Sup Forums tells me rogue one would be pumped with SJW shit

>Sup Forums tells me rogue one would be pumped with SJW shit
>Amazing cinematography
>Sand nigger rebel seperatists get btfo
>No SJW shit whatsoever
>Hammerheads from KOTOR
This anti trump shit was all hype to get views

Fuck off kike

No, YOURE the kike

The 2 protagonists are absolut shit. They dont fit in at all. The cunt acts totaly weird. She has Big Boss level soldier skills but acts cute and dumb ? Than like shes bored or something after she sees her dad die.
The guy also just generic cuck with 0 charisma.
Robot, IPMan and the other chink were good.
The whole battle to get the plans was actually great. Best Space and Land Combat in Starwars to date.

Everything was good but the main character.

sure thing disney shill

>disney has to shill on Sup Forums to sell Star Wars
I have a raging erection at this moment.

This. The anti trump shit was literally psyops to get SJW to come out and watch it as an "antiprotest" to the supposed outrage by (((trump supporters)))

That never happens.

>Feinberg
>commenting on Donnie Yen as if they share the same values

donnie yen thinks your a fag

I don't want to see any star wars until they have a pro-empire movie

The blind chink with magical ninja powers and a bow staff is so gay. Just corny and cringe inducing every time they roll it out. I almost feel sorry for Charlie. But then I remember all look same.

In this movie, again, Stormtroopers get shot down by machine gun rebels and fall like flies, it's pretty brutal, and nobody really says the Empire is bad. It's just that the Empire kills innocent people with their super weapons, but doesn't everybody find the Strom troopers cool?

To be fair, I only watched it because of a guaranteed Empire win.
Great none of the main cast survive.

And Darth Vader gets to be badass yet again.

Rebel scum get murdered.
Also litteral allahu ackbars in the movie.
Sandnigger defector gets allahu ackbar'd too.

>amazing cinematography
>in a Disney-produced film

I haven't seen it, but this seems like a stretch

I agree it appears some of the SJW stuff was a false flag to use the alt right to gain more controversy for the movie.

The casting is purely leftist multiculturalism garbage with so many minorities. Aside from that they don't push any jewish themes and its a good movie.

>amazing cinematography

LMAO. No, it wasn't SJW propaganda but that doesn't mean it's a good film.

By filmmaking standards it's low tier. Bad editing, script, pacing, acting, and the visual effects looked irreal compared to the Lucas films who had god-tier CGI.

Fucking kike.

>No SJW shit whatsoever
Probably because you're too bluepilled to notice.

Yeah if you like cinematography OP you are watching the wrong genre.

Classic films have the best camera work and composition.

Agree 100%

Even if older studio directors were stagey, the best of them could frame a shot like no one else.

Fred Zinneman, Ingmar Bergman (probably the best), George Stevens, Billy Wilder...

Wiseau

I'd like to think it's because they shot on film and actually put intent and deliberation behind what they were doing. Everything they did was for the purpose of visually conveying an emotion or action.

...

kek

This is just to get you curious. If you pay to watch this movie, they win - remember that. If you are curious, wait it out and pirate the shit out of it.

I would say that Lars and progressive camera work is far superior to classic techniques. After all classic camera OPs end up filming tv dramas and commercial features.

That's it I think. At least with Zinnemann I read that was what he was known for. Every shot was meticulously crafted.

Today very few films give a shit about cinematography and as a result they all look fake and/or bland. I do prefer film to digital by a country mile, though there are some exceptions (Lubezki works wonders with digital imho).

This. What kid ever really liked the rebels anyway?

ok reddit

>usa
Both are the kike

Well, they did it for artistic reasons but also film wasn't that cheap. Also a lot of those people derived their cinematography from the theater where you only get one stage so you have to be creative to set-up a scene how you want

>Amazing cinematography
Maybe compared to marvel crap but it was pretty dull and inconsistent for the most part. Force awakens had way better scenes and didn't look like shit in the non action segments.

Okay Disney employee, we get it. You're trying to undo the viral damage against Rogue One: Diversity Squad, and shore up sales numbers.
Shill complete. Now you can fuck off back to Feminist HQ.

The hammerheads from KOTOR made me giggle alot desu

Yeah I guess some techniques don't work, but for example the one-take scenes (the oner) is always entertaining/impressive when done right.

Kubrick was the same way. Paul Thomas Anderson is a more recent example of someone who likes meticulous camera work.


That too my nigga.

>No SJW shit whatsoever
all the bad guys were white you nimkumpoot

this.
I'm actually kind of pissed at Sup Forums for being wrong for once. Rouge One was pretty good - made TFA look like shit, they need to up their game for 8 and 9

>very few films give a shit about cinematography
No that's just typical Hollywood crap. "festival films" from around the world always manage to impress me one way or another with their creativity.

Star Wars has always been shit, including Lucas's abominations he started in the 70's.

Jew (((Disney))) shills are here,

star wars is shit

If you don't believe brainwashing exists, look at how so many idiots froth over this shit and unironically think its good