Soldier

>soldier
>woman
>pretty
>100x more likable than Hillary

Do Republicans have any chance in 2020?

Other urls found in this thread:

pastemagazine.com/articles/2016/11/tulsi-gabbard-is-not-who-you-think-she-is.html
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Serious answer, it depends on what Trump does this term.

Depends on how they run the campaign. While she's a decent base to work on, the democrats have shown that they can have every advantage, and throw it straight out of the window

doesn't she like trump?

*2024

IF YOU RIGHT WING RETARDS WEREN'T SUCH FUCKING COWARDS YOU WOULD REPEAL THE 22ND AMENDMENT AND FACE IN 2020 THE ULTIMATE DEMOCRAT. THE GREATEST PRESIDENT IN AMERICAN HISTORY.

BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA

bumpin

Trump's campaign was far too divisive. He won't be able to reverse the fact that a significant amount of the country despises him, not without pissing off all the people who voted for him in the process.

I maintain that Trump won primarily because Hillary was a shit candidate who no one liked. I can't imagine him winning against an actually good candidate, especially not one with 2008 Obama-level energy surrounding her.

If you love Obama so much why do you live in Canada?

It won't be her.

apparently actual fags really dislike her for some reason, so thankfully she won't make it through the democratic primary

She's also a Hindu and hates muslims. That could go against her because it would be easy to convince ignorant people that she's a devil worshipper and that she isn't "inclusive" enough.

Lol being part of the forest police is the same as killing goatfuckers in Iraq
Also she ia a gun-grabbing whore

>soldier
>woman

pick1

>Pretty
>An advantage for a democrat.

Single mothers will not support a candidate that sexually intimidates them.

cause canada needs me

mor bictures bls

It wont be her but i wouldnt mind voting for her

bill clinton was better

Turns out Obamaleaf is actually Trudeau.

It wasn't his campaign that was divisive, it was the coordinated media smear effort. They have been shredding their own credibility at lightning pace and now more and more people are starting to wake up.

DUDE
U
D
E

i couldnt stand this bitches ads on TV, im glad bernie got BTFO likewise with Hillary

Shes right you know. Especially with the END TERRORISTS FUNDING TODAY ACT.

Fuck every "moderate rebel" fighting for "freedom" . ISIS is literally funded by the jew

2 term limit is affirmative action for Republicans. They can't win without affirmative action.

BASED BILL CLINTON would have easily won a 3rd term in 2000.

BASED BARACK OBAMA would have easily won a 3rd term in 2016.

>Trump's campaign was far too divisive
lol

Trump isn't going to win 2020, people will get sick of him by then.

>I maintain that Trump won primarily because Hillary was a shit candidate
there is, both then and now, literally no argument against that fact, from any side. Nor did anyone need the benefit of hindsight here, this was obvious, even at the time. Bernie was a good diversion, but that image of Hilary trying to look like, she enjoyed playing with balloons? People aint completely stupid, they know a fraud when they see one - and Trump, oddly enough, was maybe the least fraudulent candidate of an un-wholesome pair. And I agree with Obama, he'd have trounced either of them (Clinton may as well have been running as Republican)

Barring a shift in social conditions, DNC will keep a bit of distance from SJW stuff next election.

she's too right wing for you leftist idiots. you'll support an somebody like Pocahontas or Obama 2.0 Corey Booker.

both will be mauled by Trump. no chance in 2020.

pastemagazine.com/articles/2016/11/tulsi-gabbard-is-not-who-you-think-she-is.html

>TFW BASED CALIMILFS

LEAVE TRUMP TO ME

>Trump isn't going to win 2020, people will get sick of him by then.

You retards on the left tried asserting your will that way during the entire Trump campaign and it never once worked. You're up against divine power, fool, your words fall dead right out of your mouth!

she likes his policy on syria. not much else though.

You underestimate how easily normies forget things after a few years.

Is that a dude

Is that the girl with the acne scars? Her skin makes me want to barf. She is so oily you could wipe her face on a pan to prevent anything from sticking. Disgusting.

Hillary will have her killed.

