Being anywhere outside of authoritarian right

>being anywhere outside of authoritarian right
Post 'em

Authoritarianism gives Jews the opportunity to have full power. All they have to do is get to the throne

are you say I stupid?

Undecided yes, stupid no. I didn't make this chart but it pretty accurate. Too left for me tho

...

>tfw when you are alt right but you take the test and it says you are a communist

Just how? Like how? Please post it

The 'alt-right' is nothing more than a collection of people commonly pointing out various broken things in our society.

>Jew being anywhere outside of the left

lol

The tests for this graph conflate social and economic leftism/rightism. Answering the questions like a pre-Franco Falangist will get you landed where Sup Forums automatically assumes Communist.

As will answering like a Strasserist.

...

>being a boot licker
>being on the left at all

The alt right is either a bunch of populist nationalist conservatives or a bunch of edgy stormfags. This man does not fit either (neither do I)

How is it?

Rate me I'm also INTP-T

My man
If you want to be on the other side, support free market capitalism and the protection of the nation, not the individual

...

...

somebody has to rep the only side worth being on yafeel?

Answering against anything but laissez-faire capitalism but not Liberalism will make you a Communist.

>protection of the nation
If you actually answered in support of the nation and other social collectivism you'd be authoritarian and not what is generally considered the Libertarian sector.

My bad, just have a bias because I am on the libertarian side

>mfw I'm in the acceptable zone

Good, you should be proud of yourself user

How do blue and red squares even function in the world? It must be never-racking to be constantly concerned with what other people are doing.

Heil

>religious cunt

My evangelical wife has really gotten to me. Good.

Suck it, faggot

>The 'alt-right' is nothing more than a controlled opposition movement.
FTFY

There is literally nothing wrong with being in the green square.

>not having a little box on the spectrum labelled "prostitutes and mercenaries" just for the lib dems

Wew

What did I do wrong? I haven't met anyone who is as right as me. I believe gays should be killed and strict Sharia Law should be implemented but apparently that's leftist.

Sieg Heil

Farthest right, two notches up from the very bottom.
It's tragic how left-wing and authoritarian Sup Forums has become. It shows in the degraded quality of the past year's posts.

...

Sup Forums influenced me in some matters. The fact that society and the western civilization has gone to shit helped.

Feels good man.

This test is so bogus. I am far from left. I hate muslims and hate big muiltinational jew coorperations that have influence in our governments just because they lobby behind certain parties giving them money etc. The election of a leader should be down to the people. Hillary lost the popular vote by 12 million. Trump landslided the whole thing. Dumb test is dumb. I don't see how they got that I am a leftist from my answers...

Too close to the left for me.

well well well

Its simply because you do not understand the questions, also probably weed, sex and muh free market push your shit to the left.

the left-right thing purely economic, so hating big muiltinational jew coorperations puts your further left

Left-right is only in the economic sense.

Also, your lack of authoritarianism is a disgrace for someone considering himself an Islamist.

I am against EU and UN etc. Fuck the free market. It's just a window for globalists to control our countries. I'm right wing. Test is broken. Not enough questions and no option to choose that you have no opinion on something.

Revolution soon.

>I am against EU and UN etc. Fuck the free market. It's just a window for globalists to control our countries.
That's pretty leftist, or should I say socialist. :^)

its because the chart must be rotated

you are like a little baby

>Libertarians rotating the chart to show they're bottom faggots

Leftist would be wanting the entire world to be governed by one organisation. I'm all about no foreign policies, no foreign wars, no treaties. Fuck everyone that isn't your own. Every country for themselves. Also genocide muslims and muslim sympathizers. Countries shouldn't be cucked into allowing each other to get away with scoundrels just because they are allied by some bullshit treaty.

>being ANYWHERE but the far right
>being ANYWHERE but purple

my man

Bow down to your future emperor, comrades.

What did they mean by this?

Holy shit this entire thread may just fill with plebs preaching
>b.b...b.b...but muh right wing, muh right wing!
when they get Authoritarian Left.

If you're not on the extreme end, you're actually close to the gradient between Hitler's area and Gandhi's, this technically means you're an unorthodox activist for the Right values without the whole Pinochet/Feudalist idea of "no free market, kill all gays and if you're not royalty kiss the dirt on my boots!".

Which is ok, it's not quite the Alt-Left and not the retarded Alt-Right. Conservatives should root for the improvement of the individual within parameters of human rights anyhow, so the ""progressives"" can keep finding out how they're actually supporting a form of political suppression.

Milton (((Friedman)))

Ever thought that the test is just poorly thought out and broken? Not enough questions and not specific enough. That's why so many people are surprised by the results when they hate gays, muslimes, free markets and free movement of people yet still get "left" as a result.

>authoritarian
>that far left
Cuck

>being retarded

Most governments in the West fall into the blue square. Yes, including European governments. And the West has never been this cucked. What are you proud of? Go to /r/politics.

WHAT CAUSES THIS????????? maybe i should retake the test

How so, user?

...

>governments in the West fall into the blue square.
topkek. you fell for their stupid positioning that they put everyone on the blue

most countries in the west are leaning to purple

...

You're right, Britbong.
Hope the head of state's gonna be alright, lad.
Make Britain Great Again when she keels over, will ya?

>GOP being more Authoritarian than Democrats

I hope the Queen dies honestly. The British government and royal family is full of pedophiles and globalists who want to flood our nation with third worlders because they are retarded and easier to control.

