Communism solves no problems that fascism or distributism hasn't solved already

Communism solves no problems that fascism or distributism hasn't solved already.

Prove me wrong, Sup Forums. Pro tip: you can't.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=jSxBLRs7c-c
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

It's wrong because it implies communism solves problems at all.

Okay, it attempts to solve no problems that fascism or distributism don't already succeed in solving already then.

bump

No, you are 100% correct
Communism will fail every time

Yes

fpbp

In spirit though OP is correct. Communism is a sick and degenerate ideology that has never accomplished anything good or noble. It is, exclusively, a negative influence on humanity.

Well I mostly meant that I don't understand why communists and socialists are so obsessed with their ideas that they ignore all the other solutions to the problems communism seeks to solve. I've brought up distributism and fascism to them and when they hear distributism they just ignore it, or if they do hear it out, they say its socialism despite the widespread private property, private ownership of the means of production, and small government. And bring up fascism to them, and they'll give you a butchered version of fascism to autistically screech about.

Eh..
Communism can only work when it's international.
This will happen after we reach the highest stages of international capitalism (globalism).
Then the UN will take control of the world and will implement international socialism.
This will last for many years until we reach the end goal of international communism.

If your system requires everybody on Earth to accept if fully before it starts working, you have a crappy system.

Historical material progress is independent of voluntaryism ("what people want"). It will happen, no matter how many times the fascists set it back.

>distributism

Explain?

This is my point though, you guys think that the ONLY way to solve the problems of automation is with communism, when the mixed economies, fascism and distributism are all capable of solving that problem perfectly on their own. In fact, distributism and fascism solves the cultural issues that will arise from a automated society that communism and the mixed economies don't even attempt to address.

You have a point there. Possibly we'll have three or four racial blocks in the world that will be managed as you described.

Subsidiarity and solidarity. Basically, government is always handled on the smallest level possible, so mayor>governor>president. Small businesses are favored over large ones, so trust busting, high taxes for large business and low taxes for small ones, tariffs, and incentives are all used to promote this. The idea is to have as many people own their own business as possible, if the business needs to be larger then it should be a co-op, and there would be guilds that act as a sort of union of business owners, making sure that no one creates a monopoly, providing start ups for new business owners, and making sure that the proper people become doctors and what not.

youtube.com/watch?v=jSxBLRs7c-c

who wants to prove anyone wrong about communism's shortcomings?

Holy shit that sounds pretty good, Don't know why i'm only just hearing this just now. Did Nazi Germany/Fascist Italy practice this?

In hindsight, fascism sucks in practise while communism doesn't suck in practise. Fascism is a dead ideology, and it only took around 10 years to achieve that.

Communism is kind of like a development dictatorship but more sustainable, less flexible, less militarized, more socially progressive, better suited for bigger and diverse countries.

...

>In hindsight, fascism sucks in practise while communism doesn't suck in practise
You have seen the track record of communism yes?

>communism doesn't suck in practise

Were you not around when USSR collapsed ruskie?

Fascism prevents mongrelization of people and creation of mindless slave race to serve kikes. Therefore leftist will be always against it, no matter how much of problems they state themselves fascism solves.

Based Ruskie

Bad Ruskie

Cold war produced many silly and ridiculous propaganda pieces. It's curious that some people still fall for them.

And that proves what? Revolutionary France degenerated into Revolutionary Empire and eventually fell. Yet I don't see many Antien Regimes around nowadays.

>tfw no anime about "what if the gestapo where little girls?"

Entered the thread with aspirations for intellectual discussion. Was responded with screens of cartoons for children.

Revolutionary France came Revolutionary Empire because it had a reasonable system

This isn't about Empires, This is about Ideology's. Communism is an unachievable mess of a system that can never work. Many communist countries lack in their economy, whilist capitalist ones boom!

At least 56 million people died in the Soviet Union alone, add up all the communist countries and that number rises up to 100 million. That's not propaganda and it doesn't take a genius to figure out that an ideology that keeps collapsing in on itself probably isn't the best, especially when that ideology doesn't even solve any problems that haven't been solved under other far more successful systems.