Why did Imperialisn fell?

Why did Imperialisn fell?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_population_in_1900
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Colonialism was a mistake

I-It's never been tried for real!

Thinking of shitskins as human was a mistake, pressing resources and labor out of them was not. If anything it made their lives better.

Ran out of fucking land to take.

My nigger.

USA and USSR happened.

WW2

That's the spirit!

Take up the White Man’s burden—

Send forth the best ye breed—

Go send your sons to exile

To serve your captives' need

To wait in heavy harness

On fluttered folk and wild—

Your new-caught, sullen peoples,

Half devil and half child

Take up the White Man’s burden

In patience to abide

To veil the threat of terror

And check the show of pride;

By open speech and simple

An hundred times made plain

To seek another’s profit

And work another’s gain

Take up the White Man’s burden—

And reap his old reward:

The blame of those ye better

The hate of those ye guard—

The cry of hosts ye humour

(Ah slowly) to the light:

"Why brought ye us from bondage,

“Our loved Egyptian night?”

Take up the White Man’s burden-

Have done with childish days-

The lightly proffered laurel,

The easy, ungrudged praise.

Comes now, to search your manhood

Through all the thankless years,

Cold-edged with dear-bought wisdom,

The judgment of your peers!

Had the natives been exterminated or excluded for good, then it would have been successful everywhere. That's what happened in the US, and the results speak for themselves. Their current decline is a result of recently understanding themselves as a melting pot of all cultures and peoples instead of just European ones, and the rejection of a unifying American culture in favor of tolerating elements of distinct subcultures (like "Blackness" or "Islamic").

Slavery is a mistake. Reservations are a mistake. Multiculturalism is a mistake.

This desu senpai

Purge the heretics or get purged by heretics.

The policy was schizophrenic. There were a lot of humanitarian overtones, but at the end of the day, the colonies still had to be set up to generate short-term profit. And it's going to be hard to turn a profit and try to provide western civilization to savages at the same time.

So once the cost of trying to uplift the wild dindus got beyond a pittance (and the world wars put dents in everyone's budgets), the whole concept got called into question.

Basically, no one learned anything from the New World. In North America, the (mostly English) colonies in the modern U.S. and Canada were settled mostly by white people, and built their own political institutions. This combination of factors let them set up complex economies which were more than glorified RGOs, and thus allowed them to become functioning Nation-States.

Conversely, in South America, the colonies were, from the perspective of the Spanish/Portuguese governments, sugar plantations and silver mines. They were governed by corrupt vice-royalties, and inhabited largely by mestizos. So the economies weren't developed, and as their RGOs became less valuable, they ran into trouble.

Then everyone did the same thing in Apefrica. That's what went wrong.

because now the imperialists can't even reproduce or hold a male or white position of leadership even in their own nations and their own nations are getting their highways blocked and cars and homes pillaged and lives destroyed even when innocent.

but the whole colonization thing was a race between the world powers. who can grab a piece of land before anyone else was there. the fastest way probably was working with the natives.
north america almost had no people on there, which is why you could just settle on it, while shooting some of them. Trying to genocide india while building up your settlements probably would have been basically impossible.

It didn't. Instead we grew weak and complacent. The US could have used the internet to forge ahead with an unprecedented technology lead to completely bury the developing world. To a degree this has already occurred, albeit using corporations as a vehicle for dominance rather than nations.
The trade off is that corporations will buy labor and resources where it is plentiful. They follow the path of least resistance. Where labor is expensive they will automate and outsource. Where labor is cheap they will market the western lifestyle, which is unobtainable in all but a few countries. Imperialism didn't fail... NATIONS failed.

Marxism

There were territories in Africa, Asia and South America that were never conquered by Europeans

This

>Used to be a German colony
>Used to be a Swedish colony
>Used to be a Russian colony

>mfw better off than those third world shitholes

Even today we can't rule well our entire territory

Virtue signaling & cowardice. The way for young Europeans to gain prestige went from "Serve the empire overseas" to "Condemn the empire and those who serve it".

Also, we overestimated the intelligence of the niggers. Turns out they would tear down a glorious civilization that they had a share in, to replace it with famine, war, and eternal poverty, just so they could feel like it was entirely theirs and no evil white men were involved. We wuz kangs and such.

WWI and WWII pretty much ended imperialism

>Why did Imperialisn fell?
It never ended, it just changed the wrapping. Companies from western/European countries still control large segments of the economy in African and Asian countries.

probable has to do with morale.
Its easier to crush the morale of soldier who fight for kike bankers than it is to crush the morale of farmers fighting on their home turf with ak47s

>Africa
Literally every single part of Africa was some sort of colony or protectorate at the outbreak of the Second World War.

technically it didnt

british imperialism gave rise to the greatest nation our world has ever seen: MURICA

the outcome of imperialism varies however because its implementation was not standardised.

what set america apart was just sheer luck, that the natives had no natural immunity to european disease, hence millions of them just dying off

if we were to go back into africa and killed 99% of the niggers (and kept their populations low), we would have nations far greater than america ever has been within 200 years tops

this wont happen though because
>"MUH GENOCIDE"

so instead we get white genocide and reversal in the progress of humanity

The mongrel hordes couldn't be civilized

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_population_in_1900

We used to be more than a fourth of Brazil and twice as many as Peru.
Just ducking sad where we had gone. Also notice all the african countries growing, fuck.. FUCK!!!

>settled mostly by white people
...
>Then everyone did the same thing in Apefrica. That's what went wrong.
basically mirroring what i said here: tldr: we should have killed every non white 300 years ago

it fell for the same reason it came about: greed. plus, nothing last forever. it didn't fall because of one thing or another; but because its time was up. reasons are given after the fact to help the common folks digest the facts.

This, but its making niggers breed.

United States

meta image related

More than a century later it is still debated whether this was meant in earnest or just irony, or both.

Where is the Ottoman Empire here? Were they spreading love and hugs or something?

Theyn were grabbing your pussy aswell.

Wrong. Ethiopia did not succumb to the scramble for Africa.

i dont see the racism in this. he is just being honest about the fact colonialism only benefited the very rich and powerful, while burdening the average white european with murder and inhumanity. if you were an average european soldier in the colonies, your life was horrible and very unrewarding. there are the powerful and the elite, then there are white people. just because those people share your skin colour does not mean they share your humanity or your vision of life. for them, white people are easily brainwash-able people that are used a murder tool to destroy and control other people.