If national socialism is so great why it NEVER EVER worked?

if national socialism is so great why it NEVER EVER worked?
you could say communism is a much more successful system because despite its flaws its still present in many countries, unlike muh fuhrers wonderland

Other urls found in this thread:

reichstagsprotokolle.de/Blatt2_n4_bsb00000613_00046.html
emersonkent.com/speeches/returning_fire.htm
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Socialist_Program
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

It doesn't.
They're a bunch of statist cucks.
It's always the former Bernie Sanders voters or the extremely left-wing voters that always do the flip to National Socalism.
Libertarianism is the only way forward.

national socialism is basically a racist communism

Facism is the worst of three .

Workers are forced into state controlled serfdom with any political voice shut down
The leader sets themselves up as great arbiter, with departments competing over responsibilities. This caused inefficiencies and infighting. See Goring having his own personal land army and screwing over the navy aircraft.
Massive run way spending which is papered over using financial trickery and looting from native population and onquered nations. Eg a plan for citizens to pre order cars was used to create more tanks pre 1939. Or Germany looting every bit of gold and industry it could grab.

Everyone know NS worked TOO well so (((they))) wanted it destroyed. Communism never worked, genocided more People than anything else, and those still using have nothing to eat.

It worked.
Which is precisely why the kikes wanted it destroyed and why after their victory, they basically made it illegal globally.

It did work, it only failed because hitler went into a war that was impossible.

>becomes a superpower
>literally every other superpower attacks it
>"it didn't work!"

>tfw your system supported by demigod aryans is too good so it gets destroyed with ease by inferior systems ran by subhuman worms
hmmmm..... revved up my brain....

In fact, they were mostly jealous of Germany's success.

polish atrocities

this

It did work

jealous faggots destroyed it because they couldnt handle its awesomeness

>makes a thread about Nationalist Socalist
NEETSOCs scurry to defend it.

>destroyed with ease by inferior systems ran by subhuman worms
>poland flag
>calls himself subhuman worm
That's why nobody likes you selfhating lefties

>try to make dank menes
>they suck and you get corrected

He asked a question and we are answering it you stupid mother fucker.

>surprised that people defend their beliefs on Sup Forums

What is Israel you faggot? Its National Socialism you stupid Polish cunt

>people think posts on anonymous anime discussion imageboard, tumblr or some sourceless websites are true because they fit their narrative
>haha dude you believe in the holocaust? you say its backed by thousands of books by famous historians? well its all bullshit. check out this post from Sup Forums, thats how it really was

>backed by historians
The historians who said the death count is not up to 20 million jews?

>thousands of books by jews
fixed
also, history is written by the winners. Germany lost. (((They))) couldn't remove all evidence and truth. You can find it here. You're welcome!

hmm i bet books written by nazis are a lot more objective when it comes to crimes commited by nazi germany

>a small country almost took over the entire world
>beat a global empire and brought another to the brink of destruction
>national socialism doesn't work

Fuck off pole kike

>One natsoc country in history
>Becomes the one of the richest strongest country in Europe in a few years
>Collapses because it can't fight a war against the world forever
>Many communist countries
>They all become shit, people live in poor conditions and starve to death
>Almost all red countries collapse by themselves in 1989

>""""""""""""""""""""""""almost"""""""""""""""""" win

What crimes are you talking about, I wonder?

>richest and strongest country in the world
>beaten by starved conscripts without training operating garbage quality hardware
so THIS is the power of third reich?

I mean, China says they uses national socialism, and they seem to be doing fine. The problem is the few, successful socialist nations, are cucks.

china is a real heaven on earth to live in isnt it?

>beaten by massive amounts of starved conscripts, the british empire, and the united states, all while trying to solve its allies' fuckups

>china
>national socialism
think before you post

>be strong and superior
>keep fucking up with stupid decisions like getting dumb allies
hmmm

I'm pretty sure China was plain Communism and later added (Jew approved) global capitalism elements. While it does share some Elements similar to NS, it's not NS and I doubt they actually said they are.

>no other nation willing to cooperative for (((reasons)))
hmmm

*cooperate

>you could say communism is a much more successful system because despite its flaws its still present in many countries

Communism doesn't exist anywhere beyond family unit or corporate level

>if national socialism is so great why it NEVER EVER worked?

It wasn't the economy that killed that experiment but a military folly

>never worked
what about when Germany had the gretest economic recover in the history of the world?

>what about when Germany had the gretest economic recover in the history of the world?

