Would a united earth with just one nation work better that now we do?

...

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge's_law_of_headlines
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Soon

No please. Anything but a muslim world.

All this kabbalistic imagery. Muh 15 vaginas

we already have one run by jews and it's fucking horrible

Do you want terrorism in every part of the world? Because that's how you get terrorism in every part of the world.

Give cops AK-47

Got a better design for that flag bro.

It would work if every part of the world was on the same level, but let's be honest it will never be. Some cultures > other cultures

Depends on what you mean by "work better" but one world nation would be horrifying

One nation implies one culture and you would therefore need to genocide any and all cultures that do not agree with you. Basically a Borg scenario. We stand to lose more than we could ever hope to gain

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge's_law_of_headlines

> TLDR: no

No and jews don't run the world. They're just stuck up and think they because a 2000 year old book told them and they're idiots. Just look at Obama. He hates kikes. Just look at what happened at the UN. Jews BTFO. Those things would not have happened if jews actually ran earth.

Fake jews because israel spiritual. Christ said Jerusalem is trampled by Gentiles. Nobody knows their tribe. Israelis are not Israelites. They will reunite with judah. And only judeans are jewish. The word jew is only 150 years old and never appeared in the Bible. Only term "Judeans" or Judah was in there

You need communism for that.

No you don't. You just need a strong leader and a unified goal.

The Man in the High Castle TV show has some interesting insight onto this conversation.

>What is this? An egg of life for ants?

...

If you kill all non whites and limit Japan and korea to a portion of the mainland and ensure they have strict laws for people entering and leaving then yes it would work.

That comes next of The United Earth

United Earth cannot work at the moment. We are too split up ethically. Forcing people to work together never works out.

No thanks

No but it would ensure peace between nations.

We are working on this, it's our ultimate goal. But we have to get rid remove the barbarian gene from the white devils first. Give us 10-20 more years.

Ah, but which will it be?

implying civil wars couldn't be more devastating

Then we are doomed to extincion.

If we just be rational...

Yes, absolutely. Sup Forums only hates globalism because they're terrified of brown people and want to have a country-sized ethnic safe space.

cease and desist templar

unfortunately it seems the bigger the nation state (or world state ) becomes the more unrepresentative and disfunctional it becomes....

as an example the amish colonies splinter before they reach populations of 200 members, the reason being that larger groups lack a sense of community and can lead to alienation and dissent from their orthodoxy

all ideological forms and structures can work up to a certain size, our spicies is better off having many varied systems rather than one

but...

on a planet with finite resources can we allow for such waste ?

probably not
and so the world government paradigm comes into play

Thats not what im worried about.

Just give it a few more hundred years. We've only recently started to move towards a global society for the past 50 years or so.

We dont have that much time.

If we unite the entire world over the government of Russia, in about 100 years we would be sailing the cosmos.
Russian goverment is like "do what you want without breaking the rules". And the that rules are good.
Yep. The world is in a permanent cold war.

You just can't force integrate the world government. If these creatures try to shove too much of this down people's throats (particularly the way they've destroyed family unit and pushed sexual degeneracy) you won't get the Rosy "united nations of earth" star trek utopia you're hoping for.

Push the white man too hard and instead you'll get the Great Reich of Mankind. A fascist dictatorship that starts in america and fucking forcibly incorporates the whole world while eliminating anyone who doesn't get with the program. The strange part is that in the long run it might be better for the species that way.

species....
spicies ?

I also fear that the megacorporations are ruling the world. Could en in George Orwell's 1984.

>A fascist dictatorship that starts in america and fucking forcibly incorporates the whole world while eliminating anyone who doesn't get with the program. The strange part is that in the long run it might be better for the species that way.
Maybe with that we'll finally end to work together.

>you won't get the Rosy "united nations of earth" star trek utopia you're hoping for.

Exactly, you will get the Borg collective instead because all individuality and distinction will be purged by the coming waves of transhumanism.

