Net Neutrality's 'Days Are Numbered' Under Trump

>Votes for Trump
>Gets Sup Forums access included in a payed Internet package like Cable TV.
Bunch of cucks.

dslreports.com/shownews/FCCs-Pai-Net-Neutralitys-Days-Are-Numbered-Under-Trump-138505

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=mFwtrPCYP4Y
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

haha like any media company would want to waste bandwidth on Sup Forums.

Might be include with an anime package or maybe something that includes infowars.

Guess net neutrality is not something pol cares about. last bump

>falling for the net neutrality jew
lmao

I thought the UN controlled the internet now.

The UN does not control what Comcast, TimeWarner, Centurylink, and so on filter out of your internet connection.

the concept of net neutrality has nothing to do with any net neutrality legislation.

>LEAF
Cause the NSA will suddenly stop once Net Neutrality is gone.

>legacy media lies constantly about how great Obama is
>approval ratings toilet in 5 years
>legacy media lies constantly about how evil Trump is
>approval ratings ??? in 5 years

Is this a long-term plan to make sure Trump has a better 2nd term than Reagan?

Net neutrality is a meme. It will be used to sneak in anti-competitive regulation.

I actually tried to make a few threads on this issue during the election as I was really concerned about this and saw that Trump had no good stance on Net Neutrality. Guess I was right to worry months ago.

they wont listen till their internet bills look like ours

Yeah, they basically have no idea what they're talking about.

What are you talking about. I pay $60 for 1.5Mbit DSL from centurylink.

You got some hot garbage.

in our "fair and balanced system" I pay 60 dollars for 50gb a month, which is never enough for me and my girlfriend, and get charged nearly 2 dollars for every gb over the cap

they also throttle my connection if I use too much too fast

thats THE best option in my area

rogers a shit

Trump is gonna fix it, right guys !?!?!

Good. Fuck you gommie niggers.

>payed

literally the only worthwhile option in my region, I'd go to bell but they used to call my home all the time with intrusive bullshit sold by poo in loos, and their customer support was garbage

theres a tiny third party company but they rent lines from bell and their customer support consists of "if you have an issue call us so we call bell to send a guy to fix it meaning you gotta deal with bell lmao"

What they don't understand is that there's a gun aimed at the head of the internet. Should they attempt to fuck with the internet, the internet can go away. Without notice. And it would destroy the economies of most developed nations pretty much instantly. The rich would become poor. The indebted would become debt free, and you'd probably see a massive, massive clusterfuck as the world would quickly resort to the early 20th century. Heads would roll.

Go for it.

Ok that is worse than me, I get unlimited 1.5Mbit and average 150-300GB a month. With a theoretical max of ~400GB a month. Centurylink has a 150GB limit at my tier but they don't enforce it.

Do you really think private companies aren't at the forefront of collecting your data? Is that really what you think?

Net neutrality is a fucking meme. No company was threatening to do what plebbitors and OP are whining about, but hey, at least the government has more control over the Internet now!

You're retarded.

this

Mark Cuban has millions invested in Netflix, and he's against net neutrality. If NN is so good for groups like Netflix, why would he go against his interests?

Not to mention even Peter Theil thinks it's retarded

>Net Neutrality

This is just dumb. Why should my VOIP, gaming or email reading bandwith be treated equally as someone downloading torrents?

Torrents should get last priority on the line. VOIP, anything realtime and browsing text should be first.

Torrents should be last. Netflix also should be last, they just need to setup the software to buffer more before streaming. It is not realtime, so fuck this.

the internet is perfect the way it is now. why are they so desperately trying to change it ?

There's a lot of money in Big Net Neutrality right now.

I'll take these MUH FREEDUM (via regulation) people seriously when there is actually a problem to fix.

How has no one called these people shills when it's THIS fucking obvious?

The internets fine, there is absolutely no reason to impose partiality for sites like facebook.

Where do you think Sup Forums will fall on the list of sites? They'll fuckin throttle you for it.

If you honestly think companies aren't saving just as much (if not more) data about you than the NSA you are too stupid to post.

SHILLS FUCK OFF, YOU ALREADY GOT TRUMP ELECTED, FUCK OFF!

Net Neutrality is not about protecting Netflix, it's about protecting the tiny companies that innovate which can't pay for the fast lanes. Small companies which could even be blocked from certain ISP. Netflix is so big that no one is going to dare block them but Netflix has and currently does pay for "upgrades" on certain ISPs. Even with Net Neutrality.

>y-you're a shill!
Not an argument.

I am still not sure I understand the issue, would I be correct in assuming that the ISP market isn't large enough for competition to drive it into fair service? I think I read something about that having to do with the cable infrastructure.

>not addressing anything else
Not an argument

Also fuck that bald virgin

>virgin
but that's not even true. It's also not an argument.

fake news

"O Vet! Goyim would rather watch netflix than our comcast, lets make sure that they cant!"

US ISP competition is pretty low.

Holy fuck the amount of shilling in this thread

You had me until the last line. Trump shills don't exist.

>Trump shills don't exist.

