Breitbart comment section going wild on the JQ,
mods haven't shut it down yet. Looking like annudah shoah right now...
Thoughts Sup Forums?
breitbart.com
Breitbart comment section going wild on the JQ,
mods haven't shut it down yet. Looking like annudah shoah right now...
Thoughts Sup Forums?
breitbart.com
>mfw when TRS is correcting the record
why can't people just not be fuckin stupid and determine the validity of a story themselves?
the truth is people can, but they want you to think you're too stupid to
Here is another example of Politifact liars, here about Mike Pence's statement about Clinton Haiti contracts and pay-to-play through Clinton Foundation...
(both URLs on the image)
This one is mentioned in the Breitbart article, about Clinton statement on open borders...
this one about Bleach-bit vs. Acid-washed server...
I'm not butthurt about FB labels
It will have the Streisand effect
I'm not alone in wanting to see things they don't want me to see.
Another fact-checker's fallacy...
When I hear "fact-checker", why does it always mean counter-propaganda ... ?
Same case in shorter...
Same case as this, but another fact-checker...
Media:
Does the Truth Matter ?!
Another case of Media Bias...
And Media deforming, what has been said...
>forcing his enemies to play a game in which moral ground does not figure
The absolute chutzpah of this fucking jizz stain.
The media lied and lied and lied through their fucking teeth about Trump and any of his supporters. The media wasn't "forced" into anything, they played dirty against an opponent who punches back.
Another false fact-checking...
Russian hackers?
Now published by WaPo, but disaproved by CIA later... No such stupid and false claim of Russian hackers in DNC case or elections...
> played dirty against an opponent
No. They played dirty against you and me and your friends. And they're still very cheap out with it... !
Just meme it as a badge of honor to post a "fake news" article. We've already begun to steal the fake news concept from them, we'll own this soon too.
Yes. Trump "asked" for it by running as a Republican, it was to be expected. It's another thing when the media went to war against us voters. They salted the earth and tainted the watering hole so deeply that people have been beaten and lost their jobs simply because they admitted to supporting Trump.
Because of this, if we head to civil war, my first targets are journalists of the mainstream media.
Guys, they're gonna let us report "fake news".
You know what to do.
I have never seen a more autistic group of people than stormfaggots and Spencerfanbois ( except maybe the 26 YO dumb bitch who wonders why she was fired for selling fucking peanuts ).
The "JQ" tinfoil hat shit cracks me up. Hard,
And then cases like this. Media forwarding al Nusra and ISIS propaganda without any questioning and without any verification...
>Shitbart
Who is FAKE NEWS then ?!
...
literally how old is that version of firefox? kys
And what started the #FakeNews hysteria?
The pedophiles investigation...
> literally how old is that version of firefox? kys
None of your business, which was the last securable version of Firefox...
Why should I kms because you don't like my software selection ?
...
Then there is media's propaganda, for example feministic...
Should that be marked "fake news" ? (Ultimatelly one of these 2 Huffington posts is wrong... Hint: the left one...)
>ctrl+f jews
>1 of 53 matches
>science says
forget it
...
And this one related to Breitbart, R.I.P.
>use FF 20 for security reasons
>not even using https
YOU PLAYED YOURSELF
>Thoughts?
(this one is probably from veteranstoday.com ... They're adding, that "we do" ...)
But generally it is a worth idea for contemplating...
OY VEY SHUT IT DOWN
BAD GOYIM DONT YOU DARE TALK ABOUT YOUR MASTERS!
DUMB FILTHY GOYIM!
>being this bluepilled
Liberals begging for fake news labels because they aren't intelligent enough to be able to filter things they read under the guise that its actually for other people.
>breitbart.com
so i go to brietbart and it tries load 30+ scripts that i prevent but still a popup sneaks by
what sort of people willingly visit this sort of website
>use FF 20 for security reasons
Well, it's FF 3 from year 2008.
Among last versions, where firefox.js is in a plain file and can be edited to remove Google backdoors...
Using https for Sup Forums ? Why? FBI and others are browsing this site and would get my IP if desired, regardless if I use https or not...
That some hacker on the cable can replace Sup Forums content with some fakery? Why ?
For the sites where it is worth, I use https...
Pretty sure there are pedophile politicians but the pizza gate theory is fucked in the head and backed by nothing.
my wife will click links to those clickbait sites that are '15 most penised buttholes' or whatever, and it's ALL ads, they make you click NEXT PAGE four times just in the hopes you accidentally click an ad instead and fill up on adware..
god, how can people let themselves be treated that way?
