I saw this circulating on the website facebook. Usually infographics I see on there are either made by you guys or some other fake news provider like occupy democrats. Somethings seem off like CNN/BBC/NYT being right in the middle when they seem skewed to the left. But WSJ and the Guardian being quality news outlets seems right on. Puting Slate Vox the Hill and Financial times high for quality makes no sense to me because they're basically blogs. Huffpo is clearly closer to fake news than this chart leads on. Am I missing any critiques?
I actually unfriended someone today due them pushing this shit. How many on that list are owned by the 7 Media Conglomerates or State Sponsored Propaganda?
Kayden Turner
Guardian is trash, BBC is trash, both provably left leaning, BBC only SLIGHTLY less than the Guardian.
Owen Hill
>slate
>>>reputable
Jayden Campbell
>No Al Jazeera >Huffington Post >Meets high standards >WaPo >NYT >MSNBC >ABC >CBS >NPR >PBS >Balanced 3/10 they tried
Blake Taylor
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
Fucking WHERE was this circulating? Among friends? A group?
Grayson Gray
>the Guardian
The Guardian published an article titled "Are You too White and Straight to be a Feminist?". It was not satire.
Carson Cook
Are you fucking kidding lol I'm googling this shit.
Bentley Hughes
cnn.. minimal bias..
Aiden Moore
Fixed
Julian Brown
>CNN minimal bias mfw
Hunter Cooper
>"Are You too White and Straight to be a Feminist?"
John James
Of course compared to CNN and Fox, the BBC sounds perfectly polished and quintessentially British and neutral. They're just better at the game. Look at their Syria coverage for a good laugh. NYT can have some amazing articles and contributions, but definitely a dollop of bullshit in there too.
If you are smart enough to see through biases then NYT, Wall Street Journal The Economist can be good reads.
You should try to soak up as much from different sources as possible to compare all the views. But avoid that garbage on the far sides, yes I said it. Infowars is and always has been conspiracy fed bullshit with a sprinkling of truth.
Evan Reyes
>guys if it's really carefully crafted propaganda it's not pure garbage >if it's an in-your-face redpill bomber it's conspiracy shit (Breitbart)
Ian Jenkins
The article is actually "Are you too white, rich, able-bodied and straight to be a feminist?"
Evan Butler
Got some poor friends that post this stuff:
vanessa.otero.9619
I agree. I fork out the money for WSJ and Times and a few other things. Had to cancel my newsweek subscription recently.
I like some of the stuff PBS does with Frontline, and I love me some 60 minutes.
Reuters and AP are effective for headline news.
Xavier Torres
So the Fox News hard news department and Huffington post are on the same level, while BBC and NPR have minimal partisan bias? Nice infograph.
Jayden Walker
checked. thanks for the laugh, great read. They were the ones involved with the snowden leaks I believe.
Justin Barnes
>otero Say no more.
Bentley Hernandez
>NPR >BBC >PBS >New York Times >CBS >NBC >ABC >Minimal partisan bias
That's fucking rich OP.
Every outlet is biased the only way to get to the truth is to expose yourself to different perspectives and judge for yourself. That's why I check 7 sources on a regular basis.
