Are the Moon landing tapes real? They look like they were made in a studio

Are the Moon landing tapes real? They look like they were made in a studio.

Other urls found in this thread:

lmgtfy.com/?q=how long is a lunar day
nasa.gov/mission_pages/LRO/news/apollo-sites.html
popsci.com/blog-network/vintage-space/apollo-rocketed-through-van-allen-belts
youtu.be/NxZMjpMhwNE
youtube.com/watch?v=8pUOcVnyg4o
youtube.com/watch?v=dUYX2sjzdFY
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_grain_robbery
youtu.be/LKzdV_jSnLE
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

what the fuck is this image trying to prove ?

that the sun was rising ?

the tape had to be faked (audio at least) because there was beautiful islamic music playing on the moon when they arrived, and they possibly met allah. true story.

It's clearly filmed inside a studio, but at the same time there's no way they had the technology at the time to fake all the footage that was captured.

I'd say the most likely possibility is that they built a film studio on the moon and filmed it there. That's how they captured all the footage with low gravity and an airless environment.

Whenever you eliminate the impossible, what ever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth.

No, the moon landing was faked and I faked it.

Prove it wasn't me that did it.

They faked 6 moon landings?

Why the fuck would they fake it if they actually go to the moon?

...

I think its trying to say that the flag and dude are the same size in the photo but their shadow is different.

It's like they invested something called Perspective in space...

>same height

The flag is clearly taller than the guy.

You are either looking through glasses the thickness of a jam jar or your blinding yourself out of choice.

How long is a moon day?
I heard they had to land at dawn, or dusk because of temperatures would either cook and freeze them any other time. So they landed at dawn or whatever, walked around for an hour or so and took off back to earth again?
It would be far more believable if they just went back without incident with modern technology but I suspect they can't really do that. Why wouldn't the Russians or Chinks go and stick one of their flags on the moon for shits and giggles, maybe collect some moon rocks? Why did all the moon rocks go missing?

sounds legit

The line should start from the other foot since that's the one that's the one next to the flag.

Let me get this straight before we go further.
do you think the guy and the flag are the same height?
Or do we just have a misunderstanding?

It's real. It doesn't look like it was made in a studio, you're saying that because you've never seen the surface of the fucking moon before. Your brain assumes that because everything looks so still, so untouched, so unclouded because of the lack of atmosphere, so crisp, that it had to be done in a controlled environment.

Well it was, the controlled environment is controlled by a complete lack of atmosphere. It's called THE FUCKING MOON.

The technology to fake these recordings did not exist and the images are congruous with reality. No, drawing calipers in MS Paint is not a fucking argument.

>never landed on moon before, have to make up what the surface of the moon probably looks like for the studio fake
>actual moon landings have exactly the same surface characteristics as the studio fake, lucky guess

The moon landing was real.

You can see the American flag and landing site with a telescope.

The Japanese recently took some pictures with their telescope to try and discredit you fucking retards, too.

You braindead mongoloids are worse than the jews.

>your

What the hell happened in this pic?

>lmgtfy.com/?q=how long is a lunar day
29 days, 12 hours and 44 minutes

If it is real, then why can they just take down their helmets and not suffocate in this picture? See! See!!! Here is your proof!

"haha you made a typo now I don't have to address your argument"

nasa.gov/mission_pages/LRO/news/apollo-sites.html

That picture is from Mars though.

you dont need humans to put up a flag on the moon. I think Robotic rover arms could do that easily. maybe they found a gateway to the moon but theres no way they could travel through the highly particle charged Van Allen's Belt in a 60s era tin can.

woah
mars, a planet that looks like an earth desert with a brown sky looks like earth desert when changed to a blue sky
woah...
really makes me think...

You are a tinfoil hat ( CIA (tm) )
Trust your government.

Kill yourselves you retarded fucking muslims.

It figures only fucking inbred arabs would believe something as fucking stupid as flat Earth or Moon landing hoax. It says Earth is flat in your shitty book.

popsci.com/blog-network/vintage-space/apollo-rocketed-through-van-allen-belts

>By February of 1964, NASA was confident that Apollo crews would be passing through the belts fast enough that the spacecraft’s skin and all the instrumentation lining the walls would be enough protection. It might seem foolhardy in hindsight for NASA to have accepted the risks of send astronauts through the Van Allen belts without extra protection, but it was a minor risk in the scheme of the mission.

>To monitor radiation exposure during the flights, Apollo crews carried dosimeters on board their spacecraft and on their persons. And these readings confirmed NASA had made a good choice. At the end of the program, the agency determined that its astronauts had avoided the large radiation doses many feared would ground flights to the Moon. Over the course of the lunar missions, astronauts were exposed to doses lower than the yearly 5 rem average experienced by workers with the Atomic Energy Commission who regularly deal with radioactive materials. And in no case did any astronaut experience any debilitating medical or biological effects. And beside, the Apollo astronauts were former test pilots. Flying to the Moon, radiation exposure included, was still a safer day at the office than putting an experimental aircraft through its paces in the skies above Edwards Air Force Base.

