Can someone explain to me in retard terms why WW2 happened?

Can someone explain to me in retard terms why WW2 happened?
If Hitler wasn't bad why did millions of Europeans die in order to stop him?

Hitler was bad and wrong.

/thread

lolwut

Leaving aside all morality and ideology and speculation about his obvious future plans, he invaded the rest of Europe with the intent of ruling from Portugal to Moscow at the very bare minimum.

the jews

"If history is written by the victor, how much do we really know about history?"

Hitler should have just built a wall around germany, deported all the degenerates and made germany so intensely amazing that people would have begged to join their nation.

It was another time with another state of mind. Either you believe everything the holocaust is about and believe Hitler was the worst person ever, if you don't he's a pretty awesome guy who got shit done but got knifed in the back hardcore style together with the whole german people

>Hitler was bad
>t. 6 year old

The Germanic race wants to destroy Europe. It is simply an aspect of their genetics; they destroyed the Roman Empire, they destroyed the Catholic Church, they destroyed the pre-WWI international system & colonialism.'

WWII was yet another expression of their desire to destroy everything around them. Not content to destroy their own nation, they brought ruin to Poland, France, Britain, and Russia. They brought about the inevitable US intervention and domination over Europe.

Even today, the Germanic race continues to destroy Europe by promoting multiculturalism and refugee migration.

he didn't do much, but he certainly wasn't the shaperst tool in the shed either

Here are examples of mistakes he did
>kills a fuckton of jews instead of putting them to forced labors during wartime
>shoots on potential allies in Ukaine that end up siding with USSR instead of allying with him
>no tactical retreat, one of the most efficient german tactics at the time
>not asking Japan to invade USSR with him as it was at it's weakest
>Dragging the USA in after Pearl Harbor
>Listening to party members instead of experienced generals
>focussing on occult degeneracy instead of nuclear power

t. delusional stormkike

the 19th century saw the rise of two factions of consciousness, kike-influence marxist bullshit and continental philosophy(Kant, Hegel, Nietzsche, etc)

the kikes succesfully subverted the minds of the eastern europeans over the course of a couple of generations in much the same way that they're implementing their bullshit here in the US, the krauts recognized what was going on because they spent the prior 200 years swallowing redpills

This gentleman of rather dark complexion is right

The eternal teuton is at fault for everything bad that has ever happened to europe

As atonement for the sins of my fathers I let my wife and daughters comfort those poor traumatized children from Africa

I can only hope that the world and the poor mistreated jewish people especially can forgive us our barbaric sins one day in the future

Yessssss, you guys are right.

>>not asking Japan to invade USSR with him as it was at it's weakest
He did, but Japan was scared shitless of USSR.

>Listening to party members instead of experienced generals
meme tier

>focussing on occult degeneracy instead of nuclear power
Germany did not have the expertise (nuclear physics was a department dominated by jews in Weimar republic, ironically) nor the required resources for a successful nuclear program. You probably don't have the idea of how many resources USA expended on project Manhattan

>a wild cuck fetishist appears itt
>his germanic
Oh my, what a shocker!

Why?

The Shoah never happened............yet.

P.S. I see you Yahudi.

F minus minus.

>He did, but Japan was scared shitless of USSR.
Hirohito should have struck USSR and not the USA at Pearl Harbor while Hitler went on Barbarossa, taking the USSR in two fronts.
Regardless, a ground assault could have been possible given the Japanese oothold in Manchuria...

>Germany did not have the expertise (nuclear physics was a department dominated by jews in Weimar republic, ironically) nor the required resources for a successful nuclear program. You probably don't have the idea of how many resources USA expended on project Manhattan
Alright, but he could have used researchers for something else that would be useful, such as making better tanks and equipment.

Equipment that he should have had ready if he wanted to take on Russia. And he should have had slanted armor waayy sooner, but I'm digressing

>pic related

Clay is a hell of a drug.

Inb4 it was all churchills fault and the eternal Anglo meme

The Jewish race wants to destroy Europe. It is simply an aspect of their genetics; they destroyed the Roman Empire, they destroyed the Catholic Church, they destroyed the pre-WWI international system & colonialism.'

WWII was yet another expression of their desire to destroy everything around them. Not content to destroy their own nation, they brought ruin to Poland, France, Britain, and Russia. They brought about the inevitable US intervention and domination over Europe.

Even today, the Jewish race continues to destroy Europe by promoting multiculturalism and refugee migration.

>Hirohito should have struck USSR and not the USA at Pearl Harbor while Hitler went on Barbarossa, taking the USSR in two fronts.
>what is Khalkin Ghol
Japan was a paper tiger, especially when we are discussing land forces.
USSR would be in Busan in 6 months

> taking the USSR in two fronts.
USSR kept more then 1 million troops in the far east all trough the war.

> a ground assault could have been possible
>a ground assault could have been possible in Siberia
>Siberia could have been conquered by a vastly inferior army in WW2

Also Japan was already fighting in 2 fronts.

We could even say 3 or 4 fronts (China, Burma and pacific isles)

He wasn't the worse person ever, but he fucked himself over at the end of the war

Geopolitics. No war ever has been about stopping the big mean man because he's a bad person.

>If Hitler wasn't bad
he was bad

murdering people for worthless reasons is bad

>If Hitler wasn't bad why did millions of Europeans die in order to stop him?
Because he started it.

World War II was not about the Holocaust at all, like what most would have you believe. In my Opinion, the Holocaust is nothing more than a minor sideshow in the titanic 6-year long bloodbath that was the War. While Millions of Jews died in the Camps from 1941-1945, Tens of Millions died on the Eastern Front and the Pacific Theatres in the same timespan.

The War was caused by three major factors: The Rise of the Nazi Party and the IJA (which both had expansionist ambitions), the Great Depression (which plagued the rest of the world but left Germany, Japan and the USSR relatively intact), and the unwillingness to effectively resist Germany on the part of the "Allies" (Britain and France went for appeasement, the USA was isolationist, and the USSR had ambitions of their own) until it was too late.

Hitler had the perfect opportunity to strike, so he did. Early on, Germany won quick, decisive victories that brought most of Europe under her heel. Unfortunately for Hitler however, he got overconfident and tried to take on the whole world by Himself, plus Germany's main advantage, tactical brilliance, was rendered null by the War of Attrition that came later.

Despite the death and destruction, you can't paint a man like Hitler with one colour. He's not just "a bad man", he did was he did for the good of the German people, or at least he thought so. He had his reasons despite everything, people always do. After all, this was a man who fought in the First World War, and he knew full well what he was inflicting upon everyone else, and so he must have had a good reason in his mind to do so. It's up to the rest of us to decide if it was the right or wrong thing to do, and if the ends justify the means.