Upopular opinions thread

What are some beliefs you hold that are best kept to yourself due to how controversial they are considered by the vast population?

I unironically believe that some races are just superior than others. When I look at Aboriginals, Africans and compare them with Whites its astounding that everyone considers us the same species. Even Asians are suspect, since they lack the moral compass that whites have.

I also do not think men and women are equal either. Sure, there are equally shitty men and women, but women just seem to fail at more things and our leaders realize this and make life easier for them simply because they are necessary for procreation and raising children.

Other urls found in this thread:

autism.org.uk/about/what-is/gender.aspx
scientificamerican.com/article/how-mens-brains-are-wired-differently-than-women/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

I voted Trump

From a New Englander, Robert E. Lee did nothing wrong.
>Dested slavery but didn't want to kill people from his own state
>Only owned on slave he used as a servant, only hired local virginians at his buisness.
>His speech at appomattox courthouse was GOAT

>loved his state more than America
Is this right or wrong? I hate Minnesotas cuckery, but also don't want to be compared to an asshole faggot Jew from New York..

The EU is a privately controlled authoritarian entity designed to siphon cheap labor, power and debt from the peripheral countries.

KEK
FOUND THE UNDERAGE FAG

High school must be tough kid

-Blacks are humans but Abbos are as close to not being human as is possible. The only reason they are is because they can interbreed with us, but then again can't dogs and wolves?

-Global warming will not be the death of the species but it will cause the third world to suffer more and I don't really ultimately care enough to have my country fall on its sword. I am for regulations for clean air and water and other tangible benefits.

-Globalism is a socialist kind of philosophy of making the richer first world poorer while bringing up the standards of living or wealth of the third world. Likewise, I have no interest in the US falling on its sword to let the third world prosper. If it's a choice of our poor and middle class flourishing and the third world being mired in poverty and stagnation and infighting then I'll sell them AKs and ARs to get to work on that.

-Likewise, Globalism is designed to break down individual nation-states and create a vast infighting-plagued proletariat for the upper class to take advantage of with cheap labor and consumers.

-You cannot live in the first world short of being a hermit in a log cabin and not have blood on your hands. By taking advantage of first world standards of living you inevitably are profiting off the misery and suffering of those building your shit, farming your shit, ectera. Doesn't mean to be wracked by white/first world guilt just means you cannot act pure and like your shit doesn't stink. You want to be pure by inaction then you should have died in the womb.

Well, your unpopular opinions are breddy dumb tbpf, though this has to be countered directly:
>but women just seem to fail at more things and our leaders realize this and make life easier for them simply because they are necessary for procreation and raising children.
Our "leaders" (read: progressive crypto-socialists) aren't making life easier for women out of the kindness of their hearts, or even for the fact that they're perhaps the weaker sex for that matter (your fail at more things comment). They're doing it for the same reason they target any other group they'll define around an identity: to have the government that they run replace and be seen as the new daddy, or husband, so to divide the people from each other, thereby conquering them.

Here's something that will be an unpopular opinion on Sup Forums. We're not becoming increasingly 'liberal' for the fact that women were allowed to participate in politics. They're simply one of the first groups targeted. Rather, things are trending that way because the revolutionary movements started taking off in the mid to late nineteenth century and the people continually failed to recognize the danger inherent to its philosophy when they switched tactics to 'progress,' upon which adherents started being awarded actual political power. As evidence in frame of reference to your comments on women, the single most 'liberal' piece-of-shit president we've had was put in office by men in 1912, seven years before women could even effect the outcome.

not feeling like writing a wall so ill just dump this. it resonates with me

>-Likewise, Globalism is designed to break down individual nation-states and create a vast infighting-plagued proletariat for the upper class to take advantage of with cheap labor and consumers.
Different forces at work, and its wrong headed of the left (and new alt-right, taking many lessons from them) to lump these together. International socialists want the poor rabble. Free market capitalists want and have a natural need to have a people who are able to afford their products.

It is directly against the interests of a man to eschew marriage and loath women on a conceptual level. Only works in favor of the divide and conquerors . . . and fags, who most often spew it.

Men really are better at women in the sciences and math fields and historically it wasn't because women were kept down by society. It's because men are 6 times more likely to be autistic/aspies than women.

>1 post by this ID

These posts are made to destroy the abundant #pizzagate evidence.

Do not fall for them.

This has the ring of truth. Sauce on the 6 times more likely stat?

I didn't research it extensively, so the ratio might be wrong (could be 4:1 or 5:1)

One source to a list of studies:
autism.org.uk/about/what-is/gender.aspx

From the same link:

>Lorna Wing found in her paper on sex ratios in early childhood autism that among people with 'high-functioning autism' or Asperger syndrome there were as many as 15 times as many men and boys as women and girls,

I think there might really be something to this.

Unpopular opinions that I have for normalfags:
>Some races are better than others
>Women are inferior to men
>Women should not be allowed to vote
>People with a low IQ or other flaws like genetic diseases should be killed

Unpopular opinions that I have on Sup Forums:
>Bernie Sanders isn't that bad, and might make a better president than Trump
>God doesn't exist
>Some Jews are alright and shouldn't be gassed, like Bernie Sanders, Eliezer Yudkowsky, Grigori Perelman, Ben Goertzel, etc.

I wouldn't phrase it that way though. Men just have more analytical minds.

scientificamerican.com/article/how-mens-brains-are-wired-differently-than-women/

You're not wrong about the correlation though. The (overly-diagnosed) autism is likely a symptom of that different wiring in brain development.

Donald Trump was the worst presidential candidate in modern history and he'll be, at best, a sub-par president.

Besides the "racism" (or race realism) that most people here also subscribe to, I firmly believe women are superior to men, which ironically puts me even more at odds with everyone else here than it does with people in normieworld.

most people on Sup Forums don't believe in God. dont buy the vocal Christian meme

>most people on Sup Forums don't believe in God. dont buy the vocal Christian meme
It's been polled many times. There's a significantly higher portion of atheism here than elsewhere in the general population, and more diversity in alternative strains of spiritualism, but that non-belief segment is in no way a majority.

>Upopular opinions thread

>on the politically incorrect board

wow, that's meta.

Just so happens my opinions are unpopular here and in normie world.

>Just so happens my opinions are unpopular here and in normie world.

you know that we're being raided by normies, right?

>you know that we're being raided by normies, right?
Every day since Sup Forums's founding.

>Every day since Sup Forums's founding.

Yup.