And then to serious "fake news", which cost lives of millions of people...
Iraq WMDs. Qaddafi said to be terrorising his citizens with planes (which was ultimatelly false). Assad action against peaceful demonstrations (they were armed from the very beginning).
Afghan involvement in 911 was ultimatelly fake. They (Taliban) dared to stop opium production in 2001 (which was immediatelly restored after US invasion) and there was a need for some pipeline between Pakistan and India or Iran, not sure...
These "fake news" perpetrated not only but also by MSM caused lives of millions of people...
Why don't you go check out some stories about "kinderladen" then
> Pretty sure there are pedophile politicians but the pizza gate theory is fucked in the head and backed by nothing.
One thing is absolutelly sure:
That they broke several grave taboos with their art and jokes and comments, which ultimatelly is pedophilic and otherwise wrong. (there are tens of more examples than this one)
And any media, claiming, that the art is "just normal", are lying...
At least this.
Here they are playing games about being canibals. (Really just a game? Maybe... Podesta's art in his office has got similar cannibalistic reference...)
So not solidly supported news are, claiming that they actually are cannibals.
But not wanting you to know, that Clinton's campaign chief is involved in canibal games and art, is information suppressing...
And the chief of CTR David Brock will also have to perform enough struggle to correct his own record...
But who will fact-check the fact-checkers?
This one is not about Pizzagate, but it makes you think...
Then:
In states surrounding Washington DC (Virginia and Mary land) there is 5x more missing children per capita than in states like New York... (or is it also fake news?)
Media double meters ...
This one is only a small example, compare for ex. Mosul and Aleppo... Aleppo and Falujah ! Soros involvement in Moldova elections, in many European referendums, involvement in European parliament decision-making, and alleged Russian hackers invalidating and delegitimizing US elections... That is also a double-meter, that your Politico and other's fact-checkers would not mark...
... so are you racist, or are you blind ?
(Actual Diversity is destroyed by Mixing...)
Which of the statements on this poster would you consider "Fake News" ?
And which of the rest was reported to you by MSM - the "watchdogs of democracy", before the election ?
Let's add, that she also started two wars (Libya and Syria - do you want links about Robert Ford and Clinton?).
This complete failure of MSM to inform you (or the normies), while pretending unpartisan fair informing, is so eye striking failure...
czeched
And this one should not be missing in News vs. PedoGate ...
Do you consider your western propaganda (or news and reports?) about Aleppo being well balanced and objective?
Why are people making this caricature...?
Now consider this, posted by some CTR shill...
How limited and biased has to be the source of his information, if he could pretend, that there is nothing wrong about Clinton beside her emails?
(Now not even considering thay they crooked Trump's own ideas, or using non-confirmed and false accusations).
Where was information about Syria war and Robert Ford, about "We came, we saw, he died" Qaddafi, about Haiti funds, about Haiti pay-to-play for Korean investors, about Uranium One pay-to-play from Russians, about hundred deaths (last of which where Seth Rich, Thorn, probably Fadyen and now possibly also Assange - who knows?), about bribing Comey and McCabe, about Mena airport...? About Huma Abedin muslim brotherhood connection?
How much have you heard about United States of Women ? (thousands related emails)
What about DNC bias against Bernie Sanders ? Funny meme says:
Scientists confirm: truth still true, even if Russian hackers find it...
So to say - fake news is also not reporting, when they should be reporting.
Truth true, even if reported by *** (fill who you dislike)
So how much are elections delegitimized by foreign involvement ?
Here we are, al-Zinki beheaders staging that viral video of boy in orange seat...
These are the "fake news", that help your government, so that you do not protest, if they are supplying arms to al-Nusra terrorists...
...
>Holy shit check out this comment
I am an orthodox Jew, a Constitutional Conservative and a Vietnam Vet and an American Patriot. I am an American thru and thru and love our country, our form of government and our way of life. I am embarrassed and ashamed that so many Jews no longer know what Judaism is about. Most Jews in the US are Reform Jews and leftist Liberals. They have replaced the Jewish religion with a new religion- and pretend that what they believe is Judaism. They have replaced the belief in G-d with strange concoction of socialism, acceptance of anything deviant, as long as someone else pays the bill. The Jews who run most of the Media and Hollywood are the worst. It continues to amaze me that people like Spielberg, Streisand etc. still support the Dems. It is beyond my understanding how this came to be.