Good, Net Neutrality is what's really holding back the internet from being the real technology of the future that it deserves to be.

Then we have Trump who thinks Net Neutrality blocks conservative media.

>American reading comprehension

It looks like he's saying Obama removing net neutrality will target conservative media because the people that would be in charge of regulating it are a bunch of fucking commies

A quick google tells me the Fairness Doctrine mandated both sides of an argument be shown to anybody who holds a broadcasting license

t. Leaf w/ national commie sponsored shill media

>It looks like he's saying Obama removing net neutrality will target conservative media because the people that would be in charge of regulating it are a bunch of fucking commies
Obama never removed net neutrality but instead got ISPs labeled as Title 2 while he was president. Effectively making Net Neutrality law instead of a general ideal which was not enforce, and not letting ISPs block or limit content on their networks. Meaning that they can't block/slow conservative websites or any other type of site.

While Trump on the other hand wants net neutrality

*While Trump on the other hand wants net neutrality gone

Trump removing net neutrality will benefit megacorps. It'll be like North Carolina and the trans bathroom ban: the people cracking down on popular sentiment will be the NFL, Apple, etc.
Fox will kill Breitbart. FB and others will act to kill anonymous websites like Sup Forums because anonymity is a missed advert opportunity.

He's not wrong.

What conservative sites have been blocked/slowed by net neutrality? Hell the man heavily won because of his internet presence.

>the free market is bad

fuck off socialist

Once again, Sup Forums creates its own worst enemies.

No. This is a dumb plan. It'd be like a conservative politician pushing for limiting tax exempt status for churches--it would directly hurt his base.
You wouldn't have the opinions you have today if defacto net neutrality didn't let places like free republic, infowars, and Sup Forums thrive.

Imagine how tea party elections in 2010 , 2012, and the Trump election would have gone if Fox/WSJ were the only big name in conservative news and any time you tried to go to Breitbart you couldn't even load the page.
Entirely getting rid of net neutrality will put globalist corporate priorities over free speech.

>free market
While I only have one choice in internet provider.
Great

Mostly people only have one choice in electrical service provider, and I don't hear the screaming over their regulation as socialism. Otherwise you could be charged like $1 a kwh or something stupid.

The Free Market would be great if the big ISPs weren't trying to legislate Google Fiber out of existence.

Site reliability engineer here at Pinterest. Net neutrality is a meme. Trump is right. The initial goal is good but in the end it will just give the Feds power over the internet and lead to shit like Sup Forums getting blocked. Net neutrality is like fake news, it can't be defined and will be enforced by commies.

Fuck Telus and their $2/1GB.

I use Shaw, they may be shit but they don't charge for going over the cap as long as you're nice to them about it.

Ice cream me up senpai

> it can't be defined and will be enforced by commies.
>allegedly works at pinterest
Pinterest is cancer, making you login to look a one image. Fuck that place.

its non existing. we have no competition here until 5G fixed mobile comes out in 4 years.

alot politicians are boomers and have no grasp of or how internet works. trump is guilty of this as well. he doesn't fundamentally understand that breitbart and Sup Forums are what led him to president. destroying net neutrality will never allow an outsider to win again because only large corporation news could afford to pay what the isp'scharge let alone many isp's own news networks/websites.

He's got Bannon to talk him out of that if he decides to dedicate any resources to it. The danger would be Reps sneaking into some other bill. Or Dems doing it. I'm not sure how the partisan breakdown is on the issue.

...

on things like tech i have very little faith in boomers doing the right thing. Net neutrality will eventually be permanent when the current gen of millennials and gen Y come into political power but as of now and the immediate future it can be catastrophic for free speech.

holy shit kek

...

you what

we can't do anything to the internet anymore. Obama gave it away to the UN in october, when ICANN became an independent entity not beholden to the US Govt, instead becoming a “multi-stakeholder” non-profit that will listen to everybody- companies, experts, academics and, even any nation state that uses it, to determine how it's run.

AKA what used to be beholden to the US Constitution, is now a global entity that can change it's views according to whoever wants them to change. And soon after the change happened, I recall a bunch of websites like youtube and facebook changing their TOS to reflect the change in ownership, giving them a broader ability to take on "hate speech" (AKA they can censors without abandon because they are no longer bound by the first amendment)

youtube.com/watch?v=mFwtrPCYP4Y

Interesting screen shot. I see a lot of anti-Trump memes coming, however I don't see pol becoming some liberal utopia.

isn't net neutrality just a false dichotomy for either government v corporation?

see

...

Fucking torrents have become too popular, the Jews has noticed it in his hollywood profit margin, and it's going to get worse and worse. The fight to control content and data are now the same (esp if TW merger goes through, that's suicide).

!0 years ago you had...maybe 1% of the nation was torrenting, if that. Now it's just too popular. The Jews are going to take it away. you needed the internet somewhat arcane and underground to keep your fun shit, same as gaming really. It's finished.

what? the US owning the internet did nothing to stop islamic nations, china and some european nations to censor or outright ban websites. I sometimes forget that Sup Forums itself has alot of babyboomer users who don't quiet understand how the internet works. Fucking the internet will destroy not only the economy (its the single greatest source of commerce now) but will hinder free speech. I have no faith in comcast making it easy to get access to news sources that rival msnbc.

