Putin's Troll Army

There is a troll army influencing behaviour.

All these accounts are part of it. There's thousands more.

Other urls found in this thread:

trump2016.ru/
washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/obama-orders-review-of-russian-hacking-during-presidential-campaign/2016/12/09/31d6b300-be2a-11e6-94ac-3d324840106c_story.html?pushid=breaking-news_1481314315&tid=notifi_push_breaking-news&utm_term=.c64aab578e41#comments
youtube.com/watch?v=VrPoJLozOa8
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

In what way are they ''trolls''? They also seem to be Americans not Russian

...

oh no, the russians are turning burgers into nationalists. the horror

Behaviour of the accounts. They just regurgitate specific narratives at high volume.

What?

>Troll army
>Six faggots
Shit how can we stop them?

It's an example of accounts. Obviously there's many many more

>obviously
wrong
>there are many more
post broofs

>troll army
>Sup Forums

Wheres my fucking ruples

I am Putin mountain troll, ask me anything.

where are the proofs

...

go look at those accounts and who they retweet. They all retweet each other to create echochambers

so?

A troll is only a troll if the intent is to misguide..

Even if they are Russian, they are not technically "trolls". The truth is the truth...

So, a foreign country is distorting the perception of citizens through social media. It's weaponzied information against the population

The political positions, the narrative of the accounts, I don't care about. What I care about is the method. And you can't say some of the content isnt misguiding, even if you're pro Trump

It's called "fighting fire with fire"

That's how twitter works you peabrain. You retweet and tweet about stuff you like. That's it! Some people like politics and Trump

I understand that, but, it's not well reported.

So if I set up thousands of accounts all sticking to the same narrative and retweeting in heavy volume, yu dont think that can shift the perception of some individuals?

Once again, that's how twitter works. People retweet things they like, if they happen to like posts by eachother they retweet it. Simple.

>go look at those accounts and who they retweet. They all retweet each other to create echochambers
welcome to twitter

Yeah you could but these are just different accounts by different people who share the same intrest and retweet accordingly.

No, people are not willing to use a critical thought process when disseminating information. If someone you know shares MSM stories, while towing the narrative, you can be sure they are not capable of seeing a broader picture.

The MSM isn't going to wake up tomorrow and admit they have been misrepresenting to truth. They have millions of loyal readers/viewers/listeners who depend on these organizations to shape the world around them. Without these institutions telling them how to perceive the world, there would be no order....We know the "order" is a farce, and once it dissipates, these "believers" will be at the mercy of those who sought truth at any cost.

So just because they don't agree with you that makes them Russian? The mainstream media has been an echo chamber for years for the establishment, why don't you mention that? Why don't you mention the echo chamber that exists in public schools and colleges to regurgitate the establishments viewpoints? Just because these people don't share your viewpoints does not mean they are Russian, you hillbot. And of course they retweet each other you fucking idiot, they share similar viewpoints and want to give credit to each other when one tweets an idea before the other! Kys newfag.

To that volume? You don't think its shady at all? I don't need to mention the echochambers you mention because it's know - especially here - while these ones are underreported.

>echochambers

Have you ever been on facebook?

Geez guys I can't tell if this is #PropOrNot can you?

Is that a retort to my claims?

No, I'm asking out of genuine curiosity if you are able to identify an echochamber.

They aren't underreported. The media links these accounts in with "fake news". People like these accounts are just tired of seeing the news industry being ran by one group that tells you what to think. They send out provocative tweets with statistics about groups like blacks and muslims that the media tries to protect. They are on social media working together because that is the only way they will ever get heard against msm. And it is a quick way to reach people as we have learned from the president elect. What else are these people supposed to do to get their viewpoints heard then?

Sup Forums is echochamber

In other words... Can you call a spade a spade? Or is one more acceptable than another? Who has the right to decide?

No shit.... That's not my point. You cannot say "look at this echochamber... They are shaping the discussion on group X"

Because ALL communities are echochambers. It's a half baked concept.

lol exactly

Well of course I've used Facebook, and yes, a lot of people get sucked into echochambers on that

Oh look the newfag paki is back.