Do you mean the woman the democrats shunned?

Trump campaigned on building a wall to keep out Mexican "rapists" and disallowing Muslims into the country. His campaign was built around appealing to white, working-class voters who believe the 1950s is the height of America. People did not come to the conclusion his campaign was xenophobic, racist and stupid because of media spin (which I admit existed).

Up until Trump won Florida on election day, few people thought he had any chance, let alone considered it "obvious" that Hillary would lose.

I would not agree at all that Trump was less "fraudulent." Trump was MORE fraudulent, just more successful at it.

By 2020 she'll be a Republican.

If the Democrats didn't alienate her and everyone that would have voted for her in 2016

Tulsi Gabbard 2016 would have slaughtered Trump majorly

But they said they will not fund her campaigns anymore because she didn't blindly support Hillary

Lmao no they will not

All indicators are showing that the Dems are doublin down on the SJWism and identity politics big time

>Mexican "rapists"
Mexican illegals, who are thus criminals. You have heard of narcopolitica, haven't you? Mexico lets its drug dealers and rapists flee to the US. Hence, when Mexico sends its people, they're not sending their best.

>disallowing Muslims into the country
Thank goodness. Have you ever seen anyone other than a muslim holding a human head?

>His campaign was built around appealing to white, working-class voters
Oh shit, white? That's not allowed. And working-class? Fucking disgusting plebs.

Maybe shove your xenophilia and ethnomasochism up your arse, cunt?

>Junior recently elected unknown congresswoman.
>Far left on most social issues including immigration.
>Too strong on defense and gun rights for leftist primary voters.
>Face looks like Edward James Olmos.

If Trump fucks up royally he'll lose in 2020 but she wont be the one running against him.

Reagan would have won 60 years worth

>democrats
>putting an actual leftist, person who isn;t a total banker shill up for election
>1979 + 37

News flash bozo, most people of all races consider the Ike-JFK era to be the height of US power. The biggest joke about the liberal white left is that they think they understand what their minority pets are like, while in reality Trump increased the vote with every single minority group, even Muslims. Who's practicing racial profiling?

My father was a Mao loving Chinese who immigrated in 1986, and he always thought America was best between 1950-1964. I've met people from the middle east and africa who thought exactly the same. Just because the Dems "win" the minority vote doesn't mean they own them, or even understand them.

Need I remind you about Obama's background?

>First elected to Congress as a Senator in 2004, in the same election day that John Kerry lost at the presidential level
>Promoted universal healthcare and took a lefty stance on other notable issues
>Name suspiciously similar to that of certain despised Muslim leaders
>Opponents aggressively pushed the idea that he was non-Christian or born outside the US, or both

She already has more governing experience than Obama at the same point in his political career despite being significantly younger.

The very simple answer is if the economy gets better, Trump wins, if not, Trump loses. People have had enough of progressive affirmative action virtue signalling, people are literally dying from the economic despair out there, Trump is their last call for help. If it doesn't work, the midwest goes back to blue and we're all right back where we started.

Literally nothing else matters.

The englishman is right. Since Trump won, there have been new programs in Mexico to reinforce the security in most states. They expect crime to raise up to 20% in some places during the next year. Why? Because of the people Trump will send back. The truth is we don't want them here either but they're ours and we're afraid to take responsibility. Find any mexican in the US you find worthy of being there, like actually giving something back to the community. Try finding a medic, engineer of any mexican with university degree. You'll find all of them are working there legally and they're working there because they're exceptional at what they do. The other medics and engineers are working here in Mexico. The ones that cross illegally are the people who want to make fast and easy money no matter what, and most of them are criminals even to our eyes.

I have to wonder if Trump will even run again in 2020. I think he'll be tired of it by then. He didn't even want to win this time.

>especially not one with 2008 Obama-level energy surrounding her

Nobody currently has that energy except for maybe Bernie but he probably won't run in 2020. Even Elizabeth Warren has more energy surrounding her than Tulsi Gabbard, who I only heard of through Sup Forums because she was having talks with Trump.

MADAME PRESIDENT. She looks like my hot SR4 character.

