Is ancap actually a political view or is it just memes and keyboard warriors on the internet?
What are some real life political movements/groups that fly under the ancap flag?
Is ancap actually a political view or is it just memes and keyboard warriors on the internet?
What are some real life political movements/groups that fly under the ancap flag?
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
praxeology.net
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
mises.org
mises.org
youtube.com
twitter.com
>ancap
..all you natsocs are communists....my latino girlfriend.....eating ass...drinking....the free market fixes degeneracy.....kill your mailman
The movement for the normalization of idiocy.
>be an ancap
>get viciously ridiculed by anyone with iq over 80 because your ideas are fucking retarded
>cry about it online
>masturbate to atlas shrugged without realizing that literally the only fucking useful message from that book is "work hard". Everything else is just what dumb people think intellectual masturbation sounds like.
>keep crying
Pretty much the natural lifecourse of an ancap.
>be ancap
>be a retard
Pick two
A government is necessary because without one things devolve into warlordism and what is that if not another state? However, the only thing a state should do is enforce basic laws governing how businesses and individuals interact with each other (NAP). This is why I don't consider myself an ancap
Actually ancaps virtually all have IQs over 110-115
The biggest problem is the contradictory name.
Anarchism has always been anti capitalist.
you can't have real anarchy without market anarchy
These responses are not arguments.
The thing is that most people associate capitalism with what you call "corporatism" and anarchism with that should be called "stateless socialism"
They are opinions.
I think what most people picture when they think "anarcho-capitalist" is more akin to a corporate plutocracy.
left libertarianism/anarcho communism isn't real
It is real, but that's whataboutism anyway
We were taking about ancap
The part of this that makes no sense is:
How does the person who refuses to participate in society or share any of the work amass any meaningful wealth or property?
In Western society, about as close as you can get to what Hoppe would describe as ideal is the Free Imperial Cities that used to be part of the HRE and, in one very interesting case, formed the Hanseatic League. Sort of a economic/military mutual agreement that kinda worked until, you know, modern governments finally took control over them. This is because realistically, large and centralized states will always be able to roll over these little enclaves. An-Caps argue that their mutual defense forces and their excessive wealth will protect them but that clearly hasn't worked at any point thus far in human history.
speak English please
that's not confusing at all, the leech will receive a distribution of resources because from the anarcho-communist drones
can't tell if blue pilled
You are bluepilled if you think that anyone past 15 will take something called "anarcho-capitalism" seriously.
...
no, i actually think you're legitimately, stunted intellectually.
anarcho-capitalism isn't meant for everybody buts its a system that does indeed exists, theres even cultures around it, but it exists as an exploit
There is no contradiction. Anarcho-capitalism is probably the only political philosophy that requires no cognitive dissonance.
Mises.org is kind of the heart of it. Founded by Murray Rothbard and now run by Lew Rockwell. They have a few dozen faculty who are usually professors at various other universities but run courses and lectures on Austrian Economics at Mises. There is a ton of useful info there.
Ron Paul is basically anarcho-capitalist though he's not open about it. Judge Napolitano is the same way.
Jeff Deist, Ron Paul's old campaign manager runs the misesmedia podcasts and is president of Mises.org
youtube.com
Tom Woods is an An-Cap writer and has a great podcast
youtube.com
Lew Rockwell also has a blog/news site of sorts: lewrockwell.com
about all I have for now
ancap meme thread?
Penn Jilette is an Anarcho-Capitalist
youtube.com
So is Glenn Jacobs (aka "Kane")
youtube.com
pic related are some of the great contributors to the fundamental ideas of libertarianism before the label was created. Libertarian to me is synonymous with Anarcho-Capitalist. If it's not AnCap then it's really not libertarian.
libertarianism was co-opted by leftists to be the party of inclusivty and degeneracy
when really, it was always about using private property to EXCLUDE others and relying on the natural order and not the government
The first libertarians in France were socialists.
