You have 5 seconds to explain why Socialism is bad

You have 5 seconds to explain why Socialism is bad.

this happened though, thanks to socialist democrats

>“You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for that my dear friend is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it.” ― Adrian Rogers

>The globalist plutocrat jews funded both sides of the cold war so we've basically had soviet-style socialism here for 50 years

Really makes you think...

Not an argument

Prove it's not an argument

holodomor

My argument is far too nuanced for you to understand.

Only bad when it's international

Enforced socialism doesn't work. You have to naturally evolve through all stages of capitalism to generate such a wealth which you can later use/spend on creating a socialistic society.

socialist policies introduced by Libs caused it though.

> You have 5 seconds to explain why Socialism is bad.
its not, thats why we have free health care and burgers go bankrupt trying to get their broken arm fixed

this.

No incentive for workers and the calculation problem of socialism

You run out of other peoples' money to give away eventually.

I worked hard for my shit. I've earned my shit. I'm not sharing my shit with someone who hasn't done shit.

You also have Trudeau, whilst the burgers have Trump.

People are greedy selfish bastards by nature no matter the system.

I'll take Trudeau over literal warzones for cities

The state can be bad at managing and allocating resources.

world is too gobalized at the moment. Socialist govermnents cant survive the migrative patterns of third+worlders.

The free market is always benefitial

> "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs"

This is a real life chief tenant of socialism

Well, with the current rate of immigration, it might be a good idea for you to keep a gun around.

I'll let the user below me explain instead.

Because it's retarded. Questions?

Except it never works that way. Needs are subjective, legislature and policies are more general - I.e. youre always going to have hard-working people bear the weight of lazy welfare leeches (despite the fact that they are physically capable of grtting a job, but choose not to).

Redistribution of wealth and seizing the means of production will not make the society happier nor is it an efficient method of providing aid to those who most need it in the society.

Aww the 'I'm only pretending not to be retarded argument'. Nice one you socialist drone

disarmed populace + socialist incentive to not get a job + strong thug culture = Chicago gang presence/violence

It can only exist if imposed by force.

Good luck on your 8 months wating list

This and only this. We can force it until we truly have the wealth, automatatiom, and ultimately logistics to easily disperse a nations wealth. And only if that whole nation is fully on board with culture and principles of the society first

On the National level it isn't bad at all

your id is huge

Wasn't this Karl Marx's argument? He just assumed that technology for automation will progress much faster than it really did, leading him to assume that socialist society can be achieved within a much shorter proposed time frame. Other than that much of his arguments were fairly good (especially his analysis of capitalist society), seeing as many still hold up fine 150 years after he wrote them.

The Fendippitous Eggmen are returning soon.

FPBP

because it'-

damn, ran out of time

>Wasn't this Karl Marx's argument?
No, Karl Marx's thesis was a bunch of Hegelian mysticism. He thought that wealth would be concentrated into a tiny elite and that the majority of people would live on day to day subsistence, and that when the proletariat rose up "history would end".

What happened in practice was that wealth became more and more distributed, and the rise of the middle class. Marx was even BTFO by facts within his lifetime.

DELETE THIS

no people live there. only niggers

It is eugenic and destroys society at large

...