"Putin's troll army" is the very definition of fake news.

but a lot of those accounts are fake accounts. Not real people.

And it is just as "problematic" as twitter "ecochambers"... Neither are morally "just", and the truth belongs to the eye of the beholder.

True OP.

Majority of shite on the net is kremlinoid

If they happen naturally, then it's up to the people involved to self asses what they consume. Most don't. What I'm saying, is, a foreign agent has been creating echochambers in cyberspace with a particular political narrative. There's a difference.

Oh, and the MSM misrepresenting the facts with a predetermined narrative IS natural?

Give me a break....

and you know that how buddy? Not to mention, what's it matter if people don't want to use their personal identity? Maybe they don't want to be hunted down by crazy social justice warriors but still want to share their thoughts. I do not see an actual problem here. You are trying to say that because these accounts are pro trump and retweet each other, they are Russian plants and the media ignores them even though they talk about them indirectly with their "fake news" narrative.

I didn't say that. TWo wrongs dont make a right.

Behavioural analysis

You are basically saying, only one side is true... Even if they are bots, and are telling the truth, it is not true.

Guess what side that leaves you on...

You don't seem to have ANY proof that these are bot accounts. And you don't have any proof that these are owned by the kremlin or putin. The only "proof" you have provided is just people using twitter like it's usually used. Sage goes in options

well if they are bots telling the truth then that is a type of lie, because it distorts people's sense of reality

And being dependent to electronic devices to deliver the truth isn't a distortion of truth?

In what way do they influence behaviour by trolling?

Yeah I don't have much to go on. Louise Mensch has some better stuff. I'm just trying to make more people aware. They're obviously fake accounts if you use your head. Who uses Twitter like that? Blasting out retweets 100+ a day? Always on message. Never talks about anything else? Its off man

Are you McLuhan? Haha. That's another level of disortion

Have you ever met a SJW in real life?

Start trends. Create echochambers. Repetition of message.

Haha.

No, but you refuse to address my main point, and went to a natural response of trying to fit me into a defined box... which means I blew your argument to shit.

No it doesn't. It means that that's another level of distortion. I basically agreed with you calm down man

Anyone remember when a russian linked this site? I think it was before the trump generals were even created.

trump2016.ru/

Then if I'm right, you're wrong.. and your questioning of the means of producing results is akin to the serpent in the Garden of Eden.

you've lost me. GO again

Louise Mensch is insane. She routinely tweets how she's being stalked by the FSB.

Let me break down for you how Twitter works if you are dissatisfied with politics and lie on the centre or the right:
1. want to express your dissatisfaction on a trending hashtag but afraid of being ruined by an SJW witch hunt
2. create a Twitter account with an anonymous name, completely unconnected from your real Twitter account (I used the name Mohammed in mine)
3. follow some popular accounts like Nigel Farage, Donald Trump, some news publications, etc.
4. look at the posts on the trending hashtag you're pissed off with, and find many tweets you agree with
5. retweet those tweets because they say it better than you could have
6. follow the authors of those tweets
7. respond to faggots' shit tweets, usually getting blocked by said faggots
8. people follow you because they agree with your responses to faggots
9. tweet barely anything on your main feed because you don't have much to say there
10. go to 1

And that's it. You agree with a tweet and you retweet it because you want to get the word out. When you're angry about an issue (e.g. migrant rapes, recent terrorist attacks), the level of retweets you make is pretty large. No automation, no Russian rubles. Just you and a thousand other pissed off people.

You still haven't told us which of the accounts in your image are "obviously fake", by the way.

your mom's vagina is an echochamber

You are questioning truth... Is that not what the serpent did?

All of them

Ah, now we have arrived at the core of the issue.. You're butthurt.

How am I questioning truth? I'm trying to reveal it. Take the distortion away

I'm British. I don't get butthurt

"All of them" because you disagree with all of them.

You're a paki.

