Why shouldn't I believe the majority of scientists and all the data that exists that prove we are affecting our climate...

Why shouldn't I believe the majority of scientists and all the data that exists that prove we are affecting our climate on a large scale? How can you guys just call it a hoax? Do you have proofs?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/DrWznOFq38s
youtube.com/watch?v=rcjpags7JT8
armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/nature/logbooks-of-1901-expedition-confirm-there-is-no-global-warming/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

MUMMY MUMMY MUMMY

I wanna screw Natalia

By "scientist", do you mean those indoctrinated bunch of people who get their salary from the goverments?

u cant shes my mummy

So what about the fact they got caught faking data and hockey sticks to secure more funding?

Have you read any of that data? Or have you just heard a bunch of people saying the evidence is undeniable?

You're free to believe what you want

who got caught faking data?

>1 post by this ID

oh fug looks like im a /climatefaggot/ now :DDD

...

I tend to believe that the planet is a lot more powerful than we are.
We might kill ourselves but I doubt we'll ever make a serious impact on the planet's atmosphere.

I've looked at both sides and it is confusing. I see many people have over exaggerated and seemed like they were trying to get a scare out of the public, but there are just so many scientists that say this is a real issue, why would all of them lie?

every peer reviewed meta-analysis that has come out about climate change has shown the majority of climate scientists think global warming is occuring and it's anthropogenic

Okay George Carlin

Cuck off.

Also, weak.

Try harder dick wad.

youtu.be/DrWznOFq38s

delet it this is inapropiat

Is there evidence of it being fake that made you a non climate faggot? What sources do you have?

>Believing the data
The data was doctored to exaggerate to shock and to cause hysteria over the issue.

The (((scientists))) are already on record for manipulating the data. Whether it was intentional or not does not matter it is unscientific to manipulate data to support a hypothesis - that is not seeking the truth that is promoting a narrative.

"Climate change is a hoax"
-said by Sup Forums never ever

Mummy's not a foot fag

I actually watched this the other day. This guy says some interesting stuff, I wish that paper he was talking about could be released already. But still, why should I believe him over all the other scientists? Because he says what I want to hear?

Well it is undeniable that it exists that is true, I guess I should say people here just think man contributes to virtually none of it, or at least close to what scientists say we contribute to climate change/ global warming shit.

1. Humans are impacting climate change.

2. But we don't know the exact extent that impact will have (Al Gore thought the ice caps would be gone by now).

3. We can't reasonably curb the human impact without granting near unlimited authority to a global government (the actions of individual nations won't matter if China is still fucking things up).

4. Such a powerful global government would severely infringe upon our rights.

5. People don't want to give up their rights to a big global government that could use that power how they please without even having a sure plan to stop climate change (non-man made would still continue and you could never fully stop man made).

youtube.com/watch?v=rcjpags7JT8

nth thread where we debunk the same bullshit and post real evidence no one reads

Well you shouldn't necessarily believe him just because he tells you want you to hear. Combined with government funding, bribery, the need for a boogey man/scape goat, it makes sense that they would keep pushing the natrative forward even though the data is showing almost the opposite of what they are telling us, specifically about feedbacks and atmospheric warming.

Well, what does he have to gain? He's going completely against all the easy government insensitives and he's laid out what they're doing wrong, how the data is manipulated, presenting his work to peer review, etc. I mean, I'm not a scientists ether but this makes a lot more sense and fits with not only the data but observation.

...

OP, no-one thinks climate change is a hoax. climate change is real, and it has happaned for billions of years. and sure, human interaction is accelerating the process.
the difference between you and us, is that you think it matters. it doesn't. climate will change, the world will spin, life will go on. we could burn all the coal in the ground and it wouldn't matter in the long term.

No, we just ask the questions 1) How much is occurring 2) Is it catostrophic? 3) How much are humans contributing?

What is a hoax is the catastrophic claims that is really just another government power grab.

>knowing you'll never get to fuck Mummy

This is true.

A single volcanic eruption could have more of an effect on the planet's climate than humans ever could. I have never heard anyone try to refute that statement so if someone can show me some data saying other wise i would be interested

...

>majority of scientists
Majority of climate scientists you mean.

Also, a bunch of scientists believing in something is not evidence.

>Why shouldn't I believe the majority of scientists and all the data that exists that prove we are affecting our climate on a large scale?
Because thay itself isn't true

not an argument faggot

>majority of scientists
that's bullshit though

Do you have any links or pictures showing examples of the manipulated data?

...

Go back to Sup Forums.

That is true, why should we be so afraid that our activity over a long period of time will have some effect when a volcano, created by nature, would cause catastrophe in an instant. Of course the Earth will survive, but other life will be wiped out mostly

mama u r so prety today can i kis u?? :3

Post 'em if you got 'em.
Mummy 4 Life!