I won't even disagree. Just hope that Lee Enfield MK3 I plan on inheriting doesn't become a relic of a dead civilization when my great grandkids take hold.

moved here from green

...

...

ten gorillion hours in MS paint

>>>>>ANARCHISM IS CAPITALIST

This seems way more centrist than my actual beliefs.

>ok guys, we need to set up a universal system to distribute the wealth and enforce that distribution fairly in our anarcho communist world! but it's totally not a state, amirite!

>dems close to classical liberalism
>trump more conservative than GOP

What kind of retarded leftie made this thing

>Ok guys, we need to build a strong capitalist system where we one guy can get so rich he can enslave everyone and make his own state

>Only then we can be free!

Yeah it's worrying to think that our grandkids may spit on such a relic due to generations of brainwashing against nationalism and being proud of your people. Good luck to you and your descendants. These are trying times for the master race.

Fucking really?

yes, because that would be a transition from actual anarchism to a state, it's not anarchism at that point

also
>implying that wouldn't happen with ancom fags

Instead of just

planned economy free market
anarchy/progressivism dictatorship/traditionalism

it should really be

planned economy free market
anarchy dictatorship
progressivism traditionalism
isolationalism internationalism
pacifism militarism (not covered at all)

based tbqh

adaptability is very important

...

Agreed. It is an incomplete test giving inconsistent results. It's not accurate to someone's political position at all.

>2017 - 1
>Not being a Lockean classical liberal

You do realize Anarchism = without state right? Capitalism mixed with it will INEVITABLY become an ultra-capitalist state.

And no, it wouldnt happen with AnComs, Communism doesnt fucking progress to Capitalism

>war on drugs
>neo-conservatism
>abortion

...

The compass is a jewish meme.

the (((alt-right))) top kek!

Just did this now.

I have superior politics.

Socdem detected

>too intelligent to be indoctrinated by a political spectrum

i don't and will never care about homosexuality and abortion. it's multiculturalism that is trash and needs reversing quickly

The principled opposition of the libertarians to the Vietnam War coincided with the somewhat diffuse opposition to the war by the New Left. In addition, the anarchistic upshot of the libertarian doctrine appealed to the countercultural left. For did not the illegitimacy state and the nonaggression axiom (that one shall not initiate or threaten to initiate physical force against others and their property) imply that everyone was at liberty to choose his very own nonaggressive lifestyle?
Did this not imply that vulgarity, obscenity, profanity, drug use, promiscuity, pornography, prostitution, homosexuality, polygamy, pedophilia or any other conceivable perversity or abnormality, insofar as they were victimless crimes, were no offenses at all but perfectly normal and legitimate activities and lifestyles? Not surprisingly, then, from the outset the libertarian movement attracted an unusually high number of abnormal and perverse followers. Subsequently, the countercultural ambiance and multicultural-relativistic "tolerance" of the libertarian movement attracted even greater numbers of misfits, personal or professional failures, or plain losers. Murray Rothbard, in disgust, called them the "nihilo-libertarians" and identified them as the "modal" (typical and representative) libertarians. They fantasized of a society where everyone would be free to choose and cultivate whatever nonaggressive lifestyle, career, or character he wanted, and where, as a result of free-market economics, everyone could do so on an elevated level of general prosperity.

You did this to me, Sup Forums...

Ironically, the movement that had set out to dismantle the state and restore private property and market economics was largely appropriated, and its appearance shaped, by the mental and emotional products of the welfare state: the new class of permanent adolescents.
This intellectual combination could hardly end happily. Private property capitalism and egalitarian multiculturalism are as unlikely a combination as socialism and cultural conservatism. And in trying to combine what cannot be combined, much of the modem libertarian movement actually contributed to the further erosion of private property rights Gust as much of contemporary conservatism contributed to the erosion of families and traditional morals). What the countercultural libertarians failed to recognize, and what true libertarians cannot emphasize enough, is that the restoration of private property rights and laissez-faire economics implies a sharp and drastic increase in social discrimination and will swiftly eliminate most if not all of the multi-cultural-egalitarian life style experiments so close to the heart of left libertarians. In other words, libertarians must be radical and uncompromising conservatives.

Hoppe is right. You need force to remove the Jew. Otherwise, you allow subversion. NatSoc is the answer. Capitalism is globalism, it leads to open borders in the name of profit-over-blood. Authority of men who will die for the nation and its people is the apex of leadership.

Classical liberal is a fucking meme term to say"I'm not a cultural marxist but I still wanna look cool to my friends"

> ITT people getting angry over the difference between Actual reality VS Proclaimed Ideals/Ideological Perception

Yeah, liberals are supposed to be pro-free speech, yet in our current situation they violate it more than Right wingers even could.

Same shit with leftists. Nazi is a leftist movement, but defined by the racial component as basis for the whole ideology behind it.

This tests are essentially useless. Even the difference in the country will essentially nullify their credibility. For example what we call a Liberal in Russia will be almost a 360-turnaround with their US counterpart.

Russian Liberal
> Pro carry and conceal
> Pro Visa with South Asia/China/Muslim countries
> Pro mass deportation of illegals
> More heavily enforced property laws
> Less business regulations
> Less taxes
> Free speech / No censorship

Liberals in the US
> Ban guns
> Open borders
> Sanctuary cities and multiculturalism
> Less private sector, more welfare/semi-government companies
> More business regulations/Controlled markets
> More taxes
> Anti-Hate speech

And yet, those two are both called "Liberals".
Almost exactly the same situation with French nationalists versus, say, British nationalists.