>This.

This is my standard response to normies bitching about trump... He'll either succeed, or fail tremendously. Nothing else matters at this point. He could build a 60ft wall and make out with putin on global television, but if he fixes this fucked economy and actually improves the financial well-being of the middle and upper-lower classes, he'll win 2020. Gonna be an interesting 4 years. He campaigned as a Nationalist(essentially) and if he follows through we can finally MAGA

Trump wouldn't stop until he succeeded.
He is fiercely driven.

My point is that media spin is not the reason people feel about Trump the way they do. This idea that if the people who hate Trump had saw what he were "really" saying about Mexicans and Muslims that they would be on board with his presidency is just delusion. The liberal / conservative divide is based on fundamental value differences and interpreting the very same information differently.

But examining your response to my points:

Being undocumented doesn't mean someone is a bad person. In fact, most undocumented are good people trying to make a better life for themselves and their family. Linking what happens to be a crime to immoral or bad behavior is something idiots do.

It is, in fact, against the law to discriminate against someone based on their religion. More importantly, it is fundamentally opposed to US values and puts us down a slippery slope.

There is nothing wrong with appealing to white voters. The failure of Hillary to do this is a major reason why she lost. You misinterpreted my point, which was that he based his campaign around appealing to a specific kind of white voter, the kind of dubious intelligence, who is openly racist at the dinner table and feels they are constantly under attack by political correctness. This is why people perceive him to be racist himself. This is why people hate him. It has nothing to do with the media.

>keeping out people who sneak into your country.
>divisive.

divisive for who? people trying to come in illegally?

If someone is a good person, they'll go through the process. I pass the houses of limousine liberals all the time...none of them would enjoy me partaking from their estates because I'm a good person.

Also, this open drain for Mexico's problems has accelerated that country's decline into shambles and cartel rule, because instead of having to deal with problems, they can just sweep them under the proverbial American rug.

It is against the law to discriminate on religion. Trump isn't doing that. It's also against the law, or used to be, to assassinate American citizens and conduct unsanctioned drone warfare around the world, among other things. Don't pretend that 'Executive Order Obama' knows or cares anything about slippery slopes.

Hillary lost voter share among every single demographic group. How can you judge someone to be racist when the actual races didn't respond close to how you were predicting? Doesn't that make you a really shitty racial profiler?

It was the height of US relative prosperity because the rest of the world was in shambles. This doesn't mean it was actually good. If your father or any of those Middle Easterners or Africans you supposedly spoke to had actually been in America during that time, they wouldn't have been able to sit at the same table as the white people they saw on Leave it to Beaver and assumed represented 1950/60s America.

No one thinks America was so great then aside from some white baby boomers, most of who are racist.

yes, DNC wont run her for the same reason they wouldnt run bernie.

because she's not corrupt.

/thread

The economy is in much better shape than it was when Obama took office in 2008. That did not stop Republicans from hating Obama. If you really think Democrats, who are generally more concerned about social issues, will just stop caring if the economy gets a little better, you are delusional.

The energy is not there yet. It's potential energy.

So you're saying the only people concerned about immigrants are illegal immigrants themselves?

>Thank goodness. Have you ever seen anyone other than a muslim holding a human head?

Mexicans.

>Democrats, who are generally more concerned about social issues

Hah, that's it. If you can't see the irony in that sentence, there's no saving you. You idiots made Trump into Hitler/Cosby/Stalin, and lost FL, IA, PA, MI, WI, and damn near MN.

Keep at it!

no one responded to you but you make a great point. It all depends on the internal war in the DNC but I feel like she's kinda an outsider either way...

>This idea that if the people who hate Trump had saw what he were "really" saying about Mexicans and Muslims that they would be on board with his presidency is just delusion.
It is true. Source: I was like that until I actually listened to Trump speak. If the BBC were to be believed, Trump was a wicked despot.

>undocumented
Illegal. In the country illegally.

>better life blah blah blah
They have to go back. They did not go through the proper channels, so it's not fair to Americans -- regardless of whether they're 15th generation Americans, or fresh migrants who have gone through the process.

