Thank God we didn't elect Killary. She would've started WW3!

Thank God we didn't elect Killary. She would've started WW3!

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/1Y1ya-yF35g
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Fuck off beaner

I just wanted to get some lib tears and to get to watch the world burn

Obama was in the midst of making the unprecedented move of declaring the US a no first use nation. That means that the president would only launch a nuke in response to another nuke being launched at the US. This is bad because it tells our enemies that they can do literally anything besides try to nuke us and the most we might do is carpet bomb them. Chemical or biochemical attack on a major US cit?, np f a m

Thats pointless anyways since the us wouldnt use nukes first anyways.

Oh you don't think so?

The mental gymnastics of Trump supporters is worthy of Olympic gold.

We are the only country on the planet that has

yeah man that'll be totally hardcore.

but won't it suck once the nuclear war begins, the power goes out, you don't have internet, and you lose your cushy lifestyle?

How is what he said a bad thing? What's wrong with strengthening our arsenal while also discussing with world leaders how we can go about nukes.

Seems pretty center aisle to me.

Humanity needs to be wipe out

That's not the point. The whole thing behind nuclear deterrence is you don't tell the enemy what specific conditions would trigger a nuclear response. Maybe the official US policy was only launch a nuke if attacked with a nuke, but no one knew for sure.

To be fair, the nukes used then were a bit significantly weaker than the ones today, and prior to that the US had been conducting air raids and firebombing Japanese cities. Firebombing caused more casualties than just dropping two 1945 atom bombs.

Doesnt matter its still worth it. Let it burn.

How is renewing old nukes a bad thing?

yesterday
>trump too soft on putin, russian shill

today
>trump too hard on putin, will start ww3

this is why your party is failing

Trump won,t even have time to be inogurated
Kek told me the end of the world is at the begining of 2017...

No, that is when the happening has truly begun.

Yes, she would have, exactly the same way Obama's foreign policy encouraged Russia to attack the Ukraine.

The reasons are so obvious even Sarah Palin saw it coming.

>Calling for a stronger national defense is the same as starting WWIII.
What's it like being retarded?

Who id he going to send the nukes to?

>w-wont you miss your internet after you have been turned into a pile of ash

>what is mutually assured destruction

>Strong nuclear deterrence
>Not a way to prevent WW3
Fucking libs

I had no idea Sup Forums was this suicidal.

Ya the fuck we would.

>our nukes should be able to be brought down by anti missile technology

faggot

and we will be safe in our shithole :^)
Chiguayante (8va región) is one of the safest places in the world in case of a nuclear war, according to some physicists of the university of Concepción.

Internet addiction is worse than heroin

>Trump is a Kremlin plant that will let Russia do whatever they want!
>Trump wants to start WW3 with Russia!
Which one is it?

He just showing the world America will not be weak like it was under Obama. 4D chess is still in effect

Funny how John Oliver did a report on the outdated and shitty state of US nuclear weapons and yet now I'm sure his cuck ass will say Trump wants to start WW3 by fixing it.

youtu.be/1Y1ya-yF35g
The report in question.

all going to plan

What is Mutually Assured Destruction?

Pol has been ready for a fallout or walking dead scenario from birth

This dimensions future Negan is probably posting in this thread

>Thank God we didn't elect Killary. She would've started WW3!
Babbies first eighties, let's get you some sugartit.

Nobody other than Russia can fuck with us...Trump and Putin are boys. Trump will be allies with Russia. How do you dipshits not get this?

>Russia unveils a nuke capable of destroying the entirety of fucking France that cannot be intercepted.
>We should not upgrade our arsenal as a deterrent.

Fucking retard. Yea let's just let one country hold the power to decimate entire countries with no response. That'll show how progressive and anti nuke we are!

chose hope, says increasily nervous nigger for the 78time

Hes calling to disarm nukes.
He clearly is saying he wishes nobody has them, but understands they are a message evil

Except no, that's retarded.

All this is saying is that a country without nukes isn't gonna get nuked by the US no matter what crazy cocksucker is in the white house. Guess what: no nation without nukes stands a snowball's chance in hell of beating our military.

Nuclear deterrence is not based on not knowing when the enemy will launch you massive retard. It's mutually-assured destruction. If you launch we can detect and launch before your missiles reach our silos and we both die.

And Trump has effectively warned the world that yes, we fucking will use them first.

No offense but nukes seem. It more like the end than the start of ww3

Yeah what's that thing called? Satan, right? 8 warheads on one missile that separate and can be independently controlled, and all tolled can destroy a land mass the size of Texas. Goodtimes!

and that is a positive thing to you?

>8 warheads on one missile that separate and can be independently controlled
Why not just make 8 missiles?

Decent question. No idea.

>How is renewing old nukes a bad thing?

This.

The nuclear treaties cap the number of nukes each country has. It's the delivery and guidance systems that are out of date. Modernizing the weapons is one of the reasons both sides agreed to reduce their arsenals over the years. They can accomplish the same military objective with a fraction of the nukes they would have needed in the 1960s.

Old nukes were fuckhuge megaton weapons because they could not reliably hit targets with them. They needed near-miss kill power as well as followup redundant strikes in case the first missed or failed to detonate. As precision and reliability improved the warheads became smaller.

It's the same as how WW2-era bombings were replaced by precision JDAMs and cruise missiles. If you need to take out a bridge and a command center you don't need to bomb half the city to do it.

Modernizing nuclear weapons lower their yield and lower civilian casualties if they are ever used. They also lower the chance of accidental ground bursts (which cause fallout and contaminate large areas). It makes nuclear war slightly less horrifying if it ever does occur.

He doesnt say add more nukes, he just said expand capabities. Putin is doing the same and it would be dumb not to

This moron cant tell the difference between his head and his butthole!

>The whole thing behind nuclear deterrence is you don't tell the enemy what specific conditions would trigger a nuclear response.
Isn't this related to why everyone in the pentagon freaked out when Shillary confirmed our exact nuclear response time?

We wouldn't launch nukes anyways, we have more powerful weapons

>Why not just make 8 missiles?

The most expensive part of ICBMs is getting them into space, same as NASA space launches. They used multi-staged rockets to do this and the nuke is a tiny part of the pay load.

"Why not 8 missiles" is like asking "why not send 8 astronauts up on 8 different rockets and have them all meet at the ISS". You want as many warheads on a single launch as possible.

North Korea has nukes, but they don't have the space program needed to get their nuke into space, circle the earth, and land on the white house.

Nukes prevented WWIII for the past 60+ years. Research MAD.

a shitty way to live, but the only way we can live
cat's out of the bag, we need the nukes now

"14/80 mate"

Read this out loud. Is this funny?

SI VIS PACEM PARA BELLUM

>We have to come to our senses regarding nukes
>That's why we must continually strengthen our nuclear arsenal causing everyone else to do so in reaction
I honestly can't tell what he was thinking with this tweet. The only logical solution is he's genuinly trolling, knowing he'll trigger everyone who argued he'd cause WW3.

>remove your nukes
>everyone still has nukes
great job retard