They're real. I personally touched a moon rock.

Human went to the moon but it wasn't by the Apollo 5 rocket. They only went to orbit around the earth and then they were picked up by interdimensional aliens who teleported them to the moon.

they brought the moon rocks, son. Of course they're real.

k

Irrefutable Proof for Moon Landing - Lunar Gravity

Lunar gravity as determined from official NASA Apollo footage provides irrefutable proof for being filmed on the moon. In addition to the Apollo 14 SEQ Bay Pendulum the Apollo 16 Flying Bag is analyzed to provide g = 1.54 and 1.57 m/s^2 in agreement with lunar gravity (g = 1.62 m/s^2) and distinct from earth gravity (g = 9.81 m/s^2). Therefore, both, pendulum and free fall motion confirm lunar gravity within a 5 % error margin. Moon landing conspiracy theorists have accused NASA to simulate lunar gravity by using wires and decreasing playback speed, but failed to recognize that there is only ONE physically correct playback speed for such an operation: 41 % (SQRT (1/6)) - as seen by using the equation » P = 2pi * SQRT (L / g) « for the pendulum or » t = SQRT (2y / g) « for free fall.

Consequently, it should be possible to restore the alleged original 1g conditions by increasing the playback speed to 246 % (SQRT 6). Under these conditions objects move as if accelerated by earth gravity (g = 9.81 m/s^2) but movements of the astronauts become incredibly fast, showing the impossibility to simulate lunar gravity by slowing down footage recorded on earth.

All NASA footage obtained from public domain, AS14 SEQ Bay Pendulum cropped, AS16 Flying Bag animation with timer reproduced at 80% playback speed. All other footage reproduced at 100% (for lunar gravity) or 246% (for earth gravity) playback speed.

youtu.be/NxZMjpMhwNE

>what is a desert

OP the moon landings were real, despite any "evdunce" that people could bring to prove they are fake, the simple fact is Russia didn't say they were fake. At the height of the Cold War the biggest enemy of the USA had all of the abilities to monitor the moon landings independently from the US didn't say it was fake.
Now take your tinfoil hat off and go outside.

Ok Godot

>they built a film studio on the moon and filmed it there.

Exactly

>Russia didn't say they were fake
not an arguement

>maximum shill overdrive

Ok, I have a question for you people who don't believe in the moon landing...

WHY HAVEN'T THE FUCKING RUSSIANS DOUBTED IT? WHY DID THEY ACCEPT IT IF IT WERE SO DUBIOUS?

They had technology to investigate, have they done it? No. Why? Are you gonna say it didn't matter for the Russians?

You mean the moon landing was faked in a desert?

You were faster lmao

youtube.com/watch?v=8pUOcVnyg4o

There are various anomalies in the Moon Landing photographs and video feed, such as the wavering of the flag and the misaligned shadows. As far out there as this explanation may be, it's always made the most sense to me: youtube.com/watch?v=dUYX2sjzdFY

dude, you're not supposed to make sense

LARP better

>WHY HAVEN'T THE FUCKING RUSSIANS DOUBTED IT? WHY DID THEY ACCEPT IT IF IT WERE SO DUBIOUS?
>They had technology to investigate, have they done it? No. Why? Are you gonna say it didn't matter for the Russians?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_grain_robbery

The great grain robbery was the July 1972 purchase of 10 million tons of United States grain (mainly wheat and corn) by the Soviet Union at subsidized prices, which resulted in higher grain prices in the United States.[1][2] Grain prices soon reached 125-year highs in Chicago. In a 10-month span, soybeans went from $3.31 to $12.90 a bushel. Food prices around the world rose 50% in 1973. The U.S. government spent $300 million and by subsidizing the Russian purchases.

I thought the fact there are retroreflectors on the moon was proof enough but this is pretty damn good

because all their space programs are fake too, including sputnik, gagarin etc.

both powers have collaborated on faking space since the very beginning, and they still fake it together to this day, despite all the "muh hackers" fake cold war type bullshit

Cold war then and now = a hoax
space travel then and now = a hoax

simple

It is an argument you fucktard, you clearly are too fucking young to comprehend what it was like living through the height of the Cold War. If America didn't actually do it Russia would have flipped its shit saying inferior capitalists have faked moon landing. They wouldn't let the Americans forget it.
Also the moon was Americas way of saving face, as they had already lost the space race.

Tbh even with a blue sky, the clouds are almost the same color as the sky, and the shapes don't seem like any on earth.

sound stage on mars. next.

They couldn't have faked the footage of driving the rover on the moon.

