One party state. It's power is controlled by a strong constitution and by the fact that people are armed.
State religion meaning it's clearly a christian state promoting Christianity but it wouldnt be autistic about it. Freedom of religion exists.
Dealth penalty orientation - if you're a pedo who act on it, you die.
post yours and rate others
>State religion meaning it's clearly a christian state promoting Christianity
holy fuck no
Right Wing politics are concerned with the long-term survival of Civilization
Christianity is only concerned with personal salvation to become part of a nebulous afterlife for which no evidence exists, and for which this world needs to be sacrificed, which is best expressed in the way early christians like Martin of Tours refused to fight enemies of their nations, insofar killing in this world could cost them heaven
When Jesus says "if they take your coat, let them have your shirt as well", "do not resist evil", "I have come to turn a man against his own household", "if you don't hate your self and your own family you can't follow me", "love your enemies, pray for your persecutors", "the meek will inherit the Earth", "those that wanna die will live", "blessed are those the persecuted, for they will be my Kingdom", "do not save treasures for tomorrow", "carry your cross so that you can receive eternal reward", "Sell all your possessions and give the money to the poor, and you'll have treasure in heaven", "it is easier for a camel to go through a needle's eye than for the rich to enter Heaven", "Woe to you who are well fed, Woe to you who laugh, for you will mourn and weep"...
... he is not kidding, or meaning the opposite, but actually setting down a morality where the world is a lie and only the afterlife is the real deal, so destroying your life in this world, "carrying your cross" as he says, is completely logical
Sup Forums "christians" seem to believe Jesus actually meant the OPPOSITE of all that, and that Jesus wants you to defend your family, that Jesus wants you to kill your enemies, to become prosperous, well-fed and rich in this world, and to avoid persecution and death!
>State religion meaning it's clearly a christian state promoting Christianity
Only a person that does not actually believe in the Heaven for the persecuted, the meek, and the martyred would actually re-interpret Christianity as a cult of earthly power which declares "the strong shall inherit the Earth", "my kingdom is of this world" and "you must destroy the enemies of your nation"
Only some one that just wanna use Christianity as an empty shell devoid of any true religious promises would claim that Paul and Peter misinterpreted Jesus when they submitted to their enemies and died to them while praying for them, instead of fighting the romans back and establishing a crusader kingdom, thing that one would expect them to do if Jesus meant "be a fighter and impose your will on your enemies" when he said "love your enemies and lend all they need to them without expecting anything in return"
But using Christianity as a shell devoid of any religious promises simply allows its poisonous morality to survive into the next generation.
You can tell your children that Jesus wanted them to be earthly warriors because "I didn't come to bring peace", but you can't stop them from reading the rest of the paragraph and realizing what Jesus wanted is for them to put christian morality above the good-being of their own families.
You can tell your children that Jesus wanted them to be earthly warriors because "Buy a sword", but you can't stop them from reading the next chapter and realizing that Jesus stopped Peter from using the sword to fight and defeat the romans, and reprimanded him for misunderstanding, all while asking him to carry his own cross (Peter, fully realizing that Jesus meant all the stuff about embracing death and his kingdom was not of this world, that angelic chariots were not going to slay his enemies and bring him victory, realized he was doomed, and would then deny Jesus 3 times)
You can tell your children that Jesus wanted them to be earthly warriors because ""Do not give what is holy to the dogs; nor cast your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn and tear you in pieces", but you can't stop them from reading the rest of the paragraph and realizing that Jesus was asking them, not to destroy their enemies, but to not put in risk their own moral position by criticizing others. You may want them to believe that Jesus, in the middle of a speech about not judging other people and sharing, suddenly decided that speak against the muslims that didn't even exist back then!
That is not going to fly.
Sooner or later, your "christian republic" state will be reformed into leftism, because the Gospel will still exist, because your children, like Peter, will realize that Jesus meant it when he said "you are to be persecuted and martyred for me", that Jesus didn't say "you will live in a stable and powerful civilization, free of oppresion and death, thanks to me".
Free helicopter rides.
Here is the spic with the copypasta again.
here you go
Summary: Aristocracy in every aspect of society.
I propose Aristocracy as practiced by the Indo-Europeans in the age of migrations and Northwestern Europe in the Early Middle Ages.
Incorporate the nationalism and strengh of Germanics, the analytical, scientific and commercial talent of Anglos and the Faustian spirit and zeal of the Southern Europeans.
It would consist on a meritocratic nobility that grants and reciprocally receives property rights, a Parliament with Houses of government that represent each societal group, a Church and an Academia, and guilds of producers, labourers etc.
Sounds complex, but it's really the complete supression of parasitism through aristocracy and free markets, which are efficient, ethical, eugenic and meritocratic.
Religion must be Western: Either Catholicism, Orthodoxy, High-Church Protestantism or Aryan Memetic Paganism.
Also little to no immigration, and no degenerate values.
>that deficit
>70% consumption tax
>80% corporate tax
i always liked the no minimum wage concept in theory but im always afraid that it's gonna be a pure wreck in practice with a huge portion of the population who would be unable to survive
>Protecting the Environment
>Never have to see another Tranny, Street Hooker, or Foreigner while remaining Free
>Unadulterated Free Speech
>Universal Basic Income for NEETS
>No central bank
>Limited Minority Rights = Happa and Mulatto Slave Girls
How'd I do?
In the worst case scenario, a minimum wage would be negotiated between unions and employers with no interference from the government, like in Denmark.
I'm ok with any type of inmigrant as long as they have good skills
on the face it sounds like double think
do i need to fix the immigration ?
why should you educate foreigners on tax payers money?
doubt youre gonna reach that 1% quota anytime soon with those requierments
>funding schools that are privately owned so those schools can rely on that funding and jack up prices.
you're stupid.
i want them to see my utopia.
it's a limit off 1%, if there are only 0,5% so be it.
If it was an option i would forbid immigration for shitskins completely.
all schools are state owned, if i could model it, i would combine them with the military.
>it's a limit off 1%, if there are only 0,5% so be it.
of*
Hey.
>all schools are state owned, if i could model it, i would combine them with the military.
fuck my bad, I read private, not public.
still though, paying for foreigners to use your schools is not my cup of tea.