*sigh*

Sup Forums ONCE AGAIN BTFO. Likely will never recover.

didn't read lol

>People going full autist with the skittles analogy

Read it you shitlord

>I would GORGE myself on skittles

lol fat people

...

>Is my life more important than thousands of dirty suicid bombers

Great, when are they going to house 10,000 migrants? Oh they don't want to be around them specifically?

WELL? ARE YOU AWAKE YET?

If he is so eager to die for the benefit of others, why is he so alive? It is obvious to any thinking person that his statement that he would die for others is pure bullshit. Only Libs can spew such ridiculous and untrue lies, and think that it makes them look smart and virtuous. It actually makes them look stupid and hypocritical.

This desu

Ridiculous argument. Those you'd be weeping for weren't volunteering to eat the skittles. You forced the skittles down their throat because of your broken idea of morality.

Why thank you for your sacrifice.
t. murderer that now lives in your house.

>completely ignoring the point of the analogy in order to grandstand and show everyone how progressive you are

virtue signalling : the post

Plus it's not about her but the people of the nation welcoming them.

They are HUMAN LIVES you racist scum, not fucking skittles. Have some damn empathy for fucks sake

the skittles don't die if you don't eat them, you're not saving lives

I would go home and eat my skittles instead of punching a Chilean in the nose who was pointing a 9mm at my heart.

If every single skittle he ate added another refugee to his own house, I doubt he would. As soon as it's other people's burden, he has no problem with it.

Not all lives are worthy to keep

Okay, let's revise that.

If I gave you a group of refugees, and three were over-excitable jihadi terrorists, would you still take them in your house?

>t. supreme edge master

A group of how many? How would you know they are jihadi terrorists? What if three refugee children would die if you didn't take them in?

This

>How many?
Considering the analogy of a bowl of skittles, 50.
>How would you know they are jihadi terrorists?
How do you know which skittle is poisoned? You don't know until you're dead.
>What if three refugee children would die if you didn't take them in?
Do you really think they would survive after the jihadis take your life?

So the left has gone full circle and they're saying the skittles analogy is flawed and hateful?

The feminist left were running these to shit on men not even half a year ago.

#yesallwomen

people with no in-group preference or loyalty to their own people deserve to die violently

I would happily watch millions of "innocent" children die, I would make popcorn and make myself comfortable while watching, just to prevent even one shitskin from entering my country.

Utilitarian logic is degenerate.

It's always easy to say that you would sacrifice yourself for others when there is no situation or way that would actually require such a thinking. But I can 100% assure you that if you presented her a bowl of skittles, 3 of which were poisoned, she would never eat any of them, even if every eaten one would save a life. And I wouldn't either, it's just human nature.

...

He's not wrong

OP is the one who compared them to skittles. Even YOU should be able to research this one....

Savior complex. He still wouldn't do it, though.

>Of course I'll only put in as much effort as eating candy to help refugees

The easy counter to this is,

"How noble of you. Now feed them to your children"

He too loved Skittles.

Press f to pay respects

F
Fucking racist cops something needs to be done. Police reform when?

>tfw found not guilty

Funny thing, eating the non-poisoned skittles is pointless because once your society has that one poison skittle, the society/body dies.

I would do the same desu instead of being a "redpilled" piece of shit waste of a skin

What if the poison skittles aren't only poisoning the skittle consumer, but raping their skittle neighbours and attempting to blow up the whole skittle bowl?

what is skittles analogy

That's actually perfect. No matter how noble these people pretend to be (we all know that they won't go out of their way to actually help) they can't fail to appreciate that they're endangering the lives of others if you force them to actually think of the consequences upon their children

Feminists =/= the left
Real leftists never used that argument. You can look up John Oliver breaking that argument into pieces already a year ago

F
this never would have happened if we had just sent all the niggers back to africa

>t.basement-dweller his mom thinks is a burden to her and society

>is MY life more important
See, this is the issue with liberals. Inviting a thousand Somalians into my town would never affect me. They wouldn't dare look twice at me, let alone attack me. But the women of my town? The children? They don't have that luxury. And personally, I couldn't look into the eyes of a broken child, whose health and confidence and innocence was stolen from them and say "We should take in more men like the one that attacked. Don't you agree?"

If a liberal is okay doing that, then there's something wrong with them.

What she needs to keep in mind is that in this analogy, you are America, not yourself. She's so closed mined she can't even think through an analogy correctly

>Feminists =/= the left

Uh huh.

You're posting with a swedish flag. A country where feminism saturates the left so much they're fucking indistinguishable and there's no such thing as an anti-feminist group.

> Real leftists never used that argument

"Real communism has never been tried"-level debating skills.

> You can look up John Oliver

I can't even tell if you're being intentionally retarded.

Fuck off, we're full.

>sweden

Life is about taking risks, and sometimes you're risking your life.

Lib cucks believe a refugee is worth risking their lives over. We don't.
We (or some of us) believe that producing heirs and continuing legacies is important, and worth the risk that women are. They don't.
Remember the trope, "Conservatives are Heartless and Liberals brainless."

Eating the poison skittle kills the Skittles you've already eaten.

This is old as fuck and has been completely destroyed hundreds of times.
How is an autist with delusions of grandeur babbling about committing mass suicide to save people halfway across the planet supposed to btfo Sup Forums?

>arguing with yourself

man, it must be really hard to make a compelling point doing that. Let me try.

