps/onlineexhibit/stalin/

what happens when we democratically pick something other than communism if that ever happens

...

friendly reminder that you're a meme country.

Okay, I'm not the guys who want to just talk about their heated murder fantasies which they just project onto communists because they want any acceptable target to be violent against.

Instead, why don't you guys actually try the baby steps of communism? Why don't a bunch of you guys form a company in which every single person on-board has an equal share of the profits and power of the company.

After all, every good experiment in anything needs a working test model before it could ever be done on a wide-scale. If you create a successful model, I'm sure more people would listen to you.

>using a argument that's been refuted so.many times

...

before the dissolution of the USSR they didn't even have breadlines then? No bread I suppose

Oh good. The commies are already starting with the censorship.
Screw leftism forever.

Requesting the "Hey Stalin, what'cha doin' ?" comic plz

explain to me how this wont happen in "your" communism?

nice quads

But that isn't how it's gonna go down. The majority of Americans are average middle class citizens, they vastly outnumber rednecks and the like.

>not enough food
The workers will produce more, (this is also an argument for a different thread, but veganism is a solution for that)

There are more people living in poverty in china than when Mao introduced communism.

This is related to capitalist population increase, like in Africa.

GUYS, we found the real socialism!!!!
Its a capitalist state that gives welfare

>tfw with Communist China does Capitalism better than you

institute.coop/examples-worker-cooperatives

>The workers will produce more, (this is also an argument for a different thread, but veganism is a solution for that)

How do you get the workers do produce more if they receive no financial benefit for working harder?

A

He did what was necessary. Another factor was that they skipped right from feudalism to communism, so the infrastructure wasn't there at first to support everyone. Marx argued that capitalism is essential as an in-between period. This is why Lenin allowed the free market

You throw them into a gulag because they won't work harder :DDDDDDD

Yeah but the ussr was just a dictatorship
Then we must accept the results user but most likely they will be swayed from doing so by propaganda and shit

>There are more people living in poverty in china than when Mao introduced communism.
Are you fucking insane???

What the fuck, China fills a city every year. It grows at 8% a year, the fastest growing economy in world history

why did you assume that the average american worker will just accept the new communist regime?

how do you know that they wont be viewed by the (((revolutionaries))) as dissenters?

The USSR was just a dictatorship not more nothing less

How about the food they eat and the services they get from the people they produce food to?
Why do you bring financial incentive as an argument?

At the same rate China destroys your economy, so it's okay. ;)

how do you know that "your" communism wont devolve into the same thing?

Interesting, I think the solution here is that socialists should congregate, pool resources, and start their own worker's cooperatives like this. While they still would be participating in the capitalist system, all the workers involved would be equally compensated for their labor. I think that would make everyone happy.

>no source

People respond to incentive. I quit one job and took another because the other job offered me higher pay.

>What went wrong with 20th century 'Communism'?
Contrary to his image, Karl Marx saw benefits and a necessity to Capitalism, while still acknowledging it's flaws and fleeting nature. To him, Society must endure Capitalism, just as a toddler must endure adolescence on it's path to adulthood.

they know if they don't produce more food then they will all starve, seems like a good enough incentive to me

Not all of them will, but hopefully when the time for revolution comes the masses will be "awake", and ready. The revolution can't happen until they are, there will be no communism until the people want it

Because if the only incentive to work is to feed yourself, you don't have any reason to produce a surplus you fucking retard.

Fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck
Offffffffffffffffffffffffffffff

>implying china is communist.

>they know if they don't produce more food then they will all starve, seems like a good enough incentive to me

If this were the case then millions wouldn't have died of famine in USSR you absolute mongoloid.

Sooooooo why is the USSR out and capitalist america still around then?

damn, leftychimps still going at it.

Is this supposed to be some sort of argument?
You have said nothing that could be considered a rebuttal, besides some fallacious speculation that poverty-stricken rice farmers 100 years ago were better off than the modern booming Chinese miracle

You're probably a 400 pound blue haired lesbian who never had a strong father figure

No.

Agree in part.
But just worker ownership will lead to the same pitfalls of capitalism(ever-expanding growth for its own sake, need cheaper labor to increase profits)
>resources are not infinite

Ha fittingly reflects communist inception IRL.

Just like the pied piper.