Anarcho-capitalism, like pretty much all utopian ideologies, will only work if the population has extremely high social trust and and social capital, as well as very high average iq and human development. The closest anyone came to achieving a society that could even begin to transition to ancap was this guy.
Couple speeches by Rothbard, back when Libertarian barely accounted for more than a few hundred people
>Libertarian to me is synonymous with Anarcho-Capitalist. If it's not AnCap then it's really not libertarian
libertarian is an umbrella term that encompasses ideologies like ancap, not the other way around
for example, libertarianism is the entire purple square, and ancap would be Armstrong in the bottom-right corner
AWAKEN MY MASTERS
government socialism leads to lower IQs and lower human development. when people have to depend on themselves and their families, and not the government, the natural order will prevail. people will have high social trust in their communities and be able to exclude those they don't like. if people are free to exclude then you will see more homogenous areas that aren't forced by the government to take in lots of immigrants
Has some good ideas, but being 100% ancap is retarded.
>Anarchist communist philosopher Joseph Déjacque was the first person to describe himself as a libertarian. Unlike mutualist anarchist philosopher Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, he argued that, "it is not the product of his or her labor that the worker has a right to, but to the satisfaction of his or her needs, whatever may be their nature." According to anarchist historian Max Nettlau, the first use of the term libertarian communism was in November 1880, when a French anarchist congress employed it to more clearly identify its doctrines. The French anarchist journalist Sébastien Faure started the weekly paper Le Libertaire (The Libertarian) in 1895.
The Left didn't hijack the term, the Right did.
The fact that Gary Johnson is a liberal and not even a right-wing lolbertarian is entirely your fault and shows your inability to form an organized movement.
AnCap Document Dump
you're the libertarian version of a cuckservative
cucktarian
Stefan Molyneux used to be a leading figure in Anarcho-Capitalism before his falling out with Mises.org
His "Matrix" vid is still one of the greatest explanations of the nature of Statism I have ever found
youtube.com
And his "Against-Me" argument was another great contribution he's made
I'm an-cap but this is what I got, because I answered "agree" to questions about racial difference and "some should just stick to their own kind". The political compass test has a misunderstanding of what ancap even is, according to this it is "authoritarian" to want to exclude people from your private property, but "libertarian" to force communities to take in and integrate immigrants and minorities.
I also answered yes to questions like "there is a worrying fusion of information and entertainment" and "there is too much openness about sex". These are not authoritarian positions, just opinions on culture. I would not want to infringe on people's right to be as open about sex as they want or as ridiculous in the media as they want, but I do think it's an example of cultural decline than ancap would go a long way to fix.
So this test has no fucking clue what it's doing. To them libertarian = denying people their private property rights and thinking that all kinds of degeneracy are great. It doens't understand that hard libertarianism would be a return to the natural order and would push people to have strong family values.
i was talking about the idea of libertarianism popular in the mid 20th century. The left specifically took their ideas and twisted them
true, it's impossible to get in the bottom-right ancap area with that shit test, it's heavily biased in favor of the green square
People dont get that ancap and libertarian philosophies allow for you to not like what others do, so long as your not infringing on their right 2 do it. you can hate shit all you want others can still do it tho they gotta fix that aspect of the compass
Judge Nap speech at a Mises event
youtube.com
pic related, my 3 favorite An-Cap books...
failed states in africa are ancap
that's because they are made up of africans
>before his falling out with Mises.org
What happened?
dude libertarian was co-opted by the right in like the 70s.
stop beating off to Ayn Rand and learn your fucking history
fucking lolbertarians, there is a reason nobody takes you deluded fucks seriously.
Many people believe Ayn Rand is some sort of important AnCap/libertarian, but though almost libertarians are familiar with her, she was ultimately at odds with a lot of things about libertarianism philosophically, and her objectivist crap is something they enjoyed mocking back in the early years
Isabel Paterson was the true libertarian/AnCap female thinker and writer. Was actually friends with Ayn Rand until they had a falling out.
the specific ideas used by the right during that time were hijacked by the left though, that's what i'm trying to say. the left perverted the right's conception of private property rights.