>Do niggers deserve to live
what?! are you kidding of course they-
>Do they really deserve it? If we adjust for contributions made vs aid given, they're really just dragging down all of human society in the long run, aren't they?
That's not the point they're human beings-
>Debatable.
Ok, well clearly you're an idiotic racist
>idiotic like Charles Darwin, who did not find the African to be entirely human himself?
That's beside the point
>THE POINT IS that niggers have been a plague on our people and a pox on society since the day we stumbled into their tree-squatting asses and they have not ceased begging for more with one hand and taking twice that with the other since! They rape our daughters, they subvert our sons, they are lazy and crude and have no sympathy for humans or animals that I can detect, they are niggers, not humans, niggers and what honestly shocks me is that you, a white person, can't possibly process that your birthrates are inadequate, your culture is disappearing, your dignity and purpose are gone entirely and it's not because of some morally relative change in the way the world operates that's occurred in the last 50 years, but because you've let a bunch of (((White))) people convince you that you owe your entire future to a bunch of fucking animals!

Wow, it sure is compelling when you rant against yourself

get raped kabob lover

that nigger can't argue ignore Jamal.

look, you want to take in refugees?
Fine, take 'em. Take them into YOUR house to live with YOUR family and you can talk down to US. Nobody is stopping you. And you can reap whatever comes of it, good or bad.

In the mean time, the rest of us who recognize what's happening in the rest of the world, will abstain from your supreme charity, and continue giving money to awful, entitled, starving and homeless American people.

Liberals have completely lost all instinct for self-preservation.

This is why they're cucks.

Being a cuck isn't merely about literal cuckoldry. Its about putting others before yourself, outsiders before your family, to an unhealthy degree. Merely being an unselfish person who helps others isn't what we're talking about here either. We're talking about when selflessness gets taken to such extreme, insane lengths, that it becomes downright suicidal. That's what a cuck is.

Somebody posted this rebuttal on facebook before I'd actually heard the skittle analogy and I was really confused as to why this person apparently had such strong views about skittles.

Stop redefining words, nigger.

Cuck detected

once Ukraine is down your next and whit trump in power theres nothing your government can do but watch

POSEIDON PROTECT US

>kikebook
fuck off

Some other nigger was bound to kill him anyway. So yes it would have happened even if he went back to Africa. Just woulda been with a spear instead of a gun.

>willing to die to save others lives.

It's a damn shame there isn't some kind of profession centered around this idea. I guess the best they can do is post virtue signaling shit on social media.

>three of them are poison
>I would eat every single fucking skittle

And this is supposed to be the "right side of history"?

>literally dying for other people for no good reason
>admitting that eventually you will find a bad skittle

Hmmmm

This

>If I gave you a bowl of poisonous skittles and only three of them were not poisonous, would you eat them?
>No, but I'd force feed them to my neighbor and then go on facebook to take the credit

I would take in people who are going to rape, murder, and rob people and just general lower the quality of life of thousands of people because it might save thousands of people who are the products of their own culture and shitty genetics. Really makes you think. Its like that abortion argument where they are always like oh they are pro life until its born. These people are humanitarians until it has to do with people being hurt because of the people they are trying to save.

very kek

This is horrifying. Why not ask the question, "who the fuck is poisoning skittles?"

Isn't this the same shitty metaphor that legbeards use to talk about #yesallwomen bullshit?

Are these cucks really hijacking their own meme?

Well at least it's not about a bowl of Cheerios.

who would do such a thing?

Of course that fat fuck would gorge on poisoned skittles. That's why his body dies while his brains are completely content knowing he's done a good deed in his righteous zeal. Then the body dies, and the unknowing brains go with it, feeling ice cold terror for the most fleeting of moments.

of course my own life is more important for me!

the only single exception i would made is when my childrens or wifes life is at danger, then i would go rampage mode and risk my own life to save them.

Top kek

This reminded me of one of the short flash clips that used to play on Newgrounds back ~2000. A kid kept eating a farmers watermelons so he put a sign saying one of them is now poisoned. The next day the farmer came back to a new sign saying now three are poisoned.

I would really love to see how many homeless people you take into your house. Take a picture and show us the rows of bed you have for helping those poor homeless people that are dying.

How many refugees have you taken in?

Well, that's fucking gay

But when each person has to do the same, and you kill an entire nation to save a few good skittles, is it still worthit?

If each skittle is 100 people

In 100 skittles 2 are poisonous

Each poison skittle has the potential to kill 1 m&m or 100 people of the country

So what he's basically stating is that
1,000 refugees are worth more then 200 of his own people

Now what happens when 1,000 skittles are let in
that means 20 of these skittles are poisonous

And now these skittles have formed a terrorist organization that carry out daily terror attacks
Oh look
Now the 20 skittles have doubled to 40 and have started converting the other skittles to become poisonous as well

And now sharia law has been implemented into the united states and everyone has the potential to become a poisonous skittle

Good job idiot

>w-we're not more important than others so skittle analogy doesn't work

It's sad that you don't value your own life but whatever, I do.

I'd save myself and those I know over those I don't know any day.

yes because of MUH HUMAN LIVES. All people are good even the suicide bomber. You should be lucky to be killed by a muslim refugee

If that's allegory for muslims then the whole bowl is poisoned.

Muslims are not humans.

We should make a wall in Europe too.

Obviously the quoted woman's life isn't more important than invading sandniggers - by her own admission.

My life is, though.

>Feminists =/= the left

hahahahahahahahaha
SWEDEN YES

looking forward to them inviting every homeless person they meet to live at their house.

A wise post.

Based Poseidon

Institutions have different responsibilities than individuals.

Plus, even if you save an individual by taking them in, you haven't saved them at all if you also take in what they are running from.

The question isn't do we save people-- everyone is agreed on that. The question is how do we isolate the poison and get rid of it. How do you quarantine a parasitic idea without trampling on people's right to have any idea they want?

>IS MY LIFE MORE IMPORTANT THAN...
yes

Don't you mean Neptune?

This is why only property owners and soldiers should be the only demographics permitted to vote.