Since Chris death we where searching a replacement for him. Some tried to fill his place but they all failed and where just normal humans with normal human ideas (know as normies) but the search concluded.
I announce now our new guy, Jordan Peterson.
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
twitter.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
youtu.be
youtu.be
patreon.com
m.youtube.com
politicsinn.com
twitter.com
BUILD WALL
He's religious though.
Jordan Peterson is leagues above Chris Hitchens. It's not even a comparison
That was our last enemy and we are in peace with them
Our new enemy much dangerous and efficient:
extremist feminist
Islamist
I love this man.
His appearance on Joe Rogan's show was amazing.
Watching Rogan listen to him was hilarious. His mouth was agape the whole time
Do yourself a favor and watch his lecture series. If you're a degenerate blaze it or drop acid first for maximum comfy.
Far more relevant and intelligent than worst Hitchens ever was.
Worst Hitchens was a libcuck tradition destroyer, he reared a generation of people to hate a core part of Western Civilization. Then he jumped on the regime change bandwagon and the rest is history.
...
They do totally different things.
Hitchens was a writer focussing mainly on foreign policy and American political scandal.
Peterson talks about SJW issues.
Hitchens wore a fucking Kurd flag on his lapel RED FLAG
He talks about a lot more than SJWs.
Wanna learn how to improve yourself? Watch his lectures.
Worst Hitchens jumped on the regime change bandwagon to collapse the United States, knowing full well it would destroy America the way it destroyed the Soviet Union. He was an international socialist until he smoked his last cigarette. Getting rid of America was one of the biggest hurdles to conquer.
>a fucking Leaf
also to stand on Hitchens tier he has to have had advanced studies in Drunken Screaming, Vomiting, Self Destructive Behavior and Assault
JORDANS FINAL FORM BECOMING ONE WITH KEK AND RESCUING US ALL FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE WELL
hitches had a sharper tongue
peterson is still a little cucked and delusion about the state of affairs, he votes NDP which is practically the communist party of canada
I've not even watched his sjw stuff, and I'm not going to, since anything to do with sjws is boring. He has dozens better videos and lectures on his channel.
Based Western Canadian born man fighting like a champ in cuckland Toronto.
He's morally religious. Did you not listen to anything he says?
What about the good Hitchens? He's better than his brother in every way. Chris was an atheist semi-lib cuck.
Hitchens is a fucking traitor. His picture ilustrates the definition of cuck in Sup Forums dictionary
oh shit ignore this wrong pic
He says he is Christian due to the fact he believes religious morals are innate part of humanity. The same stories are in every religion, and he must a draw some sort of line in the grey for a good and evil.
In a truly refreshing and fascinating way tbqh
He's religious in the best way user. His contemplations on its complexity blows everything out of the water
He's too moral for this board.
He's a christcuck
I..is this real?
Truly a patrician choice.
...
>In the best way possible
There is no reality where being a Christcuck in any way shape or form is a good thing
Hand yourself
Is this legit?
A FUCKING LEAF
>hand yourself
Heh tough luck kiddo, looks like you made a spelling error
oddly enough, the more I delve into the subject and the more I learn in general, the more I am gravitating towards Christianity, or at least religion in general, but just not in dogmatic reverence to the Word.
He's so fucking boring to listen to. Hitch on the other hand couldn't be boring if he tried.
>Worst Hitchens was a libcuck tradition destroyer, he reared a generation of people to hate a core part of Western Civilization
This
I find it horrible but I was glad when he died he was a stupid drunk.
He's been /myguy/ since I first heard about the whole ordeal at UofT, this man is one of the few Canadians in a position to stop the bullshit Marxist indoctrination in my country, one of the few people that isn't completely brainwashed by Social media and celebrity culture, most of my fellow countrymen only care about one thing, MORAL SUPERIORITY
Do you think he knows how important he is for Kek?
I'm a little surprised at how negative the responses are.
You serious....
Grow an attention span for God sake.
>he fell for the fundie 'porn is bad' shit
>He fell for the "Degeneracy is fine in moderation" meme.