...

i dont get the appeal

reputable experimental scientists don't use the word "prove". and the scientists who have proven global warming prove it all the time

it's easy enough to learn about the manipulations, it has been written about time and again. just google climate gate. google club of rome and see how it all began, how it was intentionally decided to use climate as a means to institute global socialism. read Eco-Science and learn what radical changes were being planned as far back as the 1970's. the trail is right out there in the open for anyone who isn't just ass blind to the truth.

>Majority of climate scientists you mean.

Majority would be cool, but 97% sounds like commie country election result.

what mummy says about Crimea? Is it free now?

krym become free march 2014

This.
I agree 99%. As a mountaindude I really don't care either way and the world will go on whatever happens anyways HOWEVER
if humans continue to accelerate natural climate change instead of converting to alternatives (Fusion would be preferable) the coastal regions around the world are going to have some issues. When the oceans do eventually rise there'll be a lot of drowned liberals. Can't let them into those diety flyover states after all..
Oh well

good, your mummy did a good job there

*teleports behind u*

i kno shes so speshul :3

...

If a man was falling from a cliff and as he was falling you threw rocks at him. Would that make you responsible for his initial fall?

Hello Mummy's army!

We call it a hoax because your scientists don't realize that the earth is adjusting/changing therefore some climate change is possible.

We call it a hoax becauae your scientists are liars that knows too goddam well that it's not climate change but climate manipulation. They built a HAARP, now they control the god forsaken weather. They also control earthquakes and possibly volcanoes. I dont fucking know what else, but I do know that they can control the earth's axis if they get advanced enough

Hi how are you

Real science is falsifiable and not done by consensus.

Are they friends with Marion now?

> over the next billion years the sun will gradually get hotter resulting in the extinction of all life
> better impose green taxes and build more wind turbines!

Yes but mummy is much pretty

I believe its real but I've also yet to hear a single viable solution from climate scientists. It's all just
>DUDE SOLAR PANELS AND WIND FARMS LMAO

"Majority of scientists" were the 0.001% of respondents to a survey they sent out, the other 99% of scientists they sent it to never bothered to respond, fucking moron

Good. I always thought they'll be friends.
Hope mummy helps Marion liberate France.

I fucking love Mummy threads. The intersection of shitposting and autism.

I am scientist. It is fake

Climate change is a natural occurence and trying to prevent it is like trying to prevent the sun from setting.

What we should be trying to prevent is air and water pollution that doesnt effect the global weather but affects the health of people who have to breathe that air and drink that water; and mass deforestation and hunting animals to extinction.

Pretty good. But not as pretty as mummy here.

>png
DELET NAUGHTY OF MUM
ye
нy ты любишь мaмa тoжe?

Believe it all you want, if you so choose, but forever reject central planning as the only 'solution'.

Otherwise, you are a slave, a cuck, and a retard.

Protop: there is no materialist solution to human extinction. It is an inevitability given the laws of physics.

If you intend to live into eternity, it's better to embrace the memes.

DELET DIS

Global warming is a hoax the jews present with us to make is ignore and not even think about the fact that sand (the consumption of sand) is the thing to ruin us and if sand isn't used anymore basically everything comes to a halt and in turn, money doesn't flow anymore

Haha! Where did you get this? Saved!

Worry not. It is only a product of imagination!

Yes theyre bff

Mummy hats Swedes

Mummys always pretu

>.jpg

I'm almost certain her real nudes look better than this.

>Do you have proofs?

I have proofs that a reactor in Japan melted down and 4 years later the great barrier reef was declared dead

A nexus of power in the modern world.

armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/nature/logbooks-of-1901-expedition-confirm-there-is-no-global-warming/

angru mama
why post fake mum

No user, even though peer reviews and meta-analyses which usually have a section dedicated to explaining how they hold or don't hold ties with government or other private institutions might be the gold standard in terms of information, these don't matter in term of climate change because some random essays from unethical researchers have been proved to have fake results in order to receive more funding

we will not tolerate such offenses, delete or I will hack your mother.

In another Mummy thread.

Swedish Vikings from Roslagen literally founded RUS and travelled the rivers between Gammelstad and Miklagård, can you ancestor say the same, Imperial?

yes, there hasn't been any climate change since the 21st century and the time there was it lasted for a few decades

It's not fak if you want it to be real

liberté toujours

No such luck for you. I have immunity mummy!

Is immunity mummy stronger than immunity doggo? I suppose so, I'll save it then

want to touch mummy legs
no is fake
zoofil fuk of

countdown went

>indoctrinated bunch of people who
>get their salary from the goverments
those are politicians, fgt pls

>We wuz vikangz

That's cool but now you and germoney are competing for the title of the biggest cuck

...