I am ready to accept God

I have given up my hat tipping ways and now believe in the Creator.

Help me Sup Forums. How do I know which monotheism is correct. Does it matter which one I follow?

God bless.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=rKa9hCu4nZE
youtube.com/watch?v=obtgaZ97Kdc
goodreads.com/book/show/6708.The_Power_of_Now
youtu.be/yzqTFNfeDnE
youtube.com/watch?v=5FU2nG9gTlc&t=1s
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

This is the Christian God aka the only & correct God
youtube.com/watch?v=rKa9hCu4nZE

Protestantism is the most authentic form of Christianity. A personal relationship with God, unmediated by a selfish and molesting clergy, is the only way to worship.

>I am ready to accept God
Why?
>Does it matter which one I follow?
Not particularly. There is but one Divine but she cares not for worship. But you should worship her anyway.

Christianity OP

The jews prove the gospel

Lol look at this wanker.

>There is but one Divine but she cares not for worship. But you should worship her anyway.

Trying a bit hard there aren't you mate?

Or rather, Christianity is the only religion that aligns with Logos

youtube.com/watch?v=obtgaZ97Kdc

This

It's Gnosticism.

Several religions have elements of truth.

Buddhism and Gnosticism seem to be the most legit to me

No, it's just how it is. The Goddess lives and her light will shine in your life if you let it but if you don't it's fine.

>Why?
Hard to put into words. Given the deterministic world that is created as a singular, ordered monolith, there can only be one, all-powerful God. There are no premises to fill in an argument because we are not all knowing ourselves to make absolutely correct statements. But faith relieves the anxiety and only divine revelation can inform it. I am trying to fine the correct revelation.

Count yourself fortunate. You've opened up at exactly the right time in history.

The answer is Buddhism, but don't be fooled by your mind's associations with that word. It just so happens that the teachings of the Buddha (and, as you'll realize, Jesus himself) have recently become available in pure, easily digestible form. All you have to do is be open and listen.

goodreads.com/book/show/6708.The_Power_of_Now

Get the audio book. Pirate it, get it for free via Audible's trial membership or by any other means. Use headphones, find a quiet place where you can listen undisturbed, at home, outside, whatever works for you.

It requires so little effort that anyone can afford to take this small leap of faith. If you don't like it, reject it as you will. All you have to do is recognize the truth when you hear it.

>I have given up my hat tipping ways and now believe in the Creator.
Don't forget your Creators are a man when he put his semen in a woman. They are your father and your mother. You needn't to believe in a fake god or follow any easy-to-understand cucktheism.

But why is it so different from early Christianity and all the fathers?

All you need is a relationship with Jesus you faggot.

Church doesn't matter, denominations don't matter.

Ask Jesus for forgiveness and spread his word.

t. Actual agnostic here but learned this from a good friend in the military.

But why is the Bible so different from that?

Literally Roman propaganda, and changes over time because nobody could read and you weren't allowed to criticize the Church.

It's up to you to interpret what it means to be with God. Man is flawed, but you can't go wrong with asking Jesus for guidance.

This.

Catholicism is not true Christianity.

But even if that is the case we know that there cannot be contradicting truths. So why is Christian filled with Contradicting beliefs all claiming equal validity?

But why is the early christian and all the fathers contradict Protestant?

>Eckhart Tolle
That's New Age.
That's not Buddhism.

during the reformation they burned translations of the bible from Latin into English and German

It seems there are some based Pinoys

>But why is the early christian and all the fathers contradict Protestant?
Who exactly?
In what way?

>why is the early christian and all the fathers contradict Protestant?
most of them were somewhat correct they were very much the opposite of the roman church with its pagan ceremonies

But why did the protestants remove books from the bible?

Rome had to keep pagans happy, most of the guys on the Council of Nicea were pagan - look at the "Sol Invictus" coins for proof, Christianity was more like syncrentic Gnosticism at this point. Prods stripped away all the faggotry and deceipt.

Not Pinoy mate, just live up here for tax reasons.

Also, fuck the All Blacks.

They pray for the dead. They don't believe in sola fide and sola scriptura. They venerate martyrs and their bones and they also think that the eucharist is where you actually eat and drink the flesh and blood of Jesus

Doesn't all these oppose Protestantism?