If the recovery was real, why did Hitler attack and not develop unbeatable industry capacity with jet bombers and nukes instead?

Hitler doesn't want a war, even when he was bombing the UK he tried to do peace with them but Churchill didn't want to surrender.

>nukes.

Germany didn't have nukes.

you should know this. the poles started a war and germany hit back.

>the poles started a war

I'd like to see some citation on this

>Germany didn't have nukes.

Germans were first to split the atom and build a nuclear pile and without starting the war they could've been the first people with working nukes and jet bombers

>citiation
it's actually even in fake "history" books thought in school. this fact isn't even debated, unless you visit some place on the internet where people that haven't even read fake history give answers and think germany started ww2.

Well, here are some links:
reichstagsprotokolle.de/Blatt2_n4_bsb00000613_00046.html (german)
translation (random unchecked google find): emersonkent.com/speeches/returning_fire.htm

Even if we were to accept this statement as completely factual, Germans and Soviets had already been in talks for months about dividing countries between them.

>talks for months
is that even an argument for anything? for month germany tried to find a peaceful solution with poland. for month poland provoked germany with cruel and despicable methods. you can't hold it against germany for doing what it had to do.

It did work until Americans joined the wrong side in the war.

If democracy so good then why does it fall to non democratic forms of government?

>is that even an argument for anything?

Poland wasn't the only country they agreed to divide.

Finland got attacked too, with soviet goal of occupying whole country with Germany's blessing. Hitler even prevented Italians from sending us material aid against Russians.

Co-ordinated attack by Germany and USSR shows collusion which predates open hostilities.

I can find zero evidence that Poland was exterminating German populations

Here, Polish propaganda

unless its a pic of poles killing german communities i dont see how its relevant to what i said

wait... you basically just said you're butthurt because Germany didn't protect finland (a soverein nation) from the soviets? Please clarify this.

What punishment does an accomplice to a crime deserve to get?

Hitler had his diplomat sign a pact which made Germany wilful partner in Soviet crimes of conspiring against peace

Just looked kikepedia up on this matter.
>...A secret clause of this agreement marked Finland as part of the Soviet sphere of influence...
>secret clause
I call bullshit. Fake history.

Freindly reminder that libertarinism is a jewish scheme desinged to pray on the autistic and generally weak mined.

>I call bullshit. Fake history.

????

Picture of captured soviet war material in Finnish hands.

USSR absolutely attacked us without provocation.

Russians denied it for decades but admitted in the 90's that they entered Finland under false pretext of shelling their own town near the border.

>fights against the entire fucking world
>still manages to hold out for seven years.

That's a child knocking over another childs brick tower and saying

>IF TOWERS ARE SO GREAT WHY HAVE THEY NEVER EVER WORKED?

poles started the war because my obscure nazi website said so

I'm not denying finland and soviets fighting. I'm denying the "pact" and "backroom talks" about deviding finland between germany and soviet russia.

While even I can't be 100% on this, I simply don't believe it. That said, russia lied about finland attacking russia? Ever thought russia lied about that to germany too?

Now I'm asking you, two allied Nations start fighting each other while you are already fighting a war, who do you side with? Both probably said at that time "he hit me first!!!".

You misspelled Socalism my Swedish friend.

>That said, russia lied about finland attacking russia?

Yes, they claimed that Finns attacked a town(Mainila) on soviet side of the border with artillery barrage. Such actions wouldn't have benfit Finland in any way shape or form.

>Ever thought russia lied about that to germany too?

Estonia, Lithuania, Latvia, Romanian Bessarabia? Why would soviets tiny neighbours start shit with them alone? Don't tell me Hitler was naive.

>two allied Nations start fighting each other while you are already fighting a war, who do you side with? Both probably said at that time "he hit me first!!!".

What motive would Finns have attacking USSR before soviets occupying Finnish territories?

It worked amazingly well for Germany
They went from an absolute shit country with nothing to a superpower in like three years.

and shortly after, into rubble

You have a point. Hitler probably could have (and had) recognised that russia pulled one over germany. I personaly am not yet very read in this part of history but I suspect at that time russia probably already bulldozed right into the middle of finland while saying "we just counter attacked!!!".

I guess, Germany let Finland down. While I deny the "secret pact" it really seems that in the end Hitler decided "sacrifice" Finland, either because it was already to late (russia too far gone) or it was strategly more benefiting to Germany to not break with russia. I guess Germany earned any shit you throw it's way because of it but I seriously believe either way it wasn't something like a pre-planed "evil nazi germany world domination sheme" or something that was decided easily.

