Just gonna leave this here

cnn.com/2016/10/19/politics/election-day-russia-hacking-explained/

On Oct 19 2016 CNN put a piece on their website and it's still there titled: "No, the presidential election can't be hacked"
And here’s an important quote from that CNN piece: “But election officials and cyber experts say it's virtually impossible for Moscow or some other outside group to influence the election outcome.”


So WTF are they talking about now why isn't anyone in the media pointing out their blatant double talk?

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.is/4gsF2
breitbart.com/big-journalism/2016/12/11/fake-news-cnn-shamed-into-major-corrections-on-ghana-election-story/
nytimes.com/2016/07/25/us/politics/debbie-wasserman-schultz-dnc-wikileaks-emails.html?_r=0
archive.is/EMGgf
politico.com/story/2016/11/white-house-hackers-election-recount-231849
computerworld.com/article/3148819/security/georgia-says-its-traced-an-attempted-voter-hack-to-dhs.html
redrightrepublic.com/dhs-says-ga-secstate-hack-maybe-rogue-employee-video/
ajc.com/news/state--regional-govt--politics/feds-state-disagree-attempt-hack-georgia-state-computers/wiGpYlstNl62FdMP3rPBoL/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

News has a shelf life. After 2 weeks it becomes fake.

Russia hacked the election by hacking and leaking the DNC emails. How is this hard to understand?

They aren't even trying to hide their fake news anymore.

archive.is/4gsF2

here's archive please like and share.

If the MSM started pointing out their own inconsistencies and lies it would just go on forever.

Then Podesta is liable for clicking on a phishing link asking for his password even though his advisors told him to not do so???? That ol' trick? That was the Russians? Or a mischievous young computer nerd ?

You mean by giving people the knowledge to make an informed choice on corruption? Got it. Thanks for clarifying. Russia is American hero.

>archive.is/4gsF2
This quote might be the best one:

to influence the outcome of a presidential election or statewide race would require physical tampering on a grand scale across in counties across multiple states on Election Day: In other words, it essentially can't be done.

But it's illegally obtained. It's like if a policeman obtains evidence in your house without a warrant then they can't use that evidence in court.

This isn't a court of law

>Liberal logic

because the "media" is lying. there hasn't been objective reporting in decades.

Thats not hacking an election. Its no worse then the fucking national enquirer dropping the same shit. Do you even think that most of the fucking people who voted for trump even know what wikileaks is? RETARD. 80% of the people who voted for TRUMP are blue collar workers and farmers who don't even own a computer.

russia hacked my life. it's so much easier now. thanks russia.

its what they do user

If you got this article from that other thread, youre welcome.
Glad to see it's being circulated now. Expose the liars for who they are.

>Experts say rather than the hacks, it's the reaction from the public that scares them.
>Rumors of hacking -- even if not successful -- could undermine faith in the election and play into a losing politician's claim that the election was "rigged."
From the article

Hillary
>INSTALLED

Where's your pedo ring now, cucks?

It's the highest court in the land.

breitbart.com/big-journalism/2016/12/11/fake-news-cnn-shamed-into-major-corrections-on-ghana-election-story/

>Then Podesta is liable for clicking on a phishing link asking for his password even though his advisors told him to not do so???? That ol' trick? That was the Russians?

Old Russian trick.

>Breitbart

I didn't know he was charged with anything. I'm sure the court wouldn't allow the use of the emails. Oh wait, even in a court of law they could be admissable because it wasn't the US government that illegally obtained them. Golly gee.

No worse that what Hillary and her cohorts did to the DNC.

Can someone play this 24/7 in response to liberals crying about Russia hacking the election?

Hillary hacked the DNC's emails?

Even if what you say is confirmed, which it is still speculative, what about the responsibility of Shillary bring a horrible candidate? She was handed the democrat party nomination, and screwed Bernie, her health was certainly an issue, het corruption and pay-to-play political prostitution was undeniable, and she didn't take press conferences, and the cunt didn't even think she had to campaign, she did not go into WI or MI...but somehow Russia leaking factual, undisputed emails made this a landslide win with more Republican Governors, Congress and senate seats?

nytimes.com/2016/07/25/us/politics/debbie-wasserman-schultz-dnc-wikileaks-emails.html?_r=0

Democrats arrived at their nominating convention on Sunday under a cloud of discord as Debbie Wasserman Schultz, the chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee, abruptly said she was resigning after a trove of leaked emails showed party officials conspiring to sabotage the campaign of Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont.

Gold star when you find the leaked emails.

No the media should've been reporting on a lot of impartially but they didn't. They had much of the info independent of the emails and they didn't. They colluded because the are leftists. The public confirmed what they suspected by the emails. No one was actually surprised by anything, were they?

So it's new territory. See if the media gave an unbiased account then no one would need to seek out alternatives. But right now its totalitarian and tyrannical. The media is the pr extension of the govt and the people can't make an informed choice.

And as said: It's not a court of law. Speaking of which, the CIA will have to present that evidence of le Russian haxxors if the faithless electors thing goes to supreme court right? You and I both know it's bullshit so this is going to be fun.

Someone should send this to Tucker Carlson.
He's /ourguy/ right?
I bet he would talk about it on his show.
He loves calling lefties on their bullshit.

Ive talked to several people, and they dont even realize this is the claim. People think russia actually directly "hacked" the election somehow. All people see are the headlines and whatever bullshit is posted on jewbook. Its fucking scary how uninformed people are.

CNN is fake news though

Poor Seth. The people really need to make the connection between the leaked emails and Seth Rich getting murdered in the street in a mugging that left his wallet.

This isn't what they are trying to sell us and you know it.

give them this:
Nov 26
>We stand behind our election results, which accurately reflect the will of the American people. The federal government did not observe any increased level of malicious cyber activity aimed at disrupting our electoral process on Election Day

archive.is/EMGgf
politico.com/story/2016/11/white-house-hackers-election-recount-231849

No one cares or believes fake news. Get fucked CNN.

F A K E N E W S
A
K
E
N
E
W
S

Because I'm sure this would still be a big issue for D's if the emails were about Christmas cookie recipes and donations to the Salvation Army.

...

The fucking commies maaaan
Fucking reds maaaaan
The Russians are coming to get us maaaan

That is the DNC's problem

CIA (((allegedly))) said that the Russians leaked the DNC emails, but where is the fucking evidence for it?

Up to this day we have never ever seen any such evidence for such claim.

Then they expect us to believe that somehow >muh russians boogeyman is behind everything.

>why isn't anyone in the media pointing out
Why isnt anyone talking about how the Department of Homeland Security hacked Georgias election?

computerworld.com/article/3148819/security/georgia-says-its-traced-an-attempted-voter-hack-to-dhs.html

In this article they say it may have been "A rogue employee"
redrightrepublic.com/dhs-says-ga-secstate-hack-maybe-rogue-employee-video/

In this one they completely deny it happened

ajc.com/news/state--regional-govt--politics/feds-state-disagree-attempt-hack-georgia-state-computers/wiGpYlstNl62FdMP3rPBoL/

What the hell