Even Dawkins admits that Christianity is a great bastion against Islam, better than Atheism.
...
post your face when you realize that Jordan Peterson has seen your worst shitpost
>tfw students aren't well-educated on the dangers of radical leftism
His twitter is gold (twitter.com
The argument is one of 'people are going to fall into a trap of constant instant gratification if they jerk off' when in reality there is nothing about life that is as easy as masturbation, it's one of the only things in life that is an easy source of instant gratification. The fact that people play CSGO competitive or Dota I think shows that their sense of working hard isn't gone at all because you're not even guaranteed to win in those games if you work hard unlike other hobbies.
and before you go
>video games
to become skilled at CS or dota you need like a baseline of like 2000 hours there's nothing instantly gratifying about it.
so this idea that porn and masturbation alone is ruining people is bullshit.
The prophet of kek
That's not the main argument against pornography though, terrible straw-man too
>peterson is still a little cucked and delusion about the state of affairs, he votes NDP which is practically the communist party of canada
Watch from 1h16m28s for about 8 minutes.
youtu.be
>main argument against pornography
I haven't heard any other argument.
He's an annoying little worm. Really want to see molten lava poured on his face
I find his vaguely panicked incredulousness rather endearing. It's as if he's in some kind of horribly warped lucid dream and no matter what he tries he can't escape.
And this for a bit, starting from 1h11m40s
youtu.be
christopher fucking hitchens alias i suck red cocks for living is not my prophet he is an atheist supporting iraq disaster and probably a cryptotrot as well
It's twofold, one is instant gratification, the other is the degrading of women or more specifically the corruption of our views on women.
And videogames are instantly gratifying in how it involves constant shots of dopamine and endorfine in your brain. Compare that with reading which by en large is not instantly gratifying but could be more easily related to working, since the act of doing it in and of it self is not 'great fun' but having read the work is far more gratifying than playing vidya for example.
His mind was blown, fedora tier athiests really need to watch Peterson's Maps of Meaning lectures to open their eyes.
I find it hard to imagine that he votes for a party that is anything other than centrist
Well, I have a degree of sympathy with him as regards the position he finds himself in at his university but sorry kids, judging by this video, Peterson isn't the new Christopher Hitchens, he's the new Slavoj Zizek.
He and this Pageau guy just seem to be randomly stringing together things that um kinda look sort of similar to other things and are therefore like um basically essentially the same thing more or less you feel me...In short, they seem to be pushing the same kind of cheap, superficially impressive intellectual charlatanry that Zizek does.
It's all made ten times worse by the various images that keep getting flashed up between the two talking heads, as if to illustrate their arguments, whereas in fact they just add more layers of confusion and arbitrariness.
"In the Book of Genesis the people of Sodom try to rape three strangers who are really angels and because of that the city is destroyed and that is somehow the same as the rapes in Cologne last New Years..."
Uh....yeah....only God had already decided to destroy Sodom before He sent the angels, and strangers coming to a city and being threatened with rape (Sodom) and strangers coming to a city and raping (Cologne) are not just different but diametrically opposite things, and adding images of Adam and Eve and then a Magritte and then Robert Crumb having sex doesn't make any of this look any clearer but only more random and arbitrary and in short, sorry, but these two are a couple of ignorant verbally diarrhetic frauds.
hitchens wasnt that great
he had some good moments but he was a bumdrilling homo and racial egalitarian
>degrading of women or more specifically the corruption of our views on women.
Going from zero to zero isn't really that bad.
Atheism is a Jewish cancer that causes moral rot, leading to the promotion of degeneracy.
Not in the conventional way, i feel his way is how people used to be in terms of religious identity, its alot more about upholding certain morals and ethics in a balance.
Does he name the Jew? He's read the Gulag Archipelago, but all he does is shit on "authoritarianism" (watch his debate with the short-haired dyke) as a pitfall, not the solution. He has good rhetoric, but what else is different: he hops on the anti-SJW bandwagon of "alt-right" e-celebs, starts up a Patreon and e-begs (patreon.com
Peterson is a good man, but he's transitional redpill material. Don't get stuck up on e-celebs, it will be your downfall.