>leaf

Although on the positive side, is there anything you really WANT to torrent at this point with the content being multi-kulti trash? Same as a movie, is there really anything you'd pay for on the electronic synagogue? That's where the Jew has made his mistake with multi-kult. The people with the Shekels eventually are going to switch it off. All of it.

How much further can they go with the race mixing and filth? Bestilaity next?

>>>/8pol/

internet is the printing press times a million. it has given the people more power than ever before. the elites don't like it so are pushing for net neutrality to end. Elites and corporations want to turn the internet into cable tv 2.0.

of course it doesnt stop other countries from censoring it for their users.

But it cannot be censored in the US. until now, while companies like comcast might fuck with users by throttling them so they pay for better access, they can't restrict content.

And the idea of "net neutrality" would prevent them from completely commercializing internet access to the point where if you want to visit Sup Forums you have to buy that special premium "adult internet package"

but, without control of ICANN, and without net neutrality, that means companies can do whatever the hell they want with US internet. sure, an American company might still have trouble with censorship because they are based on US soil, but what happens when internet companies do the Apple thing of relocating headquarters to foreign countries for tax reasons? when Comcast and Verizon all leave for Ireland because of the corporate tax rate, and all decide to start clamping down? suddenly they can censor what they want, and if you thought internet news sites were biased now, just wait till the actual ISP decides to control what you can search for, (search for conservative news and discussion? that'll be a rate hike for looking up hateful subjects!) and what you can access is tied to what internet package you have

they actually can restrict content if net neutrality does not exist. before we ever talked about net neutrality as a thing it was in full implementation. the internet was the wild west but then isps started "civilizing" it. we simply never NOT had net neutrality.

HOW DOES IT FEEL TO BE USEFUL IDIOTS OF BIG CORPORATIONS POL?

>Net neutrality will eventually be permanent when the current gen of millennials and gen Y come into political power
Millenials ARE Gen Y, user.

also, Im not so sure, considering they are the big SJW's. i can see democrat Gen Y Feds pushing for hate speech censorship.

HOW YOU ENJOYING SUCKING CORPORATE COCK ALT-RIGHT FAGGOT?

You aren't required to sign in to look at a single picture. Also we aren't (((google))) image search. Use their botnet if you hate registering so much.

Unrelated: Check the results of searching for Trump vs searching for Hillary on Pinterest. Our site bleeds red and isn't cucked yet.

>it has given the people more power than ever
goybook? a jew. Jewggle? 2 jews. Jewtube? again, jews. I don't doubt the Master Corrupter Media Masters are in defensive posture over losing to Trump, but so far at least it hasn't bubbled over.

more about shekels than content. look at fucking music sales now.

...

...

>You aren't required to sign in to look at a single picture.
If the pic I want requires me to scroll, then that login window comes front and center.

Good.
>government regulations are bad but not THIS government regulation

you seem to make the mistake of thinking anyone cares. It was the Jews either way. The battle was for the election night entertainment and crying fits, all captured for posterity beautifully and documented.

The Jews can carry my corpse out now. As long as it hurts you, I don't think you get people really don't care.

your babyboomer is showing. you are literally on a site that exists because of net neutrality. Sup Forums as is makes no profit. Imagine if it had to pay comcast to be on their basic tier internet plan? This site would simply not exist.

...

the internet is essentially a road network but with 1s and 0s. You would want a privately operated and owned US road network for cars and trucks? You would have major food companies buy them up and prevent competing food companies from driving their trucks on them. The same thing will happen if there is no regulation to keep the internet equal for all users and content creators.

>Unironically being a cuckservative
>Or worse, """libertarian"""

>Giving kikes the ability to throttle access to Sup Forums and conservative media websites is a good idea
Don't be retarded user, we don't have any competition in the ISP business so regulation like this is required.

Trump hasn't promised to get us more competition in the ISP market, so don't pretend like it's even an option. We need Net Neutrality for now.

So sign up, it takes literally 10 seconds. We're not a search engine (yet), we're a place to collect things you found online. Pinterest doesn't make any sense without an account. Also, we're one of the few mega-destinations online that's pretty fucking conservative. Without Pinterest, we wouldn't have President-elect Trump. We're the reason enough white women voted for him. Have a little fucking gratitude for the work we do.

>Sup Forums as is makes no profit.
>babyboomers

Your pic is imaginary. And who cares, there will be competition. There will always be ISPs that support net neutrality.

Seriously, "Net Neutrality" is nothing more than a ploy to give the government more power over the internet.

you're conservative in the way that you are full of babyboomer christian types who like scrapbooking. you are not conservative in the way Sup Forums is.

GOOD

Regulate away freedom
FASCISM NOW

Wouldn't this model just encourage competition? They can only charge $5 for Google for so long until free under-the-radar services like Ixquick and Gigablast take over