Here we've got them, the professionals of "fake news"...
Yes, not all jews are same...
(yesterday's thread)
> Not every Jew is one of (((them)))
But actual problem is, that X=90%? of group A does B and Y=90%? of perpetrators of B are from group A.
Is it "fake news" to say, that A does B, or that B is done by A?
The statement is an abbreviation (contraction). If taken literally, it can easily be disproved, since there exists Z=10%? of exceptions, which invalidate the statement and make it "fake news" in eyes of someone easily...
Compare Trump to an animal and it's funny. Compare Obama to one and you are racist !
That totally fake polls before elections... Clinton 80% to win.
The polls are actually a political weapon. They show you, who you _should_ vote for. And just before the election they swing it 49:51 in favour of opposing candidate to alarm lazy voters...
(The true polls were 67% Trump, 19% Clinton, rest undecided...)
Still now, Clinton continues to count "popular vote" margin, but recounts in Detroit already have shown large scale rigging, mail-in ballots in Nevada when verified have shown more than 9000 fake addresses, including dead people, even Edward Snowden is said to vote in Nevada...
(The electoral college is there, because one state rigging the election by allowing many millions of foreigners to vote without photo-ID and without registration - like say Comiefornia, can rig only it's share of 10% of seats... Othewise the "college" should be fully automated to prevent "aristocracy" to ignore people's will...)
Many examples of media double meter could be found... (and not only about US elections!)
Why do the people make such jokes about Controlled News Network ?
911 coverage (or rather non-coverage of the real problem - the planners, perpetrators, sweeepers and those, who earned most) would be a chapter of its own...
There was probably no other single event in human history, that attracted so much media coverage...
wikispooks.com
(even this list is not exhausting, but is much better, than most of MSM media coverage...)
Let's imagine, how fast would this be marked "fake news" by political fact-planters...?
So this was little longer but not exhausting list of which media are FAKE NEWS, that really are dangerous - and it's not the alt-media, and it's not the "Russian propaganda"...
Problem with these "fact-checkers", that (((they))) want to plant not only on facebook, is, that it will make even harder to disprove MSM lies...
> Do you not agree with these messages of our Ministry of Truth ? You are Russian propaganda agent, Fake news, or whatever false label can be attached to anyone, not in correspondence with main-stream media Point Of View...
------
I'll be glad, if someone wanted to add more examples, but regardless of that, thank you Sup Forums for providing enough of these all the time...
Call me slow but I've just figured out why they've started pushing the fake news meme
It's to muddy the waters so no one can reliably Google fake news ever again. So when they're faking the most grotesque pack of lies what can anyone do or say about it? Itd be like shouting into the wind
The MSM started to push "Fake News" meme by themselves, because of #PizzaGate. Because we were bitching about Washington's pedophiles so long, that Alt-Media noticed and started to publish it too... And as a "defense", MSM started to cry "Fake News" !
But it was probably sent to us by God himself. Because we could not wish more getting the #FakeNews tag trending, and even by the worse of liars...
You know it: "Thief calls: Catch the Thief !"
The worst propaganda outlets call: "Beware, Russian Propaganda, Fake News, whatever..."
The least democratic (the "Democratic") party cries about foreign or whatever democracy involvement... (Russians rigged the US elections by exposing, how DNC rigged the US elections... Even if the DNC emails were handed to ex-british ambassador by DNC insider in Washington DC park...)
So now I am asking: How does WaPo and NYT dare to cry "Fake News" about anyone ?
And then, you know: if you write about W.DC pedophiles, someone considers it a fake news and condemns it as dangerous, because you attacked good reputation of 50th most influential man in W.DC... and possibly whole (or more parts of) establishment...
But if (((they))) published really fake news about Iraq WMD , which was used to persuade nations into war with more than milion victims, it was OK?
>Reading Breitbart
>Caring about a websites comments section
>Thoughts Sup Forums?
I think OP is a massive faggot
Comments section is really important !
The sites without comments allowed are free to lie as they like.
Truth does not fear questions...
...
> Breitbart comment section
Is there a comment section?
(Without Javascript enabled, Breitbart has got no comment section either...)
I see... Here are the comments even without Javascript, and will be hopefully here even if Breitbart would censor them... Do they do it often?