No, you are claiming that all truth outside of your own is distortion. You claim to know which truth is the real truth while providing no truth of your own.

At best, you are a thought tyrant.

Obama plz go.

washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/obama-orders-review-of-russian-hacking-during-presidential-campaign/2016/12/09/31d6b300-be2a-11e6-94ac-3d324840106c_story.html?pushid=breaking-news_1481314315&tid=notifi_push_breaking-news&utm_term=.c64aab578e41#comments

youtube.com/watch?v=VrPoJLozOa8

Imo it's time for NATO to invade. Putin is the Hitler of our time. He's assassinated political dissidents and invaded his neighbors. Now the Kremlin is targeting NATO members with information warfare to destabilize their governments.

RUSSIA HAS CROSSED THE LINE!!
RUSSIA NEEDS TO BE TAUGHT A LESSON!!!
NUKE THE ROOSKIES!!!!
DEATH TO PUTIN!!!

>low energy kike post

They right. I'm #HootinForPutin

No because I collect them. I analyse behaviour of the accounts to determine and see how many autobots retweet them. There's plenty accounts who carry a similar message and if I determine its a real person, then I don't put em on the list. Simple

Posting this here where the exact same tactics are constantly used is pointless, as the echo chamber shilling will just go into defense mode. See: this thread.

Hello Comrade. What are you going to do after we invade your homeland and hang Putin by his balls?

reddit confirmed for russia propaganda machine?

I really dont know how you've come to that conclusion dude. I'm not saying all truth outside my own is distortion. I'm simply saying distortions happen and pointing one out

>I analyse behaviour of the accounts to determine and see how many autobots retweet them

Under which context do you do your "analysis".. Why is your context "truth".

Lol

fucking kek

see

HELLO BORSCHT NIGGER!!!
RUSSIA MUST BE WIPED OFF THE MAP!!!

desu we'd be doing you all a favor. Russia is a shithole

...

Narrative. Diversion from narrative - like, if a few tweets down the account is talking about football, or dancing, chances are it's a real person. Info in bio. Buzzwords. Legitimacy of picture being a real person. Volume of tweet activity. 100+ a day is defo a troll or bot. Also, autobots retweet trolls with many followers to amplify messages. If an account is being retweeted by an autobot egg account. That's another tell. All these things really

muh putin

GET REKT MOTHERFUCKER

Okay, which narrative is the "truth"? You keep diverging from defining the "truth". Again, you are a thought tyrant....

How should I know? I'm not proposing a narrative of truth. I'm simply pointing out a distortion

Have you ever considered that you ARE the distortion which you seek?

Don't try to reason with the Rooskie troll brigade. It's useless.

THE ONLY THING THE BORSCHT NIGGERS UNDERSTAND IS BOOTS ON THEIR NECK AND BOMBS FROM THE SKY!!

FUCK RUSSIA!
FUCK THE KREMLIN!

AND MOST OF ALL FUCK VAJ-A-QUEER POOH-STAIN! THAT LITTLE MANLET CAN SUCK MY DICK!!!!

ONLY A WEAK PEOPLE WOULD ALLOW THEMSELVES TO BE RULED BY AN AUTISTIC LITTLE MANLET LIKE THAT! NUKING THE ROOSKIES WOULD BE DOING THEM A FAVOR!!!

...

Welcome on twitter where smashing the retweet button gives you power.

>Diversion from narrative - like, if a few tweets down the account is talking about football, or dancing, chances are it's a real person.
You've already been told that people make these political accounts because they're angry about political events and they don't want doxed and bothered by butthurt SJWs. It's what I did, it's what half of Sup Forums does. These accounts aren't going to suddenly start talking about football because they're made solely to vent.

Nah just kidding, the FSB pays me many rubles to make fake accounts to spread fake information for a fake candidate. Russia really benefits from increasing nationalism in the US and across Europe, somehow.

I don't understand the question

Have you considered that you are the source of your own distorted reality?

Robesperg?

Yeah, but what does that even mean? Everyone has some kind of bias in them through conditioning.