>centralizing even more power in the hands of a select few
no thanks

>Implying I think the current governement systems would work at a planetary scale.
A new democracy type would have to be developed, as well as the governement structure.

>world democracy
sounds awful

The EU can barely get along; the United States has a similar situation. Having a global union would be awful.

It would break into factions very fast.

Please explain

This is like being afraid of the catapult in 1000 AD. That shit will NEVER get aimed at you. Stop fucking worrying about the falling rocks you fucking idiots.

how would voting even work?

how do you decide who is in charge?

>how would voting even work?
In a direct democracy, everyone votes everything.
>how do you decide who is in charge?
Democracy

Direct democracy is possibly the worst governmental system for a one world Government EVER. Nothing would ever get done.

and you see no problem with this?

billions of completely different people from completely different places, of course everyone would just vote in their self interest and only certain areas of the planet would benefit

Then we're doomed for extincion.

Israel = jews but jews aren't neccesarily Israel. There are plenty of non-zionist jews and even George Soros has supported some anti-Israel causes. From the onset the state of Israel has been opposed by large numbers of jews because the jews are by their nature a nomadic cosmopolitian people.

Offtopic: Why people hate jews?
(I am atheist)

why is that? humanity wont go extinct just because we have a certain type of government

Inestability would cause factions, and those factions may go to war. In such an advanced war, mass weapons could wipe life. Or at least humans.

I meant massive weapons like a artificial virus or bacteria or a thermonuclear bomb.

humanity will still survive even if most of it is wiped out. unless its such a powerful weapon capable of destroying the planet which at that point I hope we at least colonised mars or something

I hope so.

The Earth will never be united. The only thing people can agree on is fuck that other guy.

Then

who here likes customer service based in india ?
or likes the idea of globalization ?
equally should adobe or games workshop be allowed to charge me more because i live in australia ?

the problem with the great utopian dream of world government (wings over the world, the federation etc...), is that multiculturalism and globalized capitalism are already torn and failing in our own time
the force needed to bind and usurp the basic instincts of nationalism, sectarianism and individualistic greed would have to be so great so as to reconfigure our civilization into something unrecognizable to us all today...

so what are we left with, endless petty infighting, endless waste of resources through duplication of services, endless rise and fall of sectional empires and states

in the end technology will drive us towards what ? a better world ? a better regime ? a better boot stamping on our face ? globalists think that greater interconnection will lead to homogenization and thus greater stability and control (and the internet is an example of a globalizing culture) but the rise of islamism, the growth in national military budgets and the nascent politics of the west (let alone the closed ethnocentric cultures of north asia) prove that world government will remain forevermore a utopian dream

>Would a united earth with just one nation work better that now we do?
it physically and scientifically could not be any worse

Might be some cool explosions though.

as long as we exterminate anyone darker than a northern italian

I've spotted a serious error in the diagram.
[spoiler]The diagonal lines to which the 5c arrows point should align with the inner black field of the swastika, not with the outline. Also, no guidance is given for the thickness of the outline.[/spoiler]

Oh great. If spoilers don't work on Sup Forums then why does AltGr+S insert [spoiler][/spoiler] tags?

People without moral guidance will allways find a reason to hate eachother. Races, classes, nose form. Making a population of good people by killing other people is not the answer. Fighting a dragon be on guard not to become one.
But the left is wrong too. You cant build a good society just by asking anyone to be good. All the statistics prooves its wrong. Yet they are blind.

Its all in our genes and reptilian brain structure. I hope that we will develop our science until we can fix it. One one hand genetic engineering may help. Single-neuron surgery by nanobots is a possible answer too, but its to dangerous to come to a wrong hands, because every invention is a possible weapon.
But imagine the possibilities.
Birth control with eugenics, lower level of agression, increased IQ.
Anyway, somehow we need to fix the humanity, because its a great danger to itself now.