Then explain this

This

Look up "tom campbell a recent experiment" on youtube

Roman church did this too, See Council of Nicea. JC was not considered "The Son of God" for 350 years prior to this, in fact he insisted he not be worshipped.

But why do they accept the Council of Nicaea then?

they were not central to the redemption given to us by Christ however there are books missing overall like the Book of Enoch which was taken out by the roman church during the council of nicea which is actually very important about the real history of the world but not so much about christ

>Protestantism is the most authentic form of Christianity

Ages of distortion by the interpretation of the mind, which seeks to make everything its own. The more links in the chain of retelling, the more obscured the spiritual truth becomes. This is why we are where we are now, in a reality where man willingly destroys his own home among the stars.

Is bible edited?

Christianity has been the best so far.

Who are "they" exactly.
Name me the one who doesn't believe in sola fide.

Saint Augustine certainly does.

To avoid a civil war between pagan & Christians.

Christianity. Ignore organised religion for now and study the Bible. Ecclesiastes, Ecclessiasticus, the Gospels (John and Matthew are my favourite, others are just as good though) and Genesis (not literally of course)

It is a meme to hate religion know because (((they))) feed us misinformation about it constantly

Modern Christianity has been cucked and infiltrated to become a religion just about being 'nice'. True Christianity (being a disciple of Christ) is based and has personally made me a lot more content in life

No Pinoy would ever denounce Christianity. Have fun not owning land.

Don't you have some brown feet to kiss, papist?

The book of Enoch exist. So why don't protestants put that in? In fact why did many of the early fathers even use the so called additional books as Scripture?

Like I said, don't get caught up in words. What you call it is irrelevant.

you have given away your identity then

Of course. It's not really one book, it is several short ones. The bible has several authors.

Lucifer the bringer of light. The morning star. The interloper. The adversary.

He will crush the wicked and deep down he still loves god

Islam is hateful and illogical

Judaism has turned away from the Torah and followed the Talmud (which is a false religion), Hinduism is okay

Buddhism is good but Stoicism is better


The best combination is Stoicism and Christianity. Stoicism will also help you to understand Jesus and Christianity Better. Read 1. Epictetus' Discourses and Enchiridion 2. Marcus Aurelius' Meditations 3. Anything from Seneca

Augustine doesn't. In fact when one reads him you would see that he says very clearly that he still largely believes what he said earlier

because its is history and is not important our redempetion

But protestants exist where no pagan exist

Speak English, Abdul...

So why do you not boot out the OT books that are not mentioned in the NT?

The whole of his "teaching" can be summed up in:

>be here now
>be in the present moment
>observe your thoughts let them come and go like clouds in the sky, but you are the sky not the clouds

It's nice, it can be therapeutic and good for you neurologically etc. but it won't answer the big questions of your life. It will ultimately not satisfy you.

if the early Christians are some Proto-Protestant, why is they oppose sola scriptura?

because the old testament was created before the council of nicea it and was set as it was before christ

Lives in a counrty with the Queen of England. Can't speak the Queen's English.

But the early Christians also used the books protestants throw out

Book of Revelations has passages against further editing of the bible, which is why it's considerd the final book.

>deep down he still loves god
citation needed

If Augustine is Protestant then why did he say this....

>Comes to a place that is obviously majority christian

>help me pick the one true faith out of thousands Sup Forums

Enjoy your flock, sheep.

hes in time out for being a little shit. But God like any other parent is punishing him out of love

>I have given up my hat tipping ways

"Fedora tipping" is a Jewish trick designed to steer people away from the atheism red pill. Following any form of Christianity is following a religion created by the Jews to get the goyim to waste their time policing one another's behavior.

Why do you think when Jews have theological discussions they never bother to debate the existence of god? Why do you think there's no heaven or hell in the Jewish religion even though there is in the other Abrahamic religions? It's because they know it isn't true and even if it is it doesn't matter. Most Jewish theology revolves around morality-- morality independent from right or wrong defined by a god or gods.

Organized religion is designed to dull your senses to reality. The more time you waste in church listening to some guy talk about some desert people, beg for donations, and scare you into thinking you're going to hell for all eternity the less time you have to focus on the impending threat of globalism, or of Jewish central banks.

Since many are raised from birth to believe in the religion their parents believe, this is often the hardest red pill to swallow.