It continues driving towards a stable horizon line, while passing over fresh terrain and rocks, with a background that is pitch black.

There was no way to fake that footage in the 60s, even inside a mile wide arena covered in white sand or with some massive conveyor belt shifting white rocks underneath the vehicle.

But it's fun to be a conspiracy nut

>It is an argument you fucktard
"No"

What the fuck am I supposed to see here?
It's a bunch of pictures and arrows with no explanation

>they built a film studio on the moon
Oh my.

Yes there is no doubt about the fact they were staged.

>misaligned shadows
This argument is so fucking bad I question whether you people ever leave your homes.

I argued with a dude about these shadows once and to prove my point I simply walked outside and snapped this photo.

Anyone can do this, just look at shadows around dusk and you'll realize how fuckin' gullible you are.

A man in a fire suit behind a stage with a mini moonman on it.
I mean, trust your eyes.

There has been a 1945 agreement between America and the Soviet Union that they would fake a cold war including tech spending on things like rockets and space and nuclear bombs - to the outside world it would seem real, but in reality only the elites in both countries would benefit from it.

This agreement was torn up by Yeltsin in 1992. To protect the Russian nationalist history of space conquering, Russia kept it all a secret.

>they outran the radiation

holy fuck no

This.

>doesn't understand how focal length of lens and distance from subject effect foreground and background
>I don't understand it therefore it's fake
pic related

You faggots really need to learn about basic photography before you start analyzing photographs.

If anything those photos serve to bolster the argument that the lunar landings were real.

John Madden

>misaligned shadows

this is a main problem i have with the lunar surface photos. the only light that exists in space is the sun. the stars would be invisible from space yet alot of the photos look like they have different light sources at other angles

Source?

They're obviously fake

Pic related

keK

>outran
No, they limited their exposure. They passed through the field very quickly and timed it so that they passed through a relatively small portion of the inner field which is the most radioactive part.

That was part of the SALT agreement in July 1972, idiot. You think the Russians waited three years after the moon landings for some grain?

see

>doesn't understrood
>you fagglords need to understrood

okay but you didn't explain
I'm waiting

To be fair, moon landing conspiracy theorists are probably less likely to spend a lot of time outside.

>timed it
They had no clue it existed until after.

kek
that was nice

Why do you keep denying the landing, France?
Your flag is on the moon now!

hes the real photo you decide

shit man I went there it felt fucking surreal
it's huge as fuck and looked like something from a sci fi movie

it's crazy how far we are from the scientific community and how they can build shit like this.

There are a lot of hoaxes out there perpetrated by the US government, but the moon landing probably isn't one.

Over the course of about a decade the USSR spent tens of millions of dollars and countless man hours examining every single bit of the tapes because they wanted to show they were a hoax and discredit America. But in the end even they ended up admitting that the tapes were real and the US went to the moon.

Prior to this the US didn't monitor global grain output, they literally got btfo by the Russians in the purchase and as a result began to spy on the Russian agricultural sector.

>Why do you keep denying the landing, France?

a lie is a lie.

The photo I posted serves as an example.

The smaller the focal length the wider and farther away the background will appear. A larger focal length (more zoom) will give the appearance of a closer background.

The photo on the left was taken with a smaller focal length and you can just barely see the hallway in the background. The photo on the left was taken with a larger focal length and farther away from the subject, the hallway in the background appears MUCH closer.

Nice doctored photo

what about this

I don't see any problem.

And why are you measuring his shadow from his left leg?

Whelp can't argue with this will get back in my box.
Go jump off a cliff user be sure to stay clear of the gubment Chem trails on the way.

>moon conspirations
>flat earth conspirations

you guys are just fucking retarded

You couldn't be more wrong, did you even read the article I posted?

In case you missed it:
>popsci.com/blog-network/vintage-space/apollo-rocketed-through-van-allen-belts

You cant really tell if that shadow is due east because a. Its partislly out of frame and b. its in the background making it difficult to judge its true vector.

Can you see a problem here?

youtu.be/LKzdV_jSnLE

I had that exact same feeling bro. It's really hard to understand just how crazy this shit is until you see it in person.

No because there isn't one you goober.

>moon landing are fake
>somehow the USSR, China, Japan and Europeans space agency is in on it

explain this

the Moon Landing is fake until NASA goes there again with livestream.

There are so much doubt that would cripple out such large organization over decades, yet they still seem not to care about any accusations against moon landing, cherrypicking questions with cheat answer "we don't need to go again"

it's in 'fake state' even it was literally real back in time. it'll stay fake as fuck until nasa does it again and proves with evidence.

McDonnell Douglas across the street is where they film the "space walks" in a pool.

one of my dreams is to see an ITS launch in person when they start up, have you guys ever been to a rocket launch IRL? if so, what is it like?