>Linking what happens to be a crime to immoral or bad behavior is something idiots do.
So you haven't heard of narcopolitica. Also, illegal migration is inextricably linked with criminal lifestyles because it is harder for someone in the country illegally to make an honest living. This is straightforward logic.

>More importantly, it is fundamentally opposed to US values and puts us down a slippery slope.
It has been done already. In practice the restriction will be on handfuls of problem countries rather than polling for religion or whatever. Keep those ideological demons out, because your life will eventually depend on it.

>a specific kind of white voter, the kind of dubious intelligence, who is openly racist
You speak of "racism" at the same time as spewing gross racial stereotypes.

>This is why people perceive him to be racist himself.
Actually it's where the media has described him as a "racist" ten thousand times over. When asked "what has he said that is racist", people are either lost for words, or they intentionally misinterpret Trump's "They're bringing drugs" statement on narcopolitica.

shes not an outsider. shes just not a neolib or a globalist.

They wont run her, but she WOULD do well if they did.

And yet, Trump did worse against whites than Bush and Romney, but out preformed them both with Hispanic voters. 29% of Hispanics voted Trump. Even 8% of blacks voted Trump. If he does well, those numbers will climb. The thing the Democrats are truly terrified of is that Trump is dragging the party back to the center as the democratic party has shifted to the left. They've doubled down on the "racist sexist" language because once the Republican party gets entrenched in the center, they'll be damn near impossible to dislodge. Which is ironic, since Obama basically held the center for six years and then WILLINGLY GAVE IT UP after the 2014 midterms, leaving a vacuum Trump was more than happy to exploit.

>pro-bernie
Clintonistas would never let her run, they'd literally rather destroy their party then let it get taken over by the younger generation, it's a microcosm of everything wrong with modern societies.

I wont vote for a woman.

nigga you are dumb

Lol he was too brain dead to run a 3rd term.

>muh poor nigs
No one cares, the poor dears should have never been purchased and transported to, nor kept in, the United States.

>No one thinks America was so great then aside from some white baby boomers
Another stupid meme concocted in response to MAGA. Tonnes of people have a sort of second-hand nostalgia for the American 1950s despite being too young to have lived then. Even non-Americans. You even see its questionable fashion being imitated.

>"undocumented"
>thinking Trump is discriminating against Muslims because of their religion, not their location

>soldier
>non-combatant role

They'll have no choice, because Trump is dragging the Republican party back to centrist politics with intentions of occupying political real estate Obama willingly vacated after the 2014 midterms, and the Democrats currently occupy the Left Pole. The Left Pole is like the North Pole. At the North Pole, any direction you go is South. At the Left Pole, any direction you go is Right. So right now to the Left, even the most moderate centrist is a right Wing Extremist. The Democrats are going to wandering in the wilderness for awhile.

>If someone is a good person, they'll go through the process.
No, that's what someone does when they can afford to do it. If the difference between your children having food to eat and a future worth a damn is you sneaking over a border and working your ass off, there is no moral quandary. Private property isn't analogous, in fact, it's a very stupid analogy.

Saying that you want people to register as part of a certain religion or block them from coming into a country based on their religion is discriminating based on religion. There was no ambiguity with what Donald Trump said on that issue.

I have no idea what analogy is supposed to imply. Are you suggesting that the legal ambiguity associated with the treatment of militant Americans abroad is somehow comparable to the legality of breaking the first amendment? Or that one slippery slope could somehow justify another? Come on, dude.

Hillary didn't lose among "every single demographic group."--that's flat out wrong. She won with minorities, and Trump being racist or is not dependent on who votes for him. It is based on his beliefs, which we can only based on his behavior.

No-ones more fraudulent then Clinton, tha's just not possible. Remember her "speaknig fees"? Remember her "charitable foundation"? Remember that "completely legal" private server hidden in her basement? Remember her "positions" on the iraq war, gay marriage, TPP and single-payer healthcare? Remember that "neutral" DNC who ran the primary? No one is more fraudulent and corrupt then the Clintons, it's just not possible.

