Free minds
Free markets
Free people
Free minds
Other urls found in this thread:
twitter.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Dude I just literally shit my pants
This is precisely the ideology that encourages the degenerate human nature that globalism has imposed upon society.
Too much coercion, social or economic, or too much overall freedom is a deadly disease to poison society.
>Free minds
>Free markets
>Free people
Welcome to Europe!
...
TUVALU KEKLANDIA JIMMY ISOTOPE BRO
...
Freedom doesn't grant you the wish to do as you please, it commands you to be wise.
We are not wise, therefore you see freedom as a problem.
TL:DR- You're a low IQ faggot.
Also OP is a faggot too.
Fuck the both of you.
>British AnCap
is this ancap meme thread?
The masses are very misled and generally hold IQs below 130.
That's why you have genius men rule a nation and guide the way of life that their people will have. (National Socialist Germany)
Libertarians are radicalized centrists. Nothing more than useful idiots for whichever side.
No one respects you and we expect you to betray us on core Right-Wing issues when you see it fit.
Culturalmarxism everywhere
Welfarestate and regulations everywhere
Cucked drones everywhere
A FUCKING GYPSIE
The successful countries have free markets, but there are too many regulations
Free minds is going, if it ever existed
kids these days are not stupid enought to eat these shitty strawman memes m8
tfw you cant bring anything better
feels bad man
>for you
>europe
>freedom
pick one euronigger
Well, Europe is quite free, just look at Asia/Africa/Middle East?
I'm white dude, I don't understand what's your problem. You like all those African niggers more? Wtf?
Eh? Your the browns of Europe dude, with 5% gypsy we can't even compete with your Spanish deep brown, wtf you talking ?
Yeah I agree, but it should be a lot more free, that's all
It's more like 'relative free minds, relatively free markets, relatively free people'
dude freedom lmao
The state must survive somehow right? Else we go back to tribal Europe. That's why we have taxes and regulations. IMO.
What do you mean go back to tribal Europe?
We don't lose all the technology and economic growth.
There wouldn't be nation states, so maybe people would identify as part of a national tribe- an interesting idea
Looks like the camwhore I just fapped to.
chaturbate com/aynmarie
Interesting
Quite frankly, that "nation" notion, I am not sure for how long will resist in Europe as we are all way to mixed between us.
The only things who actually limit any kind of freedom imo are:
- goverments running after power
- religious groups
- conservators
Well people generally identify with their own people and want to be around their own people, so I don't think there would be all that much mixing
There are big wage differentials that pull people around, that's the worrying factor
>wage differentials
>forgetting about the gibs pull factor
>There are big wage differentials that pull people around, that's the worrying factor
True, but I see that as a failure of governments, and not peoples strictly. As you can see the EU have major economic problems:(
They're quite likely to persist -- West Europe has a lot more developed capital and infrastructure which lets people be productive
Where we're going there won't be gibs
Ancap doesn't mean complete freedom to do whatever you want anywhere (keep reading). It means complete private property rights. A privately owned town or city, for instance, could set standards for its residents, and evict them if they don't live up to them.
Basically, an anarcho-capitalist world would resemble many independent city-states and villages (most of them ethnically homogenous because that's what humans naturally trend to), each setting their own standards for moral behavior.
Pure anarcho-capitalism is as right-wing/conservative as it gets because it's basically about a return to the natural order, reliance on family structure and hierarchies. They really don't have much in common with Gary Johnson type libertarians, who come across as practically liberal globalists.
What's interesting is many of the first Medieval towns did this and many towns in America were doing this well into the 19th century
...
free kills
>too much overall freedom is a deadly disease to poison society.
LOL dude!
Me on the right
do anarchists enjoy the freedom of assembly? do they call the cops when they are threatened? do they waive their legal rights out of principal?
You, I like you.
And no roads
lack of rules creat caos, that make people wish for the rise of a more strong state.
thats how feudal europe ends.
Free baby market.
Ancaps have too much of a fetish for removing commons. People will tend to pool their resources for certain goods (especially for local monopoly services); and total privatization is unnecessary. Tragedy of the Commons is highly important, and it follows that most property should be private, but it is not an absolute.
You've also been reading too much Hoppe. What makes you insist that all these "ancap" towns will be white, conservative strongholds out of the 1950s. You just think that will happen naturally?! Businesses have lots of economic reasons to loosen social norms and bring in foreign workers.
here we go
we tried that and we got taken over by jews
>paying 50% income tax to feed the 3rd world and bring them into my neighborhood
top kek, stay enlightened m8. you show the world.
But the town is privately owned
He is likely to sell the houses based on the guarantee of no niggers
Or else, if the houses are rented with no guarantees, he doesn't want to bring in niggers and cause a 'white flight' from all his houses
test
>People will tend to pool their resources for certain goods
It's still a part of the ancap system if people voluntarily pool their resources together in a collective system. It doesn't make it "public property" just because people agree to share something.
AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
twitter.com
W-what did he mean by this
meanwhile in reality
...
>people are too dumb to minimise the damage from things like this by creating peaceful court systems etc
>only the state can solve these problems you guys
All these memes represent the inherent problems in ancap philosophy
Who is going to enforce property rights? And laws, for that matter?
no thanks
Fuck "anarchists" and libtardians, more bourgeois garbage
So the people who post these really have done zero research?
Who enforces them now? A "public" government that demands you pay them or they'll throw you in jail. Meanwhile it's to their benefit to make you feel less safe so you keep relying on the government, why do you think they straight wars in foreign countries or bring in boatloads of crime-prone immigrants? Not to mention this government forces you to pay for their shitty school systems and healthcare systems.
And the basic problem with these memes is that they assume that if there were no government, human beings are so rotten to their core that they would do all kinds of awful shit. If that were the case humanity would not have survive for this long. People wouldn't suddenly shoot rocket launchers at a mcdonalds just because they could, it's not like all of human morality just disappears as soon as government disappears.
...
woah
>MFW an AnCap gets BTFO by a terrible meme
keep trying kike
>anyone I don't agree with is a communist
GRRRR GOONS
Yes
I'm talking about land and public goods such as roads, gas and utilities. Furthermore, some land can and ought to remain open access, provided it has a few sponsors.
Too much freedom promotes low IQ