One of the greatest AnCap essays:
>The Humanitarian with the Guillotine - Isabel Paterson
Most people misinterpret it as some stupid bullshit like legalizing child slavery just to fit their meme.
LOL IS THIS BITCH FOR REAL
>LMAOING AT YOUR OPINIONS
>community supporting everyone's education
>somehow "totalitarian" or bad
eat shit nerd
>80
>Libertarians score higher than conservatives and democrats on IQ tests
>>before his falling out with Mises.org
>What happened?
They trashed his e-book, "Universally Prefarable Behavior"
mises.org
>"He fails, and fails miserably. His arguments are often preposterously bad."
And Stef has been butthurt ever since. He essentially has said that since they don't accept his book's ideas then he's not Libertarian/AnCap anymore.
>former soviet bloc doesn't see what's wrong with state controlled, compulsory education
the ironing
>amerifat has to pay in school to learn about social justice or racism and then preaches it on malaysian phone ricing forums
joke's on you burger
>LOL IS THIS BITCH FOR REAL
>>LMAOING AT YOUR OPINIONS
>>community supporting everyone's education
>>somehow "totalitarian" or bad
>eat shit nerd
Sorry that you are so mad. Maybe if you learn more about the ideas behind such statements you would understand them.
Nothing wrong with a community supporting education. Question is how is that support given? Voluntarily, or under the threat of a gun? (taxation)
When an entity that subsists via systematic widespread theft has also monopolized the role of presenting ideas to and shaping the minds of our children, then yes, I think that is the model of totalitarianism.
>he thinks people in a capitalist society would voluntarily give away goods or services to support their neighbors' education
:^) try again pls
This. Also I find it funny how much time they spend criticizing us without taking the time to read literature like The Machinery of Freedom.
>They trashed his e-book, "Universally Prefarable Behavior"
I only skimmed it but it looks like your average negative book review to me, somewhat aggressive in tone but nothing special. Did it badly misinterpret the book?
I can see how compulsory education beyond basic reading, writing and arithmetic is a bad but it's a rare view here and most who support it do it for religious reasons.
How so? The way I see it, it's the only internally consistent popular form of anarchism: the anarchocommunists and other leftist varieties all want socialist policies that can't exist without a government enforcing them, anarchocapitalism is just "leave me the fuck alone" taken to the maximum.
...
No, arnarchists have historically been anticapitalist, because historically anarchists have been hippies who don't analyze their political views long enough to see the inherent contradictions, the just want to "stick it to the man" in the most knee-jerk way possible.
There is a difference between "participating in society" and "being part of a redistributive commune": for example, you could sell stuff to the commune.
>charity doesn't exist apparently
Anarchy is a meme, it can never work in the world we live in. Just like Communism.
National Capitalism is the thinking man's ideology.
>takes money at gunpoint
>tells you what you must do
>and what you can't do
"aren't you glad we're maintaining society for you"
(the best is the Freudian slip implying that no government can ever be controlled by the will of the people)
how do anons view the development of advanced robotics as a potential for ancap type territories and or enterprise zones ?
that image is fucking disgusting
...
is technological advancement linked to the rise in ancap ideology ?
My IQ is in the 99.9th percentile and I'm an ancap.
It's more of an apolitical view, at least I would argue, although that's debatable. You can't think of ancap in the same way you think of most other political ideologies. If you try to make sense of individual issues from an ancap perspective without understanding the core ideals then you won't get it. The main thing you need to get is that, as far as an ancap is concerned, anyone can do anything they want as long as it doesn't inhibit someone elses ability to do what they want. Tie this together with a healthy understanding of economics and ancap makes perfect sense.
thanks for at least giving me a reply user...
heres another pic