Proof Sup Forums is just irrationally racist:

Proof Sup Forums is just irrationally racist:

You guys go on and on about how blacks commit violent crimes at a higher rate than whites. The conclusion you draw from this is that Blacks are naturally savage and incompatible with polite society.

If that's what you believe then to be logically consistent you probably also believe that Males are also naturally savage and therefore incompatible with polite society because they commit violent crime at 9 times the rate of Females.

Though you don't believe this, do you, because you're just a little scaredy bitch boy who doesn't like things that are different from you.

Other urls found in this thread:

factmonster.com/ipka/A0906931.html
youtu.be/Nt0NcaxmGHo
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Homo-sapiens are the only species on earth in which anyone would dare to relativise the different pheno-types. "Anti-racism" is good intentions drowning in pseudo science.

But when looking at the statistics of the country, blacks commit crimes far more than whites. You need men for society to function, you don't need multiculturalism for a society to function.

Racism is stupid.

/thread

No you don't. We can just harvest sperm. You consider blacks subhuman so surely by the same logic you consider men subhuman and able to be farmed for cum.

Just to be clear. I think racist jokes are fine if they're funny. The only problem is when idiots like Sup Forums take it seriously and think people actually agree with them.

What the fuck are you going on about?

Oh sorry, let's just kill the entire population by ending reproduction.

My solution is to not kill anyone because that's fucking stupid and you're judging entire groups based on the actions of some.

Why does everything have to be genocidal with you maniacs? Also, I said they could just be harvested for sperm so you can still reproduce.

Just pointing out, there is no rebuttal to this. Sup Forums argument completely dismantled.

Wow a liberal deliberately using statistics dishonestly to misrepresent facts. I'm so surprised.
How about you divide those male and female demographics by race and then we'll talk. You can't use gender to represent a race subject. I bet you'll find that most of the male criminals are minorities.
When minorities are removed from crime statistics and we observe only the crime stats of whites, the crime rate drops dramatically to more closely represent majority-white European countries.

>Males are also naturally savage and therefore incompatible with polite society because they commit violent crime at 9 times the rate of Females.
Yes, but which males, cause if you're talking about ALL males then that includes niggers as well and we all know what happens to crime rates when you add niggers

Women cannot lead a civilization.

Pretty simple rebuttal

[citation needed]

They have done before and continue to do so.

You sound like a nigger.

OP just got BTFO!!!!!

How's that dick taste, bitch??

Men created society you dip. I can't wait until we annex you.

Couldn't find the stats in the US but they hold true for NZ which has basically no black people. Our prisons are 95% male.

>When minorities are removed from crime statistics and we observe only the crime stats of whites, the crime rate drops dramatically

Same as if you remove men from the crime statistics. You're proving my point.

>implying objects for breeding who have invented nothing and done nothing can actually take the role of a male and lead

Who has a pic of that show where the women and men had to lead their own societies and the women got BTFO?

The stats hold true for whites it seems. Are you seriously denying that white men commit more violent crime than white women?

>
If that's what you believe then to be logically consistent you probably also believe that Males are also naturally savage and therefore incompatible with polite society because they commit violent crime at 9 times the rate of Females.

If you remove men from a society, what do you have left?

Haven't seen it but I'd bet my left nut it's cherry-picked.

Here are a couple women inventions.

factmonster.com/ipka/A0906931.html

Do you genuinely believe you would live in a civilization tomorrow if every male retired or disappeared?

There's about -4 niggers in NZ.

OP we are rationally racist. The observations that blacks are more violent is proven. And society can still function within the 9 times rate that you quoted because niggers are counted within that 9 times, and are a huge majority of the violence.

You're the racist because you're denying reality to fit a preconceived notion of race that you were indoctrinated with. Wrap your mind around that if you can.

Sup Forums doesn't hate all black people, Sup Forums hates niggers.

Pic related is evidence that a society of women would completely break down.

yes you maori faggot. I have no doubt that men are much more violent and savage than women.

Women are docile and sweet, or at least most of them are.

Civilization can only occur with IQ's >~90

We are not all one race.

Africans lack the 6% Neanderthal DNA Western Europeans have. They are literally Human 1.0.

Lol most of those are literally useless. Only a few are actually inventions that matter.

Women.

White males developed the concept of polite society.

You don't understand racism.

For example, it is not racist to say that there are 36M black people in the USA.

If you say that 25M of them are in welfare and 1M in prison then you are racist

>chocolate chip cookies
>windshield wipers
>rolling pin
Yes goy, women are true geniuses! They can create everything! Now, how about your wife comes and gets a job to use her superior building skills and inventing!

Do you really think a society of one gender would function? Do you think a matriarchal society would produce competitively?

I think there would be significant losses in productivity, which is one of the main reasons I wouldn't suggest eradicating all men for the actions of a few is a good idea. I'm using it to show why all bigotry is illogical by using an example Sup Forums can actually empathise with.

>implying Sup Forums cares about logically consistent or empirically proven arguments.
Your efforts are appreciated.

Daily reminder: race is a social construct.

