Why not unregulated capitalism? worked in chile, hong kong, sweden, usa 1800s
it always ends the same
>freedom and capitalism>economic improvement>degeneracy>poverty>leftism>big government>jew takeover>atheism>cucked by mass immigration>globalism>progressivism>current times
capitalism really works
What do we do then? Gommunism? Third position?
the degeneracy is caused by the welfare state
because guess who rises to the top of a purely materialistic culture? jews
guess what they do once theyre in power? they secure it and crush others (communism)
read wall st and the bolshevik revolution by anthony sutton
no they rise to the top with criminality and corruption
>Third position?
Degeneracy caused by the lack of cultural leadership and that should be reflected in economic policy as well. There needs to be laws against trade which causes degeneracy to corrupt society.
Have fun getting oppressed by the capitalist comrade, communism is the only way forward
hong kong was totally regulated, it was controlled by the UK for a long time now its completely controlled by china.
I just got back from working there and its a fucking shithole.
>Hong Kong
They dont want capitalism, they want their own socialism, just look how much they hate mainlanders who come to HK and take >muh land.
Which it always was
Obscenity laws have nothing to do with economic policy
>Worked in the 1800s
The world was (and worked in) a different way back then. Comparing it is silly.
Unregulated capitalism now would mean enormous monopolies shitting on consumes because they have no competition.
name one monopoly
Your mom.
Try reading what i wrote again. IF there was unregulated capitalism today, giant monopolies would form around every industry and eat up anyone who tries to start something new.
ok name one industry that is close to being a monopoly
name one monopoly that the government prevented
ISP's, atleast over there in america, you are lucky you have net neutrality
also checked
And then it became what it is now because it lacked all means of regulation.
Bravo.
there are plenty of ISPs to choose from
net neutrality was a solution in search of a problem
They broke up Ma Bell
Don't act daft.
No it became what it is now because of immigration and democracy
Economic migrants are generally shit tier people who should not be allowed to vote
That's how it works with a government. Absent a government, it stays a capitalist society.
>against TRADE which causes degeneracy to corrupt society.
I'm not talking about obscenity I'm talking about keeping goods and services pure. For example kikes should have nothing to do with financial institutions or the media. All those services should be regulated to prevent corruption. Society needs to be protected from predatory financial practices and subversive propaganda from kikes.
Ok thats one
How about just not let them in the country
How about stop pushing the inflation creates prosperity meme
>chile
>unregulated capitalism
>under dictatorship
Try harder you dickface, I'm all about libertarism, but you don't know shit about it.
>one day, pepe will actually be in history books
This disturbs yet intrigues me.
>because of immigration and democracy
Both being part of unregulated capitalism. I agree that these things are shit, so I'm not going to lie to myself about systems that enable them.
If pic related is what you want then sure, why not?
absent government is an ancap fantasy
anarcho capitalism is weak it could never compete against governments
They're already in the country. How's unregulated capitalism going to get rid of them? How is it going to keep them out?
immigration is not an economic issue its a national security and sovereignty issue
jews and niggers ruin it for everyone
if all people had a sense of fair play like the British and Yankee Traders did back then it'd work
since that culture has been destroyed our only option is heavily regulated capitalism or fascism
they're pretty similar systems, incidentally
except one of them is a neutered form of a completely different system
if you're going to do something do it right
No, statism is a fantasy. The "government" doesn't exist. The moment you stop believing in it is the moment it goes away.
see
Standard Oil
Learn your American history burger.
The OP literally asked "why not unlimited capitalism?", and i am saying why unlimited capitalism is a shitty idea, and what the consequences would be.
Industries atm are regulated in when they are allowed to fusion etc, to prevent super monopolies from being created. Hence your question is irrelevant to what is being discussed.
oil is a global commodity
Standard oil never had a monopoly in it
>immigration is not an economic issue
But it is, when the (((friendly corporate man))) wants to import a cheap laborforce how are you going to stop him without contradicting your stance on regulation?
This doesn't answer my question.
Free market capitalism is actually very good for developing multirracial or nonwhite countries. It helps their economy grow and forces a great decrease in the fertility rate in these places (especially because it can help prevent low iq populations from having too many kids).
However, for developed 99% white countries, a welfare system is necessary, otherwise the population will get too old due to low fertility rates.
>without contradicting your stance on regulation?
what stance?
>This doesn't answer my question.
Send them to the gas chambers I dont give a shit
>However, for developed 99% white countries, a welfare system is necessary, otherwise the population will get too old due to low fertility rates.
Low fertility rates are caused by government pensions
For making that most and asking that question, I present you with the Most Intelligent Post of All Time Award. Spend it wisely.
you differentiate, user
liking apples but not oranges isn't contradictory, it has to do with taste
likewise, liking free market but not liking immigrants isn't contradictory, it has to do with what your end goal is
it's an economic issue, sure, but primarily it's a security issue, and if you value the safety of your people over a few extra bucks you can tell them to fuck off without being a hypocrite
Because in time someone is able to position their business into a position of total dominance and then exploit the population.
Regulations are important for many reasons ranging from safety to exploitation to cartel/monopoly structuring.
That said a market based economy is the real power of capitalism, so long as your economy is market based you don't need to excess of unregulated capitalism.
This is where the EU fails as it's been eating into the market economy by protectionism, regionalism, and self justifying bureaucracy.
~
99% of the wealth problems people have are caused by the banking system. Allowing private banks to create money as debt and to expand the money supply for their own profit with fractional reserve banking.
With monetary reform I could end most of the poverty, free up massive amounts of labor for productive ends and raise the standard of living of over 99% of the population. The only people that lose out are the bankers who would go from trillions to meanly hundreds of billions.
Alcoa prior to breakup.
Boeing prior to the EU subsidizing Airbus into market dominance.
Standard Oil prior to breakup.
Unrestrained capitalism is multiculturalism. It is the importation uneducated immigrants to lower the equilibrium wage and combined with the welfare state which demands a fresh supply of young taxable individuals flowing into the country once the native birth rate inevitably declines.
In a free market a lack of competition raises the demand for competition. Government regulation is not a means of protecting people from monopolies oligopolies etc. but a means of creating them. Look around you. 4 companies control over 80% of the beef market. This has been caused by over regulation so new companies are unable to pop up.