Admittedly give it 4 years and Trump might beat them, maybe he just hasn't had the opportunity yet.

>tfw when Tulsi is your cousins wife

>implying they arnt destroying the party
ya, fucking bernie and letting trump get elected shows two important things that create a necessary division between the party and democratic voters.

1) Populism IS popular, and it is viable to run/ possible to win as a populist
2) that the DNC IS anti-populist, and will actively fight to suppress populism within the democratic party

>only one of the faces is trump
Crypto-anti-trumper detected.

Too white. Democrats need Michelle Obama or all is lost.

She's too young. 2024 maybe.

>No, that's what someone does when they can afford to do it. If the difference between your children having food to eat and a future worth a damn is you sneaking over a border and working your ass off, there is no moral quandary.

Hi, I'm a reasonable person. I can't afford to shit out a couple brats, feed, clothe, and house them.

I have a brilliant fucking idea. I just wont have kids and expect others to pick up the bill. Especially those in other fucking countries.

>Hitler/Cosby/Stalin
Sonovabich, i just spewed diet coke all over my monitor.

>Single mothers will not support a candidate that sexually intimidates them.

This

Democrats care more about social issues because social issues are much more likely to concern them. There are less social issues you actually care about when you're a white person who lives around other white people and where the values are primarily "traditional." I fail to see how that's a controversial statement.

>>implying they arnt destroying the party
That's kind of the opposite of what I was implying m8.

she's half samoan.
no whiter than obama....

This. In 2012, Obama acted as if Russia ever being a serious threat was the most ridiculous idea in the world. The minute someone from the other party gets elected, they are scrambling to find any excuse to go to war with Russia because they surely hacked all those paper ballots from Moscow. If anyone paid attention, it wouldn't fly.

It'll be interesting to see how the Democratic leadership shakes out. I think there's a Night of the Long Knives going on in the DNC as we speak.

>soldier
>woman
Top kek, OP. The 45th Catering Division or whatever isn't exactly a combat unit.

Are you plague and destruction?

The democrats care about social issues because there's so few ways for them to differentiate themselves from the republicans on economic issues. You're getting conned dumbass, they both love the bankster cock and the only reason they talk endlessly about "muh gays" and "muh illegals" is as a way to distract you. Just look at how occupy wall street completely self-destructed the moment identity politics was injected into it, that wasn't an accident.

my bad.
The more they resist, the better it is for america.

Not that I think trump needs 2 terms, but we do need america first populists.

I bet ivanka runs in 2024-2030.
Tulsi / Ivanka ticket would Obliterate all oposition.

...

Being pretty is a disadvantage for women here. She looks more like she should be Trump's secretary than the commander in chief. Atleast Hillary gives off that appearance like she has been in the trenches and put in her time.

> implying white racists are some kind of problem

America was better when it was white. But that barely even defines the era, give me a break. Lefties always forget that if white people had not themselves decided to end race laws and slavery in the US niggers woukd still be picking our cotton. It is by the savrifice of millions of white people that niggers were protected from the confederacy and the Nazis and others, and what thanks do we get? Destruction of our cultures. We should never have helped, never have changed. We made these problems for ourselves and if niggers think they had the biggest hand in earning their freedoms, they are kidding themselves.

You are looking at the fact that you interpreted what Trump said in a particular way and assuming that everyone else would have if they saw what you may have. It's not only wrong, it's ridiculously arrogant and out-of-touch. I actually live in a liberal city near a liberal American college campus.

You can use whatever word for *undocumented* that you wish. I am not claiming the laws should be a particular way, only that it's nonsense to say it's necessarily immoral to work towards a better life for your family. There is no link between illegal immigration and crime.

Slavery of African and Chinese people, internment of Japanese, and intense racism against non-English European immigrants has been "done already" in the United States. That isn't a justification for doing it again. In fact, these are looked upon as horrible points in US history.

People perceive him to be racist because he built a campaign around appealing to people who are racist and xenophobic. He doesn't need to express explicitly racist things to be considered a racist by people. Whether or not you think that is valid criteria is irrelevant. I am telling you how people operate.