So if I murdered people based on race, im evil, but if i do based on class, im not? also, ive read extensively on this period between communism and feudalism... it was on its way to capitalism under the Tsars and yes, it wasnt really capitalistic yet, after stalins 5 year plan to build up the capital from what should have been the capitalist stage, the quantities and qualities of the factories were such shit that millions died for basically nothing. Many of the factories broke down and one of the famous canals (name escapes me) was built completely shitty and doesnt even work

Because of Gorbachev. Fuck him.

What commies fail to realize time and time again is that on an instinctual level humans act in self-interest. It is part of the core human psyche.

Unless you can somehow change human brain chemistry and eliminate such things as greed and jealousy, you will never achieve your utopian society.

Nobody wants to work to the benefit of society as a whole, and to the detriment to themselves.

Oh, so it's not 'real' communism?
Interesting turn of phrase for a porky.

Oh, you want me to find a source? Easy peasy

worldbank.org/en/country/china/overview

Here's the world bank. First result off google

If you're trying to contest this well known fact, you're in a very difficult position

Can you guys bump my commie sucks general

gorbi was a commie he wanted open discussion on how to fix communism and when he showed his ppl how much better life in america was everyone said "fuck this shit"

So if a political system can be destroyed by one incompetent leader, why should I be interested in it?

>What is Communism?
A stateless, classless society.

>What is Socialism?
A transitional system between Capitalism and Communism, characterized by revolutionary govt and wage retention.

>What is Capitalism?
An economic system characterized by the private ownership of property and subsequent exploitation of labor.

>Why is Communism an almost certain inevitability?
As technology and society progresses, those who subsist on their labor will find themselves without work and coin. Their numbers will grow until eventually the abolishment of private property necessitates their survival.

>What went wrong with 20th century 'Communism'?
Contrary to his image, Karl Marx saw benefits and a necessity to Capitalism, while still acknowledging it's flaws and fleeting nature. To him, Society must endure Capitalism, just as a toddler must endure adolescence on it's path to adulthood.

Decades after his death, Vladimir Lenin would rise to power and weigh in upon Marx's ideas. Lenin rejected the notion that Feudal Russia must undergo Capitalist revolution before attaining Capitalism. The Soviets quickly learned that their Feudal development was insufficient in produce and supplying the needs of a Socialist society. And so began decades of state-sponsored Capitalism, in a desperate game of catch up.

There is much debate about this, with some arguing that Russia's premature attempt at Socialism accelerated the stage of Capitalism, with others asking at what cost? Regardless, Lenin's views and actions spread like wildfire across the globe, influencing Feudal and agrarian society's across the globe to prematurely campaign for a Socialist society that was well beyond their reach.

I end this post with some light reading material, maybe you've heard of the author: monthlyreview.org/2009/05/01/why-socialism/

so let me get this straight, you want force the population to produce food and the only reason they should produce the food is so they can survive?

tell me again how i should consider you to be human?

This is the problem with Marx's thinking imo.
He followed Hegel's dialectics, thinking that communism would be the "Absolute Idea".
I don't see any support for this, seems to me the ball will just keep on bouncing.

...

from what I remember the USSR experienced famine because of weather conditions, and also I think farmers might of protested the new regime and refused to produce

See

Stalin kept most of the resources for himself and his other elite

Whats leftypols opinion on the JQ?

BECAUSE IT WASN'T REEEEEEEEEEEEAAAALLLL COMMUNISM!

>Since initiating market reforms in 1978, China has shifted from a centrally-planned to a market-based economy and has experienced rapid economic and social development. GDP growth has averaged nearly 10 percent a year—the fastest sustained expansion by a major economy in history—and has lifted more than 800 million people out of poverty. China reached all the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) by 2015 and made a major contribution to the achievement of the MDGs globally.

>With a population of 1.3 billion, China recently became the second largest economy and is increasingly playing an important and influential role in the global economy.

worldbank.org/en/country/china/overview

do you think we will ever democratically vote to get rid of every single business owner

>bt-5

degenerate

Helicopter rides are too merciful for communist scum faggot kike lapdogs.

One leader who is malicious and intends to destroy the system. In a better communist society there would be checks and balances.

Yes ok good for you, but financial incentive makes sense only when discussing inside a capitalist framework.
There are other types of incentives you know. And financial incentives don't make sense when discussing a communist framework.

Your logical fallacy is appeal to nature.

Piss off.

>believing in an ideology that's been refuted so.many times

Actually I take back that the killing was necessary, you shouldn't kill anyone. Lenin was an angry vengeful man.

I thought the checks and balance system was the gulags.

Kill yourself

How do you know the next person elected in the USA won't call himself dictator and try to take over? Because everyone loves democracy and people get angry when it's taken away