He's outlining the underlying factors or causes that determine behavior by reverting back to ancient texts which, as he explains, tells us something about the nature of reality and how humans manifest themselves within that reality, and how this behavior is seemingly universal and therefore that we should listen to it in our relation to reality.
I didn't watch that video yet, but you need to watch maps of meaning course.
>In short, they seem to be pushing the same kind of cheap, superficially impressive intellectual charlatanry
In short: No.
lol i made this =)
>something is only of merit if it has an excess of anti-semitism
>taking Southern seriously
>dont listen to people because they are well-known
oke then
Until last 2 months when he was ganged on by SJWs, Peterson had 7k subs and zero financial support. By that point, he already was uploading his lectures for ~3 years. So I don't think so.
>By that point, he already was uploading his lectures for ~3 years.
not only that but maps of meaning was televised for the first time here in canada like 12 years ago, he's been updating/refining it ever since
>something is only of merit if it has an excess of anti-semitism
Strawman, I specifically stated that, when discussing the up-and-coming or SJW and social Marxist values, leaving out Jewish influence is a kosher redpill. Improve your reading comprehension and take your nose out of e-celeb ass.
>Until last 2 months when he was ganged on by SJWs, Peterson had 7k subs and zero financial support.
Cool, but that does nothing to address the existence of his Patreon. I already posted the link. I am aware that he has been around the block for many years, because that was his job and I respect that. I don't respect e-celebs who use deceit to fool useful idiots into swallowing kosher redpills so that they can get a name for themselves.
Second half was your response.
His material that he did on Harvard 20-30 years ago is pure fucking gold and the reason why people should like him imo. The latest sjw just gets him publicity.
suuuure
>His material that he did on Harvard 20-30 years ago is pure fucking gold and the reason why people should like him imo
Absolutely, I agree. Still, that was NOT my original point. I was discussing the latter half of his career, the anti-SJWism stuff. Chase low hanging fruit, make a Jewtube account, gather a following, and never name the actual genesis of the issue. Rake in profits. I disagree with that. That is the point of contention.
what's wrong with accepting donations for doing this exactly?:
>I want to turn my professional attention more particularly to the creation and editing of my online videos and podcasts, taking them farther than mere postings from my lectures. I would like to do a series on Solzhenitsyn, and Orwell, and great Biblical and other mythic stories. I would like to start working with animators, and other professional artists. To do that will have to start to pull back from other obligations and opportunities, and the Patreon support will make that possible.
Well, you confirm the very charge I brought.
I think the criticisms I made of the video were very concrete and precise. I cited things that were actually said and images that were actually shown and I gave specific reasons why they were inadequate to reality.
Your responses, by contrast, consist entirely of non-specific, generalizing verbiage: "ancient texts...tell us something about the nature of reality" etc., or, in the case of the second poster: "no....and the reasons why no are in some other video that you weren't talking about"
Almost every charlatan in human history, from Pythagorean mystics up, as I say, to Slavoj Zizek, has done more or less what you describe: taken long-existing, already respected and authoritative texts and woven arbitrary imaginative rhapsodies around them.
I fear you Sup Forums kids are indeed just looking for someone you can offer a new fanboidom to, as leftists offer a fanboidom to Chomsky - and I fear that Peterson will accept that offer.
>what's wrong with accepting donations for doing this exactly?
My point exactly. This is the goal of the e-celeb, to maintain an audience of gullible youth to wire them money for telling them how to think. It is near impossible to NOT develop a cult-like following in these situations. The audience admires the e-celeb over the message and the message is perverted. Take Milo. "Hey guys we are right-wing let's get Trump in okay!" "Oh we are also gay now no homophobes plox!" "Hey, I'm a Jew, cool it with the anti-Semitism you bigot."
The only reason (((Molymeme))) got as much flak as he did for his defoo nonsense was because he voiced it explicitly (that is, make the cult aware that they are a cult).
