Official Autistic Screeching Thread

Lets get the ball rolling

youtu.be/30j_MmnLDDc

Good thing I didn't sign shit faggot.

Take your nigger loving contract, and shove it up your ass.

>democracy is an imperfect system with exploitable flaws
>we should cause a huge amount of lost resources and inefficiency through implementing another imperfect system with exploitable flaws because of this
stay mad failed totalitarians

> mfw i can no longer smoke meth
> mfw cant have sex with animals
> mfw cant molest children
> mfw cant kill people because theyre mean
> mfw cant drive my lawn mower on my own privatized highway that only I and my qt ladyboys can use

>sign this contract
>implying

Shit start to the thread OP.

Go live in the forest if you don't want to be a part of society

>we should cause a huge amount of lost resources and inefficiency
I have terrible news

Tell me of a forest that isn't controlled by any state

thats right you cant, what did you think ancaps were, statists such as the podestas?

...

Literally never understood the social contract autism with anarchist.

It's a theory in favor of their ideology, obviously any theory which dictates the fragility of the government's existence should be supported.

>they use it to take our rights
It doesn't take away the idea that soceity can start a new government if we wanted to.

You realize you're essentially conceding that libertarianism can't defend territory.

>It's a theory in favor of their ideology
lol no. People have a problem with the idea of the "social contract" because it is essentially just a way to try and hide/ignore the coercionary nature of government. People claim that you are party to some contract and that is why the state has a right to impose its will on you. In reality, I never agreed to anything and cannot avoid being party to the supposed "contract."

...

...

...

(Checked)

>mfw AnCaps realize freedom of speech is no longer free

...

Too bad that you automatically signed those documents when you were born. Those documents are the Constitution and Bill of Rights.

Bamp

Apparently, some of you need to read some of John Locke's philosophical work. His work (especially about social contracts and human rights) were the basis of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. In a very broad summary, he said that everyone starts off with the ultimate God given rights to do everything a man would wish to do (which includes everything from earning as much money as you wish, to even murder) and that most governments just take away too much of your rights. So, he proposed that communities/societies/nations create a social contract that ensure people's duties to the society is stated and what kind of role the society would play. He stated that people would lose some rights, but they would only lose those rights through a concensus decision. He also stated that a society would perform better if the people were as free as reasonably possible. That was just a generalized summary of his work on the matter (which I may have to go back and refresh on), but the founding fathers did take quite a lot of inspiration from his work when they were designing the Constitution in regards to what fundamental rights should the government have (which is stated in the preamble), therefore when you are born in the US, you automatically sign those documents, to be apart of this society and if you grow up and decide you don't quite like that, then your only option is to move out.

>Too bad that you automatically signed those documents when you were born. Those documents are the Constitution and Bill of Rights.
But user the signature of an infant is meaningless.

BOOM HEADSHOT

>Tell me of a forest that isn't controlled by any state
Wow it's almost like areas where the people refuse to form an organised government get subsumed by people who chose to have an organised government. What a coincidence.

Just whipped this one up earlier today.

oh that's good

So people can be homeless as long as it's not a forest.

...