>Now you can fact-check Trump’s tweets — in the tweets themselves
>“This is incorrect or false,” “Trump didn’t win in a landslide in any sense—but more importantly there is absolutely no evidence that there were a significant number of votes cast illegally, much less ‘millions’ of them.”
Other urls found in this thread:
sciencedirect.com
twitter.com
>Trump didn't win in a landslide in any sense
>Winning electoral college doesn't count for some reason
>TRUMP DIDN'T WIN IN A LANDSLIDE
But he did
Trump definitely won in a landslide for a Republican in the last quarter century and for a candidate that was expected to do so poorly.
>projected 1% chance of winning
>won anyway
Democraps may as well just disband at this point
>January 20th
>"LETS MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN"
>"false. America was never great."
this will get old fast
>306 isn't a landslide
Oh oh oh.
>This is incorrect or false, "The sky is not blue it's actually neon pink and green. More importantly there is no evidence the sky is blue, much less has any of these so called "white clouds (another white supremacist term) in it"
>n-n-not a landslide...
>d-drumpf didnt win in a landslide
Trump should start a salt mining company when his 8 years are done
Isnt this evidence? sciencedirect.com
...
...
>fact checking
>arguing the semantics of the phrase "landslide"
Well we'll see how many people actually download the plugin.
And there we go.
Neat
...
Trump won in the bottom 20% of electoral wins.
Not a land slide.
sounds like an overwhelming majority to me!
>absolutely no evidence
What about the project veritas tapes then?
Fuck these liars.