All you've shown us is that you have no idea how civilization was made and that women literally invented themselves into unhappiness.

schizophrenic liberal

you realise men dominate the high IQs, so at best, you could have a functioning society of women, but progress would be slowed to a fucking crawl

That social construct you got here really effects behavior, body structure, IQ, and resistance to illness.

>Apgar tests, which evaluate a baby’s health upon birth
>Circular saw
>Electric hot water heater
>Elevated railway
>Engine muffler
>Fire escape
>Kevlar
>Life raft
>Locomotive chimney
>Medical syringe
>Rotary engine
>Street-cleaning machine
>Submarine lamp and telescope

No, your point is fucking stupid because it's the difference of a necessary evil versus an imported problem.

America would still arguably function and be America if every black American disappeared tomorrow. It would arguably also reduce crime rates.

If you deported every man in America tomorrow magically, the society would collapse upon itself.

Kek I just want everyone here to imagine if all men dropped out of society tomorrow. Like if they just stayed home instead of going to work and doing anything. Entire countries would collapse.

>Males are also naturally savage
well fucking duh.

Males are more aggressive and Violent that females.
No one ever disputes this.

Stephan monlyememe already debunked violence being related to race crossing FBI data on race, employment level, education level and relative poverty. Turns out education level and relative poverty have the biggest corelation to violence, but nice agumentation OP.

now list men's inventions

None of those are racist, they're just facts [I'm assuming they're facts but I haven't checked.]

>Large economic shock would be bad.
Huh, that's unexpected.

I don't have a wife, I have a girlfriend because marriage is fucking silly. She's in Law school, which btw now has more women than men without affirmative action.

Let me put this bluntly. If you have been a significant force throughout history, and you have to prove you contributed, your contributions are the exception rather than the rule.

>You didn't contribute anything! You're just user-shitpostsmith

Then why are you bringing up these exceptions to prove that women are productive? At what point is it simply minorities of one?

Sorry about this guy everyone. Let me assure you all he's a total fuckwit by NZ standards and if I can find him I'll give him the spanking he deserves for being such an uppity little cunt.

>violence
>bad

Certainly could. I even saw it on an episode of Rick and Morty.

Robert Kearns invented The windshield wiper, but had his idea stolen. Just proves women live off the success of men.

>Let's bring millions of Africans in to our country
>I know they're a lot more violent than any other race, but men are more violent than women

There's no rebuttal because you're it's a complete non argument. Just because men are more violent than women doesn't mean there isn't a fundamental problem with blacks being more violent than anyone else. Niggers are problem wherever they go, even here in Australia they're 1% of the population, they're all refugees who will live their entire lives on welfare, and they still run around in gangs committing home invasions and car jackings.

So we agree it would be bad to deport all men. But are you saying society would be better off if they were just kept and farmed for sperm?

It's HEAAAAAPS. Women would still get there in the end, just like men would have come up with the electric hot water heater in the end. The difference is that women would probably have less war.

>You will never be kidnapped and milked for semen by your female overlords

But no, a man's worth is typically not his sperm. Society would still collapse.

racism: a word invented by trotsky, the communist jew

this word should be abolished. people are racist for a reason I believe. Im not racist but I believe in eugenics

>"You can laugh and joke around with anyone at the end of the day, regardless of there skin color or political views. However, people would ultimately be more comfortable and happier living amongst there own kind "

OP's "argument" is the logical fallacy known as the non sequitur, ie, "a thing that does not follow." It's always interesting to catch these "in the wild." There are many different varieties.

In this one, OP uses reductionism to create a strawman, which he then non sequiturs into a "conclusion."

It's important to study these things in order to make your OWN arguments stronger.

That's all for today's lesson, kids. But I'm sure we'll have another one shortly.

Come visit me, fuck boy. I live at 11 Eric Price Ave, Milford. Let's see who spanks who.

So you agree niggers are great.

really makes you think

Yeah probably, but society would also collapse if you got rid of every race but whites.

it does not matter whether they are true or not. the problem is that in the USA using facts that don't tell the right (left) story, is racist.

that is the main reason why pol is racist

I've never seen someone try to sound so smart while talking entirely in farts. I was pointing out that the argument: 'niggers are bad because more of them are violent' is fallacious and used an example of men to contrast and hopefully foster some empathy.

so if I say one out of every four black people in the USA will go to prison at some time during their lifetime, vs one for every two hundred white people.

that is racist?

You're completely right OP. Society would be much better without men.

No, that's fucking stupid again. White civilizations lived homogeneously for the vast majority of civilization. The vast majority of civilizations that have ever been have been an overwhelming majority of one race. A mono-gender civilization has never been.

not with their lack of intelligence

*incompatible with white society
tumblr and libshits have one thing right, our society puts blacks at a disadvantage. They think its conspiracy, and that white people are just trying to keep the black race down.
In reality, The western world values intelligence and hardwork to a much higher standard than the average black man has the capacity for.
Just like how a white person would fall behind and be at a disadvantage in South-East Asian countries.
The liberal solution to this is to give handouts to the disadvantaged, further creating a social gap between blacks and whites. The Conservative solution is to treat everyone as if they are equal, when they are not, further creating a gap between blacks and whites.
The only correct solution is National Socialism where ethnostates are established and social evolution can resume. Eventually every race and culture will prosper, finally free from having to compete with people who are hard-wired to be smarter than you.