>poles are still this bootyblasted after all these years.

4% of the worlds land and 6% of the worlds population. 6 years to rearm and take on the French Empire, Soviet Empire, American Empire, and British Empire at the same time. They almost won on both fronts.

Germany should have wiped the polish people from the face of the earth, yet he wasted tonnes of food keeping you worthless scum alive. You fuckers tortured Germans and refused to give up a fucking corridor that was won by the blood of others.

Poles went on about self determination for 200 years and then as soon as Germans want to get away from the disastrous third world Polish control and they start WWII over it. You better hope there aren't massive WWII trials again of your country is fucked.

>Poles
>human

They know they are guilty for kicking off WWII and the current state of fuckery in the world. They've also been brainwashed to believe ridiculously inflated Jewsh numbers, and shit like 'Hitler wanted to wipe Poles off the face of the earth' which he had more than a right to do, and most people would have, yet he didn't even genocide the border towns and wasted tonnes of food on them for no reason.

They know they were the conduit the Juif used to infiltrate Europe. They fear trials more than anything.

Most people in the west learn about the partitions. How Poland wouldn't return 95% German land voting 90%+ for reunification, even though Poland had bitched about muh self determination for centuries and didn't even win the land with the blood of their own people rather it was won for them.

Germans for 1000 years didn't wipe the Pole from the face of the earth but they clearly should have and most certainly will the next time they get the chance. I know I won't fight anyone to stop it.

Communism and National Socialism is basically the same.
Difference is that Communism tries to manipulate those in the lower part of society, while NatSoc tries to manipulate those whos heart lies with the country.
The outcome is the same: some shitty totalitarian government screwing over the population for its own gain.

how uneducated do you have to actually be to fucking thinking stupid shit like this

Last time I checked it was England and France who declared war on the Reich, not vice versa

Read a book

>Communism and National Socialism is basically the same

It's not. One is jewish plot to destabilize and destroy a Nation and the other is exactly the opposite.

What an insightful post. Communism, theocracy, national socialism, etc. all are totalitarian sure. That says nothing as our leadership has been totalitarian for 99.9999% of our existence as a species.

Let's look at the parallels between National Socialism and Communism. I'll tell you were they are most different.

1) One is a Jewish multicultural movement, the other is a national movement
2) One abolishes hierarchy in theory, the other encourages it
3) One famines and/or genocides all intelligent non-Jewish people, the other allows and encourages the most lowly brilliant peasant to become the best he can be.
.. etc ..

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Socialist_Program

Now you tell me where they are similar. "muh totalitarianism" isn't an argument and this lolbertarian weak government garbage is why Denmark, and most of Europe, will be majority Muslim at this rate before the end of the 21st century.

Neoconservatism has more in common with communism than national socialism does. They are complete opposites in many regards but weak beta kikes see 'totalitarian' get scared and put them all into the same box.

>it didn't work
National Socialism turned Germany from a cucked shithole akin to Brazil into a modern, high-tech, super power that took the entire world and 72+ million men to stop.

I'd say it works better than communism.

Honestly, I'm barely empathetic towards jew killing the white race and whatnot. I just despise their underhanded tactics and trickery, really. I mean they got nearly everyone fooled.

Because it is too great. It's (((their))) kriptonite)

>National Socialism turned Germany from a cucked shithole akin to Brazil into a modern, high-tech, super power that took the entire world and 72+ million men to stop.

I have read from many sources I accept as knowledgeable and generally trustworthy that German economy was running on fumes when they entered Poland and from that point forwards ran on other peoples resources.

Also south american countries around the time were raw materiel economies, Germany was a industrial giant, South american countries in general got hit a lot harder by the inter-war economic depression because of dropping price of metals and stuff.

>economy was running on fumes
no food, no fight. that wasn't the case. I think, later in the war Germany really hat some problems because of cut off supply routes but then again, at this was war-time economy then.

Again, NS did rise Germany from ashes of a beaten and burned Nation, after ww1. This alone proofes that NS works.

War Time itself wasn't NatSoc but still of course kinda heavy based on it. Later Hitler even apologized to the German People in a Speech because he wanted to continue NatSoc politics/ economy to benefit Germany rather than going to war and put that idea on hold.

Because the whole world was at war with them. Utopia would fail under such circumstances you brony