>~40 faithless electors deny Trump the presidency
What happens next?
ELECTORS
Asher Jones
Other urls found in this thread:
washingtonpost.com
youtu.be
blog.constitutioncenter.org
youtu.be
anyforums.com
twitter.com
Justin Reyes
will not happen.
the way i see this system its kinda shit cause as soon as the 1st person gets rejected everyone else will be rejected just in spite
Ryder Cruz
holy fucking shit this google ip bs a fucking loser german flag i cant even...
Eli Moore
House votes trump in or there will be a civil war
Anthony Campbell
>40 faithless electors deny Trump the presidency
Nope. There is a standard procedure for rejecting faithless votes when Congress counts them.
Provided that one congressman and one senator agrees that the faithless vote should be discarded, then it is discarded.
As the number of votes discarded increases, the number required to for Trump to claim the presidency decreases quid pro quo.
Thus Hillary cannot win since at least one congressman and one senator will always support the discarding of faithless votes.
I know you're foreigners and that this shit is hard, but either learn it or fucking keep your yaps shut.
David Miller
>at least one congressman and one senator will always support the discarding of faithless votes.
In theory anyway.
Josiah Thomas
...
Thomas Reyes
Why do we even have this system? We already had our election, and Trump won. What is the point of this procedure?
Luis Rivera
If somehow there would be electors who would not vote for Trump as they're obliged to then what's stopping loyal republican electors to reject every next person proposed?
Cameron Edwards
Wake up from Hillshill fever dream