>blacks commit violent crimes at a higher rate than whites.

Yes.

Two seconds looking through google says most of those are/were men inventors.

most of Sup Forums watches a lot of porn and loves interracial porn especially.

but they are ashamed so they bash blacks just like a lot of closeted homos will bash gays

Nope, not if it's true, [and I don't think it is]

It's also not sexist to say that white men are 20x more likely than white women to end up in prison in NZ.

When it becomes racist/sexist is when you make unjustified generalisations and try to claim that the actions of one white man mean you can judge another white man. [or any race]

>Implying you're not just shitposting

Whatever you say kiwi

>unironically using "fuck boy" as an insult

Yeah maybe I'll stop talking about spanking before you get too excited there mate. Thanks for the offer though - I'm genuinely flattered.

Males are more aggressive then females, retard. There is a hormone called testosterone and it makes males more aggressive. If you had a set of testicles you would know that.

>No, that's fucking stupid again. White civilizations lived homogeneously for the vast majority of civilization.

That doesn't mean society in it's current form wouldn't collapse. There is a lot more co-dependence now.

We lived for thousands of years without computers but if they were all to suddenly fail, civilisation would collapse.

The thing is OP, non-whites (with the exception of the Chinese/Japanese/Koreans) have lower IQ's in general.

The image attached shows the worlds current IQ rate. Now imagine what it was in our countries before mass immigration started.

There is no denying that there seems to be a very consistent IQ difference between whites/non-whites (with the exception of Orientals).

There have been studies conducted showing that "quality of life" or "wealth inequality" didn't help fix this issue either. Non-whites still managed to attain lower IQ scores as a majority even with being in similar living conditions.

All in all OP, it's time that we (as a species) acknowledge the psychological differences between whites and non-whites. I'm not saying there aren't exceptions, but as a whole, it really does exist.

Sup Forums racism is satire to make people laugh after a stressful day of supporting Trump and exposing the evil of the world

Yeah, that's what I thought.

...

Females are the vainest creatures on the face of the earth.

Look at the beauty industry which they choose to support.

They are not able to lead civilization and they never have.

Niggers are subhuman because they cannot create culture or society or civilizations that compare to whites and asians.

This is because they are under developed creatures.

What proof of this do I have?

youtu.be/Nt0NcaxmGHo

This is pretty good proof, the fact something like this has to exist is a really strong argument.

Forgot image

Wasn't it proven that blacks have more testosterone than whites?

That's part of the strawman. We both know that your characterization of things is reductionist and therefore useless in any sort of actual logical debate.

To be more precise, you're trying to reduce things into a single X/Y-type argument along the lines of "Y is bad; X does Y a lot, therefore X is bad."

But since we're talking about social phenomena, it goes way beyond X/Y strawmen.

To use a simple example, the murder rate of women is a lot higher than the murder rate of housecats. According to a reductionist X/Y strawman, we should consider women "bad" compared to housecats on that basis (women commit more X than cats).

That's obviously retarded, since it spergs out over a single element X to the exclusion of all other considerations.

Which is the same reason niggers commit more crime. That and poverty.

And yet it's men that made civilization and not women. Even in Africa in all black areas.

>My neurons are fired up.

It wouldn't. If we're in European countries, the vast majority are still white. In the United States, the vast majority of work done by non-whites is blue collar and service industry. South Africa would collapse.

>Computers are the same as niggers
The issue you're looking at is that on average computers improve productivity while niggers steal computers.

He's going on about political correctness getting in the way of science. Taxonomy has different rules when applied to only humans. Things that would make us classify similar animals as different species, be it genetic, behavior, or otherwise, just aren't applied to humans.

Hence the pseudoscience.

Also, correctness through consensus rather than objective correctness gets in the way of science. Just because ___ many scientists say this to be true, it must be whether it objectively is true or not.

Leftist politically driven science is therefore pseudoscience and antiintellectualism.

And that is genetically determined which is why we need eugenics now more than ever.

Weeeeeeell, if you look at it through the perspective of racial biology, negros are far more animalistic than us, that's why many of them can/are
• smell when a woman is on her period (many blacks have told me they can, some can't)
• more muscular and tenacious than whites (because hunting)
• tend to be more violent because the evolutionary process in their continent is really slow, so they are more prone to animalistic behaviour.

Whites have built a sustainable society which has prolonged our lifespan, we have left the hunting-stage, and with that we have also left the animalistic/violent behaviour, because we know that working together is far more better than killing eachother over stupid shit.

The caucasian evolution and of course asian, are the best.
Me myself think that asians are better, they have way more respect for one another and won't invite these stupid niggers.

Sure does. That's why we gotta kill everyone who isn't asian. /s

I'm not saying there is no difference, I'm saying that they don't justify genocide.

this is true, if africa, south america and most of asia was white it would be much harder to opress the fuck out of them.

Good thing nobody asked you to justify anything because your opinion is meaningless.