>early Christians
early christians also used the Book of Jubilees which the Roman church also did not use so what the roman bible and the protestant bible is the difference between the talmud and the torah for jews

Hold up are you trying to say that the book of enoch is truth?

nah man the only thing you need from buddhism is the practice of meditation, the philosophy only works if you are a monk yourself.

But why did protestant do it then?

I'm not even a Christian - I thought I was helping some guy make his mind up but he is plainly just a mongoloid, or acting as one. Fuck this, I'm out.

If you still have questions to be satisfied you haven't understood the point. The moment can only be felt. Thinking is the whole problem to begin with. If you seek salvation in an answer to a question you'll never get anywhere, as there's always another question. The endless loop of "Okay, but..." is itself the problem.

>Hold up are you trying to say that the book of enoch is truth?
its fun ride to get on

To fuck your mother in the arse and wipe their cocks on your curtains. Fuck you.

>Sola Scriptura
This is often misunderstood.
It doesn't mean we shouldn't learn from tradition.
It just means that Scripture contains all that is required for salvation.

But you can learn useful things from everywhere.

Pic related: It's a woodcut made by Lucas Cranach the Elder.
Lucas was a Lutheran.

Educate yourself heathen.

Except we are told that there isn't any clear single canon. And all include to varying the degrees the books protestants throw out.

conclusions it leads to are interesting

What part of that contradicts Reformed/Lutheran theology?

>we are told that there isn't any clear single canon
well you are finally learning

Even less intensively - mindfulness is important. Being in the world rather than dulling your experience of it.

No. Sola Scriptura means that ALL tradition submits to the Bible. But such a premise is not even found in the early Christians when they presuppose its use as a guide to scripture, as a summation of it and relies on an actual historic succession to demonstrate validity. Oops, sola scriptura denies these.

Otherwise Tradition no longer works in the subservient way

You don't need to be a monk. You can meditate anywhere at any time, at home after or before work. The teaching is only to make you understand just what it is that you're experiencing when you meditate.

A)Free will is affirmed
B)Faith is not even seen as a passive reception of something
C)Human beings still have to work with God's Grace
That is Catholic theology 101. Not Protestant

> The moment can only be felt.
Is that a feeling or a thought though?

> Thinking is the whole problem to begin with.
But "thinking is a problem" is itself a thought.

>If you still have questions to be satisfied you haven't understood the point.
So which one is it? You said FEELING is the point, now you say it's about UNDERSTANDING.

>The endless loop
It's only endless for those who cannot grasp the essence of infinite progress. The true infinity, or God, stops the infinite regress.

It also means protestants cannot use "MUH add seven books"

Do you know Him?

youtu.be/yzqTFNfeDnE

...

>It also means protestants cannot use "MUH add seven books"
so what there are many different protestants

I like this a lot

I forgot to add this,
D)The sanctification stage is still that which saves contra Protestant thinking that it is simply proof or a response to such

get your paganism out of here
youtube.com/watch?v=5FU2nG9gTlc&t=1s

They all agree 66books. A stupid agreement in contradiction with history

>worships an angel
>doesn't worship best angel Ramiel
Lucifer is an uppity faggot. Ramiel will guide you to The Light. Ramiel just wants you to do your best and is the bringer of hope. Without Ramiel no one would go to heaven or hell.

IMO the deepest religious philosophy is Advaita (non duality). Theres 4 Advaita traditions each deeper than the next.

Sunyavada Buddhism
Yogacara Buddhism
Advaita Vedanta
Kashmir Shaivism

>They all agree 66books
do they though have you been through all of the thousands of churches

>A)Free will is affirmed
Lutheran theology does not deny free will. We have free will, but that freedom of the will is bound with sin. You can choose most things in your life but you cannot chose God or to be saved. That comes from God.

>B)Faith is not even seen as a passive reception of something
It is seens as that. Read the picture you posted again. It says justification is wholly the act of God. Cooperation only enters into the picture AFTER the act of faith/salvation.

>C)Human beings still have to work with God's Grace
NO. It does not say that. You're misreading it either because you lack reading comprehension or on purpose, not sure which one.
The text you posted only says that we co-operate AFTER being saved by grace. The saving grace acts TOTALLY on its own.

>It's a satanist larper episode
There are easier ways to bang 15 year old girls you know