E-begging, going around hat-in-hand looking for cash, is a pathetic thing to do. Hard work builds character. In fact, there is that old adage: work makes you free.
it just sounds like you're projecting
i donate not because i want him to keep telling me how to think, i want his message to spread to others
i barely know anything about him other than his name and profession so i don't see how i can 'admire the e-celeb over the message'
none of your reasons are specific to this professor either, you just sounds like you're against donating to anything ever
>it just sounds like you're projecting
Armchair psychology is not an argument.
>i donate not because i want him to keep telling me how to think, i want his message to spread to others
t. Patreon donator. Literally. I just guessed it, too. And I was right. This is just sad. You can't spread the message yourself, you need some figurehead that is easily corrupted to do it for you? Pathetic.
>i barely know anything about him other than his name and profession so i don't see how i can 'admire the e-celeb over the message'
>i want his message to spread to others
But you donated to HIM, and wanted HIS message spread. Do it yourself. He doesn't name the Jew but talks of Marxism. What do you think his stance is on race and evolutionary differences? Or on crime stats? You only know his stance on a few topics.
>you just sounds like you're against donating to anything ever
No, if I knew his stance on everything, then I would support him, only if he released a book (I prefer written word, at least I have something to show).
>Your responses, by contrast, consist entirely of non-specific, generalizing verbiage
I will give a summary of Peterson's views, but you'll have to watch his maps of meaning course, I can't compress it that much:
Religious texts can be defeated by objectivism and scientific arguments if you take them at face value, and most atheists don't go any further.
In times of invention of religion there was no scientific method. They were writing in metaphors, and if you analyse metaphors, they have solid scientific ground behind them, and they have a darwinian explanation behind necessity of religion itself. Science= how to interact with objects, replicable. Religion= how to behave to fulfill your darwinian objectives while not having sufficient information about the nature of the world.
Short example: humans have the best vision among primates because the main adversary while we were hanging on trees were snakes who have good camouflage. Humans have color vision because we are carnivores and color vision is required to distinguish ripe fruit. Literally humans were given vision by snake and fruit. Sound familiar? Peterson thinks that these ideas are not 2k years old, they are are least tens of millions of years old.
I don't agree that Peterson is making things more random and difficult, he's trying to uncover the truth in terms of how we should act. Peterson tries to find this by finding the underlying archetypes and systems that govern, and have always seemed to govern, our behavior and he finds these 'truths' in the similarities through all the major texts and literature of the West because the fact that these forms of stories and these forms of action have always been present within the West gives it a certain Darwinian validity since it has stood the test of time. I would suggest you check his interview with Joe Rogan just to give him another chance because I don't think he should be pushed in the same corner as Zizek.
kek
I will be brutally honest: before /pol even I didn't know about jewish overrepresentation in politics and finance. You have to have a lot of information before you can connect the dots, you at least need to know about revolution of 1918 in germany, otherwise it looks like germans all of a sudden chimped out against jews for no reason whatsoever.
Even if Peterson was able to connect the dots, his career would be over in an instant with first mention of the ((people)), remember that he read his lectures and ideas in ((Harward)) for a long time.
>I will be brutally honest: before /pol even I didn't know about jewish overrepresentation in politics and finance.
No shame in that, most of us were like that. Myself included.
>Even if Peterson was able to connect the dots, his career would be over in an instant with first mention of the ((people)), remember that he read his lectures and ideas in ((Harward)) for a long time.
Absolutely, but there ARE intellectuals besides Peterson which are consistent/aligned with these principles. Dr. William Luther Pierce is probably the most prominent one that comes to mind. You've heard of the Day of the Rope, or the Day of the Rake meme for us leaves? That comes from the Turner Diaries, a book by Pierce. It's about whites standing up and fighting for their homelands, a whole tale of revolution. The other guys, like Peterson, aren't bad. But they are transitional material, not something to get caught up in.
Not naming the Jew is a big thing. That's how Jonestein gets his dough. Just whining about (((globalists))), never telling his audience how Jewish the 1% really is (politicsinn.com
>His material that he did on Harvard 20-30 years
at harvard or about harvard?
At Harvard, it are the oldest ones on his channel on youtube
>speaks truth
>5555
>synchronicity
